Guest post by David Archibald
There were five named solar minima in the last millennium – the Oort, Wolf, Spörer, Maunder and Dalton minima. At least the last four were all associated with cold climates. The astrophysics community has elected to name the current period of low solar activity the Eddy Minimum. John A. Eddy was an American astronomer who compiled data demonstrating the periods of low solar activity prior to the Dalton Minimum. The Eddy Minimum will include at least Solar Cycles 24 and 25, and could continue until late in the 21st Century.
Benjamin Franklin was the first to suggest that volcanic eruptions might affect climate, in a 1784 communication to the Literary and Philosophical Association of Manchester:
“During several of the summer months of 1783, when the effect of the sun’s rays to heat the earth in these northern regions should have been greatest, there existed a constant fog over all of Europe, and a great part of North America. This fog was of a permanent nature; it was dry, and the rays of the sun seemed to have little effect toward dissipating it, as they easily do to a moist fog, arising from water. They were indeed rendered so faint in passing through it, that when collected in the focus of a burning glass, they would scarce kindle brown paper. Of course, their summer effect in heating the earth was exceedingly diminished.
Hence the surface was early frozen.
Hence the first snows remained on it unmelted, and received continual additions.
Hence the air was more chilled, and the winds more severely cold.
Hence perhaps the winter of 1783-84 was more severe, than any that had happened for many years.
Benjamin Franklin was referring to the Laki eruption in Iceland of 1783. This was accompanied by an abnormally hot summer in Europe and then an exceptionally cold winter in Europe, the United States and Japan. In the United States, Charleston Harbour froze and the Mississippi River froze at New Orleans between 13th and 19th February, 1784. When this logjam of ice broke up, ships encountered ice flows in the Gulf of Mexico 100 km south of the delta. The famine in Iceland caused by the Laki eruption killed 24 percent of the population.
In the second half of the Modern Warm Period, when solar activity was at its highest for 8,000 years, there was one volcanic eruption large enough to affect climate. This was the eruption of Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines starting on 15th June, 1991. It ejected 10 cubic kilometres of magma and 20 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide. The aerosols it injected into the stratosphere lowered the global temperature by 0.5°C in 1992, with a peak effect of 0.7°C. The impact on agriculture though was not significant. Some wheat farmers in the northern part of the Canadian wheat belt found that the cool growing conditions didn’t allow their crops to mature in time before winter set in. They resorted to using Roundup to make hay from their standing wheat crops.
When major eruptions are overprinted on a period of cold climate, the effect is far more severe. As John A. Eddy said in reference to the Mount Tambora eruption of 10th April, 1815, “The unusual summer of 1816 is commonly attributed to the increase in atmospheric turbidity that followed the eruption of Mount Tambora. The awesome eruption occurred, in fact, during a span of several decades of colder climate that had interrupted the gradual global warming that followed seventeenth century extrema of the Little Ice Age. These background trends may well explain a particularly severe seasonal response in 1816 to a short-term injection of volcanic dust.”
The impact on climate and agriculture of the Mount Tambora eruption on the North-eastern United States is reasonably well documented. The current great grain producing area of the United States is 1,100 kilometres to the west. Nevertheless, what happened in the north-eastern states two hundred years ago is a good proxy for how the Corn Belt will respond to a major volcanic eruption during a climatic cool period. Visitors to the mid-western states in that period noted mid-summer frosts up to the mid-19th Century.
William R. Baron compiled the weather record of the north-eastern United States in his paper contained in the book “The Year Without a Summer? World Climate in 1816”:
“The year began, at least in Phillipstown, Massachusetts, with enough snow on the ground for sleighing. All over New England, January was a snowy, stormy month until the very end when a sudden thaw caused localised flooding such as the one reported by Isaiah Thomas at Worcester, Massachusetts on 23rd January where some mill dams were carried off and some items stored in a warehouse were destroyed. According to among others, Leonard Hill of East Bridgewater, Massachusetts, February was a mild and pleasant month with only three snows reported. By the beginning of March there was little deep snow anywhere with the exception of most of northern New England. Early March was clear and cold, and was followed by a series of three snow storms around mid-month that produced a few days of sleighing but soon melted. On 28th and 30th March, warm air returned producing thunder and lightning as reported by Elijah Kellogg at Portland, Maine and Thomas at Worcester.
April quickly turned cold again with frequent frosts and some snow. However, by 14th April, there was little snow left at Hallowell, Maine. By 19th April, Alexander Miller of Wallingford, Vermont had begun to plough his fields; Stephen Longfellow of Gorham, Maine was already planting wheat; and Theodore Lincoln of Dennysville (in far down-east Maine) was reporting ice-out on the local streams – a sure sign of coming spring. At the end of the month, Joshua Lane of Sanbornton, New Hampshire already was reporting the start of a drought that would later plague all of northern New England.
In early May, farmers throughout the region completed planting their major crop, corn. By mid-month, the weather had become “backward” with a “heavy black frost’ that froze the ground to at least one-half inch reported on 15th May as far south as Trenton, New Jersey. Miller, at Wallingford, Vermont, reported snow on 14, 17 and 29 May while Lane, over at Sanbornton, saw a large frost on 29th May, and ended the month with further complaints about the continuing drought. B.F. Robbins, visiting Concord, New Hampshire noted that May ended with two days of “remarkable cold” that froze the ground “to near an inch.”
June is the month most remembered for its outbreak of cold weather. On 4th June, there were frosts at Wallingford, Vermont and Norfolk, Connecticut. By 5th June, the cold front was reported over most of northern New England. On 6th June, snow was reported at Albany, New York and Dennysville, Maine, and there were killing frosts at Fairfield, Connecticut. 7th June brought reports of severe killing frosts from across the region, and as far south as Trenton, New Jersey.
Typical of comments by diarists concerning this day are those by George W. Featherstonehaugh of Albany, New York, who wrote that the frost killed most of the fruit, as many apple trees were then just finishing blossoming. Leaves on most of the trees were “blasted” by the cold. Corn and vegetable crops were injured. He also feared that many of the sheep that had just been sheared might die of cold.
Cold weather continued through the night of 10th June. By the end of the month most observers were reporting the return of warm weather, but by then most crops were either killed or “backward” and stunted in their growth. In northern New England, those crops that survived the frosts were hit by what was now a very serious drought, greatly reducing the production
of one of the area’s primary crops, hay.
In early July there was another outbreak of cold weather in northern New England. On 5th July, at Gorham, Maine, there was a very hard frost. Benjamin Kimball of Concord, New Hampshire and Thomas Robbins of Norfolk, Connecticut reported hard frost on 7th July. There was frost on 8th July at Portland, Maine and on the following day at Sanbornton, New Hampshire. Thereafter the cold held off for the remainder of the month. Dry conditions, generally reported earlier in northern areas, persisted throughout the entire month.
Frosts returned on the morning of 21st August, being reported at York and Portland, Maine and Wallingford, Vermont. By 22nd August hard frosts were noted all over the region and as far south as Trenton where buckwheat crops were killed. Thomas, at Worcester, Massachusetts, reported that these frosts “cut off Indian corn in many places”, while others such as Hill at East Bridgewater, Massachusetts observed that frosts did little or no damage.
The frosts continued into September. In northern New England there were frosts on 10th and 11th September and throughout New England during 25th to 27th September. On 28th September, there was a killing frost throughout the region extending as far south as Trenton. It killed any vegetation that had somehow survived to that date. The drought in northern New England was finally broken by rains in the last week of the month.
The remainder of autumn was very mild with very few snowfalls or storms. December was also mild, until the last 10 days or so, when it turned cold enough to freeze the harbour at Beverley, Massachusetts. The year ended as it began, with enough snow on the ground at Phillipstown, Massachusetts to use a sleigh.”
1816 had an extremely short growing season. In southern Maine, it had averaged 140 days up until then but plunged to 70 days in 1816. Consequently farmers experienced an almost total failure of major crops. There was a fair yield of winter grain, but other crops such as corn and hay failed leading to the loss of many sheep and cattle for lack of feed during the following winter. As a result, 1816 has come down to as the “cold year”, “the famine year” and ‘eighteen hundred and froze to death”. For eastern Massachusetts, 1816 is the only year in which young corn was killed in the spring after it had sprouted and in which corn that survived replanting was killed in the autumn, before it could reach maturity. Under these circumstances, it is safe to assume that in most places in New England corn crops were an almost total failure. The story for 1816 is the same for New Hampshire and Maine. There were a number of periods in which corn crops were hit by late spring or early autumn frosts. Particularly difficult periods include: 1793-96, 1812-17, and 1835-36.
The effect of the Mount Tambora eruption is also well documented in Europe. From 1813 to 1815, harvests were generally lower than expected. However, 1816 was a year of calamity for most of the continent. Spring saw heavy rains which were followed by snow in June and July that caused widespread harvest failures. Wheat yields in France, England and Ireland were at least 75 percent lower than at the beginning of that decade. Wholesale wheat and rye prices responded by roughly doubling in 1817 across the continent. The area affected the most was southern Germany where prices increased by three hundred percent by the period May to June of 1817. In Germany and Switzerland, people resorted to eating rats, cats, grass and straw as well as their own horses and watchdogs. This was the last great subsistence crisis of western civilisation.
The climate of Switzerland in 1816 inspired Mary Shelley to write the novel Frankenstein and her host, Lord Byron, to write his poem Darkness in July of that year. The first nine lines of the poem give a sense of what the days were like:
I had a dream, which was not all a dream.
The bright sun was extinguish’d, and the stars
Did wander darkling in the eternal space,
Rayless, and pathless, and the icy earth
Swung blind and blackening in the moonless air;
Morn came and went–and came, and brought no day,
And men forgot their passions in the dread
Of this their desolation; and all hearts
Were chill’d into a selfish prayer for light
With a solar activity now falling away and return to cold climate conditions imminent, it would be a useful exercise to calculate what would happen to American crop yields using the year-by-year climate conditions of the first half of the 19th Century. This would give an indication of the size of the problem. It could be that grain production might fall 60 percent from what it is now in the event of a major volcanic eruption during the Eddy Minimum. No American need starve if they were happy to live on a diet that was mostly corn and soybeans. The price of meat would skyrocket and a large portion of the national herd of lot-fed cattle and pigs would be slaughtered to avoid the cost of feeding them. Grain production in Canada in an 1816-type year would be wiped out completely. An indication of what would happen to food pricing and availability is the price response of oats in the north-eastern United States in 1816, which rose from 12 cents a bushel to 92 cents a bushel.
A repeat of the climate experience of 1816 in the world’s temperate region grain belts would most likely result in almost all of the grain exporting countries ceasing exports in order to conserve grain for domestic consumption. The effect on countries currently importing grain would go beyond calamity to catastrophe. The resultant mass starvation event would become the largest event in human history.
Current grain stocks carried by countries around the world assume that tomorrow will be much the same as today. As at year-end 2012, total world grain stocks were estimated to have been 328 million tonnes, which equates to 21% of annual demand. The days of the continuous benign climate of the second half of the 20th Century, due to the highest solar activity for the last 8,000 years, are now past. Perhaps continuing cooling over the rest of this decade will suggest to some that it would be prudent to plan on the basis that the climate for grain growing will continue to get worse, before there is another major volcanic eruption. Absence of planning could be considered as a suicidal tendency. Major volcanic eruptions occur about every 45 years on average. At the present, in the year 2013, with the oceans warmer than they have been for 800 years, the chance of a Mount Tambora-like eruption causing another mass famine is very slight. The world will be much cooler by 2020 though, and with an average period between eruptions of 45 years the chance of any individual year witnessing a mass famine event after 2020 will be about two percent. The cumulative chance rises to near 40 percent for the period 2020 to 2040. The world may dodge that bullet. Or it may not. Cold-driven reductions in grain supply will be quite distressing even to those who are fully prepared. The unprepared will become quite dead.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Reblogged this on The Next Grand Minimum and commented:
The Next Grand Minimum is to be the Eddy Minimum. Please read the whole post by David Archibald, as he raise some interesting question about what our future might hold, based on what has gone on before. History has a nasty habit of repeating it self, we live in world of cycles.
ENSO meter has swung negative.
In the second half of the Modern Warm Period, when solar activity was at its highest for 8,000 years
There is no good evidence for that. On the contrary, the recent solar activity has not been exceptional.
“Perhaps continuing cooling over the rest of this decade will suggest to some that it would be prudent to plan on the basis that the climate for grain growing will continue to get worse”
Don;t hold your breath for the Met office to plan for this. I liked your comment though that storage of grain amounts to 21% of annual demand. If there was a meteorite or supervolcano this would be a signficant stat. Hard to plan for it though.
Any link solar activity and plate tecnotonic activity?
Or said in an other way Can a factor in our Sun system affect both sun activity and earthquake and volcano activity at the same time?
Al Gore says:
January 7, 2013 at 10:53 pm
Or said in an other way Can a factor in our Sun system affect both sun activity and earthquake and volcano activity at the same time?
There is no relationship between strong geomagnetic storms and earthquake activity:
http://www.leif.org/research/Earthquake-Activity.png
Interesting speculation. I do not discount the records of the past either. I do suggest that duplicating those conditions is very unlikely. I’m not all that sure about this Eddy Minimum business either. First is just started. I would think a bit premature in naming it too. Yes, solar activity is way down on a rather relative scale. What that means on a global or regional basis has yet to be determined. The models for predicting are as good as the AGW ones. How deep or long this diminishment of solar activity is, remains to be seen. We simply are in no position to accurately predict it. And even if we were we are in no position to model the results correctly. What we should have learned from 1816 was to keep a reasonably good supply of grain in storage from year to year. The folk wisdom to do so results from collective experience which we ignore with risk. It seems to me as a society we must keep asking ourselves how we got to where we are. Humanity seems to learn nothing from history as we keep repeating the same mistakes over and over.
Science and address many of questions. Some, those dealing with a priori inductive logic or belief systems are beyond its scope.
But we probably have been at probably the longest sustained strong solar period without a grand minimum since the Medieval Maximum. I believe that would be a fair statement. It was 110 years from the end of the Wolf to the start of the Spörer. 95 years from the end of Spörer to the start of the Maunder. 75 years from the end of the Maunder to the start of the Dalton. It has been almost 200 years since the end of the Dalton.
It was about 230 years between the end of the Oort minimum, through the Medieval Maximum to the start of the Wolf Minimum.
Regarding the “five named solar minima in the last millennium”:
The Suess or de Vries cycle of 208 years ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variation ) shows clearly in solar proxy records for the last ~10,000 years. The recent weak solar cycle was exactly where it should be, 210 years after the previous very weak cycles. There is also a 104 year cycle. See also:
http://cyclesresearchinstitute.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/analysis-of-be10-records-as-a-solar-irradiance-proxy/
http://cyclesresearchinstitute.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/cycles-in-sunspot-number-reconstruction-for-11000-years/
http://cyclesresearchinstitute.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/sunspot-number-reconstruction-by-leif-svalgaard-and-proxy-cycles-of-104-and-208-years/
The two strongest components of the ~11 year solar cycle are 11.05 and 10.49 years which give 207 years beats while other components of 10.01 and 11.79 years also create beats of near to 104 years.
Quote David Archibald:
“The astrophysics community has elected to name the current period of low solar activity the Eddy Minimum. ”
Got a link for that? I didn’t know this had been finally decided by the astrophysics community.
Quote Anthony Watts:
“Jack Eddy, discoverer of the Maunder Minimum”
Quote Jack Eddy:
“I also knew I wasn’t the first to find it, and it wasn’t really mine. I think I did quite a bit for Maunder with that name. Particularly because he also got the idea from somebody else. He got it from Sporer who was a German astronomer.”
I still think it should be called the ‘Ad Ho Minimum’.
tallbloke says:
January 8, 2013 at 12:21 am
“The astrophysics community has elected to name the current period of low solar activity the Eddy Minimum. ”
Got a link for that? I didn’t know this had been finally decided by the astrophysics community.
Shadia Habbal, the Solar Physics Division chair, has taken up the task to consider this. The current status is that since it is not certain that we will have a Grand Minimum perhaps it is premature to name anything, but should a Grand Minimum occur, the Eddy Minimum is a clear favorite. The solar community is not keen on naming things after pseudo-scientists or modern astrologers, but since Eddy was neither, he is a favorite candidate.
Clearly David your no farmer. Why a farmer in the northern Canadian wheatbelt (locally they call it the prairies) would waste money on Roundup to turn a standing failed wheat crop into hay instead of just cutting it down with a swather, or windrower and then bale it for greenfeed is beyond me.
Leif Svalgaard says:
January 7, 2013 at 11:10 pm
Al Gore says:
Can a factor in our Sun system affect both sun activity and earthquake and volcano activity at the same time?
There is no relationship between strong geomagnetic storms and earthquake activity:
There are plenty of papers in the literature purporting to demonstrate a link between low sunspot numbers and volcanoes and earthquakes. There are no simple one to one relationships, but taken over longer timescales, there is a pretty obvious correlation.
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2011/03/12/john-l-casey-the-solar-seismic-connection/
tallbloke says:
January 8, 2013 at 1:11 am
There are plenty of papers in the literature purporting to demonstrate a link between low sunspot numbers and volcanoes and earthquakes.
There are plenty of papers about almost anything. When you look more closely, the claims fade away. Now, there is some evidence that the cosmic ray record is contaminated by volcanic activity, either directly or via climate, so some of the so-called Grand Minima could be of volcanic/climate origin and not solar at all. This is, of course, speculation, but so are the purported links. You shouldn’t uncritically believe everything you find on the internet.
It bears noting that the consensus view is that the Year Without a Summer was only mildly cooler than normal, maybe a blip of 0.2 degrees Celsius on the consensus hockey stick graph. Climate influences other than carbon dioxide are not fashionable right now.
This thread refers to historical evidence that I have been aware of for many years.
It contains part of the data that led me to consider that climate changes are primarily caused by expansion and contraction of the polar air masses as a result of waxing and waning solar influences operating via the intensity of the polar vortices.
The drought and cold of 1816 and the years before and after fit well with more equatoward climate zones and jet stream tracks than we see today and probably with greater jet stream meridionality than we became used to during the recent late 20th century warming.
I noticed similar reports in the diaries of Samuel Pepys and other reports from the period around the Maunder.
Also ships logs about depression tracks in the LIA.
In contrast the MWP was a benign period with poleward storm tracks which allowed relative prosperity to develop in the outer islands to the west of Scotland with relatively uneventful inter island transport.
I think our regular contributor tonyb has compiled a lot of information of a historical nature which all tells a similar story as regards climate and weather shifts observed when solar activity changed for decades at a time.
It is only those with a relatively sparse historical knowledge who still entertain the notion that a link between the sun and global air circulation is ‘unlikely’.
Curious as to what the effect might have been in Southeast Asia region of the world. Thailand and Vietnam a few years ago suffered rice crop failures due to cold, which caused governments in the region to restrict rice exports. Vietnam is again experiencing freezing weather in the mountains.
Given that regions heavy dependence on a warm weather crop, I wonder if the savage effects of an 1816 like event would be far more devastating there than here in the continental USA?
Al Gore 7/2013/10:15 PM
No. – – Every bit of matter in our galaxy is created and maintained by electro-magnetic waves
(AKA gravity waves when passing through matter) from our galactic core.
The extent of our galaxy is limited to the “range” of these waves.
All of our major climate cycles — Eg ; H/DO & Bond cycles, are a products of our galactic core.
We cannot measure this but we can “see” it. Here:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/02/galactic_geysers/
This is the “rectifier” that changes the core’s output to pulsating “D/C” , which is changed to “A/C” when it contacts matter outside of the protective ring. The protective ring keeps electro-magnetic waves (AKA gravity waves), from imploding back into the core and changing our galaxy into
a quasar.
Note the three “wraps” in the 100,000 year time span is our 33,000 year climate cycle that our shorter cycles follow. See any legitimate temperature graph covering the last few glacial cycles.
(Closer scrutiny of the “rectifier” may give us clues to our shorter cycles)
We are presently in the midst of a cold period which occurs every 150,000,000 years.
This present dip began ~3 million years ago (marked by ice age temperature graphs and by
“recent and ongoing” rapid tectonic movements of earth’s crust.
See Paper title ;
“Neotectonics” by Nils-Axel Morner,
Paleo Geophysics & Geodynamics,
S-10691, Stockholm, Sweeden
If the “150my” time line is correct, we have ~ 3 million years left to go in this present “dip”
Optimum CO2 levels , together with optimal continental placement, can lessen the degree
of cold encountered but we don’t have the optimums.
Its time to rethink the food->biofool issue. What a waste that is !
@ur momisugly Bill. “Optimum CO2 levels ”
We all know that raise CO2 is great, especially with a extra warmth as well, but does raised CO2 levels help that much if it gets cold ?? I haven’t seen much info about that facet of CO2 / plant interaction.
Leif Svalgaard says:
January 8, 2013 at 12:56 am
tallbloke says:
January 8, 2013 at 12:21 am
“The astrophysics community has elected to name the current period of low solar activity the Eddy Minimum. ”
Got a link for that? I didn’t know this had been finally decided by the astrophysics community.
Shadia Habbal, the Solar Physics Division chair, has taken up the task to consider this. … it is premature to name anything,
So you promoting Eddy and Anthony publishing David Archibald’s untrue statement is an astroturfing exercise. OK.
The solar community is not keen on naming things after pseudo-scientists or modern astrologers, but since Eddy was neither, he is a favorite candidate.
As well as successfully pedicting the present solar minimum (while ‘the solar community cnsensus’ said solar cycle 24 would be the highest evah), Theodor L published quite a few papers cited by many other scientists in ‘the community’ and your attempts to blacken his memory are shameful and disgusting. Just like your other attacks on other scientists like Ilya Usoskin, Abreu et al and Nicola Scafetta.
Well said tallbloke. A true injustice going on here.
@redneck to answer your question about Roundup usage – I remember that farmers who used it gained ~2 weeks on the ripening of their grain. Giving them a tremendous advantage over non-users.
Dennis Nikols, P. Geo says:
January 7, 2013 at 11:21 pm
Interesting speculation. I do not discount the records of the past either. I do suggest that duplicating those conditions is very unlikely. I’m not all that sure about this Eddy Minimum business either. First is just started. I would think a bit premature in naming it too….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The naming is because there is a group who had been calling it L***t Minimum after the guy who predicted it, *Land*sch*eidt*. (Using his name here gets an automatic boot into the ether) However his name is mud in solar physics circles where he is considered a wacked-out kook. Hence the rush to name the possible modern Minimum the Eddy Minimum before the other name become stuck fast through common usage.