No, Sun Sentinel, Florida Isn’t Under Future “Climate Threats”

Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

By Anthony Watts

A recent article in the South Florida Sun Sentinel (SFSS) newspaper, titled “Florida in 50 years: Study says land conservation can buffer destructive force of climate change,” makes some catastrophic claims about what Florida’s climate will be like in 50 years. The article relies heavily on climate model projections, that are undermined by real world evidence and by the fact that the climate models in question have been shown to create “implausibly hot forecasts of future warming.

As outlined in Climate at A Glance: Climate Model Fallibility peer reviewed science has shown that climate forecasts like the one cited by the SFSS have no basis in reality because comparisons of actual measured atmospheric temperature data to model forecasts show up to a 200% discrepancy between model temperature outputs and observed temperatures.

Because the temperature forecasts are wildly implausible, the claimed disastrous impacts that are forecast to result from those unbelievably high temperatures also lack credibility.

The article starts off by asserting as a fact that, “Climate change is making temperatures and sea levels rise.”

The SFSS cites a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) graph showing increased average temperatures for the state of Florida, seen below:

It is important to note that average temperatures really didn’t start to significantly increase until around 1990, not coincidentally as the state’s population began to rise rapidly. Plus, average temperatures are just half of the picture. If you look at NOAA’s minimum temperatures for Florida, it is easy to see that it makes up the bulk of the increase in average temperatures since 1990:

An increase in overnight low temperatures is a clear indicator of an increased Urban Heat Island effect (UHI). Florida’s population has doubled from about 10 million in 1990 to over 20 million now. This more than doubling of the state’s population is reflected clearly in UHI data compiled by Dr. Roy Spencer as seen in the graph below. Note the huge temperature effects for Florida’s rapidly growing coastal cities.

Concerning the SFSS’s sea level rise claims, Miami is often used as an example of supposed sea level rise due to occasional street flooding there. Miami’s real problem isn’t rising seas as much as land subsidence. Much of Miami was built on reclaimed swamp land, and then built up with modern infrastructure. That extra weight causes a sinking of the land, known as subsidence, allowing seawater to seep in when the surfaces sink to near sea-level. It also means that during strong rainfall events, and hurricane storm surge, areas that have subsided don’t drain as they did years before.

This is clearly covered in the scientific paper Land subsidence contribution to coastal flooding hazard in southeast Floridapublished in Proceedings of IAHS in 2020. The paper clearly states:

Preliminary results reveal that subsidence occurs in localized patches (< 0.02 km2) with magnitude of up to 3 mm yr−1, in urban areas built on reclaimed marshland. These results suggest that contribution of local land subsidence affect[s] only small areas along the southeast Florida coast, but in those areas coastal flooding hazard is significantly higher compared to non-subsiding areas.

https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/382/207/2020/

Subsidence is also driven by freshwater withdrawals from the region’s groundwater reservoirs to satisfy the Miami metro area’s growing population.

Clearly, sea level rise in Florida has more to do with subsidence and land management than climate change induced rise. Plus, Miami’s flat terrain, just a few feet above sea level, lacks natural drainage routes for rainwater to flow away from urban areas.

As discussed in numerous Climate Realism articles, here and here, for instance, there is no evidence whatsoever seas are rising at an usually rapid rate. As shown in Climate at a Glance: Sea Level Rise, there is approximately the same pace of sea-level rise today that has occurred since at least the mid-1800s, disproving claims of recent climate change worsening it.

SFSS goes on to outline a trifecta of additional climate threats, saying:

There are three main climate change threats in Florida, said Polsky: More intense rain events, which leads to greater flooding; more coastal flooding — both from storm surge and high tides; and more heat and wildfire risk.

https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2024/04/30/florida-in-50-years-study-says-land-conservation-can-buffer-destructive-force-of-climate-change/

Let’s examine rainfall. Actual monthly rainfall data since 1895 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA shows no upward trend in rainfall for the state, nor does it show excessive monthly spikes in the present.

As for coastal flooding, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows no indication that climate change is causing increased coastal flooding, as is show in Table 12.12 | on Page 90 – Chapter 12 of the UN IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Emergence of Climate Impact Drivers (CIDs) in time periods, shows no correlation. The color corresponds to the confidence of the region with the highest confidence: white colors indicate where evidence of a climate change signal is lacking or the signal is not present, leading to overall low confidence of an emerging signal. The section is highlighted in yellow. Neither sea-level nor coastal flooding has been an observed element of climate change.

Even in 2050 and 2100 the IPCC does not forecast any climate change impact on coastal flooding. Also, the possible predicted effect on sea level rise that the IPCC suggests might occur in 2050 and beyond stems from the organization’s use of the RCP8.5 scenario “high emissions” scenario that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and many climate scientists have by now explicitly disavowed, as being wildly implausible if not impossible.  Climate Realism has discussed problems with the RCP8.5 scenario repeatedly, here and here, for example.

As for SFSS’s wildfire claims, while Florida had a single bad year in 2017 due to warmer local weather conditions, lightning, and arsonists, there is no overall upwards trend in the number of wildfires for the state over the last decade:

According to a summary by Alchera, which produced the Florida wildfires graph above, climate change is not a factor:

Florida’s unique combination of flat terrain, abundant vegetation, and frequent lightning strikes makes the state prone to wildfires. The flat landscape allows fires to spread quickly, while the dense vegetation provides ample fuel for them to grow in intensity. Lightning strikes, particularly during the stormy summer months, can ignite dry vegetation and lead to rapidly spreading wildfires. Human activities, such as arson, debris burning, and equipment use, are also significant factors in causing wildfires in Florida.

https://alchera.ai/en/meet-alchera/blog/ai-cameras-for-wildfire-prevention-in-the-us

The SFSS story claiming climate change is causing rapidly rising temperatures and increased flooding and wildfires in Florida has no basis in fact. Rather than presenting news, the SFSS’s story is consistent with a pattern Climate Realism has exposed time and again hyping the dogmatic narrative that climate change is causing virtually everything bad. Almost daily, climate alarmists and the media are painting a dire future due to climate change, even when the facts refute their claims. Such stories may make for good disaster fiction, but they are not fact-based news reporting, and thus are not worthy of being published by a supposedly journalistic enterprise.

Anthony Watts Thumbnail

Anthony Watts

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.

5 16 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Edward Katz
May 5, 2024 6:33 pm

If some of these media outlets would come clean on where much of their funding comes from, we’d find that left-leaning governments and various environmental organizations stipulate that if they want support and donations to keep on flowing, they’d better be certain to keep pushing climate catastrophe theories while suppressing any facts and findings that refute them.

The Expulsive
Reply to  Edward Katz
May 6, 2024 6:51 am

Many news organisations in Canada (CBC, the Star, etc.) are receiving government money, to save them from declines in reader and viewership. Print has the Canada Periodical Fund, to enable them to overcome market disadvantages and continue to provide Canadian readers with the content they choose to read. The CBC receives well over $1.4B to operate.

Tom Halla
May 5, 2024 6:53 pm

Anything using RCP8.5 should have a disclaimer—Disaster P0rn, only for entertainment value.

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 6, 2024 6:28 am

And anyone using any RCP should probably explain where we can measure for ourselves those “forcing Watts” that they are talking about.

May 5, 2024 7:11 pm

Excellent post.

derbrix
May 5, 2024 7:23 pm

I’ve been a year round resident of Florida for the past 13 years and really can’t say anything (climate) has changed all that much. Where I live in the extreme northern part of the state, we generally get around 60 inches of rain every year and it has been a few years where we passed 100° for any given day. Actually, it appears to be a bit cooler year over year.
I’m at 180 feet above sea level and my property does partially flood maybe once a year. That only happens if we get a number of successive storms over a week, or so. The creek that forms the southern property boundary usually has a couple of inches of water nearly year round and flows about 7 feet down from the lip. Just recently, we had a storm that dropped 6 inches of rain on top of another storm a few days earlier. The creek did rise to about 2 feet from the lip. Went back down to the normal level two days after.

Reply to  derbrix
May 6, 2024 6:55 am

To put some hypothetical numbers to it…..say a 1 degree temperature rise results in 7% more water vapor in the air (by Clausius Clapeyron). So normal is say 60….probably means your normal variation is actually somewhere from 30 to 120….The increase in rainfall due to “CC” at 7% is only 4….not even noticeable over the whole year….Say at some point you get a 6” rain. How can you “attribute” that rain to CC ? At best you could say “the rain might have been 5.6 before CC”….However everyone that owns a rain gauge that shows .5-1 variation would then realize that the CC component is foolish to consider….so wackos talk about more common floods and droughts as if they were CC related….whereas actually they are related every civilizations’ attempts (since writing was invented at least) to be less susceptible to the vagaries of Mother Nature….

M14NM
May 5, 2024 8:40 pm

Slightly O/T: Floating solar panel farm? WTF! https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1787224785170190752

May 5, 2024 10:28 pm

An increase in overnight low temperatures is a clear indicator of an increased Urban Heat Island effect (UHI). Florida’s population has doubled from about 10 million in 1990 to over 20 million now.

More Climate Ambition™ refugees.

The state picked up one more seat for a total of 28 in the U.S. House of Representatives and 30 Electoral College votes. The expectation of an additional seat has already triggered a flurry of political speculation as a redistricting panel gets ready to carve out new congressional and state legislative boundaries.

U.S. Census Bureau figures released Monday show Florida gained more than 2.7 million residents since the last once-a-decade count in 2010, boosting its population to 21.5 million. It is the nation’s third most populous state, behind California and Texas.

Florida needs to make certain new refugees renounce their climate beliefs otherwise they will pollute the voting pool.

guidvce4
May 6, 2024 5:12 am

The acknowledgement that the prediction is based on “computer models” puts the whole thing in the category of more “circus” shenanigans by the hooligans in academia. Calliope music in background should be required with all articles regarding “climate…” anything, unless actually exposing the fallacies of it all. Just sayin’.

May 6, 2024 5:26 am

Two proxies from SE Florida: Lived here since 1997. I have an ebike I built myself, and use it to exercise on weekends. Using pedal assist I go for an 8-10 mile run on weekends, at sunrise to avoid a$$holes in cars. (whereas using the same human power I could only muster about 2 miles, so the ebike is faster and more fun) I’ve had it for 7 years and have 5500 miles on it. It is NOT water proof, but merely water resistant, so if there is rain at dawn on Sat or Sun, I don’t ride. Likewise the few times temp drops below 55F, it’s too cold to ride. Normally I ride about 90% of weekend mornings. This past year my weekend rides are down to 55% due to bad weather – rain or excessive number of cold days by comparison to the norm. I do not buy the notion last year was hotter – it simply was not.

Second proxy which is more concrete than bike ride days, is my condo’s air conditioning unit. Brand new 5 years ago. Forced to go from the older more efficient R22 as it was banned, to the less efficient and more finicky R410a. Anyway I keep a daily log of the on time of the A/C. For 2019-2022 it remained fairly stable on an annual average of 26-27% ON time. (daily value averaged over a year). Last year it was down to 21.5% ON time, which is statistically significant. So again the notion last year was the hottest evah, is simply not true. (always with exactly the same program setting for day vs night, and no change in using heat emitting appliances or window coverings) (heck even FPL [Florida Power and Light] shows fewer degree days for last year, so the propagandists don’t have all their ducks in a row regards the hottest year evah)

davetherealist
May 6, 2024 11:00 am

UHI is once again the only true man made climate change. Ground temps around urban areas are nothing but an indication of the population, concrete area and automobile traffic. You could cut CO2 to 200 and the same effect will still be there. As usual, garbage in, garbage out in climate models.

May 6, 2024 2:20 pm

Florida.
If I’m not mistaken, Florida is the state most often hit by hurricanes. Lightening strikes, and it is not only mostly “flat” but also not much above sea level to begin with.
Makes me wonder if this story in The Sun Sentinel is just groundwork to blame what happens naturally in Florida is suddenly because of Man’s CO2?Real “Climate Change” happens over multiples of centuries.
Florida is, as is, one of the results of “Nature doing it’s thing”.
(How many islands would make up Hawaii if Nature didn’t just continue to “do it’s thing”?)

Man can’t control Nature. But some want to fool people into thinking Man can so they can control Man.

Bill_W_1984
May 9, 2024 7:41 am

Anthony,

You said the section on coastal flooding is highlighted in yellow. I believe you meant to say “in white” or the highlight you added does not display.

Bill

Verified by MonsterInsights