UK ads banned for overstating climate change

From The Times

Ed Miliband’s adverts banned for overstating climate change

by Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor

the Advertising Standards Asociation has banned Ed Miliband's  Environment department from running misleading nursery rhyme  advertisements on climate change.
The adverts' claims 'were not supported by science'

TWO government advertisements that use nursery rhymes to warn people of the dangers of climate change have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for exaggerating the potential harm.

The adverts, commissioned by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, used the rhymes to suggest that Britain faces an inevitable increase in storms, floods and heat waves unless greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control.

The ASA has ruled that the claims made in the newspaper adverts were not supported by solid science and has told the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that they should not be published again.

It has also referred a television commercial to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom, for potentially breaching a prohibition on political advertising.

The rulings will be an embarrassment for Miliband, who has tried to portray his policies as firmly science-based. He had commissioned two posters, four press advertisements and a short film for television and cinema, which started appearing in October last year in the run-up to the Copenhagen climate talks.

They attracted 939 complaints — more than the ASA received for any advertisement last year. The deluge posed problems for the ASA, which is not a scientific body, so it decided to compare the text of Miliband’s adverts with the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Based on that comparison, it ruled that two of the DECC’s adverts had broken the advertising code on three counts: substantiation, truthfulness and environmental claims.

Of the two banned adverts, one depicted three men floating in a bathtub over a flooded British landscape, and the text read: “Rub a dub dub, three men in a tub — a necessary course of action due to flash flooding caused by climate change.”

It then explained: “Climate change is happening. Temperature and sea levels are rising. Extreme weather events such as storms, floods and heat waves will become more frequent and intense. If we carry on at this rate, life in 25 years could be very different.”

The second showed two children peering into a stone well amid an arid, post-climate-change landscape. It read: “Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water. There was none as extreme weather due to climate change had caused a drought.”

It then added: “Extreme weather conditions such as flooding, heat waves and storms will become more frequent and intense.”

It was these additional claims, rather than the nursery rhymes or illustrations, that fell foul of the ASA, which ruled it was not scientifically possible to make such definitive statements about Britain’s future climate.

The ASA said: “All statements about future climate were based on modelled predictions, which the IPCC report itself stated still involved uncertainties in the magnitude and timing, as well as regional details, of predicted climate change.” It added that both predictions should have been phrased more tentatively.

The ASA did, however, reject other complaints, including one suggesting the DECC adverts were misleading because they presented human-induced climate change as a fact.

Miliband said: “On the one issue where the ASA did not find in our favour, around one word in our print advertising, the science tells us that it is more than 90% likely that there will be more extreme weather events if we don’t act.”

Greg Barker, shadow minister for climate change, said: “It is so unnecessary to exaggerate the risks of global warming, and also counterproductive.”

Read the complete article here

========================

Here’s the website where the ads originate from ActOnCO2

Here are some of the advertisements in question:

ActonCO2_Twinkle

Hey_Diddle

Jack&Jill

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
163 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jaypan
March 13, 2010 8:42 pm

Sounds good, looks funny … why not deliver the next IPCC report in such way?
Would exactly match the level of science behind and what these guys think politicians would understand.

spangled drongo
March 13, 2010 8:43 pm

“Rock a bye baby on the tree top, When the wind blows…”
Hurricanes will be more severe and frequent with climate change..blah, blah, blah.
Indoctrinating ’em in prep school is far too late…

March 13, 2010 8:45 pm

About time.
The British are getting a little “alarmism weary”
This spoof site sums it up quite nicely
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/science-%26-technology/global-catastrophe-warnings-reach-monthly-quota-200903191650/
Post climategate, the public needs to hear some truth, not propoganda.

DoctorJJ
March 13, 2010 8:56 pm

The name of their department is the Department of Energy and Climate Change. Let me guess which side of this they are going to be on. Does anyone think they would EVER try to push anything that disputes or downplays climate change? I can hear it now, “Congrats everyone on debunking climate change. Oh snap!! Now we haven’t any jobs!!”

rbateman
March 13, 2010 8:59 pm

Once again, Britain stands alone.

Vilmos
March 13, 2010 9:04 pm

I am wondering how the government paid for these ads.
So the used the British people’s tax in order to pay for this ad which indirectly tries to persuade them to pay even more tax (such as carbon tax) and to give up their freedoms (like travel allowances)?
Vilmos

RayG
March 13, 2010 9:11 pm

I will bet a case of Newcastle Brown Ale (as long as my local Costco has some in stock) that none of the US MSM picks up this story…which I will post on DotEarth.

Al Gore's Holy Hologram
March 13, 2010 9:13 pm

ActOnCO2 has also been running a poll on Facebook for many months. Their first version offered three options. The alarmist option “I’m doing everything I can to reduce my CO2” got the least votes after many months. This did not jive well with the government, so they have replaced it with a new poll this week and each of the three options leave no room for skeptics/rationalists to vote.

Dr A Burns
March 13, 2010 9:25 pm

They should have used a different nursery rhyme:
Oranges and lemons, Say the bells of St. Clement’s
You owe me five millions, Say the bells of St. Pachauri’s
When will you pay me? Say the bells of Old Gore.
When I grow rich, Say the bells of Jones ditched.
Here comes a candle to light you to bed.
Here comes a chopper to chop off your head.
Chip chop, chip chop, the last man’s dead.

Anu
March 13, 2010 9:25 pm

The ASA did, however, reject other complaints, including one suggesting the DECC adverts were misleading because they presented human-induced climate change as a fact.
Looks like the National Air Conditioner is still a go.

March 13, 2010 9:43 pm

Sounds like a dire situation in Britain to me!

March 13, 2010 9:43 pm
Wren
March 13, 2010 10:21 pm

After reading the Times article by Jonathan Leake, read ASA’s Final Adjudication, available at guardian.co.uk
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/mar/13/scienceofclimatechange-climate-change
Now ask yourself if Leak is an accurate reporter?

Amino Acids in Meteorites
March 13, 2010 10:23 pm

….heat waves will become more frequent and intense….
Looking out the window I see cold waves are doing that not heat ones.

G.L. Alston
March 13, 2010 10:31 pm

Ahhh…. there will always be a large island off the northern coast of France.

UKIP
March 13, 2010 10:39 pm

But how much damage has been done in the last six to twelve months of their exposure? And how much more have they ploughed us into unpayable debt with this campaign?

Wren
March 13, 2010 10:52 pm

The guardian.co.UK described the Advertising Standard Authority’s adjudication as a mild rebuke of the government’s ads, saying
‘The Advertising Standards Authority’s only criticism was that a claim that “flooding, heat waves and storms will become more frequent and intense” should have be phrased more tentatively.’
The Times headline “UK ads banned for overstating climate change” is misleading. The ASA said two of the four press ads shouldn’t appear again in their current form, which means they could appear again if revised.
The adjudication can be read at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/mar/13/scienceofclimatechange-climate-change

Baa Humbug
March 13, 2010 11:02 pm

As an Aussie, I’m thrilled whenever and however the poms get a beating. But their government is so so bad, even I’m feeling just a teenie weenie bit sorry for them.
The volume of money sinfully wasted by the UK govt has to be hurting the average pom in the street. They have a chance later this year to toss out this incompetent mob and replace them with another incompetent mob. A change is as good as a holiday they say.

janama
March 13, 2010 11:04 pm

Dr A Burns (21:25:09) :
nice 🙂

Phillip Bratby
March 13, 2010 11:21 pm

“Incy wincey spider
Climbed up the spout
Down came the rain (due to climate change)
And washed the spider out
Out came the sun (due to climate change)
And dried up all the rain
Incey wincey spider
Climbed up again “.

Evan Jones
Editor
March 13, 2010 11:27 pm

Rain, rain, go away . . . (etc.)

Rick Bradford
March 13, 2010 11:41 pm

Odd.
I thought the UK had banned nursery rhymes as being demeaning towards children and hence a violation of their human rights.
Maybe it was just a prescient dream.

March 13, 2010 11:43 pm

…within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event. Children just aren’t going to know what snow is” (Dr David Viner of the CRU, Independent 20 March 2000)

STEPHEN PARKER
March 13, 2010 11:53 pm

This is why its not funny.govt ministers, fully paid up members of the new religion, all in safe seats. Wide eyed and on message. Hope for another poor summer and cold winter, maybe then they will find something else to ” believe” in.

March 13, 2010 11:57 pm

That’s great! Aside from Milliband’s porn, can’t they ban Pachauri’s porn and other kinds of AGW porn? 😉

1 2 3 7