Here’s the latest poll from Bloomberg on most important issues facing the country:
Climate change ranks dead last in importance. Source: PollingReport.com
Now compare what the American People think to what Obama thinks in his UN speech today.
The following is the text of Obama’s speech as prepared for delivery today at the UN:
Good morning. I want to thank the Secretary-General for organizing this summit, and all the leaders who are participating. That so many of us are here today is a recognition that the threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing. Our generation’s response to this challenge will be judged by history, for if we fail to meet it — boldly, swiftly, and together — we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe.
No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change. Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive. On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.
The security and stability of each nation and all peoples — our prosperity, our health, our safety — are in jeopardy. And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.
And yet, we can reverse it. John F. Kennedy once observed that “Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.” It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well. We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history.
We’re making our government’s largest ever investment in renewable energy — an investment aimed at doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years. Across America, entrepreneurs are constructing wind turbines and solar panels and batteries for hybrid cars with the help of loan guarantees and tax credits — projects that are creating new jobs and new industries. We’re investing billions to cut energy waste in our homes, buildings, and appliances — helping American families save money on energy bills in the process. We’ve proposed the very first national policy aimed at both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks — a standard that will also save consumers money and our nation oil. We’re moving forward with our nation’s first offshore wind energy projects. We’re investing billions to capture carbon pollution so that we can clean up our coal plants. Just this week, we announced that for the first time ever, we’ll begin tracking how much greenhouse gas pollution is being emitted throughout the country. Later this week, I will work with my colleagues at the G20 to phase out fossil fuel subsidies so that we can better address our climate challenge. And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.
Most importantly, the House of Representatives passed an energy and climate bill in June that would finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy for American businesses and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One committee has already acted on this bill in the Senate and I look forward to engaging with others as we move forward.
Because no one nation can meet this challenge alone, the United States has also engaged more allies and partners in finding a solution than ever before. In April, we convened the first of what have now been six meetings of the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate here in the United States. In Trinidad, I proposed an Energy and Climate Partnership for the Americas. We’ve worked through the World Bank to promote renewable energy projects and technologies in the developing world. And we have put climate at the top of our diplomatic agenda when it comes to our relationships with countries from China to Brazil; India to Mexico; Africa to Europe.
Taken together, these steps represent an historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government. We understand the gravity of the climate threat.
We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations.
But though many of our nations have taken bold actions and share in this determination, we did not come here today to celebrate progress. We came because there is so much more progress to be made. We came because there is so much more work to be done.
It is work that will not be easy. As we head towards Copenhagen, there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us. We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work. And so all of us will face doubts and difficulties in our own capitals as we try to reach a lasting solution to the climate challenge.
But difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction. And we must not allow the perfect to become the enemy of progress. Each of us must do what we can when we can to grow our economies without endangering our planet — and we must all do it together. We must seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change.
We also cannot allow the old divisions that have characterized the climate debate for so many years to block our progress. Yes, the developed nations that caused much of the damage to our climate over the last century still have a responsibility to lead. And we will continue to do so by investing in renewable energy, promoting greater efficiency, and slashing our emissions to reach the targets we set for 2020 and our long-term goal for 2050.
But those rapidly-growing developing nations that will produce nearly all the growth in global carbon emissions in the decades ahead must do their part as well. Some of these nations have already made great strides with the development and deployment of clean energy. Still, they will need to commit to strong measures at home and agree to stand behind those commitments just as the developed nations must stand behind their own. We cannot meet this challenge unless all the largest emitters of greenhouse gas pollution act together.
There is no other way.
We must also energize our efforts to put other developing nations — especially the poorest and most vulnerable on a path to sustainable growth. These nations do not have the same resources to combat climate change as countries like the United States or China do, but they have the most immediate stake in a solution. For these are the nations that are already living with the unfolding effects of a warming planet — famine and drought; disappearing coastal villages and the conflict that arises from scarce resources. Their future is no longer a choice between a growing economy and a cleaner planet, because their survival depends on both. It will do little good to alleviate poverty if you can no longer harvest your crops or find drinkable water.
That is why we have a responsibility to provide the financial and technical assistance needed to help these nations adapt to the impacts of climate change and pursue low-carbon development.
What we are seeking, after all, is not simply an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. We seek an agreement that will allow all nations to grow and raise living standards without endangering the planet. By developing and disseminating clean technology and sharing our know-how, we can help developing nations leap-frog dirty energy technologies and reduce dangerous emissions.
As we meet here today, the good news is that after too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us. We know what needs to be done. We know that our planet’s future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse gas pollution. We know that if we put the right rules and incentives in place, we will unleash the creative power of our best scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs to build a better world. And so many nations have already taken the first steps on the journey towards that goal.
But the journey is long. The journey is hard. And we don’t have much time left to make it. It is a journey that will require each of us to persevere through setback, and fight for every inch of progress, even when it comes in fits and starts. So let us begin. For if we are flexible and pragmatic; if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children. Thank you.

Back in the fifties there was a pop song “Two different worlds”. The title describes so well the world inhabited by the presidents, prime ministers, AGW activists, etc., etc., ad nauseam, who continually preach about a coming “climate crisis” due to CO2 emissions (formerly known as “global warming” until the warming stopped), and the world inhabited by those of us who look at what the world is actually doing.
IanM
“This means we need to control them.” Stefan
Another control freak. And you assume, it seems, that a post-Christian West is benevolent. But look, we already have Western leaders that think CO2 is a pollutant and you wish to give them more power?
Henry chance (12:43:53) :
“Is Europe angry about this or are we just being told Europe has issues with our ambivalence?
I don’t have a problem with strong energy consumption because we consume so much producing crops.
Resident Obama’s teleprompter is soft on facts and science as it is soft on economics”.
Forget all about the Europeans,
The people of Europe have got their freedom freedom stolen and EU does not agree on anything but further reducing the people’s liberties.
As we speak they are destroying the agricultural infra structure by bankrupting the farmers. Millions are out of a job and by the next year they will stand in lines for food.
If they don’t watch it Europe will be a part of Russia soon.
Mark H. (05:52:34) :
And from the “Pay No Attention to That Man Behind the Curtain” category, the NY Times this morning reported that advancement on the GW issue has been bogged down by an uncooperative climate. Apparently the Earth has just stopped warming (and may be cooling, darn the luck!), and it’s throwing a major wrench into the works.
Andrew Revkin, while solidly in the AGW camp, is not your typical lemming. He quite often gets in trouble with the alarmists for speaking out about heir excesses.
Out of the disconnect between Obama and the public, the proposition has been raised on this blog that the leader is doing what a leader is meant to do – lead! This is a worthy point of view that deserves serious consideration.
I would start by questioning whether in fact Obama is indeed leading at all. What should not be underestimated is the amount of pressure that is continually being applied to world leaders “to fight climate change.”
This pressure comes from a continual barrage of press articles that are universally critical of the perceived lack of urgency to the (imagined) problem. It comes from publicity seeking NGO’s (such as the normally low profile Christian age’s organization of a mass tresspass and email petition of Obama & Brown). It comes from authority figures in the UN (Moon et al). and last but not least it comes from a small coterie of the climate science clique who constantly sound the WTPT alarm (worse than previously thought). And yet still it comes from the figurative slaughter that any leader knows would be visited upon him if he expressed a skeptical opinion.
That is the negative. Of course, the opposite is also true. By embracing the issues head on, by showing “leadership”, he is in effect seeking, and winning approval from the people that matter. This need for ego-grooming is at least as important as avoiding the pyschological pain that he would suffer from pushing the other way. It is a very powerful carrot and stick situation – and Obama has chosen the carrot.
Thus Obama is simply being swept along in a torrent of opinion: a tide so powerful that reason and rational thought are but driftwood tossed in the waves. Therefore, if this is leadership then leadership be no more than bowing to the prevailing wisdom. But should not leadership be more than this? Where is the process of due diligence, the act of seeking confirmation of the facts? Obama is surely aware of dissenting views on climate change. Yet he chooses to deny their very existence. Why? Because to acknowledge that there exists dissent is to acknowledge that the science is not settled. To acknowledge that is to bring forth the approbation of all those from whom Obama seeks approval.
Here’s another comment by USA leaders on AGW:
http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/09/21/steven-chu-americans-are-like-teenage-kids-when-it-comes-to-energy/
I’m thinking they’re also working on lowering our allowance and adding a curfew.
Much too worrying to ignore
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/melting_ice_caps_expose_hundreds
Its interesting the level of control that our ‘leaders’ seem to think they can get away with at the moment.
Fuelled by the conspiracy of corrupt politicians, greedy media publishers and the people behind the curtain.
One wonders what they will do if the globe continues to cool as it has in recent years? There comes a point when the public (who arent stupid so much as misinformed) decide the message is fake. At which point, continuing to beggar them on behalf of that message tends to lead to somewhat violent protest.
The people in charge of the current scam obviously think that they have enough control that nothing will happen. I do wonder if they read history….which shows that no matter how much control you have, at some point it all falls apart. And the longer you keep the lid on, the more violent the backlash is.
Vincent (07:31:48) :
Well said! And, again, this applies to most leaders in the world. Obama is no exception, unfortunately.
I love this quote from Energy Secretary Steven Chu:
“The American public…just like your teenage kids, aren’t acting in a way that they should act,” Dr. Chu said. “The American public has to really understand in their core how important this issue [climate change] is.”
Translation: “You just aren’t smart enough to figure out this climate change stuff, so shut up, sit down, and hand over your tax dollars.”
He left out (with a nod to Mike86): “And you’re grounded until you learn how to appropriately embrace climate change!!”
So…apparently the message here is one can’t walk and chew gum at the same time? That’s pretty lame. How many issues is he dealing with concurrently? Economy, health, war, climate…
Obama’s speech seems sensible:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8270174.stm
Talks about building new coalitions and cooperation to solve world problems – sensible.
The only thing that is not sensible is the endorsing of IPCC’s way to tackling climate change.
“His speech received warm but not effusive applause, a sign perhaps that in the face of real world problems the expectations surrounding the president are gradually being adjusted to reality”. Adjusted to reality is right.
As for Gaddafi: “It shouldn’t be called the Security Council, it should be called the Terror Council” yeah right from the guy who organised the Lockerbie bombing. We need to have him on the security council for it not be called the “Terror Council”.
Here’s a message from our Great Leader – John Key. He has led by example – he has shown us how each one of us can do their little bit in influencing ‘Climate Change’ aka Anthropogenic Global Warming.
And how has he done this? – By walking from his hotel to the UN venue – all 500 yards of it, after flying to New York from New Zealand by jet plane and going by car from the airport to his hotel, thereby reducing his carbon footprint and saving the world.
So next time you get home from work please follow my great leaders example. Stop your car at the end of your driveway and walk the rest of your way home. You will feel good about it and you will have contributed to saving the world.
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a real threat to the world. Our science advisor, who is a world renowned expert on premature babies says so. And the solution is simple. Switch off your lights and pay your taxes.
Paul Tonita (09:50:49) :
So…apparently the message here is one can’t walk and chew gum at the same time? That’s pretty lame. How many issues is he dealing with concurrently? Economy, health, war, climate…
………..
No Paul, no one here is questioning the Presidents intellegence or ability ….or that he is doing one of the toughest jobs in the world.
We do, however, have some doubts about his priorities…..
cdl
About 20% of registered Republicans are not sure if Obama is born in the US, so that’s the next thing he’s got to worry about.
Steven Chu should know how smart the American public, he’s got a Nobel Prize after all and has been a professor of renown for over 3 decades. But then obviously he doesn’t know as much about policy as Limbaugh right?
Richard (12:46:11) :
Libya is on the UN Security Council:
http://www.un.org/sc/members.asp
Clearly our friend Gaddafi was describing himself 🙂 He must have a sense of humour that man.
We should do nothing about GW. If it still happens this will be a great way to cull the Worlds population and the survivors WIN. OTOH if we do stop GW the population will continue to rise and the energy/food will fail and many will die and the earths population will again be reduced.
Aak! (POUND-POUND)
a.) Even if it does warm up a bit, or even quite a bit, things will be just fine (if history is any indication whatever).
b.) Energy/food will not fail; both will greatly increase, regardless (if history is any indication whatever).
But then obviously he doesn’t know as much about policy as Limbaugh right?
Speaking as a liberal, judging by their respective public statements on the matter, I would be forced to say it would appear not . . .
And when has having a Nobel Prize and being a professor of renown for 30 years (strike two) ever resulted in an accurate appraisal of the intelligence of the American people? And compared with whom?
(Come to think of it, Americans do seem to win a disproportionate percentage of those Nobel Prizes. But please don’t hold that against us!)
OTOH, since you want to play that game, a third of democrats think dubya did 911, so maybe Doc Chu has a point, at that!
“Steven Chu should know how smart the American public, he’s got a Nobel Prize after all and has been a professor of renown for over 3 decades. But then obviously he doesn’t know as much about policy as Limbaugh right?”
thurgood–What in the world does Limbaugh have to do with this? Focus on the issues and not the straw man. The point is, Chu is announcing that anyone who doesn’t embrace and believe in AGW is a fool. In fact, he’s equating the skeptics to “teenage kids.” How arrogant is that? I’m dismayed that Chu–a former professor and winner of the Nobel Prize–is so quick to close his eyes to scientific debate, especially when there is obvious and substantial evidence that at the very least calls into question the theory of AGW (and yes, it is still nothing more than a theory).
Scott A. Mandia (16:46:28) :
We finally have a leader in the White House that consults the scientific experts on these matters instead of his horoscope.
Yes, but what do these so-called “experts” consult? They are more like the soothsayers of old, rather than scientists.
Clap, clap, clap, for a President that finally has intelligence and courage to try to do what is right for Americans and the rest of the world.
Shooting ourselves in the foot on energy policy, and further jeopardizing our already fragile economy can never be considered “what is right” for either America, or the world. So, Boo, hiss, hiss.
Yeah Scott, Holdren’s a real gem of a scientist. This is well worth the read:
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/
A pathological lier is not concerned with the accurateness of the facts used, just creating a good argument, “If you can’t convince them with what you know, then dazzle them with B.S.” Obama is the best speachifier I have ever heard, the best law schools, finest argument presenter, ever. Now the great deceiver is also chair in the world government and he says “follow me to a wonderful new future”, they will for a while.
His time is nearly over, the house of cards that his life has been created from is beginning to collapse behind him. 2012 is the end of the Old ways and the beginning of the new. An unknown wise old man will set things on a new path.
“May you live in interesting times.”