Pelosi concedes 'not enough votes to pass global warming bill'

If any WUWT readers have moderates in their congressional district, now is the time to make your opinions known.

May I suggest that you send your congressional representative this story with a request to read it on the floor. And while you are at it, the EPA shenanigans and my surfacestations report.  – Anthony

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/11/23/us/politics/23waxman_span.jpg

From CNN political ticker

House Democrats unsure of global warming bill’s passage

WASHINGTON (CNN) – House Democratic leaders are furiously lobbying their members and moderate Republicans to support a landmark energy bill in the face of resistance from some conservative members of their own party, and staunch opposition from the GOP — roadblocks that are making it difficult to find the 218 votes necessary to pass the measure, according to Democratic leadership aides.

A vote on the Clean Energy and Security Act, which would restrict emissions of green house gases and require use of alternative energy in an effort to slow the effects of global warming, is scheduled for Friday.

The legislation’s lead sponsors held a pep rally outside the Capitol on Wednesday to whip up support for the legislation’s passage.

“We are going to pass the most important energy and environment bill in history,” declared Rep Ed Markey, D-Masachusetts, chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. “We are going to reduce the carbon we send up into the atmosphere but at the same time we are going to begin to back out the oil that we import from countries that we should not be importing it from.”

The legislation would require a 17 percent emissions reduction from 2005 levels by 2020, mandate electric utilities to meet 20% of their electricity demand through renewable energy sources by 2020, provide $90 billion for new investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy, along with $60 billion for carbon capture and sequestration. Another key provision, termed “cap-and-trade,” would require industries and manufacturers to cut carbon emissions by setting up a system where they could buy and sell pollution credits.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi conceded Wednesday evening that there were not enough votes to pass the bill, but that meetings with Democrats and Republicans were ongoing. Many Democrats from rural districts are concerned about the bill’s effect on the manufacturing of ethanol and other biofuels, while Republicans have questioned the overall price tag to Americans.

“This legislation has really been quite an experience for all of us,” said Pelosi. “This is really about regional differences, as well as philosophical differences.”

Democrats are hoping that a recent evaluation by Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which estimates that the annual economywide cost of the cap-and-trade program in 2020 would be $22 billion — or about $175 per household, is enough to alleviate concerns of some members.

But House Republican leaders claim the CBO estimate is too low, and doesn’t adequately gauge the harmful effect that stricter regulations will have on business and industry.

“There is no question that the cap and trade bill will cost millions of jobs and it is pretty evident, I think now, given the word that we are hearing that the other side has 190 votes at this point, far short of that which are needed to pass this bill,” said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Virginia.

Despite concerns about not getting any Republicans to ultimately support the bill, Democratic leaders are hoping their more conservative members coalesce around a “grand agreement” being worked out with Rep Colin Peterson (D-MN), chairman of the Agriculture Committee and a leading voice for rural Democrats concerned with the bill.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
84 Comments
Ron de Haan
June 25, 2009 2:15 pm

They are pushing Republicans now to secure a smooth vote!
Please call these guys and tell them waht mistake they are about to make.
Some names are mentioned in the folllowing article:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/print_friendly.php?ID=cda_20090625_6428

Ron de Haan
June 25, 2009 2:21 pm

Neo (13:38:00) :
Al Gore cancels appearance on the hill.
It would look pretty bad to bring in a “green venture capitalist” to lobby for the passage.
We’ve been thru the S&L adventure, the dot-com run up, Y2K, subprime/Alt-A/Option-A loan mess and now the “carbon tax” (AKA Global Warming/AGW/cap-n-trade). Each and every one of these government FUBARs was intended to extract money from the masses and give it to the friends of the politicians.
Always remember that the last “global consensus” was that Iraq had “stockpiles of WMD” and it was “all wrong”. Now we have a new “global consensus” which also appears, in so many ways that it’s hard to count, to be “all wrong.”
Neo, off topic but:
Only if you leave out 550 tons of uranium yellow cake, a stock pile of chemical weapons (nerve and mustard gas) you are right about the ‘Global Consensus’.

Curiousgeorge
June 25, 2009 2:37 pm

Gary don’t forget the “Pork”. Wanna bet no hungry DC street people will be invited? Royalty only, I’m sure.

Editor
June 25, 2009 5:24 pm

In my experience, congresspeople and their staff don’t actually read constituent letters in great depth regarding pending legislation. They tend to just pile the “for” and “against” letters in piles and weigh the mass of each. So if y’all wanna have an impact, send your letters via snail mail on as heavy a bond paper as you can… lol.

Ron de Haan
June 25, 2009 6:09 pm

[post excerpt plus link] ~ charles the moderator

K
June 25, 2009 7:50 pm

Comment for non-US readers. The fact that a House bill is much weaker than the Senate version, or the reverse, means very little. Don’t place your hopes on that.
A committee from the House and a committee from the Senate will sit down together and make changes to reconcile the versions This gives a tremendous advantage to the party that controls both houses. Or in this case to Pelosi and Reid.
Expect a reconciliation bill to omit concessions put in before the vote.

old construction worker
June 25, 2009 8:19 pm

Climate Heretic (09:19:28) :
‘Al Gore cancels appearance on the hill. Pelosi finally realized flying in the VP to rally against CO2 was stupid, damn they are learning the ropes, because it would open the VP up to criticism regarding his big fat …. footprint.’
The Gore Affect
She didn’t want snow in June.

gt
June 25, 2009 9:24 pm

Gary A. (13:26:44) :
I hope he did not use our tax dollars for that. But I am not holding my breath neither.

June 25, 2009 10:01 pm

I have to laugh when politicians claim that a huge new tax will “create millions of new green jobs.” Did these folks fail economics, or just common sense class?