Newly found weather records show 1930's as being far worse than the present for extreme weather

Plot of NOAA/NCDC state high temperature records by decade with atmospheric CO2 concentration overlaid. From C3 Headlines with thanks – click to visit website

The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

By Patrick Michaels on World Climate Report

Sure is hot out! And what better time for a paper to appear in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology describing the construction of the “all-time” records for various types of weather extremes for each of the 50 United States plus Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The paper details efforts of the U.S. State Climate Extremes Committee (SCEC) established by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) and led by Dr. Karsten Shein. Basically, the SCEC dusted off old records and found other new sources. So now we have “new and improved” data (available here) for the value, the date and the location of the all-time high and low temperature, greatest 24-hr precipitation, greatest 24-hr snowfall and greatest snowdepth for 50 states and two territories. The statewide record extremes have been updated through 2011 and are subject to continuous updating.

This paper is an interesting read for those who perseverate on climate history and how it is constructed from a variety of observations both made from “official” (federal) observing stations as well as those deemed reliable from “non-official” observations (such as 12-oz soda bottles or credible “amateur” observer accounts). The new effort resulted in “the revision of 40 percent of the values” contained in the old dataset at NCDC and “underscored both the necessity of manual quality assurance methods as well as the importance of continued climate monitoring and data rescue activities to ensure that potential record values are not overlooked.”

It also is useful for putting the recent heat wave in perspective. Despite the 24/7 caterwauling, only two new state records—South Carolina and Georgia—are currently under investigation. And, looking carefully at Shein et al. dataset, there appears to be a remarkable lack of all-time records in recent years.

This is particularly striking given the increasing urbanization of the U.S. and the consequent “non climatic” warming that creeps into previously pristine records. Everything else being equal—and with no warming from increased greenhouse gases—most statewide records should be in or near big cities. But they aren’t.

This year there were a huge number (many thousands) of reports of daily high temperature records being set across the eastern two-thirds of the country in recent weeks, and even a large number (a few hundred) reports of all-time records high temperatures being set for a particular location. But if only two new statewide records were set, that’s hardly an historic heat wave when considered in its totality.

In Table 1, below, we list the all-time record daily maximum temperature observed in each of the 52 entries (as compiled by the SCEC) and the date and location where it was recorded. Notice that the vast majority of the all-time records were set more than half a century ago and that there are exceedingly few records set within the past few decades. This is not the picture that you would expect if global warming from greenhouse gas emissions were the dominant forcing of the characteristics of our daily weather. Instead, natural variability is still holding a strong hand.

Table 1. All-time statewide maximum temperatures (from NCDC)

In Table 2, we’ve compiled the top five years when the most records were set. When multiple years tie for the high, each individual year gets a fraction of a “record”. So, for example, 1954 and 1933 each get a half of a record for Colorado.

Table 2.

But this doesn’t stop people from implying that last week’s heat wave as an indication that global warming is leading to unprecedented conditions.

Capital Weather Gang (CWG)—the popular and respected weather blog for conditions in and around Washington DC, and one which is closely watched by the media, was quite vocal all about all-time records of one sort or another being set in our Nation’s Capital during last week’s heat wave.

If the Shein et al. methodology is applied to DC’s temperatures, then CWG’s very public pronouncements (they were picked up on the Drudge Report) are not all going to stand. That’s because CWG relied only on a single record, while largely ignoring the comprehensive set of observations historically taken within the geographical boundaries of the District of Columbia. The single record used by CWG is the “official” version of the Washington DC daily temperature which is a record which has been stitched together from observations made at National Airport (from 1945 through the present), which by the way is not even in the District of Columbia, and from observations taken at a Weather Bureau location at 24th and M street (1889 through 1944, and other locations prior to then). But when the records were concurrent (which they were during the 1940s and 1950s), only one is included (DCA).

If you really wanted to establish all-time records for Washington DC, you’d have to consider all available records that are credible—rather than relying on a data for a single “station.”

That’s what Shein et al. did. Although the SCEC has not yet compiled the all-time weather records for Washington DC, the word is that they are in the process of doing so, and are considering all available observations.

The CWG should do the same when discussing records for “Washington DC”. Or at the very least, they must be very clear that they are discussing a single (changing) location (i.e., Reagan National Airport, the downtown City Office, etc.) rather than Washington DC as a whole.

Here is an example of how things can go awry.

According to CWG, the recent heat wave “Washington D.C.” tied its record for the longest string of consecutive days in which the daily high temperature was 100°F or above. According to the CWG, the record was/is 4 days set in 1930 and 2012. However, in July/August 1953, 5 days in a row with temperatures of 100+°F were observed at the old Weather Bureau observing station at the City Office. These observations were from “an” official weather station within DC but not part of “the” “official” stitched together record. If the NCDC SCEC were compiling all-time strings of consecutive days of 100+°F, they most certainly would consider the old City Office records (including during the time of overlap with DCA observations), something that the Capital Weather Gang opted not to do.

Whether or not additional examination would alter any of the other “all-time” temperature that the Capital Weather Gang identified as being broken in “Washington DC” during the recent heat wave is unknown at this time.

One lesson here is that when considering “all-time” extreme weather records for a particular region, a comprehensive study must be undertaken (as described by Shein et al.) rather than simply deferring to a single station record.

The other take-home is that one has to be very careful about attributing the recent extreme temperatures to dreaded global warming. As noted above, there are surprisingly few all-time state records in recent years. Further, a look at their table indicates that only one of these—Providence RI, in 1975—comes from a city. Somehow—and this seems impossible—the dreaded greenhouse effect cannot raise already climbing urban temperatures to state record levels.

We can thank the SCEC for helping to do most of the dirty work in establishing an accurate dataset of all-time statewide record extremes for the United States that can be relied upon into the future, so that accurate assessments can be made when comparing current extreme weather events to past ones.

Reference:

Shein, K., D. Todey, F. Akyuz, J. Angel, T. Kearns, and J. Zdrojewski, 2012. Evaluating Statewide Climate Extremes for the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0226.1, in press.

4.5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

111 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John A
July 14, 2012 12:16 pm

per·sev·er·ate
Verb:
Repeat or prolong an action, thought, or utterance after the stimulus that prompted it has ceased.

I had to look it up.
The rest of Pat Michael’s report doesn’t surprise me in the least.

TinyCO2
July 14, 2012 12:18 pm

Nice:-) Great to see that there are people still doing a good job.
How many articles do we see where some journalist solemnly proclaims that some weather event or other is at an all time high due to climate change? The easiest way to illustrate the proof is with a graph, a picture painting a thousand words and all that, but how often does it happen? Apart from arctic ice and global temperatures can anyone think of a warmist graph?
Sceptics need to have a slogan ‘SHOW US YER GRAPH!’

D Caldwell
July 14, 2012 12:21 pm

Yes, yes, all of this is mildly interesting, but highly premature until the older records have undergone the proper “adjustments”.

R. Shearer
July 14, 2012 12:22 pm

Even with a lower population, about a half million people were forced to leave the Dust Bowl states then.

July 14, 2012 12:22 pm

If July 1936 happened this year… To quote Bart Simpson…. so many folks in the climate science community would ‘have a cow’.
I suspect that the retort is that the 1930s was an event brought on by natural variability with the confluence of xyz variables which all translate into warming forcings and feedbacks– WHILE 2012 is one where just about every single ‘natural variability’ indicator would point to us being in the ice box, were it not now for AGW … and then further posit that if 1936’s “natural” conditions were to occur in the futre along with our present-tracked AGW component, well, we may not survive it.

Rex
July 14, 2012 12:26 pm

I would have thought that heat waves might contribute to an increase
in mean temperatures. Others seem to want to put the cart before the
horse … Beats me.

mogamboguru
July 14, 2012 12:34 pm

Well, is it just my eyeball Mark I seeing a flat, if not declining trend in the plot of NOAA/NCDC state high temperature records, or do you see the same trend as I do?

mike g
July 14, 2012 12:38 pm

Classic confirmatin bias on a massive scale is the only explanation these records hadn’t been surfaced by any of the thousands of main stream “scientists” involved in the AGW fraud. What do you expect with activists, not scientists, running all the major societies.

July 14, 2012 12:51 pm

Conditions in the N. Atlantic 1n the early 20th century were comparatively different to the late 20th and early 21st. This is clearly demonstrated by the CET (N. Atlantic is the main driver) when the summer – winter temperatures were running in the anti-phase.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/CETseasons.htm
If USA temperatures were equally affected it is not known to me.

fredb
July 14, 2012 1:01 pm

I think the issue is that the recent events are records *on top of* the earlier records.

pat
July 14, 2012 1:16 pm

Were the records found in Hansen’s garage?

Bryan A
July 14, 2012 1:28 pm

Most certainly these records from the SCEC will be altered at some point. We are all aware of how current Global Warming causes prior temperature records to be adjusted downwards

July 14, 2012 1:39 pm

Claims of drought seem overblown.
3 states have set a monthly record for driest month in the last 12 months.
Colorado Mar 2012, Delaware Feb 2012, Wyoming Jun 2012.
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2012/07/12/2012-isnt-that-dry-so-far-noaa-precipitation-data-by-state/
6 states have set a monthly record for wettest month in the last 12 months.
Florida June 2012, NH Aug 2011,NJ Aug 2011,NY Aug 2011, Pennsylvania Sep 2011, Vermont Aug 2011
http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2012/07/14/wettest-month-noaa-data-surprise-not-as-dry-as-they-claim/

July 14, 2012 1:41 pm

In Figure 1, note that the 1930s decade couldn’t be “adjusted” enough to prevent the perturbation of the otherwise “perfect” temp/CO2 fit. I now see what a Herculean effort Hansen et al made to squash the 1930s temps down – they had to go well beyond the limits of decency in their quest. I was a 30s baby but just missed 36 by 2 years. That decade was a topic of conversation in the parlours (we don’t have parlours in houses anymore – no kids allowed, for visitors like the preacher, etc.) of the continent throughout the 40s and when the dust storms came back in the fifties (I grew up in Winnipeg-flat prairie) I got to see what I had missed in the middle 30s – brown air, orangy-yellow sunlight, handkerchiefs over the nose, black/brown sweat-mud inside collars and cuffs, black snot, and tiny barchans of topsoil around the leaside of telephone poles, fence pickets and house corners.
Well this extended the parlour talks of the dirty 30s for another few years – but winters had turned cold in the late 40s. I had a paper route and my mother used to walk with me in a January evening to collect for the newspapers – fearing that I might be overcome on my long walk in the dark cold from Portage Avenue – an east-west main streat on out of town to my last customer – a dairy farmer.. For her effort, I treated her to a movie – at night the fare was adult black and white silver screen stuff with Bogey, Edward G. Robinson, Barbara Stanwick, and the like – 12 cents each – a fortune compared to the Saturday afternoon “Horse Operas” with Roy Rogers, Rod Cameron, Hoppy,… at 5 cents.
Definitely, there has been a cherry-picking industry at work to hide this weather history..

July 14, 2012 1:54 pm

I had commented on other post how list I had from 2007 differed from list from 2009 and 2012. (I’d even put up a couple of the whole lists. They may have been more annoying than informative. 😎
I certainly hope that the differences were due to things being actually corrected rather than “adjusted”.
PS The biggest was lowering the record high, set on the for the same day in the same year in the late 1800’s by 5*F. The very latest list raises it back up to the 2007 temperature.

July 14, 2012 2:15 pm

Another PS. Here’s where I obtained the list on different years. http://www.erh.noaa.gov/iln/cmhrec.htm

July 14, 2012 2:21 pm

10 years ago, when I was trying to decide if I should get a heat pump, I did several searches of the average heating days per month/day for my city and for areas where I had good, solid, data on the kWhr usage per day for heat pump usage. I found quite a few of these historical records and many went all the way back to the 30’s and even earlier. There were many daily accumulative tables of the heating degree days (HDD). A few years ago I had a brain storm that if it was getting warmer then the daily HDD would show this. I have spent many hours over the last few years trying to find this data again. It is not there. It has been removed. There are some that go back 10 years, and some that go back 20-25 years, depending on the city you look for and who is keeping it, but I can’t find the old NOAA tables that had the “ancient” history of these numbers. Where did they go? Why did they remove this information? Where is it? What are they hiding? Are they trying to revise history again?
Second question. Why is it that when you read a thermometer, by sight, that you always visually round it to the closest whole digit or in some cases will indicate 1/2. But, when you convert from Celsius to Fahrenheit, the decimal is carried out to two(+) places? Surely this has some effect upon the historical temperature reading. This would be further exacerbated by the fact that when it is cold out you unconsciously tend to see a colder temperature and when it is hot you see a hotter temperature.

son of mulder
July 14, 2012 2:44 pm

UHI was wrong all along should have been UCI judging by these records;>)

David Ball
July 14, 2012 2:48 pm

There is a case of “the mysterious trapper” in Canada. He was chased by authorities through what was thought to be an impassable mountain trail after shooting a constable. It is interesting that this occurred in 1934.

July 14, 2012 2:55 pm

Lol, I’m deja vousing all over again! Can we get a retroactive “amen” for Steve, Joe, and Anthony? http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/08/why-the-u-s-east-coast-heatwave-was-not-unusual-nor-the-number-of-record-temperatures-unprecedented/

Dave Worley
July 14, 2012 3:06 pm

I’ve seen articles that blame the dust bowl on farmers’ unsustainable practices.
Studies which blame globlal warming for environmental issues come from scientists who fail to find a cause, or a remedy, for a local environmental issue, They take the easy way out, blaming the catch all “Global Warming” and in their minds they turn failure into success….and press! They might as well be blaming God, but then they are probably secular humanists, so that option is out.
If they were honest scientists, they would admit that they cannot find a specific cause or remedy (for instance where oyster yields are down in Oregon). Instead they just piggy-back on the latest global catch phrase and act as though their research is relevant……and worthy of additional funding.

July 14, 2012 3:19 pm

Bill McKibben (350.org) is constantly sending out doom and gloom, hot weather Tweets.
Here’s my Tweet back at him today:
@billmckibben It’s hot in Gotham City too… http://t.co/6GBtVuNt

davidmhoffer
July 14, 2012 3:44 pm

pat says:
July 14, 2012 at 1:16 pm
Were the records found in Hansen’s garage?
>>>>>>>>>>>
Wrapped in discarded tree ring data and marked “secret”.

Mindert Eiting
July 14, 2012 3:54 pm

All-time records are peculiar statistics because they amount to severe dependency of the data: each record redefines the records thereafter. Am I the only one who cannot make sense of the graphs and tables?

Ian H
July 14, 2012 3:56 pm

The interesting thing about the 1930s in my opinion is that they still lack a decent explanation. Warmists are too busy trying to revise history so that it never happened. Sceptics are often too busy celebrating the fact that it was warmer back then and seldom go beyond that. Nobody seems to have much interest in explaining WHY it was so warm back then and why it shopped being so warm shortly thereafter.

1 2 3 5