Guest essay by Eric Worrall
A new study claims that people who live in tropical climates can’t be as productive as people who live in temperate climates – that 13c (55F) is the optimum temperature for human productivity. In the press release, the researchers further claim that warmer temperatures lead to poorer school results and more violence.
The abstract of the study;
Growing evidence demonstrates that climatic conditions can have a profound impact on the functioning of modern human societies, but effects on economic activity appear inconsistent. Fundamental productive elements of modern economies, such as workers and crops, exhibit highly non-linear responses to local temperature even in wealthy countries. In contrast, aggregate macroeconomic productivity of entire wealthy countries is reported not to respond to temperature, while poor countries respond only linearly. Resolving this conflict between micro and macro observations is critical to understanding the role of wealth in coupled human–natural systems and to anticipating the global impact of climate change. Here we unify these seemingly contradictory results by accounting for non-linearity at the macro scale. We show that overall economic productivity is non-linear in temperature for all countries, with productivity peaking at an annual average temperature of 13 °C and declining strongly at higher temperatures. The relationship is globally generalizable, unchanged since 1960, and apparent for agricultural and non-agricultural activity in both rich and poor countries. These results provide the first evidence that economic activity in all regions is coupled to the global climate and establish a new empirical foundation for modelling economic loss in response to climate change, with important implications. If future adaptation mimics past adaptation, unmitigated warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change. In contrast to prior estimates, expected global losses are approximately linear in global mean temperature, with median losses many times larger than leading models indicate.
Read more: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature15725.html
According to the Washington Post;
Culling together economic and temperature data for over 100 wealthy and poorer countries alike over 50 years, the researchers assert that the optimum temperature for human productivity is seems to be around 13 degrees Celsius or roughly 55 degrees Fahrenheit, as an annual average for a particular place. Once things get a lot hotter than that, the researchers add, economic productivity declines “strongly.”
“The relationship is globally generalizable, unchanged since 1960, and apparent for agricultural and non-agricultural activity in both rich and poor countries,” write the authors, led by Marshall Burke of Stanford’s Department of Earth System Science, who call their study “the first evidence that economic activity in all regions is coupled to the global climate.” Burke published the study with Solomon Hsiang and Edward Miguel, economists at the University of California, Berkeley.
…
Assuming this relationship between temperature and productivity is correct, that naturally leads to deep questions about its cause. The researchers locate them in two chief places: agriculture and people. In relation to rising temperature, Burke says, “We see that agricultural productivity declines, labor productivity declines, kids do worse on tests, and we see more violence.”
…
However, the new work has already drawn criticism — University of Sussex economist Richard Tol called it “hugely problematic” in an email to the Post — so it remains to be seen what other researchers make of the work.
Even if we accept the study at face value, according to the abstract, unmitigated warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change.
Given that the global economy is growing at around 1% per annum per capita, a simple projection still yields a 130% increase in per capita income by 2100 under BAU. A 23% reduction to a 130% gain doesn’t seem such a big deal, in the scheme of things.
(1 + 0.01)85 years = 2.3
2.3 (230%) – the original 100% = 130% gain
I’m concerned that this study may be ignoring a lot of political and historical context. If an equivalent study was performed in the age of the Roman Empire, when much of the world’s economic activity centred on warm countries like Italy and Egypt, it seems likely that the calculated “optimum economic temperature” would have been significantly higher than 13c (55F)
However the simplest criticism of the study is the irrefutable fact that humans are physiologically optimised to extreme tropical conditions.
How would you feel, right now, if you took all your clothes off outdoors? You might feel embarrassed – but that is a cultural response. What you would most likely feel is cold, unless it was a hot day.
We all wear clothes, for comfort, style, and most importantly, to protect ourselves from the cold. Even in my home town on the edge of the tropics, certainly in winter, and for at least part of the Summer, people have to wear clothes, otherwise they get uncomfortably cold.
If you become too hot, such as when performing outdoor physical labour on a hot day, you can adjust your clothing to optimise your body temperature, say by swapping a long sleeve shirt for a t-shirt, wearing shorts, or in extreme cases by peeling down to not much clothing at all. I’ve mowed a large hilly multi-acre lawn with a petrol push mower, on days when the temperature exceeded 110F (45c). I’ll spare you the image of what I was wearing on those days.
My point is, humans are physiologically well adjusted to handling very hot weather, without adverse effects, providing we are acclimatised, providing we stay hydrated, and providing we dress appropriately for the weather. In any climate cooler than the extreme tropics where humans evolved, we have to wear clothes pretty much continuously, to protect ourselves from the cold.
Suggesting that productivity inevitably drops off, as we approach our physiological optimum environmental temperature, in my opinion is just plain silly.
As for the productivity of other plants and animals on which we depend, tropical countries are characterised by their superabundance of natural life, including food plants and animals. Some staple crops such as oats might like it cold – but there is plenty of edible farm produce which thrives in the heat.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

More evidence for my conjecture that CAGW is Eugenics reborn.
Cut through all the multi-sylobol BS and you have the old spiel about the inferiority of the poor brown person.
The Cult of Calamitous Climate is sick, possibly evil
I agree this is attempt to not allow the development of the
dark-skinned world because they are: too hot, lazy sick and
stupid.
The biggest fear of Greenies is the spectre of healthy, happy
prosperous,dark skinned people.
So, if 55/13 is optimal, and “significantly higher” is detrimental, what is “significant”? 1deg., 2deg.? And what happens with lower temperatures. If an average annual temperature of 55/13 is optimal, Canada must be the most productive nation in world. http://www.currentresults.com/Weather/Canada/Cities/temperature-annual-average.php
The USA has a productive band above which it is too cold and below which it is too warm http://www.currentresults.com/Weather/US/average-annual-state-temperatures.php
And many cities in Europe simply can’t be productive due to the sweltering
http://www.currentresults.com/Weather/Europe/Cities/temperature-annual-average.php
Yes, the claim is certainly very racist and concerns many preconceived ideas from Nazi ideology. Dreadful and shows how these people think(?)
And they aren’t very well versed in previous cultures that sprang up in the tropics. The Polynesians, a stone age culture developed the technology to populate and cultivate a vast swath of islands in the Pacific Ocean. Being a navigator myself, I am in awe of their navigational abilities.
I believe that the first productive humans on this planet came from the warmest regions of Africa.
They evidently chose not to go to Scandinavia, because there was nobody interesting, living in Scandinavia.
Not too many pre-Neanderthals fossils found in the Antarctic highlands.
And in recent memory, I don’t think there were any dark skinned persons, on that ship of fools that went looking for intelligent life in Antarctica, and got trapped in the shifting sea ice.
I believe the first nomadic Africans, that decided to go walkabout, and create the rest of us, were actually akin to today’s “bushmen” of Africa, that National Geographic have traditionally portrayed as less than the best Africa has to offer. Well nutz to NG.
I’m quite proud of my African Bushman ancestry.
Read an article about some modern human teeth that were found in a cave in China that pre-date the time when modern humans were thought to have left Africa.
Now for some heat. It baffles me how we ever managed to evolve. We have hung around for some time now in one of the hottest regions on the planet. Human beings are tropical animals. Take it or leave it.
The naked human dies of exposure if average temperatures drop below 27C, the tropical jungles from which we came.
There is a reason that most of the poor of the world live in the tropics. If they didn’t, they would be dead, because they can’t afford the cost of heating. At 13C most of the poor of the world would be dead within a day or two.
Absolutely.
The reason we wear clothes is not because of modesty, but because it is too damn cold.
It is only our ability to adapt either ourselves (with clothes) or our environment (with buildings, homes and heating) that has allowed us to inhabit almost all of the globe. That said, it is noteworthy that there is no major city in really cold climates, yet we see great cities in really hot climes (such as Dubai, UAE Qatar etc). It is very difficult for us to adapt to really cold conditions, probably largely uneconomic but also cumbersome.
Humans usually do what we have to do to maintain comfort and livability. Strong, insulated homes are necessary in Wisconsin or upstate New York or Maine, where even in summer a cool snap can bring temps in the 40s. Such homes are desirable even in Florida and Louisiana, where winter temps can dip into the 20s and even colder (one memorable morning when we were living in Baton Rouge, LA, the temp was 7 degrees F with a strong wind, or about -14 C). In the Amazon rain forest, where the natives don’t wear clothes because it never gets cold enough to need them, a strongly insulated home would seem an affectation. You build what you need; you invent what needs to be invented. The lack of a trusty furnace in much of central Africa would not be noticed; in Sweden or Siberia it would be disastrous. The lack of inventions or constructions to protect from the cold, in areas where it’s not cold, is not a sign of anything.
The temperature was just fine here in Brisbane, Australia. Most of the day was just comfortable between 28C to 31C with an evening thunderstorm to wash away the dust. I don’t know what these researchers are smoking but I wouldn’t like to have to spend the year at their “optimum” temperature.
Well no, there are lots of naked and near naked people on European beaches every summer at temperatures well below 27 C. In fact here in England it rarely gets as high as 27C but my heating is off from April to the end of Sept
As a 60+ year old I grew up in the days before central heating and recall waking up to go to school before the coal fires had been lit. The house was so cold there was often frost on the INSIDE of the windows.
The inuit are pretty poor as were the crofters of Northern Scotland and Russian peasants lived in wooden huts with nothing more technological than firewood but somehow they managed to survive
None of this was evenly remotely comfortable and the smog from all those open grate coal burning fires was a killer. Gas fired central heating was a real boon.
You might want to check out the Yaghan people before you generalize too much about temperature ranges for humans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaghan_people#Adaptations_to_climate
Humans are actually one of the most hot-adapted species that there is.
We use sweating to cool off. We sweat more than any other animal, orders of magnitude higher.
We even lost our body hair about 1.8 million years ago to help sweating provide this super cooling off mechanism. Almost all other animals have to pant to cool off. We used this super cooling off ability to run down/jog down prey in the middle of the day-time heat on the African savanna.
After a few kilometers of jogging down a four-legged herbivore, the animal suffered heat exhaustion and was easy prey for the new two-legged, efficient runner, staying cool through sweating and having the new handaxe which could cut up a kill very fast. A bigger brain to out-think these other animals and fire to make the meat easier to digest didn’t hurt either.
We became king of the day-time heat of the savanna. It was such a successful strategy, that we soon spread to the rest of the colder world (after some type of clothing was developed) and slowly became king of all environments. We are a sweaty, two-leg, efficient running, smart, weapon-wielding hunter. The hotter it is, the more advantageous this becomes.
@richard verney: Over time, the necessity becomes the social norm and those who flout it are considered disrespectful. Hence in a cold climate our aversion to seeing naked people. Hence also the desert dweller’s insistence on wearing a face covering in public because if you were in the desert and got hit by a sandstorm it would be a handy thing to have. Just slightly. But in our climate it’s ridiculous. Similarly the necktie, which originated as the cravat which held-up a stiff collar as a protection in swordfights. Not many engage in duelling these days, but the tradition is remarkably persistent.
Bill Illis, I agree, w/the caveat that we have to have, or get fairly quick access to water. From my experience/observations, we don’t physically match up or exceed other animals in most ways, except for, along w/camels, tolerating heat.
If people did not wearing any clothing from the day we were born, we would adapt to the local temps like every other creature on Earth.
Use it or lose it.
We are born nearly infinitely adaptable, but we lose many of our abilities as we grow because we lose that plasticity, and any unused abilities wither like a cut umbilicus.
The great cities of Dubai and Qatar only developed after oil was discovered. Whether they survive the end of oil in those countries remains to be seen.
@ur momisugly Bill Illis – October 22, 2015 at 4:00 am
And you really believe that T&P, ……. huh?
So tell me, …. was it before or after those new two-legged, proficiently sweating, efficient running hominoids migrated out onto those hot African savannahs …. that they learned to carry a big jug of water ……. and a bag of salt with them …. to prevent themselves from suffering a fatal case of heat exhaustion … long, long before that four-legged herbivore did?
What a “bloody” sight that must have been, …… a naked bi-pedal hominoid fastly running barefoot through the “brush n’ thorns n’ briars” trying to catch a four-legged herbivore.
Where did humans evolve? Not in the Arctic. We evolved in pretty warm temperatures, and spread out from those areas, donning clothes along the way.
As an aside, I had to larf at the WaPo writer:
Culling together economic and temperature data…
It’s not ‘culling’, it’s ‘compiling’. Culling = selecting, which doesn’t make sense.
dbstealey: When it comes to climate science, culling the data make perfect sense.
The term ‘culling’ could be appropriate if the author indeed was casting out data that he considered inconvenient to his pre-selected conclusion.
Samuel C. Cogar October 22, 2015,
Yes, they carried water with them. Ostrich eggs, leather bags, something was used.
Look up Homo Egaster or Homo Erectus. How did we go from Ape to a technological species. It was these two steps which lead to us and why you are cold without clothes when it is just 13C.
Wonderful! The Wiki link says:
No thank you sir! Give me clothing instead.
@ur momisugly Bill Illis – October 22, 2015 at 4:25 pm
You have been miseducated into believing the “circular reasoning” scenarios being touted by the proponents of the ….. “Out of the trees and across the hot African savannahs” theory of Homo sapien sapien evolution.
So, shur nuff, you believe our early ancestors carried their Ostrich egg water containers and their leather bags containing salt along with their flint axes that the used for killing and butchering the 4-legged herbivores ….. to obtain the high protein food that they required for enhanced brain development so that they would become intelligent enough to invent water containers, leather bags and flint axes.
Yup, they invented those thingys before they were smart enough to invent them because they needed them to acquire the high protein foods they needed to make them smart enough for inventing thingys.
“Head for the roundhouse Molly …… they can’t corner you there.”
And ps: As far as you or anyone else knows, ….. the evolving of “sweat glands” in the epidermis covering of the human body may have specifically evolved for ridding the body of excess salt …… because the retention of too much salt will kill you “deader than a door nail”, There has been more than one (1) human that has died from drinking “salty” ocean water.
One can lust for power without hating tropical brown people. Power and profit are ends unto themselves. If you want to imply that greenies are racist instead of generally anti-development, you’d better provide more support.
Your average greenie is a nice guy in his skin, but they are the useful idiots for not so nice guys – elites that know what’s best for all and, yes, they invented eugenics and its cropping up more and more. If you or I said what this ‘study’ has said, we would be pilloried as rank racists and rightly so. There is nothing more colonial than the idea that these tropical lazy savages need ‘our’ schooling, guidance and manangement of their affairs. Power and profit isn’t all they want. It’s what they want to do with it and it doesn’t augur well for our tropical folks. Who do you think they have in mind when they talk about the ideal population of half a billion people are what we should aim for?
Rob, you don’t see a pattern in that every “Green” solution to every “ecological problem” for the last 50 years has had at the bottom the idea that non whites should live in poor conditions and stay there?
From DDT, which was only “dangerous” after it had wiped malaria out in the predominantly white nations to current cutesy solar cookers that seem really good until you understand that the kids still have no light to study under, no fresh water and no sanitation. A nice big dam would provide all three, but Greens have never found a dam they like.
But turn the question around, is there a single policy advocated by Greens that would raise the actual living standards of non whites on this planet? Or would they all, in the long run, just leave them in sickness and poverty?
So I’m not the only one who read the superiority of the White Northern European into this pathetic excuse for a study. It’s racial Darwinism at it’s finest.
Without CAGW, the power to sue both industry and the wealthy using disparate impact will be significantly weakened.
The most powerful lobbying group in the USA is the trial attorneys industry. They want CO2 accountability badly. They will get richer and their clients will vote for the Dems.
CAGW would never have gotten this far unless a this significant reward was within reach.
Go beyond the casual NGO search in America and look at local NGOs, including alliegence organizations such as Occupy Wall Street and Hands Up. Then follow the money. There are also very good public sites that do this for you.
CAGW would have died a long time ago if it wasn’t so easily transformable into a social justice tool.
+1
Agree John, seems like egocentric prejudice and Eugenics. The intolerance and prejudice of the lefty greenie elite is staggering. Mean annual temperature in the Berkeley, CA area ~ 58 F.
I guess it’s just coincidence that San Francisco is perfect (Berkeley and Stanford). Everything in California is perfect, and we better listen because the folks there are really bright and productive as well. I assume that if we checked out the setting on their office thermostats they all keep it 13C – ya, sure.
Optimum Populations (of which David Attenborough is a member ~spits in disgust~) also concluded that to achieve optimum population all those ghastly little brown fellows should be culled.
OK, not in those exact words.
The link used to be here, but I see it’s gone http://www.optimumpopulation.org/images/briefingfigs/opt.af.lpr02.tab2e.xls
I was going to say something like this myself. Sounds like more “progressive” racism. Maybe they want to go back to their eugenicist roots?
We need to make sure the poor get air conditioning.
actually, it’s probably more eugenics on steroids but minus the racist color issue. One finds plenty of references by some idiots like malthusians that the human population must be kept around 500 million – meaning that they need to exterminate billions of people to achieve it. Since this is most associated with leftist progressive views, one can figure that this time around diversity will probably be in the mix rather than going for the old fashion exterminate the inferior races BS. That won’t fly this time because the inferiors in society who are running the show feel that being racist is politically incorrect.
By and large those producing these kinds of “papers” are the global warming foot-soldiers and not the key players behind the global warming agenda.
You have nailed it. The US has temperatures between Maine and Florida, temperate California and intemperate Florida. Chicago is cold. Speaking of average 13 for many of these places is absurd. Yet the US productivity beats anywhere else on the world. People in Nevada in the US can be productive in spite of temperatures over 100 much of the year because of an invention available only in the united states called an AC Machine. People in Chicago can be productive in spite of 40 mile/hour -20C winds producing wind chills of -100 by using buildings that are sealed from the weather. These Americans, very crafty. When climate change hits these crafty americans must be made to give up their secrets of closed buildings and AC Machines.
If anyone has any doubt they should visit the Holocaust Memorial Museum. The old Eugenics news clippings read eerily like the climate doom stories of today right down to the “consensus”.
Here is Golkany in March. He reminds us that catastrophic global warming is “supposed to warm winters more than summers — even so-called Skeptical Science acknowledges this! ”
Don’t get side-tracked by ‘heating’ of warm countries, they want us to keep our eyes off the pea.
Eh????
NPR Radio covered this at length on the 7 p.m. “news cast” with no suggestion that this might be an erroneous conclusion. Sigh.
National Pravda Radio
Government Radio.
How does Singapore ever get through a day knowing it will fail and its getting worse.
Totally agree John R.
So, we need to move everyone out of Texas, Florida and especially India, since their economies must be collapsing as we watch. (see map: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/images/a/aa/Annual_Average_Temperature_Map.jpg)
Exactly! You don’t need a statistical model to prove this theory wrong. You just have to look at places with higher average temperatures as in your example. Scientism runs amok.
I’m thinking of a kind of international exchange program…for example, where I live, the yearly average temperature is 39.6. I would move to Hawaii and become “less productive” and some people who live in Hawaii would come and live in my home and become “more productive”. Equality for all! Cold lives matter!
And that explains Detroit and Chicago perfectly! I mean the average yearly temp for Detroit is 56.7F and Chicago is 56.8F. Just those itty bitty increases over 55F has led to incredible violence, lack of productivity and horrible economic destruction! (sarc)
Wow, such a sad excuse for a scientific paper. There are so many variables left unturned, so many correlations without causation.
See the comment below by Karabar. This is all a part of the political buildup for the Paris bash.
News just in! The UK government has announced that as from today children’s classrooms will be set at 13C. All government offices the same. Citizens are advised to turn down their average room temperature of 21C to 13C so they can get smarter and do more house work. 😉
A lot of stuff is coming out prior to the Paris-ites and their talk fest that rightfully belongs on that TFV programme “The Science of Stupid”.
What’s the temperature in Paris?
Aaah, 52F!
Average yearly temperature in Paris is a whopping 57.65F! That’s WAYYYYY too hot to be productive at a global conference! (grin)
Smokin’ hot, if you know where to go.
If they want to work in the optimum temp at the Paris talkfest I think the heating should be turned off in all the venues and hotels, I see it having 2 results
!- They would learn warmer is better and
2- Many of them would get a cold and be unable to speak!
Result everybody wins.
James Bull
I’m sure it’ll be toasty warm at the exclusive private airport where the 40,000 rent seekers will hold their gabfest.
http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/10/21/private-jet-airport-hosts-paris-climate-summit/
Paris will be a blast… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6T0Ni3-mlM
Well, this study finally explains the tremendous technology and industry base of northern New England, ME, VT, and NH, as opposed to that economic backwater Southern California, and specifically Silicon Valley.
I wonder if they calculated a whole bunch of Wee p-values?
*sigh*
Silicon Valley is in the Bay Area, not SoCal, but point taken.
What was the economic activity in Europe like before the Enlightenment and individual rights led to greater individual freedom?
Correct…our thermal neutral point is around 82F, like chimps.
So this study suggests we should all crank the AC during summer? I thought that was bad. I wish they’d make up their minds…
Good Heavens! No wonder I’m so non-productive…During the summer when it’s nice, all I want to do is play. During the WINTER when it is COLD, all I want to do is watch football and drink. There is a NARROW WINDOW of (part)Sept,Oct,Nov(part) when I can be produtive, and sometimes April and May. I’m doomed.
April and May are prime Walleye fishin’ months around here. June, July and August are made for Bass fishin’ water sports road trips and tending the garden. September1st and Dove season starts, with too much football and NASCAR goings on in October to be bothered. Deer and Turkey season are getting going in late October, through the end of the year. Ok, January is still waterfowl season, so you’ve got February, but that’s prime skiing into March- and then the Crappie take off and the Sand Bass start runnin’…
I feel your pain, Alan ;o)
It’s Montesquieu all over again.
So if it gets too hot it is not optimum for students learning.
Better tell that to the kids of Singapore almost on the equator with high humidity heat all year round who are consistently in the top three countries in the world for scholastic results. Rated by Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Singapore students are tops mathematics and third in science and reading.
Imagine if they lived in an optimum climate.
Truly every day in every way the climate BS grows ever more elaborate and far fetched.
just a statistical anomaly…..
“just a statistical anomaly”
Sure, until it’s adjusted out.
I live in Singapore and have 3 childern in grade school and there is no air conditioning in school, just fans. School results as said above is one the highest in the world.
Also productivity in the work place is one of the highest in the world.
Average temperature is 26-33c year round. As an American it did take me a year to get use to but for the past 14 years no problem.
Singapore is a terrific example of why the temperature productivity inference is nonsense. Lovely place, been too long since my last visit.
Your right Eric, everything works here, and a beautiful city. The reason I live here.
My reaction too, nonsense. If you wanted to pick at temperature it should be 22~24C.
CNC
Obviously too productive. I’m checking Singapore’s OCO2 footprint right now. Ah, looks like you exceeded your carbon footprint allocation. Please send check to :
Worldwide Foundation for Social Justice
1492 Picadilly Lane
London, England SW61AA
I am partial to 60F in the morning, 80-85 in the afternoon, low humdidity, and clear skies.
And rain only at night.
Menicholas October 21, 2015 at 9:20 pm
“I am partial to 60F in the morning, 80-85 in the afternoon, low humdidity, and clear skies.
And rain only at night.”
Yes, a nice climate but it would not keep the water above 82 so it would be much too cold to swim.
Hawaii.
Another example-Haiti/Dominican Republic. I don’t live there, and did not know Dom. Republic climate so much cooler than Haiti. This certainly explains how Haiti’s climate so impairs productivity, even all that Clinton Foundation cash (?) didn’t help.
emsnews October 22, 2015 at 6:55 am
“Hawaii.”
As an aside, when I was first stationed in Hawaii I remember looking out the window in winter on a bright sunny day. I went outside and was surprised how warm it was. I couldn’t figure out why I was surprised, after all I knew I was in Hawaii. It dawned on me that my subconscious mind had seen the length of the shadows and associated those lengths to the temperature that I grew up with in New England. The shadows made it look like a crisp, cool October afternoon to my mind which then expected temperatures to be in the 50’s.
Mmmmm Very interesting, from the study all offices and factories should be kept at a constant 13C. I wonder how we are going to achieve that without using electricity, renewables ,Birds muncher and friers, will not be sufficient to supply enough juice!!
Paris or die!!!
Mareeba,
You don’t understand. When all of us undesirables, have the courtesy to exit the planet, and leave it to the enlightened ones. Everyone can live in the ideal temperature zone and there will be no need for any artificial energy sources (assuming the enlightened ones can survive the freezing winter nights).
Time for everyone to set thermostats to 55 deg F and get gov’t subsidies to pay electric bills for operating under optimal temperature.
What are the optimum temperatures for fruits and veggies to grow? We have to eat.
Greenhouse
The EVIL Greenhouse.
Depends on the plant and its exposure. I had bad luck this Spring starting berry plants obtained through the mail. The first 3 weeks in May here (20 miles S of SFO) were consistently 42F min, 48F max, RH=100%, with a steady sea breeze. I think 50F+ and enough Sun to warm the soil is required to get most plants started. Established fruit trees will blossom and bloom with less, but the honeybees may not come out to pollinate.
Tell that to Brazil. I do grant that there are quite a few issues there, nonetheless, it will give several current great powers a run for their money.
If these clowns really believed this, they’d set their indoor thermostats to 55 F in winter if they live in cold areas, or crank down the A/C all year round if they live in hot areas.
Are they doing this? No? Then they can just STFU.
Hope no one believes this or they will all want to move here to Wyoming. 55 is summer here.
No silly, it’s a YEARLY average of 55F. Wyoming’s yearly average is 45.6F….and that’s just way, way, way too productive of an environment for me. You must work yourself to the bone up there! *grin*
“A new study claims that people who live in tropical climates can’t be as productive as people who live in temperate climates – that 13c (55F) is the optimum temperature for human productivity.”
Should all offices have their aircon’s set to 13C to increase their productivity. In a good economic country at least half their workforce sits on their ass in a office and produce nothing at all except pollution of every kind. between 10 and 40% of their workforce works for the government at some level.
Next we are going to have a wet bulb temperature scare. When extratropical people can not be bothered to be afraid of +2C degree warming, they start to claim world poverty is caused by too hot tropics. So we need to cut emissions so that people in India can increase theirs without boiling themselves ‘in sustained wet bulb temperatures higher than +35C.’
Anyway, what I think Africa needs is governments which are capable of building power plants and setting up electric wires so that air conditioning can be used in middle class working places, like factories, shops and offices. Electricity improves productivity in many many different ways, including making night work possible, but it also makes life just more bearable.
Hugs, electricity and television is a good population controller as well. It gives people something to do of a night instead of playing ten toes up ten toes down . I remember here in Australia the population spiked when we had rolling blackouts because of pay disputes.
Well said Hugs. I came here to drop some hit-and-run comment about optimal temperatures for wet or dry bulb humans, but you’ve put me into a serious mood.
People who have grown up surrounded by continent spanning electric grids and treated drinking water need to spend a great deal of effort to imagine what ‘African normal’ is… where modern medicine has taken hold just enough to interrupt the cycle of disease and premature death in those populations… more people migrating to their cities… BUT the modern infrastructure that would also provide a stable existence to all of these areas is absent, not yet built. Why do Westerns (and Europeans) tend to think of Africa as a continent ‘needing medical assistance’ and a couple of solar panels on the roof that might run an apartment fridge and a LED light bulb. People whose own hospitals have 500kw standby generators think this. In Electricity in the time of cholera I speculate it it will (finally) be China that steps up and wires Africa into the 20th century. What a shame for US, if such was a priority we could have done with it by now.
Take a look at Hans Rosling’s 200 Countries, 200 Years, 4 Minutes – The Joy of Stats – BBC Four to see the interplay of “wealth” and life expectancy over time. In case you’re wondering why the life bubble for China took a sudden dive in 1959, that was Chairman Mao. Let’s not do that again.
Which leads into Hans Rosling’s Child Mortailty, Family Planning and the Environment where it is revealed that in a progressively ‘modern’ world with low child mortality and family planning (by whatever means) women choose to have fewer children. The United States has achieved a fertility rate matching the replacement rate. To me this means that despite any political, ideological or religious mandates, folks with access to all the modern inconveniences are (naturally) gravitating towards a more stable population. If we could find a way to share our present level of infrastructure with the whole world in a clean and sustainable way, such as with grids powered by molten salt reactors, the greatest potential ‘threat’ of abundance — an over-abundance of people — would be pushed years into the future.
HL
I used to like the elegance of Han’s showmanship. A gift for graphics. I still like his shtick but he goes all in on the ‘carbon’ ruse despite elegantly getting it wrong with Legos and Othello discs.
http://inhabitat.com/hans-rosling-uses-lego-bricks-to-explain-climate-change-and-population-growth/
Maybe I’ll drop him an email and ask him to use the game of RISK to describe how wealth shifts from one continent to another under the ruse.
There are quite a few (but much older) papers that have found that the productivity difference between tropical and temperate climes has to do with the need to over-produce and not directly with temperature. The need to overproduce and stash food for winter creates different behaviors and work ethics that do not exist in the tropics. Or so they say. Anyway, it is quite pretentious to claim that there exists an optimal temperature for human productivity without consideration for humidity because our body’s temperature control system is fundamentally based on sweating.
As I said, the wet bulb temp scare is behind the corner. It has been mentioned, soon MSM will take it.
Exactly…humdidity is the key here.
Hot and humid can be oppressive, hot and dry, not so much.
I’ve heard this story. It started with (or before) Aristotle’s Temperate, Torrid, and Frigid Zones:
http://geography.about.com/od/culturalgeography/a/envdeterminism.htm
An idea “… that received much prominence in geographic history but has declined in recent decades of academic study is environmental determinism.”
Besides, all experts agree the ultimate number is 42.
Yes, 42 is the answer.
But…what is the question?
Too what question is this the answer?:
“9,W”
(Do you spell your name with a V, Herr Wagner?”)
I get it!
And what are the units? Celsius, Farenheit? Reamur?
From the article,
“If future adaptation mimics past adaptation, unmitigated {absurd policies to slow} warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change {fanatics destroying the world economy}.
It is interesting that within this “study” it was determined that 13 C is optimum, when about a century ago, that was what the global temperature was. We are now at 14 C globally and allegedly accelerating madly towards 16 C, globally due to too much man-made CO2 thrown into the atmosphere. Since homo sapiens originated in Africa, which is the hottest continent on earth, I wonder how this can all be reconciled?
The hominid fossils are mainly found in the east african highlands and South Africa where the average annual temperature is around this value.
ah, but what was the average temp there 1.5-2 million years ago???
Cooler than today.
See my references.
Abstract – 2010
Benjamin H. Passeya et al
High-temperature environments of human evolution in East Africa…..
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/21/claim-optimum-average-annual-temperature-for-humans-is-13c-55f/#comment-2054371