Big drop in global surface temperature in February, ocean temps flat

UAH Global Temperature Update for February, 2013: +0.18 deg. C

By Dr. Roy Spencer

Our Version 5.5 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for February, 2013 is +0.18 deg. C, a large decrease from January’s +0.50 deg. C. (click for large version):

UAH_LT_1979_thru_Feb_2013_v5.5

These large month-to-month changes are not that uncommon, especially during Southern Hemisphere summer, and are due to small variations (several percent) in the convective heat flux from the ocean surface to the atmosphere.

The global, hemispheric, and tropical LT anomalies from the 30-year (1981-2010) average for the last 14 months are: 

YR MON GLOBAL NH SH TROPICS

2012 1 -0.134 -0.065 -0.203 -0.256

2012 2 -0.135 +0.018 -0.289 -0.320

2012 3 +0.051 +0.119 -0.017 -0.238

2012 4 +0.232 +0.351 +0.114 -0.242

2012 5 +0.179 +0.337 +0.021 -0.098

2012 6 +0.235 +0.370 +0.101 -0.019

2012 7 +0.130 +0.256 +0.003 +0.142

2012 8 +0.208 +0.214 +0.202 +0.062

2012 9 +0.339 +0.350 +0.327 +0.153

2012 10 +0.333 +0.306 +0.361 +0.109

2012 11 +0.282 +0.299 +0.265 +0.172

2012 12 +0.206 +0.148 +0.264 +0.138

2013 1 +0.504 +0.555 +0.453 +0.371

2013 2 +0.176 +0.369 -0.016 +0.169

Related:

Global Microwave Sea Surface Temperature Update for Feb. 2013: -0.01 deg. C

The global average sea surface temperature (SST) update for Feb. 2013 is -0.01 deg. C, relative to the 2003-2006 average: (click for large version)RSS_mwSST_2002_thru_Feb_2013

The anomalies are computed relative to only 2003-2006 because those years were relatively free of El Nino and La Nina activity, which if included would cause temperature anomaly artifacts in other years. Thus, these anomalies cannot be directly compared to, say, the Reynolds anomalies which extend back to the early 1980s. Nevertheless, they should be useful for monitoring signs of ocean surface warming, which appears to have stalled since at least the early 2000′s. (For those who also track our lower tropospheric temperature [“LT”] anomalies, these SST anomalies average about 0.19 deg. C cooler over 2003-2006.)

The SST retrievals come from Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), and are based upon passive microwave observations of the ocean surface from AMSR-E on NASA’s Aqua satellite, the TRMM satellite Microwave Imager (TMI), and WindSat. While TMI has operated continuously through the time period (but only over the tropics and subtropics), AMSR-E stopped nominal operation in October 2011, after which Remote Sensing Systems patched in SST data from WindSat. The various satellite datasets have been carefully intercalibrated by RSS.

Despite the relatively short period of record, I consider this dataset to be the most accurate depiction of SST variability over the last 10+ years due to these instruments’ relative insensitivity to contamination by clouds and aerosols at 6.9 GHz and 10.7 GHz.

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
oldfossil
March 4, 2013 3:14 pm

This is encouraging. The alarmists have ramped up their hysteria lately and even the most devout skeptics must be feeling a trifle challenged. These UAH and SST anomalies show that we’re not such damfools after all.
We’re not skeptics because we want to be difficult, we’re skeptics because we don’t believe in pink unicorns, alien abductions and climate models.

GlynnMhor
March 4, 2013 3:39 pm

It would appear that January was a bit of an anomaly then… an outlier as it were.

Editor
March 4, 2013 3:50 pm

And as I always provide at this time, here’s a link to the preliminary sea surface temperature update for February 2013:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/preliminary-february-2013-sea-surface-temperature-anomaly-update/
The full update will be posted next Monday.

James Abbott
March 4, 2013 4:01 pm

“Encouraging” for skeptics is data that backs their position. All else needs to be questioned as “unreliable” (like the Jan figures were because they were up).
Its one months data, consistent with short term variations and it shows a +0.18C anomaly cf the 1981-2010 mean for satellite sensing of the lower troposphere.
Look at the 13 month running mean – far more instructive.

007
March 4, 2013 4:10 pm

Mr Abbott,
Has the lower troposphere warmed in the last 16 years?
That too is instructive.

bw
March 4, 2013 4:11 pm

Clearly, this temperature plot is like looking at brownian motion around a fixed point.
Adding estimated error bars of +/- one degree swamps the “signal”
The SST y-axis is almost 3 times more sensitive than the UAH anomaly.
Increase the Y-axis range by a factor of 10 and you will get a better picture of the real global trend.
For example, the following plot is an example of a realistic global trend line.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/best/to:1980/plot/rss-land/plot/uah-land
If real ocean temps were shown on the same scale, then you would see a flat line.
However, real global SSTs were not measured before the recent technologoy explosion. Even today I would be sceptical of any claim of precise SST measurements on a global scale.
If anyone with any engineering experience regarding signal/noise ratios looked at these charts, they would give a similar response. No trend, or a trend of zero slope.

braddles
March 4, 2013 4:15 pm

Here are some trend figures for different time periods, for the current UAH LT data. Not much to write home about warming-wise, until you go back 20 years. The 20-year starting point was during the Pinatubo cooling. Expect the 20-year figure to fall over the next couple of years as the Pinatubo effect (1992-94) drops out of the 20-year window.
Degrees C per decade:
20-year 0.149
18-year 0.094
17-year 0.089
16-year 0.057
15-year 0.016
14-year 0.111
13-year 0.069
12-year -0.004
11-year -0.034
10-year -0.009

March 4, 2013 4:18 pm

bw,
Here is a chart showing a normal y-axis. Not so scary, eh?

March 4, 2013 4:23 pm

@bw
Your line reminds me of this one by Grotch:
http://enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com/global-temperature-graphs/slgrotchafterlindzen/
Lindzen used it in a lecture once and then compared gmt to daily variations here as the straight red line:
http://enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com/global-temperature-graphs/lindzendailylocalglobalannualcomparison/

Lawrie Ayres
March 4, 2013 4:26 pm

James Abbott is quite correct. We should not take individual months or even years as indicative of overall trends. Unfortunately that is exactly what happens here in Australia as our chief climate commissioner, Tim Flannery, tries his best to keep the lie alive. Hottest summer screamed the BoM but overlooked the blocking high which caused much of the hot weather. After Tim told us we would have a permanent drought we have had three years of rain, rain which according to Tim would not fill our dams because the soil would be too hot. So James the warmists are very adept at using one-offs to “prove” their point. BTW the running average since 1998 looks pretty flat and according to the alarmists that wasn’t an option back in the 90s and earlt 2000s.

March 4, 2013 4:27 pm

What are the +/- values of the statistical and systematic errors on the processed data points?

James Abbott
March 4, 2013 4:29 pm

007 says:
March 4, 2013 at 4:10 pm
Mr Abbott,
Has the lower troposphere warmed in the last 16 years?
That too is instructive.
Er – yes – the plot clearly shows warming. Not a lot, but warming. As others have said it depends on the margins of error, but that why I said look at the running mean which smooths the monthly variations.
BTW the debate on whether the US has had its hottest month/year
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/03/a-note-about-temperatures/
can now turn to Australia:
The Bureau of Meteorology has confirmed the three summer months ending February 28 were the hottest season ever recorded in Australia, leading the government’s Climate Commission to label it the “Angry Summer” in a new report. “The Australian summer over 2012 and 2013 has been defined by extreme weather events across much of the continent, including record-breaking heat, severe bushfires, extreme rainfall and damaging flooding,” the report said.
Australia experienced its hottest ever average national maximum temperature on January 7 of 40.30 degrees Celsius (104.5 Fahrenheit), while 44 sites, including Sydney and Hobart, recorded all-time high temperatures in the summer. The report said there have only been 21 days in 102 years where the average maximum temperature for the whole of Australia has exceeded 39 Celsius and eight of these happened in the summer just gone.

RockyRoad
March 4, 2013 4:37 pm

GlynnMhor says:
March 4, 2013 at 3:39 pm

It would appear that January was a bit of an anomaly then… an outlier as it were.

Strange–the region where I live saw record-setting low temperatures for the month of January. Apparently they’re throwing those away as outliers. And February was warmer than normal–those they probably kept. Obviously where I live is out-of-kilter with the rest of the world.

Lank exposes a looney
March 4, 2013 4:43 pm

The head of the Australian Climate Commission Prof Tim Flannery also says….
“90 per cent of the heat that is trapped by the greenhouse gases goes into the ocean, and you look at the whole of the Earth, we’re seeing a very strong warming trend. The atmosphere, you know, it’s a very volatile organ of the planet. Sometimes we get cooler average temperatures, sometimes warmer, it bounces around a little bit on the graph. And you can pick any period in that to show anything you want. But if you look at the whole Earth system, you can see that strong warming trend. And indeed, if you look at the atmospheric record for a long enough period, you see exactly the same trend.”
Flannery is flogging a disgracefully alarmist report on Australia’s “Angry Summer” to account for his previous dud prediction that global warming would stop rivers from flooding and dams from filling. He is clearly spending most of his time in Lala land.

Bill Illis
March 4, 2013 4:49 pm

There was a lot of unusual up and down cycles in the last 3 months, (well, not unusual but they lasted just long enough to affect the monthly average numbers in unusual ways).
We are in a general slight cooling trend right now as we transition from the impacts of a small El Nino last summer and fall to a small La Nina right now with the overall ocean cooling slightly.

cui bono
March 4, 2013 4:51 pm

braddles says (March 4, 2013 at 4:15 pm)
The 20-year starting point was during the Pinatubo cooling. Expect the 20-year figure to fall over the next couple of years as the Pinatubo effect (1992-94) drops out of the 20-year window.
——
Or: Expect the 20-year figure to be cited by the alarmists over the next couple of years until the Pinatubo effect (1992-94) drops out of the 20-year window. Then they’ll cite something else.

RichardD
March 4, 2013 5:02 pm

Abbott……
Your Australian example is junk science/propaganda…the Australian Trick?
According to JoNova,
“the brutally simple average of all the temperatures recorded at 721 weather stations on Jan 7th was 35.1C, not 40.3C. The extra 5 degrees is produced by a form of area weighting to average the thermometers over the entire nation.”….”the average of the hottest 339 stations is 40.3C.”
Apparently the data and methods used by the Australian Bureau are new for this year and not available for inspection. And surprise, we get a bunch of new records this year…..sarc/.
http://joannenova.com.au/

Martin
March 4, 2013 5:23 pm

That’s the trouble with BoM, it insists on weighting to average over the entire continent. If it didn’t do that or if they recognised the blocking high and took that two weeks out of the equation, the summer wouldn’t have looked nearly as hot. It’s just fiddling with the data.
Anyway from the look of the chart we are entering a cold phase. Given the arctic ice recovered this past few months, the next few years will start getting really cold before the world ices up again.

March 4, 2013 5:25 pm

The ocean temperature is as flat as the Earth the warmists live on.

thelastdemocrat
March 4, 2013 5:35 pm

Stealey says…
“bw, Here is a chart showing a normal y-axis. Not so scary, eh?”
-I say: stealing a trick from Mann – only showing data up to 2005!

March 4, 2013 5:36 pm

Something to remember, although it might be fun to jam the current low month temperature in the maw of warmists, its meaningless to the question of whether the planet is still warming. The only way to confirm that is to run a linear regression. I find that most posts like this are just as interesting as the data personally. Up or down, its just a fun little data gathering exercise and to think it means anything beyond that and perhaps just irritating “believers in the end of the world via global warming” there is no other point to it.
Of course Abbot is a fool for trying to claim that a record high (for the month, year, decade or whatever) in Australia means anything at all because frankly to even interject something that stupid in a discussion of measurements shows that SOMEONE has zero understanding of statistics and is either ignorant, or is purposely trying to mislead people into actually believing that the world is still warming when Dr. Jones told us otherwise.
In statistics speak, stating that the record high temperature was reached is as interesting as saying that bears #*$& in the woods. Well no duh. But its not interesting at all to the discussion on say Feb. 2013 anomolies and as such Abbot betrays his ignorance at statistics simply by posting here and stating that.
Whether the planet is currently warming or not can only be solved through linear regression on QUALITY DATA. We can argue for instance on whether 15 years is long enough or too long, or perhaps on whether the data is worth anything……. Otherwise, our planet stopped warming 15 years ago and it just freaks people out to no end to hear that they were wrong all along. How else can you explain so many trolls thinking they know more then the actual facts? How else can you explain such a lack of understanding at statistics? Must be some sort of religious belief that people believe CO2 changes the weather and/or climate depending on whether we had a bad weather experience or not recently. Otherwise, remember folks, weather is not climate.

Editor
March 4, 2013 5:38 pm

One metric of global warming is to look at how far back we can go with a negative temperature trend. I’ll use data to the end of January 2013. That’s the latest month available for all datasets, and I want to make this an apples-to-apples comparison. The various datasets, and their longest cooling trends back from January 2013 are…
RSS – January 1997 to January 2013
Hadley v3 – April 1997 to January 2013
Hadley v4 – November 2000 to January 2013
NOAA – December 2000 to January 2013
GISS – May 2001 to January 2013
UAH – September 2008 to January 2013 (also September 2008 to February 2013)
The UAH dataset seems to be a warm outlier amongst the major global sets.

March 4, 2013 5:49 pm

thelastdemocrat,
I say: I provided a link to that chart, I didn’t make the chart. If you can find one that goes to 2012 or 2013, post it here. You will find that the flat y-axis looks the same as pre-2007. Global temp is still ≈14ºC.

Catcracking
March 4, 2013 5:51 pm

Anthony,
While reading the weather report for the mid atlantic states one meterologist is comparing the characteristics of storm predicted this week to a “similar” storm in 1962 which devistated the Coast line (40 foot offshore waves) and dumped massive snow inland. I personally remember the difficulty of traveling into Phila to complete a final exam.
This link, For those who are hawking climate change and severe storms, destroys the claim that the recent hurricane Sandy proves climate change.
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/storm-next-week-could-look-lik/7172141
“No two storms are ever exactly alike, and the case with the storm on the East Coast in March 6-7, 2013, will be no exception to this rule. However, there may be similarities to other storms over the past and particularly one that occurred in 1962 on the same date.
The Ash Wednesday Storm, as it was called, caused everything from feet of snow to high winds and extensive coastal flooding.
The storm which formed on February 5, 1962, stalled along the mid-Atlantic coast and blasted areas with heavy precipitation, gales and storm surge for days. Over 40 people were killed, over 1,000 others were injured and damage reached $200 million 1962 dollars.
Chief Meteorologist Elliot Abrams and the majority of AccuWeather.com meteorologists concur that the storm of 1962 and the storm during the middle of this week bear similarities on the historical weather maps.”
“The storm of 1962 caused extensive damage to boardwalks and beaches and flooding in communities from North Carolina to Long Island with beach erosion as far north as Maine.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), during the Ash Wednesday Storm of 1962, part of Steel Pier at Atlantic City, N.J., was destroyed and NASA’s Wallops Island facility sustained extensive damage. Chincoteague and Assateague islands were completely submerged. Winds reached 70 mph and offshore seas approached 40 feet. Two feet of snow fell from Charlottesville to Winchester, Va., with 18 inches of snow falling as far north as the middle of Pennsylvania. Snow fell as far south as Alabama.”
“The keys to the storm for this week in terms of impact are how strong it becomes, how long it lingers along the mid-Atlantic coast and so being how far north it turns.”

u.k.(us)
March 4, 2013 6:13 pm

If they would just stop building the windmills, my anger might lessen.
Until then, I view it as bureaucracy out of control.
My rants emanate from this simple ideal.

1 2 3