Good news from #AGU14 'Arctic sea ice is holding up to global warming better than expected'

From the “no death spiral” department comes this press release made at AGU from ESA.

Arctic sea ice is holding up to global warming better than expected, according to the latest data from the CryoSat-2 satellite, a team from University College London will tell the AGU Fall Meeting in San Francisco.

Five_years_ice-thickness_change[1]

Arctic sea ice volumes in the autumn of 2014 are above the average set over the last five years and sharply up on the lows seen in 2011 and 2012, according to the latest satellite data.

Data from the European Space Agency (ESA) CryoSat-2 satellite to be presented to the American Geophysical Union’s Fall Meeting in San Francisco later today (Monday 15 December, 2014) will show Arctic sea ice volumes in October and November 2014 averaging 10,200km3 – slightly down on the 10,900km3 reported in 2013 but sharply up on the lows seen in 2011 and 2012.

This is the second year in a row where a relatively cool Arctic summer has led to less sea ice melting than has been typical during the summers of recent years and this has resulted in thicker and older ice surviving into the autumn and winter during both 2013 and 2014.

Arctic_sea-ice_thickness_node_full_image_2

The team of researchers from University College London (UCL) who are presenting the CryoSat-2 data to the AGU Fall Meeting state in the abstract of their presentation that their data indicates “the Arctic sea ice pack may be more resilient than has been previously considered”.

The autumn 2014 volume is the second-highest since satellite measurements of Arctic sea ice thickness began in 2010, and the data shows that “the five-year average is relatively stable”, according to ESA.

This news comes as the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reported that Arctic sea ice extent – the area of ocean covered by sea ice – in November was “fairly average”.

It is a combination of sea ice extent and sea ice thickness which gives rise to sea ice volume. CryoSat was designed to measure sea-ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean using radars, and this has allowed scientists to monitor the overall change in Arctic sea ice volume accurately over the last five years.

However, researchers are careful to caution that this apparent stability shown in the satellite data does not mean there has been a recovery in Arctic sea ice. A news release from ESA quotes Professor Andrew Shepherd from UCL and the University of Leeds as saying: “We must to take care when computing long-term trends as this CryoSat assessment is short when compared to other climate records”. Shepherd is one of the authors of the AGU presentation.

Here is a news release from the European Space Agency regarding this research issued on 15 December 2014:

CryoSat Extends Its reach Into The Arctic

CryoSat has delivered this year’s map of autumn sea-ice thickness in the Arctic, revealing a small decrease in ice volume. In a new phase for ESA’s ice mission, the measurements can now also be used to help vessels navigate through the north coastal waters of Alaska, for example.

Measurements made during October and November show that the volume of Arctic sea ice now stands at about 10 200 cubic km – a small drop compared to last year’s 10 900 cubic km.

The volume is the second-highest since measurements began in 2010, and the five-year average is relatively stable. This, however, does not necessarily indicate a turn in the long-term downward trend.

“We must to take care when computing long-term trends as this CryoSat assessment is short when compared to other climate records,” said Prof. Andrew Shepherd from University College London and the University of Leeds.

“For reliable predictions, we should try other approaches, like considering what is forcing the changes, incorporating the CryoSat data into predictive models based on solid physics, or simply waiting until more measurements have been collected.”

CryoSat was designed to measure sea-ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean, enabling scientists to monitor accurately the overall change in volume.

While the amount of ice normally fluctuates depending on the season, longer-term satellite records show a constant downward trend in ice extent during all seasons, in particular in summer, with a minimum occurring in the autumn of 2012.

Establishing whether the ice volume is following a similar trend is one of CryoSat’s key mission objectives.

A team of UK researchers at the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling are presenting their findings this week at the American Geophysical Union’s autumn meeting in San Francisco, California.

“October is interesting because it is the first month we get data directly following the sea-ice minimum in September, so that’s where we see the largest interannual variability in our volume estimates,” said the Centre’s Rachel Tilling, who is working on the CryoSat measurements as part of her PhD studies.

Launched in 2010, CryoSat has long surpassed its planned three-year life. At the mission’s recent mid-term review, it was further extended until February 2017.

Tommaso Parrinello, ESA’s CryoSat Mission Manager, said, “CryoSat has already achieved outstanding results, both within its original mission objectives and for unexpected applications.

“Looking ahead, we are working hard to prototype new operational capabilities so that the measurements can be used for routine assessments in climate science and for services affected by Arctic sea ice.”

To test this, scientists have produced an assessment of sea-ice thickness north of Alaska and eastern Russia with data acquired over the last month. Products like this could prove useful for maritime services, such as shipping and exploration.

End of ESA news release.

Abstract

Despite a well-documented ~40% decline in summer Arctic sea ice extent since the late 1970’s, it has been difficult to estimate trends in sea ice volume because thickness observations have been spatially incomplete and temporally sporadic. While numerical models suggest that the decline in extent has been accompanied by a reduction in volume, there is considerable disagreement over the rate at which this has occurred. We present the first complete assessment of trends in northern hemisphere sea ice thickness and volume using 4 years of measurements from CryoSat-2. Between autumn 2010 and spring 2013, there was a 14% and 5% reduction in autumn and spring Arctic sea ice volume, respectively, in keeping with the long-term decline in extent. However, since then there has been a marked 41% and 9% recovery in autumn and spring sea ice volume, respectively, more than offsetting losses of the previous three years. The recovery was driven by the retention of thick ice around north Greenland and Canada during summer 2013 which, in turn, was associated with a 6% drop in the number of days on which melting occurred – climatic conditions more typical of the early 1990’s. Such a sharp increase in volume after just one cool summer indicates that the Arctic sea ice pack may be more resilient than has been previously considered.

Citation

CryoSat-2 observes Arctic sea ice volume recovery, after anomalously low melting in summer 2013 by Rachel Tilling, Andy Ridout, Andrew Shepherd and Duncan Wingham presented to the American Geophysical Union’s Fall Meeting in San francisco on 15 December 2014.

Read the abstract here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cnxtim
December 17, 2014 9:23 am

Interesting way of saying all our predictions were wrong.

brians356
Reply to  cnxtim
December 17, 2014 10:39 am

Shouldn’t this read “Arctic Ice is Holding Up to NO Global Warming for 18+ years AS EXPECTED”?

Curious George
Reply to  cnxtim
December 17, 2014 10:44 am

A quote from Dilbert’s comic strip today: If I understand the job description, you basically hallucinate about the future and then something different happens.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Curious George
December 17, 2014 1:17 pm

lol

Reply to  cnxtim
December 17, 2014 6:45 pm

They can’t make a U-turn. They skirmish around a bit during rowing back gently. Later they will tell us: Yes, we saw the possibility…

markl
Reply to  Johannes Herbst
December 17, 2014 7:41 pm

They’re just buying time and hoping that warming will redeem them.

Eustace Cranch
December 17, 2014 9:31 am

Maybe because there’s no warming in the first place?
Nahhh, can’t be that.

Eyal Porat
Reply to  Eustace Cranch
December 17, 2014 9:52 am

Precisely my thought.
Maybe, just maybe, there is no “global warming”, but rather temp fluctuations throght the years?
After all, the models say the poles willl warm faster than the rest of the earth, but these pesky places refuse to cooperate.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Eyal Porat
December 17, 2014 1:10 pm

Eyal Porat! Do you know how glad I am to see you post? Glad you are still in the land of the living — very dangerous where you are (even if you feel quite safe!).
And, yes, good point (re: computer simulations missing it on the poles, see Bob Tisdale’s book: Climate Models Fail).
HAPPY CHANUKAH!
(I put up my first Menorah with little pretend-flickering flame lightbulbs last night — in the window in front of my Christmas tree — it made me so happy to see it there …. I don’t have the honor of being Jewish, but I love the Jews so much!)
#(:))
Your American Ally for Truth,
Janice

Eyal Porat
Reply to  Janice Moore
December 20, 2014 8:37 am

Hello Janice, Thank you very much for the warm words.
Happy Christmas to you and your family,
Eyal

December 17, 2014 9:33 am

However, researchers are careful to caution that this apparent stability shown in the satellite data does not mean there has been a recovery in Arctic sea ice.

Translation: “Please don’t pull our funding! We still believe.”

george e. smith
Reply to  alexwade
December 17, 2014 11:38 am

Well why would it need to recover, if it was AOK in the first place.
After it is all gone for good in2015, then we can talk about recovery.
Until then, I’m working on recover from Ocean Acidosis; so don’t bother me with sea ice recovery. The Ocean plastic recovery program has first priority anyway.

george e. smith
Reply to  george e. smith
December 17, 2014 2:28 pm

It would be nice if we could all get out of this holiday spirit of frivolity, and get back to some serious science and or math.
Even I get tired of sarcastic semi-witticisms. (including my own)
But it is also good to know that Armageddon has been postponed due to lack of interest.

george e. smith
Reply to  george e. smith
December 17, 2014 2:42 pm

Also worth reporting, on this morning’s radio news, I was forced to listen to UK’s socialist Prime Minister, David Cameron, railing on endlessly, trying to dress down the Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbot, for having the good sense to opt out on behalf of Australia, to the mass suicide of Western Culture.
Come on David. You guys chose to export these Aussie misfits out of the northern hemisphere, for simply stealing a lump of coal to warm their English muffins; or was it their buns or bums they were warming.
So if’n you think these chaps are a little weird now; don’t worry about it. The Kiwi’s will see that our SH cousins don’t send you any more coal back to warm your bums; scuse me that was meant to be buns.
If the UK wants to take a 15 foot leap across a 20 foot gap in the Chunnel, well don’t try taking us colonials with you. We like it down here in the far flung reaches, of the Temperature regulated southern oceans.
So nyet on castigating the Aussies; they just don’t know any better. Whew ! I nearly got a Malapropism in there in place of “castigating.”
G

markl
December 17, 2014 9:34 am

“Relatively stable” and “fairly average” are good technical terms for the masses. We wouldn’t want anyone to believe it is normal.

Jimbo
Reply to  markl
December 17, 2014 12:06 pm

Here is one Arctic sea ice expert on the matter of extent. Extent went up after in 2013 and stayed there in 2014. That has all the hallmarks of a death spiral. Volume also went up.

[Professor PETER WADHAMS]
WWF – Before 2013
Catlin Arctic Survey – results
“It shows we’re getting a big contraction of the ice cover in summer now, which never used to happen. And once it starts happening, it’ll never stop.
“The amount of open water generated is so great that it’s absorbing a lot of radiation in the summer, and it warms up by several degrees. It takes much longer to cool down in the autumn, so the next year’s cycle of ice growth is disrupted, and so it goes on.
http://www.wwf.org.uk/what_we_do/tackling_climate_change/results.cfm

Never make predictions, especially about the future.
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current_new.png

Taphonomic
Reply to  Jimbo
December 17, 2014 1:24 pm

Wadhams just never gets tired of being wrong.
It also appears that he is not familiar with the Mpemba effect, which has been known for millennia that warm water can freeze faster than cold water. Even Wikipedia agrees (don’t tell Connolley):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect

xyzzy11
Reply to  Jimbo
December 17, 2014 5:09 pm

Yep, Wadhams is the gift that keeps on giving. 😉

Brandon Gates
Reply to  markl
December 17, 2014 9:59 pm

xyzzy11,
When all one has is scraps, every one is precious.

December 17, 2014 9:35 am

The Arctic Sea Ice is holding up well to the warming that isn’t happening!?
Well, that sounds reasonable.

ConfusedPhoton
December 17, 2014 9:43 am

“We must to take care when computing long-term trends as this CryoSat assessment is short when compared to other climate records,” said Prof. Andrew Shepherd from University College London and the University of Leeds.
Strange how the alarmists jump on any old short term event to tell us how this shows global warming, but when it comes to anything which contradicts their predictions – the trend is just too short!

Reply to  ConfusedPhoton
December 17, 2014 11:57 am

I thought that was a reasonable statement. And…

“For reliable predictions, we should try other approaches, like considering what is forcing the changes, incorporating the CryoSat data into predictive models based on solid physics, or simply waiting until more measurements have been collected.”


Sounds right too.

Editor
Reply to  ConfusedPhoton
December 17, 2014 12:24 pm

How odd: Not a single mention of winds and currents, which are known to be the major short term factor (intra-annual, inter-annual).

Brandon Gates
Reply to  Mike Jonas
December 17, 2014 10:05 pm

Wind and currents need not apply in the Southern Ocean of course.

Betapug
December 17, 2014 9:56 am

Bad news!! It’s better than we thought.

Grant
December 17, 2014 10:02 am

Three year life span?!!

ShrNfr
December 17, 2014 10:08 am

This will certainly spawn a number of studies to find out why the latent heat of melting of water has suddenly increased over the past half dozen years or so in only that location. I mean, that has to be the reason why the Arctic is not ice free.
We can expect more veritable joules of research in the near future.

hunter
December 17, 2014 10:08 am

So once again skeptics were right to question the climate alarmist consensus. Once again the climate obsessed predictions fail.

D-Girl
December 17, 2014 10:21 am

I’m so confused 🙂 I thought the science was settled!

Greg Woods
Reply to  D-Girl
December 17, 2014 10:53 am

I’m confused also: What is wrong with an ice-free arctic?

LeeHarvey
Reply to  Greg Woods
December 17, 2014 11:27 am

It causes harsher winters in the US.
…at least that’s what John Holdren told me.

Chip Javert
Reply to  D-Girl
December 17, 2014 4:25 pm

Don’t worry, the science is settled.
The science is incorrect, but it is settled (i.e.: 97% of some goof-ball group or other still believes it).
This absurdity will exist until complicit politicians (even dumber than “client scientists”) are rejected by tax-paying voters.

December 17, 2014 10:22 am

What cool summer? The temp chart on WUWT sea ice page suggests nothing of the sort.

tty
Reply to  Andrew
December 17, 2014 10:41 am

I think you may have done a Tiljander. The chart shows that temperatures were consistently below normal from May through August, which includes essentialy the whole melting season.

mwhite
Reply to  Andrew
December 17, 2014 10:57 am

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php
Check out the ARKIV – above 0 degrees celcius

CRS, DrPH
December 17, 2014 10:27 am

…good news for the polar bears and walruses! Bad news for the seals & clams!

Reply to  CRS, DrPH
December 17, 2014 11:44 am

Actually too thick ice is bad for both seals and bears. The ringed seal pups, which are the bears’ most tasty dish, are kept by the parents on an ice flo covered like an igloo. If the ice flo is too thick the mother seal cannot burrow up from below to feed the pup. Consequence? seal populations decline and so too do those of the bears!
http://www.polarbearscience.com run by Susan Crockford

December 17, 2014 10:29 am

“Arctic sea ice is holding up to global warming better than expected, according to the latest data from the CryoSat-2 satellite.”
Is this because global warming is holding up to global warming better than expected, as measured by thermometers, rather than climate models?

Shano
December 17, 2014 10:30 am

The models tell us that the arctic is going to melt.
So scientists get together and come up with a way to measure it. (any good scientist needs data and understands that models are not data)
They send up a satellite to measure.
The measurements begin to support the models during the first three years of data collection.
Then the fourth year shows the models are wrong. Instead of concluding that the Arctic is recovering and the models and theory are not working, they conclude the ice is just more resilient. Did I miss something or is ice still what happens to water that freezes? Any way I look at it, it appears the tail(AGW) is wagging the dog.

LeeHarvey
December 17, 2014 10:34 am

Wow… that had to be hard for them to say.
I suppose it would be asking way too much to get them to mention Antarctic ice volume and coverage, too.

Brandon Gates
Reply to  LeeHarvey
December 17, 2014 10:07 pm

More like unnecessary.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Brandon Gates
December 18, 2014 12:55 am

unnecessary for what?

Latitude
December 17, 2014 10:36 am

a recovery is not a recovery……..
When a smaller mectric was used to prove it in the first place

December 17, 2014 10:36 am

I would describe this as the expectations not holding up as well as the ice.

Reply to  Alan Watt, Climate Denialist Level 7
December 17, 2014 10:38 am

Or more completely: “The global warming expectations are holding up worse to the arctic sea ice”.

schitzree
December 17, 2014 10:37 am

This is the second year in a row where a relatively cool Arctic summer has led to less sea ice melting than has been typical during the summers of recent years and this has resulted in thicker and older ice surviving into the autumn and winter during both 2013 and 2014.
But. But. Warmest year evar! How can it be? I thought the Arctic was where all the warming was hiding from the thermometers.

Jimbo
Reply to  schitzree
December 17, 2014 12:32 pm

They told us that the Arctic is the fastest warming place on Earth.

NASA News – July 25, 2013
An unrecognizable Arctic

The Arctic acts as an early warning system for the entire planet.
– Dr. Chip Miller, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Human burning of fossil fuels continues to increase the amount of carbon, a potent heat-trapping greenhouse gas, in our atmosphere. As a result, our planet is warming, and that warming is pushing Earth systems past critical points. This is especially true within the icy realm of the Arctic, the northernmost polar region of the planet, where the effects of climate change are expected to be most exaggerated [1] and have the biggest impact (see sidebar).

If Arctic extent and volume starts to climb won’t that mean their theory is crap? We may be getting closer than we thought!

xyzzy11
Reply to  Jimbo
December 17, 2014 5:21 pm

Agreed, Jimbo. I still don’t get how arctic ice melting completely can lead us to a tipping point. Clearly, the arctic has been ice-free before, and will probably be ice-free again sometime. I presume that this wasn’t a bad thing then (we’re still here), so why is it potentially bad in the future?
The thing that worries me more is that the ice extent might keep growing, pushing us back into glacial ice-age conditions.

Brandon Gates
Reply to  Jimbo
December 17, 2014 10:15 pm

xyzzy11,

The thing that worries me more is that the ice extent might keep growing, pushing us back into glacial ice-age conditions.

A tipping point, so to speak.

phlogiston
Reply to  Jimbo
December 17, 2014 11:45 pm

Yes Brandon during the current glacial period we know that two more or less stable attractors exist – glacial and interglacial, with a valley in the probabilistic landscape between them that you like to call a tipping point.
However the existence of a third hotter attractor above interglacial is pure fantasy with zero basis in fact.

highflight56433
December 17, 2014 10:47 am

Maybe WE should be worried the ice extent is expanding…like my waist line this time of year. 🙂

MarkW
December 17, 2014 10:48 am

Wouldn’t “resilient” imply that the ice isn’t melting as fast as they thought.
The fact that the levels have been growing for the last several years implies other words.

Alan Williams
December 17, 2014 10:53 am

The Hudson Bay and Chukchi Sea have just finished freezing over so that was good to see too.

Dodgy Geezer
December 17, 2014 10:55 am

We must to take care when computing long-term trends as this CryoSat assessment is short when compared to other climate records…
So, how long has the ice got to expand for before the Arctic is no longer considered to be melting? 15 years? Or was that 18?

MattN
December 17, 2014 10:57 am

So, this is worse than they thought, right?

Hugh
December 17, 2014 11:14 am

Wasn’t the ice going to disappear already summer 2015 or 2016?
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/sep/17/arctic-collapse-sea-ice
Only what bugs me is the excellent straight line, the linear trend these experts have been drawing. Either they knew, or I will have fun starting from autumn 2016.

1 2 3