Sea ice news Volume 5, # 5 NSIDC: 'the expansion in Antarctic sea ice is confirmed'

From NSIDC: Sled dog days of summer

NSIDC reports near record Antarctic sea ice extent in July

Arctic sea ice extent declined at a fairly rapid rate through the first three weeks of July, but the loss rate then slowed due to a shift in weather patterns. In Antarctica, the advance of sea ice nearly halted for about a week in early July, and then resumed. At the end of the month, Antarctic extent was at or near a record high for this time of year.

Overview of conditions

Antarctic sea ice extent map

July 2014 average ice extent was 8.25 million square kilometers (3.19 million square miles). This is 1.85 million square kilometers (714,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average for the month.

Ice extent is below average in nearly all sectors of the Arctic. Open water continued to grow in the Laptev and Beaufort Seas, reaching well north of 80oN in the Laptev Sea. By the end of the month, the Alaskan Coast was essentially free of ice except for small patches of very diffuse ice off Barrow. The Barents Sea, Hudson Bay, and Baffin Bay/Davis Strait are now essentially ice free. Large areas of low concentration ice in the central Beaufort Sea are likely to melt out in coming weeks. The Northwest Passage through the channels of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago remains choked with ice. Parts of the Northern Sea Route are still difficult to traverse because of high-concentration, near-shore ice between the Laptev and East Siberian seas and also north of the Taymyr Peninsula.

Conditions in context

sea ice extent graph

For July 2014 as a whole, ice extent declined at an average rate of 86,900 square kilometers (33,600 square miles) per day, close to the 1981 to 2010 average July rate of 86,500 square kilometers (33,400 square miles) per day. However, this averages together a fairly fast rate of decline over the first three weeks of the month with a slower rate of decline over the remainder of the month.

The slower ice loss later in the month reflects a shift in weather patterns. For much of the month, high pressure at sea level dominated the central Arctic Ocean and the Barents Sea. However, this pattern broke down and was replaced by lower-than-average pressure over the central Arctic Ocean. A low pressure pattern tends to bring cool conditions and the counterclockwise winds associated with this pattern also tend to spread the ice out.

July 2014 compared to previous years

sea ice trend graph

July 2014 is the 4th lowest Arctic sea ice extent in the satellite record, 340,000 square kilometers (131,000 square miles) above the previous record lows in July 2011, 2012, and 2007. The monthly linear rate of decline for July is 7.4% per decade.

More news on the Antarctic

Antarctic sea ice map

Antarctic sea ice graph

In our previous post, we noted that on July 1, Antarctic sea ice extent was growing rapidly, and could surpass the September 2013 record high extent (over the period of satellite observations). During early July, the advance of Antarctic sea ice extent nearly halted, but toward the end of the month, there was another period of rapid ice growth. Maximum extent is usually reached in September or October, at the end of the austral summer.

Many readers may be familiar with NSIDC’s Charctic interactive sea ice graph that allows one to plot daily Arctic ice extent for any year in the satellite record (1979 to present) and make quick comparisons with average conditions and between different years. NSIDC has recently added an Antarctic option to Charctic. We have done so in response to growing interest in Antarctic sea ice conditions and the very different behavior of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. Just go to the Charctic site and click the button marked “Antarctic.”

Questions about data processing

algorithm comparison graph

A recent paper investigated the processing of Antarctic sea ice data and how this affects the interpretation of Antarctic ice extent trends. While their findings do not affect NSIDC’s analysis of Antarctic sea ice extent, as we use a different data set, it is an interesting example of scientific rigor regarding data, and it does affect other reports of Antarctic sea ice trends.

The paper studied the Bootstrap algorithm, which has been used in several published reports of Antarctic trends, including the last two IPCC Assessment Reports. These reports suggested that the Antarctic sea ice extent shifted from a small, statistically insignificant upward trend in the early 2000s to a more substantial, and statistically significant upward trend in recent years. (NSIDC uses a different algorithm, called NASA Team, to estimate sea ice extent.)

The paper found that following an update to the algorithm in 2007, using the newer Version 2 of the Bootstrap algorithm produced Antarctic sea ice extent trends that were approximately two times larger than those derived using Version 1. Closer examination of the data showed a noticeable step change in extent at the point of transition to a new satellite sensor in 1991. This step change appeared to be related to an error in calibration between the sensors, rather than actually being an abrupt shift in Antarctic sea ice.

Trends derived from both versions for time periods either before or after the sensor transition are similar. However, the two algorithms produce different results when trends that span the 1991 sensor transition are calculated. Using Version 2 of the algorithm produces a markedly higher trend.

Using the newer version of the algorithm, Antarctic extent trends agree much more closely with the trends from the NASA Team algorithm used by NSIDC. Regardless, the expansion in Antarctic sea ice is confirmed by other groups using different techniques.

References

Eisenman, I., W. N. Meier, and R. J. Norris. 2014. A spurious jump in the satellite record: has Antarctic sea ice expansion been overestimated?, The Cryosphere 8, 1289-1296, doi:10.5194/tc-8-1289-2014.

==============================================================

For comlete up to date data, graphs, and images, see the WUWT Sea Ice Reference Page

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Latitude
August 7, 2014 10:05 am

Arctic sea ice extent declined at a fairly rapid rate…
the old normal is now “fairly rapid”…..what agenda driven BS

August 7, 2014 10:19 am

And at the other pole, an unexpected sharp uptick in ice extent suggests perhaps that this year the minimum ice extent may be more than even 2005. For more in depth daily coverage of the unfolding Arctic ice sage this is the place to go: http://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/arctic-sea-ice-melt-the-death-spirals-debunking
For the latest info, as Caleb updates it daily, go to the start of the comments section, then scroll up.

Anything is possible
August 7, 2014 10:31 am

“Maximum extent is usually reached in September or October, at the end of the austral summer”
====================================
Facepalm.
.

Eliza
August 7, 2014 10:34 am

The real worry is if these people (AGW) simply do not accept what is happening and shut down the sites for public viewing. In my estimation this is almost a certainty in the coming months.
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php Watch this one VERY CAREFULLY as attempts will be made to force them to shut down or change the baseline

Eliza
August 7, 2014 10:37 am

Oh My Gaaad! how can this BS be published
“July 2014 is the 4th lowest Arctic sea ice extent in the satellite record, 340,000 square kilometers (131,000 square miles) above the previous record lows in July 2011, 2012, and 2007. The monthly linear rate of decline for July is 7.4% per decade.”
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php Absolute trype!

Latitude
August 7, 2014 10:40 am

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php Watch this one VERY CAREFULLY
====
Eliza, here’s the trick…..go to the old DMI and see how it would have been plotted if they hadn’t changed it…..compare like for like…
It’s set to break a high record……
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/old_icecover.uk.php

philincalifornia
August 7, 2014 10:42 am

Eliza says:
August 7, 2014 at 10:34 am
======================
I screencapped it for posterity here.
Almost touching the 1979 – 2000 average:
http://i60.tinypic.com/anbzoo.png

mwhite
August 7, 2014 10:43 am

Don’t expect any corrections in the MSM.

BallBounces
August 7, 2014 10:45 am

So, has global catastrophe been put on ice?

Bruce Cobb
August 7, 2014 10:51 am

Meanwhile, BAS team trapped without power, and record cold (-55°C).

Patrick B
August 7, 2014 11:02 am

Eliza and PhilinCalifornia – this is not an area I have followed much; help me understand what you are saying and why the differences in the various plots. Thanks.

Bill Illis
August 7, 2014 11:16 am

Very low daily melt rates in the Arctic since the mid-July. For a period of time in the third week of July, the 5 day melt rate was the lowest on record in my database going back to 1972.
Jaxa and NSIDC daily melt rates.
http://s29.postimg.org/6ofg76k6f/NH_SIE_Daily_Change_Aug6_2014.png
NSIDC’s September average minimum is coming in at 5.38M km2 versus 5.25M in last year’s recovery and 3.58M in 2012.
http://s30.postimg.org/yuqcrns1t/NSIDC_Min_Proj_Aug6_14.png

Crispin in Waterloo
August 7, 2014 11:18 am

Are they on diesel power? Perhaps the lines froze. -55 is cold enough for that.

phlogiston
August 7, 2014 11:20 am

Arctic sea ice extent declined at a fairly rapid rate through the first three weeks of July, but the loss rate then slowed due to a shift in weather patterns. 
The main reason for the high, recovering summer Arctic ice minimum in September will be thick multi-year ice, not weather. However expect weather to be deployed increasingly as a fig leaf to hide embarrassment at the robust health of the ice, as we near the minimum.

August 7, 2014 11:24 am

RE: Eric Simpson says:
August 7, 2014 at 10:19 am
Thanks for the compliment, Eric. Usually when I check my obscure site at lunch, and notice a flurry of visitors, I can trace it back to you.
NSIDC has to put a brave face on the embarrassing situation they are in. It must be hard to work under Mark Serreze, and have to cover for his “death spiral” statements, and the fact he suggested the Pole would be ice free this summer.
They fail to mention a few ways of noting the increase in the quality of the ice. Few are calling it “rotton ice” this year. If you compare “area” to “extent,” you note it is more densely packed, and if you check out the PIOMAS data for July you see the average thickness is 1.91 meters, thickest in five years, and the decrease since June was only 0.07 meters, which is the smallest July decrease in the past five years. In many ways we are heading back to pre-2010 levels.
What the ice is teaching us is how swiftly it responds to the “cold” phase of the AMO. The AMO is not scheduled to turn officially cold for another five to ten years (as if the weather ever obeys human schedules) but it has had what most think is a temporary cold-spike the past ten months or so. If the AMO switches back to “warm” and the ice immediately starts shrinking on the Atlantic side, I think it will demonstrate the ice responds to oceanic cycles, not CO2.

DD More
August 7, 2014 11:25 am

And in other Arctic news, DMI is still showing temps N80 still have not reached the average from 1958-2002.

Bloke down the pub
August 7, 2014 11:25 am

‘A low pressure pattern tends to bring cool conditions and the counterclockwise winds associated with this pattern also tend to spread the ice out.’
Isn’t this counter-intuitive as winds will tend to blow inwards towards an area of low pressure?

John
August 7, 2014 11:43 am

I ran across Biomagnetism today in search of a geo-magneitic gestalt.
Dipole is a muse micro and macro and logically the concern ‘Climate’?

rogerknights
August 7, 2014 11:48 am

“The Northwest Passage through the channels of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago remains choked with ice.”
This is setting up for Ship of Fools II.

Resourceguy
August 7, 2014 11:53 am

Surely they can show us the huge line of commercial ships about to ply the Northwest Passage sea lane in the ice free Arctic. /sarc

John
August 7, 2014 12:00 pm

“This step change appeared to be related to an error in calibration between the sensors, rather than actually being an abrupt shift in Antarctic sea ice.”
Stupid is as Stupid does!
Nothing to see here, move along.

August 7, 2014 12:01 pm

Caleb says at 11:24 am: …when I check my obscure site…
Obscure site? That’s modesty for you. Lol. Everyone seems to have the highest of praise for the quality of your very detailed play by play reporting on the Arctic situation. And now it’s coming down to the wire as far as what the ice extent minimum is going to end up being. Time for people to tune in to your site.

Greg
August 7, 2014 12:14 pm

NSIDC: ” Using the newer version of the algorithm, Antarctic extent trends agree much more closely with the trends from the NASA Team algorithm used by NSIDC. Regardless, the expansion in Antarctic sea ice is confirmed by other groups using different techniques.”
Which is of course the first thing that Eisenman et al should have done before publishing a speculative yet inconclusive paper casting doubt on the reliability of the Antarctic sea ice data.
They were well aware that “Bootstrap” was not the only algorithm yet chose not look at ( or at least not to publish ) what would have taken very little effort to check.

August 7, 2014 12:30 pm

And what they also don’t say is that ice coverage is above-average on Hudson Bay and in Foxe Basin, leaving polar bears with hunting habitat later in the season than usual.
I’ve compiled the charts and graphs for the week of Aug. 6, 2014 (from the Canadian Ice Service) in this new post: http://polarbearscience.com/2014/08/07/foxe-basin-and-hudson-bay-have-more-than-average-polar-bear-hunting-habitat/
Cheers,
Susan

August 7, 2014 12:35 pm

Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
Its not really ice its a new breed of dense white algae from how hot it is down there from climate change!