From NASA News: Are Sunspots Disappearing?
September 3, 2009: The sun is in the pits of the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century. Weeks and sometimes whole months go by without even a single tiny sunspot. The quiet has dragged out for more than two years, prompting some observers to wonder, are sunspots disappearing?
“Personally, I’m betting that sunspots are coming back,” says researcher Matt Penn of the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson, Arizona. But, he allows, “there is some evidence that they won’t.”
Penn’s colleague Bill Livingston of the NSO has been measuring the magnetic fields of sunspots for the past 17 years, and he has found a remarkable trend. Sunspot magnetism is on the decline:

Above: Sunspot magnetic fields measured by Livingston and Penn from 1992 – Feb. 2009 using an infrared Zeeman splitting technique. [more]
“Sunspot magnetic fields are dropping by about 50 gauss per year,” says Penn. “If we extrapolate this trend into the future, sunspots could completely vanish around the year 2015.”
This disappearing act is possible because sunspots are made of magnetism. The “firmament” of a sunspot is not matter but rather a strong magnetic field that appears dark because it blocks the upflow of heat from the sun’s interior. If Earth lost its magnetic field, the solid planet would remain intact, but if a sunspot loses its magnetism, it ceases to exist.
“According to our measurements, sunspots seem to form only if the magnetic field is stronger than about 1500 gauss,” says Livingston. “If the current trend continues, we’ll hit that threshold in the near future, and solar magnetic fields would become too weak to form sunspots.””This work has caused a sensation in the field of solar physics,” comments NASA sunspot expert David Hathaway, who is not directly involved in the research. “It’s controversial stuff.”
The controversy is not about the data. “We know Livingston and Penn are excellent observers,” says Hathaway. “The trend that they have discovered appears to be real.” The part colleagues have trouble believing is the extrapolation. Hathaway notes that most of their data were taken after the maximum of Solar Cycle 23 (2000-2002) when sunspot activity naturally began to decline. “The drop in magnetic fields could be a normal aspect of the solar cycle and not a sign that sunspots are permanently vanishing.”
Penn himself wonders about these points. “Our technique is relatively new and the data stretches back in time only 17 years. We could be observing a temporary downturn that will reverse itself.”
The technique they’re using was pioneered by Livingston at the NASA-supported McMath-Pierce solar telescope near Tucson. He looks at a spectral line emitted by iron atoms in the sun’s atmosphere. Sunspot magnetic fields cause the line to split in two—an effect called “Zeeman splitting” after Dutch physicist Pieter Zeeman who discovered the phenomenon in the 19th century. The size of the split reveals the intensity of the magnetism.
Right: Zeeman splitting of spectral lines from a strongly-magnetized sunspot. [more]
Astronomers have been measuring sunspot magnetic fields in this general way for nearly a century, but Livingston added a twist. While most researchers measure the splitting of spectral lines in the visible part of the sun’s spectrum, Livingston decided to try an infra-red spectral line. Infrared lines are much more sensitive to the Zeeman effect and provide more accurate answers. Also, he dedicated himself to measuring a large number of sunspots—more than 900 between 1998 and 2005 alone. The combination of accuracy and numbers revealed the downturn.
If sunspots do go away, it wouldn’t be the first time. In the 17th century, the sun plunged into a 70-year period of spotlessness known as the Maunder Minimum that still baffles scientists. The sunspot drought began in 1645 and lasted until 1715; during that time, some of the best astronomers in history (e.g., Cassini) monitored the sun and failed to count more than a few dozen sunspots per year, compared to the usual thousands.
“Whether [the current downturn] is an omen of long-term sunspot decline, analogous to the Maunder Minimum, remains to be seen,” Livingston and Penn caution in a recent issue of EOS. “Other indications of solar activity suggest that sunspots must return in earnest within the next year.”
Whatever happens, notes Hathaway, “the sun is behaving in an interesting way and I believe we’re about to learn something new.”
h/t to Michael Ronayne
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
At first glance, it looks as if the plot is splice between a low resolution and high resolution dataset.
“If we extrapolate this trend into the future, sunspots could completely vanish around the year 2015.”
Yikes! Since when is nature linear? Somebody should make up a rule about extrapolating a fit to data without there being a clear cut physical model behind the fit.
NASA actually used the words “Maunder Minimum” for the first time. I await the response of the Washington ruling class with breathless anticipation. In a sane society wishing to maintain a technological civilization in the face of a very real and possibly catastrophic cooling event, which will occur by 2015, we would be building nuclear power plants, expanding the electrical grid, drilling for oil and natural gas and doing everything to increase our supplies of energy. Instead the United States finds itself in the control of an anti-technology religious cult.
Also see this report in Red Orbit:
Sunspots On The Decline
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1747730/sunspots_on_the_decline/
Michael Ronayne
Nutley, NJ
Is this where I observe that a decrease in sunspot magnetism must be causing Global Warming? (and then run like heck, ducking and with my hands over my head to ward off projectiles)
Clearly, the “Watts Minimum”!
Agreed Anthony and makes sense as the observations intensified after the last maximum
DaveE.
Fortunately, the sun has no effect on climate. Or weather. Not even sure if it affects the difference between day and night.
REPLY – It must do. Tmax is almost always during the day and Tmin is almost always at night for any given location. ~ Evan]
Where can we get this sunspot magnetic field graph that goes back farther in time?
The sun doing unexpected things is a helluva lot scarier than extra CO2 ever will be.
“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”
I find it interesting that we obviously don’t understand the sun as well as we thought we did (except possibly Leif of course), yet confidence abounds about old Sol’s effects (or lack thereof) here on earth. The one thing that Mr. Hathaway has said in the past couple years that is likely to come to pass “….we’re about to learn something new.”
“… failed to count more than a few dozen sunspots per year …” There were 8 in 2008 and 10 so far this year. When will we get up to a few dozen per year? — John M Reynolds
While it remains to be seen, right now, I see nothing going on that says L&P’s trend will bottom out and go back up.
All I see are plages and miniplages, some borne to actual spots, some blinking in & out.
I see a lot more blinkers on the EIT’s than I do the Continuum or the Magnetogram.
I see less organization and structure than was seen last cycle, and I see a decline since 2007 that goes unabated.
Does anyone see something that says L&P will bottom out?
Assuming nothing changes:
Is L&P eating the goodies out of the spots faster than the cycle can build?
Or can the cycle outgrow L&P erosion and make a measurable maximum before the Sun totally wipes out on the downramp to the next minima?
Starts off smooth, then gets all spikey.
Mark:
There is a CD. Click on “more” found under the pic.
The DASL compact disc contains over 5,000 solar magnetograms obtained on every clear day which the KPVT magnetograph was operational since 1974–slightly more than a complete 22-year magnetic cycle. This data is represented in two forms: large compressed “still” images that will be used to perform the active longitude investigation, and as a “QuickTime” movie that can be played to demonstrate the changes in the solar magnetic activity over time. Playing the 25 -year movie allows one to scroll through the data to quickly locate dates and areas of interest. In addition to the magnetograms and QuickTime movie, the software for performing this project is available through the CD.
What about the other indicators of activity, as x-rays during the same time span.
“May you live in interesting times.”
This is clearly the result of technology… somehow sucking the magnetism out of the sun! There is an undeniable correlation with increasing technology and declining solar activity! When will we learn, that mung beans and hemp are the answer to a simpler life style that will prevent us from destroying the universe! The only logical solution, is to fire all our nuk’s at mercury in the hope of breaking it free of its orbit and launching it into the sun… which will re fire up the sun(somehow) and get things back on there natural path. 😉
I note you cover your ass with almost always.
BTW. What’s the best time to record max/min for a given day? (For an experiment, let you know after I’ve finished.)
DaveE.
We must take action immediately!
I propose we lobby the our respective givernments to launch huge magnets at the sun before we are plunged into the Watts Minimum Ice Age (WMIA). That and pump out a heck of a lot more CO2…. and stick paper bags over our heads.
Yeah, that about covers it.
Mark Bowlin (17:50:06) :
And that something new we are about to learn may not be what we would like to see. We are truly a captive audience. No exit.
Should we not be busy digging up the Maunder and Dalton drawings that survive and getting them out digitally into the light of day?
With a movement to run an agenda in polar opposition to where the Sun is currently heading, it’s wise to get a head start, should things pan out in the wrong direction.
I can’t tell who’s the bigger stubborn mule: The Climate Changers or the Sun.
J.Hansford (17:53:10) :
That’s sparse measurements to more frequent & systematic measurements
DaveE.
The wonderful nerd webcomic XKCD has already weighed in on the habit of overenthusiastic extrapolation:
http://xkcd.com/605/
Bulldust (17:56:41) :
…. and stick paper bags over our heads.
Some already have.
I like your analogy. Quote of the week material. Got my vote.
Michael Ronayne (17:12:19) :
NASA actually used the words “Maunder Minimum” for the first time.
Not quite. The search engine on NASA’s home page picks up twenty hits on that term.
If my memory serves me correctly (and it sometimes doesn’t) when a magnetic field splits the energy levels and results in two different components at slightly different wavelengths those two components are also plane polarized perpendicular to each other, which gives an additional clue that you are seeing a zeeman split, and not some other interloper line (whatever the blazes that might be. There may also be some sorts of three way splits, where a single line calves off an upper and lower pair that are perpendicularly polarized, and equidistant from the original line that remains unpolarized.
But now I am way the hell out on thin (arctic) ice because that comes from the bowels of my memory and not from any recent reference to the literature or textbooks. I used to teach Atomic Physics but only at a freshman level; actually pre-med students; so we sure as heck didn’t mention anybody beginning with a zed.
The Zeeman effect is about like a Phillips #2 screwdriver to an astronomer; they have that stuff in their shower water. In my next re-incarnation I plan to be an astronomer.
George