Ice Ages and Sea Level

Guest post by Dr. David Archibald

The Earth is currently in an interglacial period of an ice age that started about two and a half million years ago.  The Earth’s current ice age is primarily caused by Antarctica drifting over the South Pole 30 million years ago.  This meant that a large area of the Earth’s surface changed from being very low-albedo ocean to highly reflective ice and snow.  The first small glaciers were formed in Antarctica perhaps as long ago as 40 million years.  They expanded gradually until, about 20 million years ago, a permanent ice sheet covered the whole Antarctic continent.  About 10 million years later, glaciers appeared on the high mountains of Alaska, and about 3 million years ago, ice sheets developed on lower ground in high northerly latitudes.

Pacific Ocean bottom water temperatures started declining 40 million years ago, falling 10° C to the current 3° C.  The band of high ocean temperatures (above 25° C) also contracted towards the equator, from 45° latitude to 20°.  Eventually the oceans lost enough heat that the Earth’s orbital parameters started causing surges in ice formation.  There are three orbital parameters: eccentricity, precession and obliquity, shown in Figure 1.

eccentricity-precession-and-obliquity1

Figure 1:  Orbital Parameters:  Eccentricity, Precession and Obliquity- click for larger image

This figure is developed from A.L.Berger, 1978, Long Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary Climatic Changes, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, volume 35 (12), 2362-2367.

Eccentricity is caused by changes in the shape of the Earth’s orbit due to the gravitational attraction of other planets.  Precession is the change of direction of rotation.  Obliquity is the tilt of the axis.  When these effects aligned, their effect is reinforced.  From three million years ago to about 800,000 years ago, the dominant pattern of glaciation corresponded to the 41,000 year period of changes in the Earth’s obliquity.  Since then, a 100,000 year cycle has been dominant.

Ice ages occur because the summer sun in the northern hemisphere does not get hot enough to melt all the ice that accumulates over winter.  Ice has a much higher reflectivity than rocks or vegetation, and so reflects more sunlight into space and the cooling is reinforced.  Eventually the orbital parameters change back and warming occurs.  Glacial periods tend to cool slowly and warm abruptly.  Because the Earth’s orbital parameters can be calculated, the amount of sunlight in high northern latitudes can be calculated.

insolation-at-65-north

Figure 2:  June Mid-Month Insolation at 65° North – click for larger image

This figure is derived from M.F.Loutre and A.Berger, 2000, Future Climate Changes: Are we entering an exceptionally long interglacial?, Climatic Change 46, 61-90

Figure 2 shows how that translates to insolation (sunshine) at 65° North.  The recent peak in insolation was 11,000 years ago at the end of the last glacial period.  It has since declined by about 10% to 476 watts per square metre. Insolation will rise from here for the next 30,000 years, but it will still be low enough for the next glaciation to form.  This is shown by Figure 3 of Northern Hemisphere ice volume for the last 200,000 years and a projection for the next 130,000 years.  According to these calculations, the Earth is at the beginning of a 20,000 year plunge into the next ice age.

The reason why the Earth doesn’t respond more rapidly to changes in insolation is due to the retained heat in the oceans, which smoothes the whole process over thousands of years.  Over the short term, the oceans are very responsive to changes in solar activity.  Figure 5 shows the very strong correlation between the annual rate of sea level rise and solar cycles over the 20th century.  The sea level rise of the 20th century can largely be attributed to a more active Sun relative to the 19th century.  About 70% of the sea level rise of the 20th century was due to thermal expansion of the oceans, with the rest due to melting glaciers.

future-glacial-periods-9th-january-2008

Figure 3:  Future Glaciation – click for larger image

This figure is derived from M.F.Loutre and A.Berger, 2000, Future Climate Changes: Are we entering an exceptionally long interglacial?, Climatic Change 46, 61-90

sea-level-rise-and-solar-cycles-of-the-20th-century

Figure 4:  The Correlation between Sea Level Rise and Solar Cycles over the 20th Century. – click for larger image

The sea level data is derived from S.Holgate, Decadal rates of sea level change during the twentieth century, Proudman Oceanic Laboratory, Liverpool, UK.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

207 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim F
February 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Touche, Gary.
Joel seems to be in the “kill the messenger” camp.
I suspect there are many examples of discoveries made by people who don’t have Harvard Ph.D.s in whatever field is being illuminated. Arguing against the principle, not the man, seems to be a useful construct.

maksimovich
February 28, 2009 9:39 pm

Hmm
Strong asymmetry of hemispheric climates during MIS-13 inferred from correlating China loess and Antarctica ice records
Z. T. Guo, A. Berger, Q. Z. Yin, and L. Qin1,
Abstract. We correlate the China loess and Antarctica ice records to address the inter-hemispheric climate link over the past 800 ka. The results show a broad coupling between Asian and Antarctic climates at the glacial-interglacial scale. However, a number of decoupled aspects are revealed, among which marine isotope stage (MIS) 13 exhibits a strong anomaly compared with the other interglacials. It is characterized by unusually positive benthic oxygen (δ18O) and carbon isotope (δ13C) values in the world oceans, cooler Antarctic temperature, lower summer sea surface temperature in the South Atlantic, lower CO2 and CH4 concentrations, but by extremely strong Asian, Indian and African summer monsoons, weakest Asian winter monsoon, and lowest Asian dust and iron fluxes. Pervasive warm conditions were also evidenced by the records from northern high-latitude regions. These consistently indicate a warmer Northern Hemisphere and a cooler Southern Hemisphere, and hence a strong asymmetry of hemispheric climates during MIS-13. Similar anomalies of lesser extents also occurred during MIS-11 and MIS-5e. Thus, MIS-13 provides a case that the Northern Hemisphere experienced a substantial warming under relatively low concentrations of greenhouse gases. It suggests that the global climate system possesses a natural variability that is not predictable from the simple response of northern summer insolation and atmospheric CO2 changes. During MIS-13, both hemispheres responded in different ways leading to anomalous continental, marine and atmospheric conditions at the global scale.
The correlations also suggest that the marine δ18O record is not always a reliable indicator of the northern ice-volume changes, and that the asymmetry of hemispheric climates is one of the prominent factors controlling the strength of Asian, Indian and African monsoon circulations, most likely through modulating the position of the inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and land-sea thermal contrasts.
Interesting extract.
The correlation reveals a number of decoupled aspects between the loess and ice records. Among them, a strong anomaly is observed for MIS-13 compared with the other interglacials.Comprehensive examination of the relevant geological
records consistently suggests a significantly cooler Southern Hemisphere, but an unusually warmer Northern Hemisphere with reduced northern ice volume, and hence, an enhanced asymmetry of hemispheric climates. During this interglacial, both hemispheres responded in different ways to the northern summer insolation and atmospheric CO2 changes.
MIS-13 is therefore a real case of a substantial northern hemispheric warming under relatively low concentrations of greenhouse gases. Smaller northern ice-sheets would have also occurred during MIS-11 and MIS-5e, with apparently
a lesser hemispheric asymmetry than for MIS-13. These also suggest that the coupling of hemispheric climates at the glacial-interglacial scales was significantly unstable in the Mid-Pleistocene and that marine 18O records may not
be always reliable indicators of northern ice-volume. These findings may also have implications for the evolution of the climate system during other periods of the Quaternary.
http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/5/635/2009/cpd-5-635-2009.html

maksimovich
February 28, 2009 9:55 pm

Incorrect link to paper
http://www.clim-past.net/5/21/2009/cp-5-21-2009.pdf
Guo et al

Verified by MonsterInsights