From Dr. Benny Peiser and the GWPF
We Really Don’t Understand Our Climate

Something is happening to our sun. If history is anything to go by, the sun’s change of mood could affect us all by cooling the earth and throwing our climate change calculations into disarray. It might even be the case that the earth’s response to low solar activity will overturn many of our assumptions about man’s influence on climate change. Cold not warmth might be our future. We do not know. We must keep watching the sun. –David Whitehouse, Public Service Europe, 24 July 2013
![]()
Global warming has been on “pause” for 15 years but will speed up again and is still a real threat, Met Office scientists have warned. In a set of three new reports, the Met Office claims that global warming has been disguised in recent years by the oceans, which have absorbed greater amounts of heat and prevented us from noticing the difference at surface level. Other factors including a number of volcanic eruptions since 2000 and changes in the Sun’s activity, could also have masked the effect of greenhouse gases by providing a slight cooling effect, they said. –Nick Collins, The Daily Telegraph, 22 July 2013
In its conclusions the Met Office states that the pause has not falsified the climate models. If the pause is, as they define it and limit it, from 2001 onwards, then this is true. But if the pause is 16-years, as the temperature data actually show, then the models, already looking unimpressive, are in jeopardy. We are at the waiting stage. Better and more reliable OHC data are desperately needed. Even if global temperatures were to rise again the climate models have shown themselves inadequate. If the pause continues, however, then the crisis of climate science will become more serious. –David Whitehouse, The Global Warming Policy Foundation, 24 July 2013
The scientists say, pauses in warming were always to be expected. This is new – at least to me. I’ve never heard leading researchers mention the possibility before. I asked why this had not come up in earlier presentations. No one really had an answer, except to say that this “message” about pauses had not been communicated widely. But what about another possibility – that the calculations are wrong? What if the climate models – which are the very basis for all discussions of what to do about global warming – exaggerate the sensitivity of the climate to rising carbon dioxide? –David Shukman, BBC News, 22 July 2013
Scientists are still struggling to explain the slower-than-predicted global warming over the past decade. There are innumerable variables in the climate system that could be responsible for the warming slowdown. These scientists have identified some of the likeliest culprits, but one professor admitted that they “don’t fully understand the relative importance of these different factors.” The recent warming plateau is exposing our limited understanding of climate, and it’s effectively killing the rationale for green policies that limit growth and, at the most basic level, try to force people to do things they would rather not do. — Walter Russell Mead, Via Meadia, 23 July 2013
The Science Media Centre has released a statement on the failure of global temperatures to rise in line with the models. It’s spin of course, although perhaps not quite as blatant as we are used to from them. Lots of “our understanding is getting better” and not a lot of “nobody has a clue what’s going on”. There’s a complete misrepresentation of science’s level of understanding of the reasons why this is happening. As I said in Parliament, the inability of climate scientists to admit their ignorance is one of the reasons nobody trusts them. The Science Media Centre are just helping that process along in the wrong direction. –Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, 22 July 2013
First, I asked Stephen Belcher, the head of the Met Office Hadley Centre, whether the recent extended winter was related to global warming. Shaking his famous “ghost stick”, and fingering his trademark necklace of sharks’ teeth and mammoth bones, the loin-clothed Belcher blew smoke into a conch, and replied, “Here come de heap big warmy. Bigtime warmy warmy. Is big big hot. Plenty big warm burny hot. Hot! Hot hot! But now not hot. Not hot now. De hot come go, come go. Now Is Coldy Coldy. Is ice. Hot den cold. Frreeeezy ice til hot again. Den de rain. It faaaalllll. Make pasty.” –Sean Thomas, The Daily Telegraph, 19 June 2013
The Sunday Politics interview with Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Davey on July 14 provoked widespread reaction in the twittersphere and elsewhere, which was only to be expected given the interview was about the latest developments in global warming and the implications for government policy. Many of the criticisms of the Davey interview seem to misunderstand the purpose of a Sunday Politics interview. –Andrew Neil, BBC News, 22 July 2013
“May you live in interesting times.”
I only wish some of my friends who have tended to give the benefit of the doubt to “the experts” would have been more convinced and taken the wagers I offered over the last few years. Now I’ll never find any suckers. ;-(
I don’t have a clue what all these scientists are quibbly about. Didn’t President Obama clearly say that in the last 10 years we have been experiencing accelerated global warming? Who is going to argue with him?
Told you so:
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=1396&linkbox=true&position=1
The Death Blow to Anthropogenic Global Warming by Stephen Wilde
Wednesday, June 4th 2008, 5:46 AM EDT
Quick question. Your article states that the sun is inactive at this time, but from what I’ve been able to gather from scientific news sources, the sun has been very active within the last couple of weeks.
http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/8203/20130717/sun-hurls-coronal-mass-ejection-toward-earth-spacecraft.htm
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1112904369/coronal-mass-ejection-witnessed-nasas-stereo-072313/
http://scienceblog.com/64335/coronal-mass-ejection-headed-toward-mercury-and-venus/
According to these sites, we just had some major Coronal Mass Ejections just in July alone, and it doesn’t show any signs of calming down. Can you please explain this discrepancy? Thanks.
“””””””…….In its conclusions the Met Office states that the pause has not falsified the climate models. …….”””””””
No need; the climate models themselves have falsified the climate models. How many of them are there, and do any two of them agree.
Why is there any more than ONE climate model, if they are correct ?
You are all missing the most obvious reason for the “pause”. The tireless pursuit of scientists (well, 97% of them anyway) has piled up enough mule muffins to have actually diminished the suns capacity to make heat. We are saved!
Izzere any significance to the apparent color shift between the two sun images in fig 1a and 1b ??
Nature is providing the natural experiment to point out who the real deniers truly are. I will believe in the power of CO2 only If the earth warms despite the cooling sun and cooling ocean cycles.
taobabe says:
July 24, 2013 at 11:08 am
Go on line and read. It’s all there. Compare these max to previous maxs. Think and check the data and you will be enlightened like the rest of us.
It is simply not plausible to postulate that low sun activity is responsible for the global cooling over the past 15 years, without entertaining the possibility that high solar activity in the 80s and 90s was at least partly the cause for global warming.
The Law of Obfuscation states that there will be an equal and opposite reaction to alternate outcomes from the coerced consensus, cooling in this case. It will begin by finding places to hide the heat while simultaneously claiming there was always potential for extended, opposite patterns to the coerced consensus. It may need to be expanded to include solar cycles as temporary effects delaying the inevitable warming or it may cite weather to deny the pause itself, even as others explain the pause as thou it is a pause. This may lead to some internal fights to seek purity among the cultists in refining the unified response message.
“throwing our climate change calculations into disarray” states Whitehouse.
Were they ever in any state but disarray? The mistake was to pretend that calculations described it in the first place. The IPCC draft AR5 graph of modeled temperature with actual observations shows the magnificence of the ‘calculations’. And to think it is upon this claptrap that the believers base their policies, the rest surrendering meekly to Progressive impoverishment, while the mantra denied the sun had a role. Now, they even claim brazenly and quite out of step with their own modeled data that they also had the ‘pause’ in warming nailed. Well, show me the graph that predicts the pause.
If it wasn’t all so criminal could it have been comical?
Good post, but I could have limited without the witch doctor section. Seems a bit petty and out of place.
The links in my 2008 article no longer seem to work so whilst I have attention here is one of them:
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=1302&linkbox=true&position=10
The Real Link Between Solar Energy, Ocean Cycles and Global Temperature by Stephen Wilde
Wednesday, May 21st 2008, 8:20 AM EDT
and for the benefit of the Met office the ‘missing’ heat is not in the oceans since it never reached the oceans in the first place due to increased cloudiness since 2000 when the jets became more meridional.
As per Bob Tisdale’s work any small recent increase in ocean heat content is due to the recharge phase of the ENSO process. When La Ninas dominate,heat accumulates in the oceans.
I think it will be found that the current recharge is a weak affair due to increased global cloudiness since 2000.
You’d think the media might at least try to sing from the same hymn sheet. Today the BBC has a completely different take of things – although to be fair, some of the same excuses are being paraded around the square. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23432769
Actually, I thought Sean Thomas was brilliant. We need to begin to ridicule the ridiculous. They have compared AGW skeptics to Holocaust deniers. We might as well have a little fun with their silly religion.
Oh how glorious it will be when the Senate questions the Hansenites on how their dogma turned out to be so wrong. Thousands of apologies will be due but will any be made? I doubt it. The only problem will be that, although we will get to say told you so, we will all suffer the consequences of a cooling planet.
The Met is seriously worried their extra posh First Class seats on the Global Warming Fame & Gravy Train are about to be be removed from under their ever so hysterical fear mongering buttocks.
Does anyone, anywhere still believe any Met Office predictions?
Don’t worry methane will warm us up – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23432769
I thought global warming was increasing in rate. At least that’s what I’ve been told by all environmentalists and almost all weather channels.
Check this out from the BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23432769
Little wonder Joe Public is a bit confused. One report says it might get colder – another one says, “there’s a methane bomb an all the ice is going to melt really, really fast…oh no….and it’s going to cost trillions upon trillions. Please give us more money to get more info, ta”!!
Stephen Wilde says
I think it will be found that the current recharge is a weak affair due to increased global cloudiness since 2000.
henry asks
more cloudiness as a result of what?
HenryP says:
July 24, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Stephen Wilde says
I think it will be found that the current recharge is a weak affair due to increased global cloudiness since 2000.
henry asks
more cloudiness as a result of what?”
http://thecloudmystery.com/The_Cloud_Mystery/Home.html
I really like the Met Office 15-30 day outlook, like today’s for example…
“The balance of probability suggests that changeable conditions currently expected during the first few days of August should persist for at least part of this forecast period. Consequently, further showers or longer spells of rain are likely to affect the UK, perhaps over northern and western parts in particular.
There will also be some spells of fine weather, probably most likely in southern regions. Temperatures are considered more likely than not to be at least a little above average and, as such, conditions should feel pleasantly warm during finer spells of weather”.
Now that’s what I call real meteorlogical brilliance! I wonder if “Deep Blue” had anthing to do with it? With this kind of wishy, washy nonsense, they can never really be proven right or wrong….and this one is actually more decisive than most of its 15-30 outlooks.
taobabe says:
July 24, 2013 at 11:08 am
“…from what I’ve been able to gather from scientific news sources, the sun has been very active within the last couple of weeks.”
Relative to its recent average behavior, but activity is currently at a low point in the overall scheme.