From the University of California – Los Angeles
Research also helps unravel the mystery of retreating glaciers in the Pacific Ocean’s western tropics
Using a cutting-edge research technique, UCLA researchers have reconstructed the temperature history of a region that plays a major role in determining climate around the world.
The findings, published online Feb. 27 in the journal Nature Geoscience, will help inform scientists about the processes influencing global warming in the western tropical Pacific Ocean.
The study analyzes how much temperatures have increased in the region near Indonesia, and how ocean temperatures affect nearby tropical glaciers in Papua New Guinea and Borneo. Researchers also evaluated the accuracy of existing climate model predictions for that region. The findings illustrate that the region is very sensitive to climate change and that it has warmed considerably over the last 20,000 years, since the last ice age.
The team chose the specific area examined in the study because it is Earth’s warmest open ocean region and a primary source of heat and water vapor to the atmosphere. As a result, temperature changes there can influence climate not just regionally, but globally.
“The tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system has been called a sleeping dragon because of how it can influence climate elsewhere,” said lead author Aradhna Tripati, a UCLA assistant professor in the departments of Earth, planetary and space sciences, and atmospheric and oceanic sciences.
Tripati and her team used a technique known as clumped isotope thermometry, which examines the calcium carbonate shells of marine plankton for subtle differences in the amounts of carbon-13 and oxygen-18 they contain. The researchers analyzed extensive modern and geological datasets, conducted theoretical calculations and examined climate model output. The group discovered that temperatures have changed by about 8 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit (4 to 5 degrees Celsius) over that span — more than scientists had previously thought, and more than most models have estimated.
“Most global climate models underestimate the average temperature variations that the region has experienced,” Tripati said, adding that the other models’ simulations may be incomplete or the models are not sensitive enough.
The UCLA team’s conclusions about temperature changes in the region also imply that there have been major fluctuations in the volume of water vapor in the atmosphere there.
As part of the study, Tripati and her colleagues also investigated what sets the past and present height of glaciers in the tropics, and why they have been retreating. To accurately estimate the height of tropical glaciers and average temperatures at altitude in this region, they found that atmospheric mixing, through a process known as entrainment, needs to be factored in.
“We found that the large amount of ocean warming goes a long way to explaining why glaciers have retreated so much,” said Tripati, a faculty member in the College of Letters and Science and a member of UCLA’s Institute of the Environment and Sustainability. “Throughout the region, they have retreated by close to a kilometer since the last ice age, and are predicted to disappear in the next one to three decades. Previously understanding this large-scale glacial retreat has been a puzzle. Our results help resolve this problem.”
Among the implications of the study are that ocean temperatures in this area may be more sensitive to changes in greenhouse gas levels than previously thought and that scientists should be factoring entrainment into their models for predicting future climate change.
The group has already begun a follow-up study, looking at sediment from Indonesia’s Lake Towuti to develop data that can be used to further improve models of climate and water cycling for the region. Researchers will also look at other places in the tropics, the Western U.S. and China.
Co-authors of the study are Sandeep Sahany, postdoctoral researcher in the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, Dustin Pittman, graduate student in the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, Robert Eagle, assistant researcher in the department of Earth, planetary and space sciences, Jonathan Mitchell, assistant professor in the departments of Earth, planetary and space sciences and of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, J. David Neelin, professor in the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences and Luc Beaufort, a research scientist at the Center for Research and Teaching of Environmental Geosciences in Aix-en-Provence, France.
The research was supported primarily by the National Science Foundation.
=================================================================
Paper: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n3/full/ngeo2082.html
Modern and glacial tropical snowlines controlled by sea surface temperature and atmospheric mixing
Abstract
During the Last Glacial Maximum, tropical sea surface temperatures were 1 to 3 °C cooler than present1, 2, 3, 4, but the altitude of the snowlines of tropical glaciers5, 6 was lower than would be expected in light of these sea surface temperatures. Indeed, both glacial and twentieth-century snowlines seem to require lapse rates that are steeper than a moist adiabat7, 8. Here we use estimates of Last Glacial Maximum sea surface temperature in the Indo-Pacific warm pool based on the clumped isotope palaeotemperature proxy in planktonic foraminifera and coccoliths, along with radiative–convective calculations of vertical atmospheric thermal structure, to assess the controls on tropical glacier snowlines. Using extensive new data sets for the region, we demonstrate that mean environmental lapse rates are steeper than moist adiabatic during the recent and glacial. We reconstruct glacial sea surface temperatures 4 to 5 °C cooler than modern. We include modern and glacial sea surface temperatures in calculations of atmospheric convection that account for mixing between rising air and ambient air, and derive tropical glacier snowlines with altitudes consistent with twentieth-century and Last Glacial Maximum reconstructions. Sea surface temperature changes ≤3 °C are excluded unless glacial relative humidity values were outside the range associated with deep convection in the modern. We conclude that the entrainment of ambient air into rising air masses significantly alters the vertical temperature structure of the troposphere in modern and ancient regions of deep convection. Furthermore, if all glacial tropical temperatures were cooler than previously estimated, it would imply a higher equilibrium climate sensitivity than included in present models.
Looks like a pretty small and localized sample size:
Figure 1: Sites studied.

Shown are core locations (806B, MD97-2138, V24-109) and mountains that were glaciated at the LGM
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“The findings illustrate that the region is very sensitive to climate change and that it has warmed considerably over the last 20,000 years, since the last ice age.”
Gosh. I’m so happy to know that things have warmed since the last ice age. Will send more grant money ASAP.
“Most global climate models underestimate the average temperature variations that the region has experienced,” Tripati said, adding that the other models’ simulations may be incomplete or the models are not sensitive enough.
oxymoron…………
I’m glad to report that my region has warmed considerably over the last 2 weeks. It’s nice.
glaciers in the Pacific Ocean’s western tropics – Yeah, I have to guess glaciers would NOT like the tropics.
As usual, climate scientists paid from my tax money publish behind a paywall.
That is a bit disturbing given the lack of accuracy of “climate models”.
Yeah, Like this is, you know, fantastic science, why didn’t anyone ever think? Oh California.
“………We found that the large amount of ocean warming goes a long way to explaining why glaciers have retreated so much,” said Tripati……..”
Well then, what caused the ocean warming??
It is simply amazing that the explanations advanced to “explain” the retreating glaciers really do not explain anything at all , but just use some other “observed” event as the reason that something else happened.
Just DESCRIBING what has been observed does not constitute an EXPLANATION for a subsequent event.
I have woken up considerably since 3am. LOL.
The Pacific region is so sensitive to climate changes that it has been very detrimental to humans. We must act then!
What about the other tropical glaciers? Are they sensitive to the considerable global warming since the last DE-GLACIATION as opposed to “the last ice age.” Are these people climate scientists? Time for bed.
For those who did not get my last comment we are still in an ice age I vaguely recall. My advanced apologies if I am wrong.
What sea level. Was not the sea level much lower or nonexistent at this time?
“The tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system has been called a sleeping dragon because…”
Repent CO2 sinners or face the desolation of Smaug! Doom! Doooooom!
Most logical people, skeptics and warmists, tend to agree that the Sun is the main source of energy for the Earth and the rest of the Solar System.
Similarly both skeptics and warmists seem to have questions about the causes of cycles or events that do not “fit” into any specific hypothesis.
Such situations require that we remember that the Sun and Solar System are part of a galaxy, which in turn is part of the Universe.
While the changes to the Sun’s activity may be the principal driver of weather and climate, who’s to say that extra-Solar events may account for inexplicable (at least presently) activity?
Yes Jimbo, we are experiencing an interglacial or interstadial. Volcanoes can heat up the sea, there are more undersea vents and volcanoes than terrestrial ones. One of my studies in post graduate forensic archaeology, was the ice man, or Ortzi. A volcanic eruption covered the mountain ranges where he was found with dust or ash. Because it could no longer reflect warmth from the sun, the region experienced a unseasonal melt. Didn’t last long though. They discovered other bodies too, even German troops from the second world war that had been covered by an avalanche and frozen in a glacier.
The models that are too sensitive to model the current climate are not sensitive enough to model the past?
Can’t even mock that.
The key conclusion and probably why this stuff got in Nature to start with: “Furthermore, if all glacial tropical temperatures were cooler than previously estimated, it would imply a higher equilibrium climate sensitivity than included in present models.”
Higher sensitivity… from a line of dedcution that is of course much, much more precise than let say, works from hyper instrumentalized observations from the present day.
In central and southern Ontario this winter, highs have been below 30 year historic lows. I am happy I am not there. I imagine that the north eastern US is much the same. Did they think they could fool people into thinking it was warmer than it was?
I say, do what these authors say you should do, change the models to make them MUCH more sensitive. Whichever group of scientists cooked this one up, let em loose on the modelers. Ratchet those things UP!!!!!! What’s not to like about that? Stew: Meet your own pot.
I don’t think they meant like climate sensitivity. Perhaps it is something else.
“The tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system has been called a sleeping dragon because of how it can influence climate elsewhere,” said lead author Aradhna Tripati,
==============
I always knew it was the “dragons”.
They’ve never been quantified.
“The tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system has been called a sleeping dragon…”
which has so far been quite beneficial to our climate system, agriculture, and civilization in general. Niiiiiice dragon. Maybe, like the Vikings in the Dreamworks film “How to Train Your Dragon”, some of us have badly misjudged this particular “dragon”. 🙂
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Train_Your_Dragon_(film)
Abstract:
….
“We conclude that the entrainment of ambient air into rising air masses significantly alters the vertical temperature structure of the troposphere in modern and ancient regions of deep convection. ”
Translation: the warm air goes up into the air and is warm in a warmly fashion.
We’ve made some remarkable tentative conclusions around here as well. We’ve discovered that as the temperature is freezing the air around us (to wit, near us) is likewise in a cold manner but as the temperature structure warms, so doth the airith around uth. As we travel into space, the entrainment drops to nothing, and it is freezing as hell, until you fly into the sun, which burns like the stupid.
Looks like shit; i.e. far beneath the dignity of Bull Shit.
“Among the implications of the study are that ocean temperatures in this area may be more sensitive to changes in greenhouse gas levels than previously thought and that scientists should be factoring entrainment into their models for predicting future climate change.”
Why am I not surprised by that assertion?