
Incompetence, stupidity, diversion, blame shifting, and false solutions to imaginary problems
Guest post by Paul Driessen
“Superstorm” Sandy killed more than 100 people, destroyed thousands of homes and businesses, and left millions without food, water, electricity, sanitation or shelter for days or even weeks. Our thoughts and prayers remain focused on its victims, many of whom are still grieving as they struggle with the storm’s wintry aftermath and try to rebuild their lives.
Unfortunately, too many politicians continue to use the storm to advance agendas, deflect blame for incompetence and mistakes, and obfuscate and magnify future risks from building and development projects that they have designed, promoted, permitted and profited from.
Sandy was “unprecedented,” the result of “weather on steroids,” various “experts” insist. “It’s global warming, stupid,” intoned Bloomberg BusinessWeek. “Anyone who says there is not a change in weather patterns is denying reality,” New York Governor Andrew Cuomo declared. We must protect the great NY metropolis from rising oceans, said the Washington Post. This storm should “compel all elected leaders to take immediate action” on climate change, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg pronounced.
Unfortunately for the politicians and spin-meisters, the facts do not support this obscene posturing.
North America’s northeastern coast has been battered by hurricanes and other major storms throughout history. A 1775 hurricane killed 4,000 people in Newfoundland; an 1873 monster left 600 dead in Nova Scotia; others pummeled Canada’s Maritime Provinces in 1866, 1886, 1893, 1939, 1959, 1963 and 2003.
Manhattan got pounded in 1667 and by the Great Storm of 1693. They were followed by more behemoths in 1788, 1821, 1893, 1944, 1954 and 1992. Other “confluences of severe weather events” brought killer storms like the four-day Great Blizzard of 1888. The 1893 storm largely eradicated Hog Island, and the 1938 “Long Island Express” hit LI as a category 3 hurricane with wind gusts up to 180 mph.
Experts say such winds today would rip windows from skyscrapers and cause a deadly blizzard of flying glass, masonry, chairs, desks and other debris from high-rise offices and apartments. People would seek safety in subway tunnels, where they would drown as the tunnels flood.
Sandy was merely the latest “confluence” (tropical storm, northeaster and full-moon high tide) to blast the New York-New Jersey area. It was never a matter of if, but only of when, such a storm would hit.
People, planners and politicians should have been better prepared. Instead, we are feted with statements designed to dodge responsibility and culpability, by trying to blame global warming. The reality is, even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose to 391 ppm (0.0391%) today, average global temperatures have not changed in 16 years, and sea levels are rising no faster than in 1900. Even with Hurricane Sandy, November 2012 marked the quietest long-term hurricane period since the Civil War, with only one major hurricane strike on the US mainland in seven years. This is global warming and unprecedented weather on steroids?
In Hurricane Sandy’s aftermath – with millions freezing hungry in dark devastation – Mayor Bloomberg sidetracked police and sanitation workers for the NYC Marathon, until public outrage forced him to reconsider. While federal emergency teams struggled to get water, food and gasoline to victims, companies, religious groups, charities, local citizens and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie worked tirelessly to raise money and organize countless relief efforts.
Most outrageous of all, though, was how ill-prepared the region was for another major storm – and how many political decisions had virtually ensured that any repeat of the 1893, 1938, 1944 and other storms would bring devastation far worse than would likely have occurred in the absence of those decisions.
In one of the most obvious, architects, city planners, mayors and governors alike thought nothing of placing generators in the basements of hospitals and skyscrapers built in areas that are barely above sea level. Past storms have brought surges12 to 18 feet high onto Long Island, and studies have warned that a category 3 direct hit could put much of New York City and its key infrastructure under 30 feet of water. Sandy’s 9-foot surges (plus five feet of high tide) flooded those basements, rendering generators useless, and leaving buildings cold and dark. Perhaps if Mayor Bloomberg had worried less about 32-oz sodas and seas that are rising a mere foot per century, he could have devoted more time to critical issues.
The mayor has also obsessed about urban sprawl. However, when new developments mean high rents, high taxes and photo-op ground breakings, he has a different philosophy.
Mr. Bloomberg’s Arverne by the Sea initiative transformed what he called “a swath of vacant land” into a “vibrant and growing oceanfront community,” with “affordable” homes starting at $559,000. (The land was vacant because a 1950 storm wiped it clean of structures.) The new homes were built on 167 acres of land raised five feet above the surrounding Far Rockaway area. Those Arverne homes mostly survived Sandy. But the high ground caused storm surges to rise higher and move faster elsewhere than they would have on Rockaway lowlands that are always hit head-on by northward moving storms.
If Sandy had been a category 3 hurricane like its 1938 ancestor, the devastation would have been of biblical proportions – as winds, waves and surges slammed into expensive homes, businesses and high-rises, and roared up waterways rendered progressively narrower by hundreds of construction projects.
Lower Manhattan has doubled in width over the centuries. World Trade Center construction alone contributed 1.2 million cubic yards to build Battery Park City, narrowing the Hudson River by another 700 feet. The East River has likewise been hemmed in, while other water channels have been completely filled. Buildings, malls and raised roadways constructed on former potato fields, forests, grasslands and marshlands have further constricted passageways for storm surges and runoff.
As a result, storms like Sandy or the Long Island Express send monstrous volumes of water up ever more confined corridors. With nowhere else to go, the surges rise higher, travel faster and pack more power. It’s elementary physics – which governors, mayors, planners and developers ignore at their peril.
No wonder, Mayor Bloomberg, Governor Cuomo and other politicos prefer to talk about global warming, rising seas and worsening weather – to deflect attention and blame from decisions that have put more people in the path of greater danger. Indeed, the very notion of packing more and more people into “sustainable, energy-efficient” coastal cities in the NY-NJ area is itself madness on steroids.
Worst of all, politicians are increasingly and intentionally obscuring and misrepresenting the nature, frequency and severity of storm, flood and surge risks, so that they can promote and permit more construction in high-risk areas, and secure more money and power. They insist that they can prevent or control climate change and sea level rise, by regulating CO2 emission – while they ignore real, known dangers that have arisen before and will arise again, exacerbated by their politicized decisions.
As a result, unsuspecting business and home owners continue to buy, build and rebuild in areas that are increasingly at risk from hurricanes, northeasters and “perfect storms” of natural and political events. And as the population density increases in this NY-NJ area, the ability to evacuate people plummets, especially when roadways, tunnels and other escape routes are submerged. Let the buyer beware.
Sandy may have been a rare (but hardly unprecedented) confluence of weather events. But the political decisions and blame avoidance are an all-too-common confluence of human tendencies – worsened by the dogged determination of our ruling classes to acquire greater power and control, coupled with steadily declining transparency, accountability and liability.
How nice it must be to have convenient scapegoats like “dangerous manmade global warming” and insurance companies – today’s equivalent of the witches whom our predecessors blamed for storms, droughts, crop failures, disease and destruction. It’s time to use the witches’ brooms to clean house.
Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Still… Mission accomplished. Obama won.
Yes spot on. Not least because the US can do nothing whatever about global warming even if the IPCC is right. For a very simple reason, it is only about 15% of global emissions, and that percentage is falling as China and India ramp up. Whatever the politicians in the US do, it will have minimal effects even if the IPCC is right.
But spot on about blaming the effects of poor land use policies on AGW.
Add to the list of culprits the self-styled environmentalists who blocked all efforts over the decades to build a storm surge barrier across the entrances to Upper or Lower NY Bay, such as those protecting Providence, R.I. & a number of European cities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Point_Hurricane_Barrier#Historical_background
The cost in treasure, let alone lives, just of Sandy greatly exceeds the construction expense of such a barrier. As if the development of NYC & environs since the 17th century hasn’t altered the environment of the region.
“WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate on Friday approved a $60.4 billion aid package to pay for reconstruction costs from Superstorm Sandy, which ravaged mid-Atlantic and northeastern states, after defeating Republican efforts to trim the bill’s cost.
…
The bill also provides $17 billion in Community Development Block Grants to help rebuild homes, schools, hospitals and other buildings destroyed by the late October storm, help small businesses and improve the power infrastructure.”
Texas taxpayers are going to fund the rebuilding of uninsured schools and hospitals in NY & NJ?
“Never let a crisis go to waste.”, Rahm Emanuel
Climate might not be cooperating with the alarmists, but weather still can.
Excellent article. Too bad the bought-and-paid-for corporate-owned media scribblers won’t pick it up. Which is no surprise: They have become glorified stenographers for entrenched politicians, greedy bankers and globalist power brokers.
Good article, which all those of the Church of Warming will ignore. I think it could have benefited from stating that Sandy was barely and briefly a Category 1 hurricane at landfall in New Jersey (?). It should state what that means in wind speed, and that in New York/Manhattan Sandy was less than hurricane strength but it was geographically larger than usual because of the (already listed) contributory factors.
great essay Paul!
Mr. Paul Driessen:
It is obvious that you have not yet been infected with Skeptical Science Syndrome.
Please continue the inoculation process.
Very nice article well reasoned and referenced.
I have read tens of thousands of contemporary observations of the weather from 1000ad onwards. They are available in many places including those I do my research in such as the met office library and the Scott polar institute and great cathedrals whose records can be seen on animal hide.
There is no doubt at all that we currently live on benign times. The great storms of the past dwarf those of the present and seem to belong to eras of cooling not warming. Some day those great weather events will return and with our vastly greater population and much more vulnerable infrstructure the devastation will be truly immense.
We will of course blame it on agw instead of realising that our climate is hugly variable and that we have been very fortunate to live in the calm age we currently inhabit
Tonyb
Just a query from a Civil Engineer in the UK.
How come no tidal barrier has been proposed?
And why, at least, aren’t critical subway / tunnel entrances provided with storm surge barriers?
Cost? Peanuts compared with the losses that Sandy caused. And obviously better value than pouring taxpayers’ money into Ruinable Energy projects (that don’t work).
Unbelievable. I can’t believe that Civil Engineers haven’t pointed this out years ago. No doubt the politicos didn’t see it as a vote winner?
Too true sadly.
Brisbane suffered a flood which exposed shonky planning. People were advised their houses were above flood level. The flood proved otherwise. Someone somewhere took money for shifting a line on a map. At least in Queensland the building code is to build for cyclone rating and it is enforced. Now having seen the error they are requiring new houses to be built 2 stories high with the floor being above flood level.
It was government greed, charging for water so they let the storage levels get too high and then were forced to release water in a huge surge because the wall was in danger of breaching.
The government accepted the green CAGW story fully. The Premier appointed her husband as the Department Head for Climate Change. So believing that permanent drought was the order of the day they refused to comply with the designed storage intent of flood mitigation. They increased the price of water, did not build further flood mitigation dams, foisted the cost of water infrastructure onto rate payers, built a desalination plant that has never been used.
As you can see in one example, Climate Change policies have cost Queensland especially the South East corner, billions of dollars for no reward, other than advancing green socialist expenses onto other people, while they are sucking on the taxpayers teat.
Apply that disaster world wide and the cost of warped green vision would be trillions, and never once out of a green pocket. Crocodile tears and saving the planet are a match.
All to true. Well said and sadly destined to be ignored by most if not all in any position of influence. These people are all True Believers and willfully ignore anything that does not fit the orthodoxy they have chosen to believe.
Found this interesting, worth reading the article:
“The Seven Rules of Bureaucracy”
by Loyd S. Pettegrew and Carol A. Vance
http://mises.org/daily/5955/The-Seven-Rules-of-Bureaucracy
Rules of Bureaucracy
Rule #1: Maintain the problem at all costs! The problem is the basis of power, perks, privileges, and security.
Rule #2: Use crisis and perceived crisis to increase your power and control.
Rule 2a. Force 11th-hour decisions, threaten the loss of options and opportunities, and limit the opposition’s opportunity to review and critique.
Rule #3: If there are not enough crises, manufacture them, even from nature, where none exist.
Rule #4: Control the flow and release of information while feigning openness.
Rule 4a: Deny, delay, obfuscate, spin, and lie.
Rule #5: Maximize public-relations exposure by creating a cover story that appeals to the universal need to help people.
Rule #6: Create vested support groups by distributing concentrated benefits and/or entitlements to these special interests, while distributing the costs broadly to one’s political opponents.
Rule #7: Demonize the truth tellers who have the temerity to say, “The emperor has no clothes.”
Excellent post, Mr. Driessen. So clearly stated that only a person with a self interest in the scam could disagree. Thanks, Anthony. It’s strong pieces like this that will turn the tables on them. Also, blaming politicians is a tact that might resonate with many Americans who may not be paying close attention to the issue.
Most of the effects of this storm were eloquently predicted by weather organisations such as Weatherbell at least a week prior to the event. The fact that nobody heeds those who have superior knowledge is no surprise. What is a surprise is that the media seem to propagate the CAGW nonsense as a reason for these overdue natural events. Have the alarmists also full control of the media or is it just that the media want a good story? CO2 is a good cover story to force the public to pay additional taxation to fund the lifestyle of those that decide to live in prime locations. Unfortunately most people, educated or not, will continue to believe the alarmist hype until the propaganda machine is silenced.
“Manhattan got pounded in 1667 and by the Great Storm of 1693.”
Huh??
The most dangerous aspect of this CAGW propaganda is that the blame goes on unprecedented global warming which implies that the storm was too unpredictable to prepare against which is completely bogus. They knew weeks in advance that the storm was going to hit and they did nothing. That it was a tropical storm is another indication that things could have been much, much worse. But they avoid any and all responsibility. That is far too dangerous a position to take. The worst part is that this attitude of denying facts will continue to kill and harm people.
As much as the Providence hurricane barrier protects the city of Providence, it puts the surrounding communities of East Providence, Cranston and Warwick at greater risk. Also, Providence is at the head of Narragansett Bay where the funneling storm surge would be blocked at a neck only few hundred feet wide. The landscape is just the opposite for Manhattan. Can’t imagine how such a barrier would be built there.
Tom in Texas says:
December 29, 2012 at 11:38 am
“WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate on Friday approved a $60.4 billion aid package to pay for reconstruction costs from Superstorm Sandy, which ravaged mid-Atlantic and northeastern states, after defeating Republican efforts to trim the bill’s cost.
=================================================================
As Tom says, it is not the federal government’s job to pay for storm damage. Another slush fund for Obama to spend as he wishes.
BTW . . . This will completely eat the projected revenue from “raising taxes on the rich.”
@ur momisugly Paul Driessen
Great job, well done.
While I get your meaning with:
“It’s elementary physics – which governors, mayors, planners and developers ignore at their peril.”
It’s rarely themselves that are put in peril.
John West,
Thank you for the “Seven Rules.” They describe with precision the way any modern state operates.
I always wondered, why otherwise seemingly intelligent and educated people would continue to insist that “democracy” or “Republic” still exist.
Paul Driessen, thank you for the excellent post. In the following comments I expect to see many other related and contributing factors supporting you post.
Here is my attempt to put together a Power Dissipation Index for storms making landfall north of Chesapeake Bay (including Atlantic Canada) for the period 1851-2011. It’s a noisy signal, so unsurprisingly, I wasn’t able to find a significant trend:
https://sites.google.com/site/climateadj/home/noreast-pdi
Things will only change if politicians will be held accountable with their own money.