Hockey stick observed in NOAA ice core data

At the Foresight Institute, J. Storrs Hall had some interesting graphs made from NOAA ice core data (Alley, R.B. 2000. The Younger Dryas cold interval as viewed from central Greenland. Quaternary Science Reviews 19:213-226.) It sure seems to mirror other hockey sticks this past century. Dr. Mann will be thrilled to see this I’m sure.

J. Storrs Hall writes:

One thing that Climategate does is give us an opportunity to step back from the details of the AGW argument and say, maybe these are heat-of-the-moment stuff, and in the long run will look as silly as the Durants’ allergy to Eisenhower. And perhaps, if we can put climate arguments in perspective, it will allow us to put the much smaller nano arguments (pun intended) into perspective too.

So let’s look at some ice.

I’m looking at the temperature record as read from this central Greenland ice core. It gives us about as close as we can come to a direct, experimental measurement of temperature at that one spot for the past 50,000 years.  As far as I know, the data are not adjusted according to any fancy computer climate model or anything else like that.

So what does it tell us about, say, the past 500 years? (the youngest datum is age=0.0951409 (thousand years before present) — perhaps younger snow doesn’t work so well?):

histo6

Well, whaddaya know — a hockey stick.  In fact, the “blade” continues up in the 20th century at least another half a degree.  But how long is the handle? How unprecedented is the current warming trend?

histo5

Yes, Virginia, there was a Medieval Warm Period, in central Greenland at any rate.  But we knew that — that’s when the Vikings were naming it Greenland, after all.  And the following Little Ice Age is what killed them off, and caused widespread crop failures (and the consequent burning of witches) across Europe.  But was the MWP itself unusual?

histo4

Well, no — over the period of recorded history, the average temperature was about equal to the height of the MWP.  Rises not only as high, but as rapid, as the current hockey stick blade have been the rule, not the exception.

histo3

In fact for the entire Holocene — the period over which, by some odd coincidence, humanity developed agriculture and civilization — the temperature has been higher than now, and the trend over the past 4000 years is a marked decline.  From this perspective, it’s the LIA that was unusual, and the current warming trend simply represents a return to the mean.  If it lasts.

histo2

From the perspective of the Holocene as a whole, our current hockeystick is beginning to look pretty dinky. By far the possibility I would worry about, if I were the worrying sort, would be the return to an ice age — since interglacials, over the past half million years or so, have tended to last only 10,000 years or so.  And Ice ages are not conducive to agriculture.

histo1

… and ice ages have a better claim on being the natural state of Earth’s climate than interglacials.  This next graph, for the longest period, we have to go to an Antarctic core (Vostok):

vostok

In other words, we’re pretty lucky to be here during this rare, warm period in climate history.  But the broader lesson is, climate doesn’t stand still.  It doesn’t even stay on the relatively constrained range of the last 10,000 years for more than about 10,000 years at a time.

Does this mean that CO2 isn’t a greenhouse gas? No.

Does it mean that it isn’t warming? No.

Does it mean that we shouldn’t develop clean, efficient technology that gets its energy elsewhere than burning fossil fuels?  Of course not.  We should do all those things for many reasons — but there’s plenty of time to do them the right way, by developing nanotech.  (There’s plenty of money, too, but it’s all going to climate science at the moment. :-) ) And that will be a very good thing to have done if we do fall back into an ice age, believe me.

For climate science it means that the Hockey Team climatologists’ insistence that human-emitted CO2 is the only thing that could account for the recent warming trend is probably poppycock.

h/t to Kate at SDA

Share


Sponsored IT training links:

Sign up for 70-432 course to successfully pass 642-524 exam. Save a big deal on real exam with 70-662 free resources.


0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

259 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Luke (Holland)
January 12, 2010 5:45 am

Great, hope some politicians will understand this as well. Truth is that All knows how to manipulate those dumheads.

Bros
January 12, 2010 8:38 am

Anyone notice that the graph stops at 1900?

Johan Sterk, Amsterdam
January 12, 2010 11:49 am

How the Americans made ‘poppycock’ out of the Dutch word ‘pappekak’ (thin fluid shit) is beyond me, but may be the right word in this context. The world is covered with assholes and pink baby shit after all.

Wolfgang
January 15, 2010 4:35 pm

There seems to be an overall periodicity in the long-term, cf. the last plot. What is the cause for that? The sun?

January 16, 2010 8:37 am

Hi Wolfgang
I think this is due to the orbital position of earth, e.g.. the Milankovitch cycles.

DrClimate
January 16, 2010 4:22 pm
January 17, 2010 2:34 am

Dr Climate, I like the graph, but I just want to be sure about the y axis. Is the unit on the y axis degrees C /100?

Wolfgang
January 19, 2010 3:28 pm

Henry Pool
Thank you for your answer…another thing I learned. 🙂

January 20, 2010 9:04 am

Wolfgang
sorry, one thing about wattsupwithtaht.com: there are an awful amount of postings and so much information to digest. If you (like me) are interested in global cooling, follow us now here:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/11/ipcc-scientist-global-cooling-headed-our-way-for-the-next-30-years#comments

1 9 10 11