Basil Copeland and I also found linkages between surface temperature and solar cycles in two articles we published in the last year. We were roundly criticized and ridiculed by warmists mainly due to a statistical error in the first essay, but the base premise remained and the second essay was improved due to that error. I’m pleased to see that NCAR has found other solar to earth linkages, such as this one in ENSO. This is exciting news, but by no means a complete solution to the climate puzzle. There is much more to be learned about this. This is but one connector of the hydra-like patch cable that Dr. Jack Eddy imagined – Anthony

Scientists find link between solar cycle and global climate similar to El Nino/La Nina. Credit: NCAR
Establishing a key link between the solar cycle and global climate, research led by scientists at the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., shows that maximum solar activity and its aftermath have impacts on Earth that resemble La Niña and El Niño events in the tropical Pacific Ocean.
The research may pave the way toward predictions of temperature and precipitation patterns at certain times during the approximately 11-year solar cycle.
“These results are striking in that they point to a scientifically feasible series of events that link the 11-year solar cycle with ENSO, the tropical Pacific phenomenon that so strongly influences climate variability around the world,” says Jay Fein, program director in NSF’s Division of Atmospheric Sciences. “The next step is to confirm or dispute these intriguing model results with observational data analyses and targeted new observations.”
The total energy reaching Earth from the sun varies by only 0.1 percent across the solar cycle. Scientists have sought for decades to link these ups and downs to natural weather and climate variations and distinguish their subtle effects from the larger pattern of human-caused global warming.
Building on previous work, the NCAR researchers used computer models of global climate and more than a century of ocean temperature to answer longstanding questions about the connection between solar activity and global climate.
The research, published this month in a paper in the Journal of Climate, was funded by NSF, NCAR’s sponsor, and by the U.S. Department of Energy.
“We have fleshed out the effects of a new mechanism to understand what happens in the tropical Pacific when there is a maximum of solar activity,” says NCAR scientist Gerald Meehl, the paper’s lead author. “When the sun’s output peaks, it has far-ranging and often subtle impacts on tropical precipitation and on weather systems around much of the world.”
The new paper, along with an earlier one by Meehl and colleagues, shows that as the Sun reaches maximum activity, it heats cloud-free parts of the Pacific Ocean enough to increase evaporation, intensify tropical rainfall and the trade winds, and cool the eastern tropical Pacific.
The result of this chain of events is similar to a La Niña event, although the cooling of about 1-2 degrees Fahrenheit is focused further east and is only about half as strong as for a typical La Niña.
Over the following year or two, the La Niña-like pattern triggered by the solar maximum tends to evolve into an El Niño-like pattern, as slow-moving currents replace the cool water over the eastern tropical Pacific with warmer-than-usual water.
Again, the ocean response is only about half as strong as with El Niño.
True La Niña and El Niño events are associated with changes in the temperatures of surface waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean. They can affect weather patterns worldwide.
The paper does not analyze the weather impacts of the solar-driven events. But Meehl and his co-author, Julie Arblaster of both NCAR and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, found that the solar-driven La Niña tends to cause relatively warm and dry conditions across parts of western North America.
More research will be needed to determine the additional impacts of these events on weather across the world.
“Building on our understanding of the solar cycle, we may be able to connect its influences with weather probabilities in a way that can feed into longer-term predictions, a decade at a time,” Meehl says.
Scientists have known for years that long-term solar variations affect certain weather patterns, including droughts and regional temperatures.
But establishing a physical connection between the decadal solar cycle and global climate patterns has proven elusive.
One reason is that only in recent years have computer models been able to realistically simulate the processes associated with tropical Pacific warming and cooling associated with El Niño and La Niña.
With those models now in hand, scientists can reproduce the last century’s solar behavior and see how it affects the Pacific.
To tease out these sometimes subtle connections between the sun and Earth, Meehl and his colleagues analyzed sea surface temperatures from 1890 to 2006. They then used two computer models based at NCAR to simulate the response of the oceans to changes in solar output.
They found that, as the sun’s output reaches a peak, the small amount of extra sunshine over several years causes a slight increase in local atmospheric heating, especially across parts of the tropical and subtropical Pacific where Sun-blocking clouds are normally scarce.
That small amount of extra heat leads to more evaporation, producing extra water vapor. In turn, the moisture is carried by trade winds to the normally rainy areas of the western tropical Pacific, fueling heavier rains.
As this climatic loop intensifies, the trade winds strengthen. That keeps the eastern Pacific even cooler and drier than usual, producing La Niña-like conditions.
Although this Pacific pattern is produced by the solar maximum, the authors found that its switch to an El Niño-like state is likely triggered by the same kind of processes that normally lead from La Niña to El Niño.
The transition starts when the changes of the strength of the trade winds produce slow-moving off-equatorial pulses known as Rossby waves in the upper ocean, which take about a year to travel back west across the Pacific.
The energy then reflects from the western boundary of the tropical Pacific and ricochets eastward along the equator, deepening the upper layer of water and warming the ocean surface.
As a result, the Pacific experiences an El Niño-like event about two years after solar maximum. The event settles down after about a year, and the system returns to a neutral state.
“El Niño and La Niña seem to have their own separate mechanisms,” says Meehl, “but the solar maximum can come along and tilt the probabilities toward a weak La Niña. If the system was heading toward a La Niña anyway,” he adds, “it would presumably be a larger one.”
Source: National Science Foundation (news : web)
h/t to Leif Svalgaard
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This may be a stupid question but what guarantee is there that the models used in this formulation are more accurate than the ones used by the warmists? What parameters are used to model the forcings in order to reach this conclusion (which is very interesting if true)?
And does my question make any sense?
So it is the sun.
I hear a dying echo-like sound—
It sounds like “The science is settled.” Repeated and growing fainter.
Uhm…isn’t this describing a negative watervapor feedback from warming?
And isn’t this the exact opposite of what climate models assume (positive feedbacks) to come up with warming from CO2?
And absent positive feedbacks, doesn’t this refute CO2 as a significant driver of climate?
But Buzz didn’t see any climate on the Moon and only lunatics on Earth.
A connection between solar cycles and global climate?? A fine step forward.
So, the Sun does have something to do with climate, imagine that!
What happens in this mechanism if the solar cycle is delayed or very weak?
Do we get heavy snows where applicable instead of heavy rains?
I do agree with one thing here: Whenever I have witnessed an El Nino dump on the Western US, the next couple of years are as dry as popcorn. It shuts itself off with La Nina.
One more plug on the Eddy patch cord.
I noticed some articles on Intellicast as well that also shows 11 year cycles in the reliability and intensity of various monsoon seasons and the price of coffee.
Now that we know the possible 11 year impacts of a regular solar cycle on ENSO, but what happens in a grand minimum or a very weak cycle?
Speaking of ENSO all of the plots on the TAO site and the SOI isn’t showing anything that points to an El Nino even close to 1998 levels though SST’s are now on their way down from near-record levels, this El Nino is looking more likely now that it could be a weak one when it’s all said and done.
Very good Anthony.
Served at request!
We know the sun plays an important role.
Now we have a mechanism that explains what is going on.
We need more study, data and observations but step by step…
Eventually. despite the chaotic and dynamic character of weather turning into climate directed by the clock of time we will crack this complicated puzzle of mechanisms.
Thanks for your work.
“…The transition starts when the changes of the strength of the trade winds produce slow-moving off-equatorial pulses known as Rossby waves in the upper ocean, which take about a year to travel back west across the Pacific…”
Yabbut what causes changes of the strength of the trade winds? Do the trees in South America stop wiggling their branches?
At last some “sunlight” is being shed in the very dark corners of the AGW debate. Perhaps Henrik Svensmark has a place on the podium along with Newton, Coppernicus and Gallileo.
It is interesting that they claim the extra Sunshine heats the air which only then evaporates more water. Wouldn’t some of the extra Sunshine evaporate water directly, like maybe the IR part of the spectrum?
Now with this minimum -Nino seems to portend a Moderate to weak one.Looking at the SST charts,It is nothing like ’97/98…
Yet there are those who fervently hope..
jorgekafkazar (16:56:10) :
“Yabbut what causes changes of the strength of the trade winds?”
From the text posted: “. . . as the Sun reaches maximum activity, it heats cloud-free parts of the Pacific Ocean enough to increase evaporation, intensify tropical rainfall and the trade winds”
heat/evaporation/ xxx / trade winds
xxx = low pressure
Trade winds blow from the STHP cells toward the ITCZ. Lower pressure in the latter will “intensify” the trade winds.
“The next step is to confirm or dispute these intriguing model results with observational data analyses and targeted new observations.”
My goodness, what a novel idea – test the models with observations!
Now what are the probabilities of Hansen or the IPCC using this new procedure?
I am afraid the answer as to why the trade winds vary in both strength and slightly in position is a bit of a circular one.
Essentially the path and strength is driven by the convective processes that heat the air at the tropics and we can neglect any tiny variation in the rate at which the earth turns upon its axis.
But When the heating is less the winds become less strong and their path is more affected by the rotation of the earth.
As you might expect they move at their fastest and are more stable towards the centre of the wind zone: hence the old sailorman’s references to the ‘true trades’ as opposed to the rather inconstant winds at either edge of the zone.
Kindest Regards
The paper is filled with similes. Make sure you don’t jump over those to conclusions about ENSO and PDO that were never made in the paper. Also, it appears that this is a dynamical model, not a statistical model. You won’t find the signal in the observed statistical data, only in the model. At least not yet.
Jim (17:05:31) :
It is interesting that they claim the extra Sunshine heats the air which only then evaporates more water. Wouldn’t some of the extra Sunshine evaporate water directly, like maybe the IR part of the spectrum?
I can only provide you with a single web address on this subject:
http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com
More evidence on the sun’s influence on the earth. The pieces are coming together. It looks like we are at the edge pieces stage now.
All the while Al Gore is getting more desperate in his war on science. His latest comparison of his battle against us ‘deniers’ is with the battle against the Nazi’s—no, I’m not kidding.
But Richard Lindzen is right : we will win, because we are right, and they are wrong.
11. a prime number. math is a beautiful thing.
This isnt exactly revolutionary, the sun warms the sea, increases evaporation and cloud colver preventing further heating. When there is less sun there are less clouds and the sea warms more. This feature moderates the climate at the equator (and the earth to a lesser extent) and is the reason why Co2 wont cause much more than slight warming. Cloud behaviour helps maintain a ocean temperature equilibrium at the equator. This is why in previous warm periods the equator was the same or slightly cooler than today yet the northern and southern extremities where much warmer. This happens every day aswell, its just that there is a longer more subtle cycle overlaid ontop.
Just a shame the IPCC models cant include the correct behaviour of clouds at the equator and how the climate system actually functions. The climate model used in this study sounds like it better replicates the behaviour of clouds and has the correct values for ocean surface evaporation etc…
This also ties in with two studies (I dont recall the names or authors) that found baseflows in large river catchments and extreme floods correlate with solar activiity.
Certainty very interesting
UK Skeptic says:
“This may be a stupid question but what guarantee is there that the models used in this formulation are more accurate than the ones used by the warmists?”
I think we need to get one thing straight. The models used by GISS, Hadley, CSIRO etc. are not so much inaccurate as wrongly used. Those models are basically being used for the wrong purpose by the IPCC in that they are being used to predict the climate out to 2100. They shoud and still are used to test our understanding of the climate system. The use of models in gaining an understanding of a system and hypothesis development is actually what they are meant for.
In this case, the models are legitimately being used to develop an understanding of a system and the likely research directions needed to develop a full understanding of it.
It is not a matter of accuracy.
Wow, so you guys were “criticized and ridiculed by warmists mainly due to a statistical error?”
Wonder how these same people reacted when they found out about Mann’s statistical shenanigans (Mannanigans?) with the 1st hockey stick?
Sunspot Cycle Length 1800-1960
via Wavelet Analysis:
http://www.sfu.ca/~plv/SunspotCyclePeriod.PNG