Writing from Starbucks WiFi in Sacramento. Still have all my hair, but have to drive 90 miles home now as I just dropped off the server for re-rack at the CoLo
As I promised for tonight, www.climateaudit.org has regained life.
– Anthony
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Slightly off topic — has James Hansen started to endorse the role of the sun? He seems to be using it as a partial reason for why 2008 wasn’t so warm. Here’s a press release from yesterday:
Public release date: 23-Feb-2009
Contact: Leslie McCarthy
leslie.m.mccarthy@nasa.gov
212-678-5507
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
2008 was Earth’s coolest year since 2000
Climatologists at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City have found that 2008 was the coolest year since 2000. The GISS analysis also showed that 2008 is the ninth warmest year since continuous instrumental records were started in 1880.
The ten warmest years on record have all occurred between 1997 and 2008.
The GISS analysis found that the global average surface air temperature was 0.44°C (0.79°F) above the global mean for 1951 to 1980, the baseline period for the study. Most of the world was either near normal or warmer in 2008 than the norm. Eurasia, the Arctic, and the Antarctic Peninsula were exceptionally warm (see figures), while much of the Pacific Ocean was cooler than the long-term average.
The relatively low temperature in the tropical Pacific was due to a strong La Niña that existed in the first half of the year, the research team noted. La Niña and El Niño are opposite phases of a natural oscillation of equatorial Pacific Ocean temperatures over several years. La Niña is the cool phase. The warmer El Niño phase typically follows within a year or two of La Niña.
The temperature in the United States in 2008 was not much different than the 1951-1980 mean, which makes it cooler than all the previous years this decade.
“Given our expectation that the next El Niño will begin this year or in 2010, it still seems likely that a new global surface air temperature record will be set within the next one to two years, despite the moderate cooling effect of reduced solar irradiance,” said James Hansen, director of GISS. The Sun is just passing through solar minimum, the low point in its 10- to 12-year cycle of electromagnetic activity, when it transmits its lowest amount of radiant energy toward Earth.
The GISS analysis of global surface temperature incorporates data from the Global Historical Climatology Network of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climate Data Center; the satellite analysis of global sea surface temperature of Richard Reynolds and Thomas Smith of NOAA; and Antarctic records of the international Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research.
“GISS provides the ranking of global temperature for individual years because there is a high demand for it from journalists and the public,” said Hansen. “The rank has scientific significance in some cases, such as when a new record is established. But rank can also be misleading because the difference in temperature between one year and another is often less than the uncertainty in the global average.”
###
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2008_temps.html
Written by:
Leslie McCarthy
Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Great pic to introduce the topic.
By the way, speaking of funny and humor, the alarmists and their followers seem not to know what is funny and have no sense of humor. Must be hard for them to go through life that way.
Thanks Anthony, for your work and dedication.
Off topic but the Carbon Observatory Satellite is lost for failure to reach orbit. I’m sure this will feed some conspiracy theory somewhere.
Drudge linked it below:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=av6QSiI5BuOI&refer=us
thanks
Ed
Let’s start one. Hansen’s first overt act of civil disobedience.
Nasa´s global warming satellite lands in ocean…http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090224/ap_on_sc/sci_carbon_satellite
Nasa´s global warming satellite lands in ocean.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090224/ap_on_sc/sci_carbon_satellite
Nice job Anthony, just another example where maintaining of hardware is crucial to the production of good data. Perhaps NOAA and its affiliates can learn for this experience and dedication to rapid corrections and repairs.
Thank you for your work and dedication,
Bill Derryberry
Thanks Anthony,
Invaluable.
OT: Climate Sat Fails Launch
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123548383188959177.html
Orbiting Carbon Observatory
Just in time to investigate this cover-up; I guess the new CO2 monitoring satellite didn’t say what they wanted >hee hee hee<
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/02/24/nasa.launch/index.html
Uhhh the latest image of the sun seems to me to be showing a sunspot region, but the count is 0…. Am I missing something???
In the top left hand corner of the sun… image from 24-02 at 14:24
Ramming a satellite into the earth is the most violent form of data correction yet… this science is getting dangerous!
Re: Alex (07:30:48) :
Yep, the magentographic shows a clean Cycle 24 configuration for this high latitude NH sunspot group. It’s amazing how quickly these spots can come out of nowhere.
good to see this site up and running again.
I think this service is particularly valuable for mann’s and steig’s students, as they are given a chance to find out what, how bitterly low the scientific levels and standards are taught in their classrooms and laboratories.
“”” Ross Berteig (11:01:39) :
I have a running PDP-11 in the other room. My tiny company still uses it for bookkeeping, and the occasional revisit to ancient project work. Aside from occasional maintenance on the 9-track tape drive, it has survived for over 20 years… just try to get that kind of lifetime out of a PC!
I’m sure there’s a forum somewhere for war stories from the good ol’ days of the PDP-10…”””
Nah sissy stuff ! why aren’t ya using a PDP-8; now that is a ne plus ultra computer.
But I do admire your fortitude in staying with the -11, rather than drinking the M$ coolade !
George
Anthony:
I bet I could still do a SYSGEN of M+
REPLY: Eww!
George E. Smith (17:20:24) :
Careful – my father designed a multiprocessor industrial control computer (think power plants) and claimed it was so easy to program that a 12 year old could do it. Since I was 12 at the time, he proceeded to teach me how to program the I/O processor. 25 bit (sign + 6 BCD digits), executed off a drum, germanium transistors. That was in 1962. One system monitored an Australian power plant for 30 years. In its latter years people used a PC spreadsheet to optimize instruction and data layout on the drum.
George E. Smith (17:20:24) :
The ’11 has served us well, but since DEC sold most of itself to Intel and Compaq, and the original VMS team created the NT kernel for MS, the Wintel world carries some of the heritage from the glory days. Its the prospect of switching from systems that still work and are paid for to something new that costs money that keeps the ’11 running today. Mind you, our productive work is done entirely on PCs these days, and the bits of it that run in PCs (the rest runs in deeply embedded processors, often with no OS at all) runs under Windows.
Bringing the topic back to something resembling the what this blog is actually hosted for, I am pretty sure that is a big factor in why we keep tripping over ancient code and equipment as we survey the methods and practices of climate science. Change costs money, and as Anthony is documenting, premature change can cost you the whole value of the experiment you didn’t know you were performing. (MMTS was pushed at least 15 years too soon for technology.)