Debate between John Cook and Marc Morano in Paris

John-Cook-Morano-Climate-Hustle
L- John Cook R- Marc Morano from Paris
Marc Morano writes:
A debate just finished within the hour here today.  Cook interviewed me on camera and I audio recorded for my protection.  He is going to post full video. But in meantime, anyone can post full audio.  The entire global warming debate was discussed. 97% claims, etc.  Richard Tol, Anthony Watts,  Steve Goddard, Fred Singer, Michaels, Curry, Monckton and others were cited.
Full audio follows, video may be available from John Cook at some point in the future but this assures us an unedited record of the event: (54 minutes)
NOTE: some people report no audio, if you are using Firefox, that’s likely the reason. I’ve dumped it months ago as it has become buggy, unstable, and mostly unusable in current forms.

Try Chrome – works flawlessly, and is faster. -Anthony


UPDATE -TRY THIS: for those of you with browsers that can’t play audio, it turns out the problem was that it was in Apple m4a format and not all browsers support it. M4A is an audio file format that is very similar to MP4. It is a proprietary file format of Apple. iTunes store contains the audios as M4A format. It uses MPEG-4 codec to contain audio files.

So to fix that, here is the file format in a much better MP3 format, which doesn’t rely on Apple formats and is much more standards compliant.

Direct download:

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
267 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike
December 9, 2015 1:17 pm

sounds like a zinger, I’d like to hear this. But I’m not getting anything from the audio widget. 🙁

December 9, 2015 1:17 pm

I would love to read a transcript

Reply to  Jeff in Calgary
December 9, 2015 1:56 pm

Agreed. Reading is quick and easy to understand.
Haven’t got time got time to listen for an hour.

Reply to  MCourtney
December 9, 2015 6:11 pm
Jeff Alberts
Reply to  MCourtney
December 11, 2015 6:11 pm

The helium version?

Alan Robertson
Reply to  Jeff in Calgary
December 9, 2015 5:07 pm

OT (but in keeping with your request,) is anyone experienced with voice- to- word processed software, such as Dragon Naturally Speaking?

Hugs
Reply to  Jeff in Calgary
December 10, 2015 6:40 am

Transcript is also vital to people like me who have both hearing problems reducing even extraordinary clear speech into unintelligible mumble as who have the disadvantage of reading and writing English as a second language. Yes writing; I don’t really understand spoken English.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Hugs
December 10, 2015 7:05 am

“I don’t really understand spoken English.”
Very few pople do,….. including the English. 🙂

Joe Bastardi
December 9, 2015 1:22 pm

No audio

December 9, 2015 1:24 pm

I have full audio.

1saveenergy
December 9, 2015 1:25 pm

Dead link ???

Francisco
December 9, 2015 1:26 pm

Audio works fine for me

kev1701e
December 9, 2015 1:31 pm

Working fine here – Win10/Chrome

Jurgen
December 9, 2015 1:42 pm

No audio also, but my media-downloader (Video Downloadhelper plugin Firefox) could download the file after pushing the play button.

Jurgen
Reply to  Jurgen
December 9, 2015 4:14 pm

my Firefox runs just fine in Linux

Bloke down the pub
December 9, 2015 1:45 pm

Even with the tape, it won’t stop them from cut and pasting. How does the line go? A lie will run around the world before the truth has got its boots on. The msm will happily run with this bs and then hide any retraction on page 10.

Reply to  Bloke down the pub
December 10, 2015 12:24 pm

Except that Marc Morano is always ON or IN the media somewhere, and he’s genius at getting himself on camera-the man released his movie about the AGW lie in PARIS during the climate summit! And it’s obvious to anyone who watches him even once that he’s not the type of person who would quietly allow anyone to misrepresent him.

December 9, 2015 1:45 pm

No sound working for me but I’ve just heard that they are now targetting 1.5 deg C not 2 deg C. I bet that is because with all the recent indications that sensitivity is much lower than previous, they realise there is not a cat in hell’s chance that temperature rise will approach 2 deg C so they can now chase 1.5 deg C without apearing quite so stupid as follwing the current el Nino the temperature will drop back.

Francisco
Reply to  son of mulder
December 9, 2015 2:14 pm

WE ARE SORRY!! That was our hot but dumb minister of the environment and climate change.
Yes!! We, Canadians, apologize!!

Mike Bromley the Kurd
Reply to  Francisco
December 11, 2015 3:23 am

I’m not apologizing. I didn’t vote for that hairpiece.

Werner Brozek
Reply to  son of mulder
December 9, 2015 2:43 pm

so they can now chase 1.5 deg C

And presumably we already had an increase of 0.8 C since 1750 and nothing bad happened. Why would another 0.7 C all of a sudden be dangerous?

Carbon500
Reply to  Werner Brozek
December 10, 2015 2:24 am

Werner Brozek: Agreed entirely – also, CO2 has gone up from 280ppm to 400ppm in that time – a 43% increase!

Pat Paulsen
Reply to  Werner Brozek
December 10, 2015 6:48 am

2 good points!

RobertBobbert GDQ
Reply to  son of mulder
December 9, 2015 9:17 pm

Spot on SOM.
And we need to keep them to their 2C mantra which they have been rabbiting on about as gospel.
So I propose that on every occasion you hear them claim the New Marketing Melting Point for Doom and Disaster demand of them their previous position, and in as mocking a tone as possible, ask that the 2C science wasn’t settled and inquire if this New settled Science is rock solid or is it likely to be changed next year.
Now when they accuse you of being a Science hater you could go all Sciency in return – which the alarmaramas hate – you could ask them for the mathematics which underpins this New Disaster measure …as if Science and math verification has any thing to do with anything.
This is marketing and this 1.5C is like Global Warming to Climate Change, Polar Bears, the 97% consensus, the Arctic and Vanishing Pacific Islands.
The New Marketing Melting Point for Doom and Disaster is what this is about.
The Mainstream Media will lap it up and it is our role to challenge it for The Marketing Strategy that it is.

cassidy421
Reply to  RobertBobbert GDQ
December 10, 2015 11:57 am

And global warming marketing is a disguise for the NWO New Age satanism the UN environmental program was founded to market.
Reading a description of the agenda doesn’t require any religious or spiritual belief.
http://webdotarchive.org/web/20010814061645/http:/redmoonrising.com/newman.htm

ralfellis
December 9, 2015 1:55 pm

No sound on Safari either… 🙁

Steve in Seattle
December 9, 2015 1:59 pm

No audio, no link – not sure the prob is Firefox …

Steve in Seattle
December 9, 2015 2:00 pm

What would be highly desirable is a complete transcript in RTF !

troe
December 9, 2015 2:02 pm

Audio working here. So far Marano doing very well. Currently talking about the consensus. What other field of science has ever accepted a squishy debate about consensus as a form of proof. That’s the rub.
Audio cut out.

cassidy421
Reply to  troe
December 10, 2015 12:49 pm

Exactly – this is a message to ascientific sheep who base their opinion on that of “the majority of scientists”. No one has pointed out that Cook threw out 2/3 of the input he got in a literature search designed to find only global warming support. The total number of scientists who support AGW in all similar studies is less than 1% of the number of scientists who signed the Oregon Petition. This fact, and the fact that signers consider UN limits to be HARMFUL to the environment. We have to establish the truth that WE are the herd of scientists the herd of nonscientists should be following – the message to the public is not a scientific discussion.

Latitude
December 9, 2015 2:04 pm

Steve Goddard….Tony??

Reply to  Latitude
December 10, 2015 6:25 am

pen name Steve Goddard .. real name Tony Heller

JohnWho
December 9, 2015 2:07 pm

Audio OK.
Am using Chrome.

FJ Shepherd
December 9, 2015 2:10 pm

Chrome works well.

Mike
December 9, 2015 2:12 pm

“Try Chrome – works flawlessly, and is faster. -Anthony”
Thanks for the tip. I don’t trust big G further than I can throw them, which ain’t far. If they are happy to install a audio surveillance device that records sound in the room and sends it to Google for voice rec. I will NEVER install Chrome.
Of course, when they have voice rec’ed the audio content of your living room, they are not going to analyse, store an index it like their core business does with everything else they collect. No, they are just checking to see whether you said “back” or “forward” to give you a cool voice assisted browsing experience. The rest of the data, they just bin it right?
This “cool” feature was installed and activated by default without the user’s knowledge. If it does so “flawlessly” that is even more worrying. Thanks but , not thanks.

Alan Robertson
Reply to  Mike
December 9, 2015 5:11 pm

+1

Steve in Seattle
Reply to  Mike
December 9, 2015 8:34 pm

In the beginning, Google was great, then good, then Google tried to be all things to tech illiterates and most recently has decided that ” playing ” big brother is valid and necessary. Will NEVER use Chrome.

Mike
December 9, 2015 2:14 pm

“Try Chrome – works flawlessly, and is faster. -Anthony”
Thanks for the tip, but I don’t trust big G further than I can throw them, which ain’t far. If they are happy to install a audio surveillance device that records sound in the room and sends it to Google for voice rec. I will NEVER install Google Chrome.
Of course, when they have voice rec’ed the audio content of your living room, they are not going to analyse, store an index it like their core business does with everything else they collect. No, they are just checking to see whether you said “back” or “forward” to give you a cool voice assisted browsing experience. The rest of the data, they just bin it right?
This “cool” feature was installed and activated by default without the user’s knowledge. If it does so “flawlessly” that is even more worrying. Thanks but , not thanks.

Mike
Reply to  Mike
December 9, 2015 2:22 pm

MP3 works fine, thanks.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Mike
December 10, 2015 12:37 am

I trust google as far as I can toss a live bull up a silo.

December 9, 2015 2:17 pm

Audio Good with Chrome. Hard to understand John Cook’s elocution sometimes…

Reply to  Anthony Watts
December 9, 2015 4:01 pm

Works for me with this new widget. Thank you Anthony.

BCBill
December 9, 2015 2:25 pm

Audio fine on Chrome. Hilarious! Loved it. Cook’s only defense was that many sources of evidence support AGW even though there is no direct empirical line between CO2 levels and current temperature. Morano points out repeatedly that there are conflicting interpretations on phenomena which could be construed as supporting evidence, which Cook either is not aware of, or denies. Will John Cook seek out the contrary publications? If he does, clear victory for Morano and the battle for hearts and minds. If Cook doesn’t decide to look more closely, well then the whole exercise is a metaphor for the futility of arguing with the faithful. Morano wins on humour and familiarity with the science. Loses on leaving too many points hanging, which a clever editor could exploit.

Dave
Reply to  BCBill
December 9, 2015 5:47 pm

Whether or not Cook believes the hype/science, he makes an income from it. Not in his best interest to know contrary info and have to deny it.

Marcus
December 9, 2015 2:25 pm

Second version above for Firefox..

December 9, 2015 2:26 pm

Firefox works OK for me.

George
December 9, 2015 2:28 pm

Want to download this to listen during my commute

George
Reply to  George
December 9, 2015 2:49 pm

Got the download! Smashed Cook left and right.

1 2 3 4