NWF's winter weather wackiness

We’ve seen how the World Wildlife Fund reports were included in IPCC AR4 with disastrous results, now we have an example of a newspaper and TV Network hanging their entire story on a report from the National Wildlife Federation.

Here’s the WaPo story:

Harsh winter a sign of disruptive climate change, report says

By Juliet Eilperin and David A. Fahrenthold

Washington Post Staff Writer

Thursday, January 28, 2010; A10

This winter’s extreme weather — with heavy snowfall in some places and unusually low temperatures — is in fact a sign of how climate change disrupts long-standing patterns, according to a new report by the National Wildlife Federation.

… more here

Now here’s a few things to consider.

Ryan Maue writes at Climate Audit:

The title of the newest contribution is “Odd-ball Winter Weather:  Global Warming’s Wake-Up Call for the Northern United States” and the PDF can be downloaded from their website.   It is a well-manicured reported with glossy photos of wildlife, folks enjoying ice fishing and skiing, and snowplows.  Here is the introductory paragraph to get a flavor of the quality of the report:

Global warming is having a seemingly peculiar effect on winter weather in the northern United States. Winter is becoming milder and shorter on average; spring arrives 10 to 14 days earlier than it did just 20 years ago. But most snowbelt areas are still experiencing extremely heavy snowstorms. Some places are even expected to have more heavy snowfall events as storm tracks shift northward and as reduced ice cover on the Great Lakes increases lake-effect snowfalls. Even as global warming slowly changes the character of winter, we will still experience significant year-to-year variability in snowfall and temperature because many different factors are at play.

Ryan adds:

A few brief comments:  (1) Throughout the report, there is unscientific language in the headlines similar to “seemingly peculiar” like “odd-ball”, “erratic”, “surprises”, “patchy”, and “thrown for a loop”.  It is clear that the audience of the report is the layperson in the public, but using such terminology obfuscates the scientific message being made.  (2)  As the first paragraph highlights, there have been changes in winter weather during the past 20-years, a rather short time period to be making proclamations about trends or climate change for that matter.  Also, the equivocal nature of the final sentence needs to be translated:  global warming “slowly” changes the character of winter… year-to-year variability and different factors are at play =  natural climate oscillations and modes of large-scale variability trump the changes associated with global warming during the past 20-years.

Recent odd-ball (sic) weather events.

As WUWT readers know, we’ve seen lots of “odd-ball” weather before in the USA, often far worse than today.

1930's dust bowl. Image from Texas A&M University

Here are a few of the NWF claims:

The spatial extent of snow cover across the Northern Hemisphere has decreased by approximately 3 to 9 percent since 1978, with especially rapid declines in the western United States

This is highly misleading.  As reported earlier on WUWT,  December, 2009 had the second greatest December snow cover on record in the Northern Hemisphere.  17 out of the last 21 Decembers have had above average snow cover.  October, 2009 had the sixth greatest October snow extent on record in the Northern Hemisphere.  Seven out of the last ten Octobers have had above average snow cover.  January, 2008 had the third greatest snow extent ever measured in the Northern Hemisphere.  Seven out of the last nine January’s have had above average snow cover.

The western United States has actually been seeing record snowfall in recent years, not “rapid declines” as claimed by NWF.

NCDC snow report from the winter of 2007-2008 Numerous ski resorts in the West reported record breaking snowfall this year, as did parts of northern Maine. Caribou, Maine received 197.8 inches (502 cm) of snowfall this winter, shattering the previous record of 181.1 inches (460 cm).

Mt. Crested Butte, Colorado received 418 inches (1061 cm) during the 2007-08 winter, breaking the previous record of 415 inches (1054 cm) from 1979-1980. Even Spokane, Washington was the second-snowiest on record with 89.5 inches (227 cm), four inches (10 cm) short of the previous record from 1949-1950. The map to the right depicts the snowpack levels in many Rocky Mountain basins on May 1, 2008, illustrating a residual near to above average snow cover over much of the Rockies and Cascades in the western U.S. Thirty-two Snowtel locations reported record snow water equivalent records by the end of April.

NCDC snow report from the winter of 2008-2009

Across North America, snow cover for the 2008-09 winter was above average, with the 12th largest extent since satellite records began in 1967.

The winter of 2009-2010 has also started with record December snow cover in the US, and near record snow depth in the southern Rocky Mountains.

Arizona Snow Bowl, Flagstaff

5 FEET OF SNOW IN THE PAST 7 DAYS

Wolf Creek, Colorado

Midway Base Depth : 112 Inches

Last 7 Days : 56 Inches

Year to Date : 271 inches

Pajarito Mountain, New Mexico

YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL 103″

BASE DEPTH (mid-mountain undisturbed) 60″

NWF Claim:

Stronger hurricanes, heavier rainfall, and rising sea levels: this is what global warming has in store for the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic coasts.

This again is misleading.  According to NOAA the number of major hurricane strikes on the US peaked in the 1940s at ten, and have been generally declining ever since.   (2001-2010 has had seven so far.)   The last Category 5 hurricane to strike the US was Andrew in 1993.  The last three years have seen exceptionally quiet hurricane activity in the US.

Sea level has been rising for 20,000 years since the end of the last ice age, when it was 400 feet lower.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/images/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png

Blaming sea level rise on CO2 isn’t going to fly.  According to NOAA, sea level is rising at about 2.5mm/year along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts of the US.  At that low rate, it will take nearly a millennium to rise to the high end of IPCC estimates.

NWF Claim:

Global warming will bring more extreme  heat waves. By the 2080s and 2090s, many parts of the country will have more than two months each year with 100-degree weather if global warming emissions are not curbed.

There is zero evidence of this in the temperature record.  NCDC data shows essentially no warming in US summer temperatures over the last 80 years.   The hottest summer was in the 1930s.

NCDC summer temperatures for the US  1930-2009

NWF claim:

Global warming has caused more heavy rainfall events in the United States over the last few decades along with an increased likelihood of devastating floods

Actually, the ten deadliest floods in US history all took place prior to 1977.

1. Johnstown, PA

May 31, 1889

Death Toll: 2,200

Several days of extremely heavy rainfall, brought about the collapse of the South Fork Dam, which was 14 miles upstream of Johnstown, PA.  It was the first major disaster relief effort handled by the new American Red Cross, led by Clara Barton. Support for victims came from all over the United States and 18 foreign countries. It remains one of the greatest disasters in U.S. history.

The Johnstown Flood also became a social cause celebre, because the dam that collapsed had been built to create a lake for vacationing millionaires, such as Andrew Carnegie and Andrew Mellon, while the inhabitants of the town were Welsh and German immigrants.

2. Mississippi Valley

January and February 1937

Death Toll: 1,100

Heavy rains flooded 12,700 square miles, destroying 75,000 homes, and leaving 600,000 refugees.

3. Ohio River

March, 1913

Death Toll: 700

Heavy rains brought severe flooding. The disaster led to the nation’s first flood control board and programs.

4. Santa Paula, CA

March 12, 1928

Death Toll: 450

Collapse of the St. Francis Dam

5. Rapid City, SD

June 9 – 10, 1972

Death Toll: 237

Flash flood

6. Kansas City, Missouri

May 16 – June 1, 1903

Death Toll: 200

Heavy rains brought flooding that raised the level of the Missouri River 35 feet.

7. Mississippi Valley

April – May 1912

Death Toll: 200

The Mississippi River overflows its banks.

8. Willow Creek, OR

1903

Death Toll: 200

Flash flood sweeps away a third of the town.

9. Man, WV

Feb. 26, 1972

Death Toll: 118

Slag pile dam collapses under torrential rains.

10. Loveland, CO

August 1, 1976

Death Toll: 139

Flash flood in Big Thompson Canyon

NWF claim:

Large parts of the western United States and much of the Southeast has already begun experiencing more frequent and more severe droughts

According to USDA, none of the southeast and very little of the west is experiencing a severe drought.   No doubt there is unsustainable water usage in the west, but this has little to do with climate.   The 1930s saw the worst droughts in US history.  Likewise, the Anasazi were driven out of their home by drought in the thirteenth century, but it is unlikely this was due to people driving Hummers in Chaco Canyon.  Drought cycles happen in the west, and they always have.

http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html

In summary, it appears that NWF, like WWF, is spreading a large amount of global warming misinformation, and some news outlets like Washington Post and MSNBC seem to accept it without question.

h/t Thanks to Steve Goddard for rounding up rubuttal graphics

National Wildlife Federation Misinformation Campaign

1930s Dust Bowl Drought

The National Wildlife Federation has issued a new report “Odd-ball Winter Weather: Global Warming’sWake-Up Call for the Northern United States” containing an exceptional amount of misinformation.

Here are a few of their claims:

The spatial extent of snow cover

across the Northern Hemisphere has

decreased by approximately 3 to 9

percent since 1978, with especially

rapid declines in the western United

States

This is highly misleading.  As reported on WUWT – December, 2009 had the second greatest December snow cover on record in the Northern Hemisphere.  17 out of the last 21 Decembers have had above average snow cover.  October, 2009 had the sixth greatest October snow extent on record in the Northern Hemisphere.  Seven out of the last ten Octobers have had above average snow cover.  January, 2008 had the third greatest snow extent ever measured in the Northern Hemisphere.  Seven out of the last nine January’s have had above average snow cover.

The western United States has actually been seeing record snowfall in recent years, not “rapid declines” as claimed by NWF.

NCDC snow report from the winter of 2007-2008 Numerous ski resorts in the West reported record breaking snowfall this year, as did parts of northern Maine. Caribou, Maine received 197.8 inches (502 cm) of snowfall this winter, shattering the previous record of 181.1 inches (460 cm).

Mt. Crested Butte, Colorado received 418 inches (1061 cm) during the 2007-08 winter, breaking the previous record of 415 inches (1054 cm) from 1979-1980. Even Spokane, Washington was the second-snowiest on record with 89.5 inches (227 cm), four inches (10 cm) short of the previous record from 1949-1950. The map to the right depicts the snowpack levels in many Rocky Mountain basins on May 1, 2008, illustrating a residual near to above average snow cover over much of the Rockies and Cascades in the western U.S. Thirty-two Snowtel locations reported record snow water equivalent records by the end of April.

NCDC snow report from the winter of 2008-2009

Across North America, snow cover for the 2008-09 winter was above average, with the 12th largest extent since satellite records began in 1967.

The winter of 2009-2010 has also started with record December snow cover in the US, and near record snow depth in the southern Rocky Mountains.

Arizona Snow Bowl, Flagstaff

5 FEET OF SNOW IN THE PAST 7 DAYS

Wolf Creek, Colorado

Midway Base Depth : 112 Inches

Last 7 Days : 56 Inches

Year to Date : 271 inches

Pajarito Mountain, New Mexico

YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL 103″

BASE DEPTH (mid-mountain undisturbed) 60″

NWF Claim:

Stronger hurricanes, heavier rainfall,

and rising sea levels: this is what global

warming has in store for the U.S. Gulf

and Atlantic coasts.

This again is misleading.  According to NOAA the number of major hurricane strikes on the US peaked in the 1940s at ten, and have been generally declining ever since.   (2001-2010 has had seven so far.)   The last Category 5 hurricane to strike the US was Andrew in 1993.  The last three years have seen exceptionally quiet hurricane activity in the US.

Sea level has been rising for 20,000 years since the end of the last ice age, when it was 400 feet lower.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/images/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png

Blaming sea level rise on CO2 isn’t going to fly.  According to NOAA, sea level is rising at about 2.5mm/year along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts of the US.  At that low rate, it will take nearly a millennium to rise to the high end of IPCC estimates.

NWF Claim:

Global warming will bring more extreme

heat waves. By the 2080s and 2090s,

many parts of the country will have

more than two months each year with

100-degree weather if global warming

emissions are not curbed.

There is zero evidence of this in the temperature record.  NCDC data shows essentially no warming in US summer temperatures over the last 80 years.   The hottest summer was in the 1930s.

NCDC summer temperatures for the US  1930-2009

NWF claim:

Global warming has caused more

heavy rainfall events in the United

States over the last few decades along

with an increased likelihood of

devastating floods

Actually, the ten deadliest floods in US history all took place prior to 1977.

1. Johnstown, PA

May 31, 1889

Death Toll: 2,200

Several days of extremely heavy rainfall, brought about the collapse of the South Fork Dam, which was 14 miles upstream of Johnstown, PA.  It was the first major disaster relief effort handled by the new American Red Cross, led by Clara Barton. Support for victims came from all over the United States and 18 foreign countries. It remains one of the greatest disasters in U.S. history.

The Johnstown Flood also became a social cause celebre, because the dam that collapsed had been built to create a lake for vacationing millionaires, such as Andrew Carnegie and Andrew Mellon, while the inhabitants of the town were Welsh and German immigrants.

2. Mississippi Valley

January and February 1937

Death Toll: 1,100

Heavy rains flooded 12,700 square miles, destroying 75,000 homes, and leaving 600,000 refugees.

3. Ohio River

March, 1913

Death Toll: 700

Heavy rains brought severe flooding. The disaster led to the nation’s first flood control board and programs.

4. Santa Paula, CA

March 12, 1928

Death Toll: 450

Collapse of the St. Francis Dam

5. Rapid City, SD

June 9 – 10, 1972

Death Toll: 237

Flash flood

6. Kansas City, Missouri

May 16 – June 1, 1903

Death Toll: 200

Heavy rains brought flooding that raised the level of the Missouri River 35 feet.

7. Mississippi Valley

April – May 1912

Death Toll: 200

The Mississippi River overflows its banks.

8. Willow Creek, OR

1903

Death Toll: 200

Flash flood sweeps away a third of the town.

9. Man, WV

Feb. 26, 1972

Death Toll: 118

Slag pile dam collapses under torrential rains.

10. Loveland, CO

August 1, 1976

Death Toll: 139

Flash flood in Big Thompson Canyon

NWF claim:

Large parts of the western United

States and much of the Southeast has

already begun experiencing more

frequent and more severe droughts

According to USDA, none of the southeast and very little of the west is experiencing a severe drought.   No doubt there is unsustainable water usage in the west, but this has little to do with climate.   The 1930s saw the worst droughts in US history.  Likewise, the Anasazi were driven out of their home by drought in the thirteenth century, but it is unlikely this was due to people driving Hummers in Chaco Canyon.  Drought cycles happen in the west, and they always have.

http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html

In summary, it appears that NWF, like WWF, is spreading a large amount of global warming misinformation.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Douglas DC
January 29, 2010 8:07 am

Just reading that report I get a “tingle up my leg” no, it’s down, and it’s due to setting at
the computer too long and too much Coffee…
spellchecker’s off and brain non- functioning more coffee?

Icarus
January 29, 2010 8:22 am

The western United States has actually been seeing record snowfall in recent years, not “rapid declines” as claimed by NWF.
Not according to the NSIDC –
http://nsidc.org/sotc/snow_extent.html
“The 28 year trend in snow extent derived from visible and passive microwave satellite data indicates an annual decrease of approximately 1 to 3 percent per decade with greater deceases of approximately 3 to 5 percent during spring and summer. Precipitation in regions of seasonal snow cover appears to be constant or increasing slightly in some locations over the same time period, which suggests that diminishing snow cover is the result of increasing temperatures. One region where the snow appears to be diminishing rapidly is the Western United States, especially in spring when the duration of snow cover has been decreasing by 2-3 days per decade (see blue-colored areas in the Spring Duration figure). This satellite-derived trend agrees with direct measurement of snow depth and extent on the ground (Mote et al. 2005).”
The Mote et al paper is here:
http://www.cses.washington.edu/db/pdf/moteetalvarandtrends436.pdf
“Snow course and SNOTEL measurements of spring snowpack, corroborated by a physically-based hydrologic model, are examined here for climate-driven fluctuations and trends during the period 1916-2002. Much of the mountain West has experienced declines in spring snowpack, especially since mid-century, and despite increases in winter precipitation in many places. Analysis and modeling shows that climatic trends are the dominant factor, not changes in land use, forest canopy, or other factors. The largest decreases have occurred where winter temperatures are mild, especially in the Cascade Mountains and Northern California. In most mountain ranges, relative declines grow from minimal at ridgetop to substantial at snowline. Taken together, these results emphasize that although the Pacific Decadal Oscillation has played some role in fluctuations in the region’s SWE, the West’s snow resources are already declining as Earth’s climate warms.”
The National Wildlife Federation’s concern about milder winters disrupting ecosystems seems to be justified on this basis.

Spector
January 29, 2010 9:07 am

Douglas DC
Perhaps you need a visit to the ‘spin-doctor’ who crafted this article…

Steve Goddard
January 29, 2010 9:33 am

Icarus,
If NSIDC says it, it must be true. Like director Mark Serreze predicting an ice free north pole in 2008. Or their forecast for a record minimum in 2008.
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/200805_Figure4.png
This article contains links and graphs directly from the Rutgers University snow labs showing increasing autumn/winter snow extent in the Northern Hemisphere. It was also linked to in the current article
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/10/second-snowiest-december-on-record-in-the-northern-hemisphere/

Gary Pearse
January 29, 2010 9:44 am

Several desperate reports are being hurried out there following climategate, the collapse of Copenaggin, disgrace of IPCC, all backdropped by freezing snowy weather. What we are seeing here in this is the physiology of a dying beast. The real anatomy of “D”. I noticed for the first time on the streets of Ottawa, Canada, young Greenpeace boosters with sad little thwatches of literature and sign-up forms. I believe we will be blitzed by WWF, NWF and the rest as the funds dry up for these once naive idealists now turned charlatans. The terrible cold is because of global warming – gad, how stupid do these people think everyone is?

Icarus
January 29, 2010 9:50 am

Steve Goddard (09:33:09) :
Icarus,
If NSIDC says it, it must be true. Like director Mark Serreze predicting an ice free north pole in 2008. Or their forecast for a record minimum in 2008.
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/200805_Figure4.png
This article contains links and graphs directly from the Rutgers University snow labs showing increasing autumn/winter snow extent in the Northern Hemisphere. It was also linked to in the current article
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/10/second-snowiest-december-on-record-in-the-northern-hemisphere/

Thanks for your comments. However, we are talking about observations, not predictions, and the observations are supported by independent papers (e.g. Mote et al). Also, the current article doesn’t cite any data supporting an increasing trend in snow extent – it only talks about isolated data points (e.g. the recent cold snap). One or two weeks of chilly weather in part of the Northern Hemisphere does not constitute a trend on decadal scales, and as we all know the planet is getting inexorably warmer, not cooler.

Steve Goddard
January 29, 2010 10:10 am

Icarus,
The current article says “This is highly misleading. As reported earlier on WUWT” – with a link to http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/10/second-snowiest-december-on-record-in-the-northern-hemisphere/
If you follow the link in you will see the references to the raw data showing that autumn/winter snow cover is increasing.
I don’t know where you hang out, but in the places I spend my time (Europe and the US) temperatures have been declining in recent years.

derek
January 29, 2010 10:12 am

I will never understand why people even watch or read MSNBC its absolute agenda drivin garbage.

Icarus
January 29, 2010 10:21 am

Steve Goddard (10:10:43) :
Icarus,
The current article says “This is highly misleading. As reported earlier on WUWT” – with a link to http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/10/second-snowiest-december-on-record-in-the-northern-hemisphere/
If you follow the link in you will see the references to the raw data showing that autumn/winter snow cover is increasing.

Overall I see a declining trend here:
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=0&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=12
Do you?
I don’t know where you hang out, but in the places I spend my time (Europe and the US) temperatures have been declining in recent years.
How recent is ‘recent’?

Spector
January 29, 2010 10:23 am

Here is a link to a news item about a new article in Science:
“Slowing Rise in Global Temperature Linked to Declining Stratospheric Water Vapor”
http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2010/0129sp_vapor.shtml

Tim Clark
January 29, 2010 10:38 am

Icarus (08:22:46) :
“The western United States has actually been seeing record snowfall in recent years, not “rapid declines” as claimed by NWF.”
Not according to the NSIDC –
“The 28 year trend in snow extent derived from visible and passive microwave satellite data indicates an annual decrease of approximately 1 to 3 percent per decade with greater deceases of approximately 3 to 5 percent during spring and summer. Precipitation in regions of seasonal snow cover appears to be constant or increasing slightly in some locations over the same time period, which suggests that diminishing snow cover is the result of increasing temperatures. One region where the snow appears to be diminishing rapidly is the Western United States, especially in spring when the duration of snow cover has been decreasing by 2-3 days per decade (see blue-colored areas in the Spring Duration figure). This satellite-derived trend agrees with direct measurement of snow depth and extent on the ground (Mote et al).

You may be having difficulty with reading comprenhension. The post refers to amount, not extent. The trend for precipitation in the US is increasing.

January 29, 2010 10:45 am

Robert Townshend
Many thanks for that great link to Australian climate history -I repeat a part of Chapter 17 below-it just shows that modern temperatures are nothing unusual; This should be read in conjunction with my earlier post of Thomas Jeffersons observations of a warming cklim,ate in the 1750’s
Observation of Watkins Tench
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/t/tench/watkin/
December 1790-vicinty of Sydney
“But at Sydney, without constantly dressing the ground, it was in vain to expect them; and with it a supply of common vegetables might be procured by diligence in all seasons. Vines of every sort seem to flourish. Melons, cucumbers and pumpkins run with unbounded luxuriancy, and I am convinced that the grapes of New South Wales will, in a few years, equal those of any other country. ‘That their juice will probably hereafter furnish an indispensable article of luxury at European tables’, has already been predicted in the vehemence of speculation. Other fruits are yet in their infancy; but oranges, lemons and figs, (of which last indeed I have eaten very good ones) will, I dare believe, in a few years become plentiful.
Apples and the fruits of colder climes also promise to gratify expectation. The banana-tree has been introduced from Norfolk Island, where it grows spontaneously.
Nor will this surprise, if the genial influence of the climate be considered.
Placed in a latitude where the beams of the sun in the dreariest season are sufficiently powerful for many hours of the day to dispense warmth and nutrition, the progress of vegetation never is at a stand. The different temperatures of Rose Hill and Sydney in winter, though only twelve miles apart, afford, however, curious matter of speculation.
Of a well attested instance of ice being seen at the latter place, I never heard. At the former place its production is common, and once a few flakes of snow fell. The difference can be accounted for only by supposing that the woods stop the warm vapours of the sea from reaching Rose Hill, which is at the distance of sixteen miles inland; whereas Sydney is but four.* Again, the heats of summer are more violent at the former place than at the latter, and the variations incomparably quicker.
The thermometer has been known to alter at Rose Hill, in the course of nine hours, more than 50 degrees; standing a little before sunrise at 50 degrees, and between one and two at more than 100 degrees.
To convey an idea of the climate in summer, I shall transcribe from my meteorological journal, accounts of two particular days which were the hottest we ever suffered under at Sydney.
[*Look at the journal which describes the expedition in search of the river, said to exist to the southward of Rose Hill. At the time we felt that extraordinary degree of cold were not more than six miles south west of Rose Hill, and about nineteen miles from the the sea coast. When I mentioned this circumstance to colonel Gordon, at the Cape of Good Hope, he wondered at it; and owned, that, in his excursions into the interior parts of Africa, he had never experienced anything to match it: he attributed its production to large beds of nitre, which he said must exist in the neighbourhood.]
December 27th 1790. Wind NNW; it felt like the blast of a heated oven, and in proportion as it increased the heat was found to be more intense, the sky hazy, the sun gleaming through at intervals.
At 9 a.m. 85 degrees At noon 104 Half past twelve 107 1/2 From one p.m. until 20 minutes past two 108 1/2 At 20 minutes past two 109 At Sunset 89 At 11 p.m. 78 1/2
[By a large Thermometer made by Ramsden, and graduated on Fahrenheit’s scale.]
December 28th.
At 8 a.m. 86 10 a.m. 93 11 a.m. 101 At noon 103 1/2 Half an hour past noon 104 1/2 At one p.m. 102 At 5 p.m. 73 At sunset 69 1/2
[At a quarter past one, it stood at only 89 degrees, having, from a sudden shift of wind, fallen 13 degrees in 15 minutes.]
My observations on this extreme heat, succeeded by so rapid a change, were that of all animals, man seemed to bear it best. Our dogs, pigs and fowls, lay panting in the shade, or were rushing into the water. I remarked that a hen belonging to me, which had sat for a fortnight, frequently quitted her eggs, and shewed great uneasiness, but never remained from them many minutes at one absence; taught by instinct that the wonderful power in the animal body of generating cold in air heated beyond a certain degree, was best calculated for the production of her young.
The gardens suffered considerably. All the plants which had not taken deep root were withered by the power of the sun. No lasting ill effects, however, arose to the human constitution. A temporary sickness at the stomach, accompanied with lassitude and headache, attacked many, but they were removed generally in twenty-four hours by an emetic, followed by an anodyne.
During the time it lasted, we invariably found that the house was cooler than the open air, and that in proportion as the wind was excluded, was comfort augmented.
But even this heat was judged to be far exceeded in the latter end of the following February, when the north-west wind again set in, and blew with great violence for three days. At Sydney, it fell short by one degree of what I have just recorded: but at Rose Hill, it was allowed, by every person, to surpass all that they had before felt, either there or in any other part of the world.
Unluckily they had no thermometer to ascertain its precise height. It must, however, have been intense, from the effects it produced. An immense flight of bats driven before the wind, covered all the trees around the settlement, whence they every moment dropped dead or in a dying state, unable longer to endure the burning state of the atmosphere. Nor did the ‘perroquettes’, though tropical birds, bear it better. The ground was strewn with them in the same condition as the bats.
Were I asked the cause of this intolerable heat, I should not hesitate to pronounce that it was occasioned by the wind blowing over immense deserts, which, I doubt not, exist in a north-west direction from Port Jackson, and not from fires kindled by the natives. This remark I feel necessary, as there were methods used by some persons in the colony, both for estimating the degree of heat and for ascertaining the cause of its production, which I deem equally unfair and unphilosophical.
The thermometer, whence my observations were constantly made, was hung in the open air in a southern aspect, never reached by the rays of the sun, at the distance of several feet above the ground.”

A C Osborn
January 29, 2010 10:57 am

Icarus (10:21:32) :
What I see is 2002-2008 repeating 1985-1989.
In 1989 the reversal started as it has in 2008, but notice how much more vigorous the Winter snowfalls have been over the last 8 years compared to 80/81.

Steve Goddard
January 29, 2010 11:39 am

Icarus,
Here is a good read.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/23/sanity-check-2008-2009-were-the-coolest-years-since-1998-in-the-usa/
Temperatures in the US and Alaska have declined significantly over the last decade. Same for Europe, which is having the coldest winter in many decades after several cool summers and a cold winter last year.

JonesII
January 29, 2010 11:41 am

Steve Goddard (23:39:22) : Poor guys, that’s like the SOMA of Huxley’s “A Brave New World”…

Steve Dallas
January 29, 2010 11:52 am

Who knew “Global Whatever” could actually change the orbit and axis of the earth?! Somebody better notify Punxsutawney Phil.
“spring arrives 10 to 14 days earlier than it did just 20 years ago.”

JonesII
January 29, 2010 11:57 am

It is not Climate Change but Weather Change.

Keith Herbert
January 29, 2010 1:13 pm

Talk about wacky! The NWF warns if we don’t reduce our CO2 there won’t be enough snow for our snowmobiles. Of course we have to stop using snowmobiles to reduce our CO2.

Steve Goddard
January 29, 2010 1:34 pm

Icarus,
It looks to me like Autumn/Winter anomalies have been positive recently, and Spring/Summer anomalies have gone negative.
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=12

Walter M. Clark
January 29, 2010 6:57 pm

The St. Francis Dam collapse and flood was human error, not weather related. After they designed and started building they raised the dam by ten feet, then another ten feet, enlarging the reservoir from 30,000 acre feet to 38,000 acre feet without making the base of the dam wider. It had cracks and leaks throughout its short existence (built 1925-26, collapsed March 12, 1928) yet no one did anything until the dam did it itself. A good source of information with photos is at http://www.sespe.com/damdisaster/

Fluffy Clouds (Tim L)
January 29, 2010 8:40 pm

Dr. Dave (21:31:45) :
I grew up on Lake Michigan. It NEVER freezes over. AGW only works in one direction (theoretically) – it WARMS. There is nothing in the theory to suggest it can trigger cold weather by magically upsetting Gaia.
it will freeze over occasionally, but if it does that proves the planet is warming!
lake effect snow last about 6 weeks.
cheers!

January 30, 2010 12:24 am

About two years ago I reported in this blog very mild winter conditions close to the Baltic Sea. I was told that the next winter (2008/2009) would still be mild (what was true) and the one we are having now – very cold (what has proven to be very much true again). Is it possible that anyone here with such global knowledge could comment on the winters at the Baltic Sea – for how long will the colds last this year and what are the predictions for the next years?

Roger Knights
January 30, 2010 1:19 am

Icarus:
… and as we all know the planet is getting inexorably warmer, not cooler.

The Fates smirk when mortals talk that way.

Jimbo
January 30, 2010 3:56 am

Can you imagin if the 1930’s dust bowls took place in the last 10 years; what do you think the headlines would be? What would the National Wildlife Federation say for just 1 year of a dust bowl type event let alone a decade? The more they scream and deceive the more sceptical I become.

January 30, 2010 4:22 am

red wisse (07:41:37) :
dear friends ,
for all co2 pathogists there is appearing hope on the horizon . According the latest scientific news nuclear fusion is becoming more and more within our reach and may be in 10 to 20 years time we are able to tap all our energy from this source

If we are going to get fusion power deployed in the next 10 or 20 years it is not going to come from gigantic lasers or ITER like devices.
It will come from small fusion experiments. Things like FRC, Focus Fusion, General Fusion, or my favorite – Polywell Fusion. And the best part about Polywell? We Will Know In Two Years or less.