Tech Companies Drive Nuclear Power Plant Expansions, More Electricity

By Paul Steidler

For much of the past 40 years, nuclear power has been in a funk in the U.S., though according to the U.S. Department of Energy it still produces nearly 20% of U.S. electricity and is the country’s largest single source of clean, emission-free electricity.

Cost overruns, financing problems, mammoth regulatory delays, and low-cost U.S. produced natural gas have led dozens of plants to close, with few new ones opening.

The shining star of success in the nuclear industry is uprates – the process by which nuclear engineers make existing reactors more efficient while increasing their maximum generating capacity. And uprates are about to kick into high gear.

Constellation Energy recently announced agreements with Google and Amazon that will drive uprates at 13 nuclear reactors in four states, increasing output by a cumulative 1,080 megawatts. That is enough electricity to serve approximately one million average size U.S. homes. All the new power is scheduled to be available by 2032.

The reactors are at nuclear plants in Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, where communities will get significant economic stimulus from the projects. This includes 7,200 new construction jobs.

Uprates are reviewed and approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC says on its website, “Over the past 20 years, we’ve approved uprates that have given the nation’s electricity grid an additional six gigawatts.” That is enough power to meet the average use of more than five million homes.

Indeed, the October 6 announcement by Google and Constellation Energy for 890 megawatts of new electricity through uprates is one of the most important and under-appreciated announcements pertaining to clean energy, data centers, and electricity infrastructure.

In the press release, Constellation said, “By modernizing and upgrading turbines, steam generators, and digital control systems at operating plants, uprates deliver substantial capacity gains without the multi-year timelines or interconnection bottlenecks associated with greenfield construction.”

Constellation is able to proceed with confidence on the ambitious uprates as Google has signed a 20-year power purchase agreement that includes the 890 megawatts from the uprates and a separate 15-year agreement for 2,700 additional megawatts from Constellation. This enables Constellation to invest more than $4.3 billion in uprates.

Google said, “Our agreement with Constellation to fund nuclear reactor uprates will strengthen the PJM grid, which serves 67 million people, all while protecting energy affordability and supporting local union jobs.”

On September 30, Constellation and Amazon announced a 20-year power purchase agreement for 690 megawatts of power that will directly lead to 190 new megawatts of power generated through an uprate. “The agreement will enable more than $3 billion in Maryland infrastructure investment, including state-of-the-art improvements” at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant, said Constellation.

It also said, “Amazon’s long-term commitment will help provide Constellation with the revenue certainty to relicense the plant for another 20 years and make progress toward the development of new clean energy power plants at the site.”

The Google and Amazon announcements are one of the ways the companies are implementing the Ratepayer Protection Pledge. This is President Donald Trump’s demand to ensure that data centers secure the power they need and pay for the electricity and infrastructure required, without passing those costs on to other ratepayers.

Both Amazon and Google have also made major investments in new nuclear energy technologies, such as small modular reactors. If successful and approved, these could lead to transformative increases in power supply and lower costs while producing abundant, emissions-free power.

For the past 40 years, the nuclear power industry has weathered major challenges and found creative and innovative ways to survive and expand. Large, sweeping agreements with America’s most innovative tech companies, like Amazon and Google, may be the last, best chance for the industry to truly have a renaissance, which will profoundly benefit American consumers as well.

Paul Steidler is a Senior Fellow with the Lexington Institute, a public policy think tank in Arlington, VA.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
October 22, 2026 4:21 am

Not once did the writer use the terms baseload, dispatchable, continuous, reliable or capacity factor, but he repeatedly used the terms “clean” and “emissions-free.” It reflects the brainwashed, myopic thinking of a Washington Beltway consultant. Whatever he says about nuclear power, he must not tarnish the image of costly, intermittent, weather-dependent wind and solar. He avoids delving into the practical motivations for why tech and logistics are selecting gas, nuclear, and maybe even coal to meet their energy demands.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  pflashgordon
October 22, 2026 8:31 am

I was going to post a similar comment. Then I saw yours. Concur.

However, one point that is always missed in the social/emotive language.
Electricity is clean. Energy is clean.
Neither is colored, although the case can be made that certain frequencies of visible light are “green.”

It is not the energy or electricity that is “clean” or “emissions-free.”
It is the generator technology that can be defined in that way.

Just a side point.
Many nuclear steam turbine generators are not emissions free.
They emit water vapor.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2026 9:12 am

And the reactors that power those steam turbine generators emit nuclear waste.

More than just a side point.

cgh
Reply to  ToldYouSo
October 22, 2026 10:48 am

It’s only considered waste because we have no further use for it at this time. “Waste” is a meaningless term. Have you never considered the concept “recycling”?

Reply to  cgh
October 22, 2026 1:27 pm

Hmmm . . . cgh, just reflecting on what you stated to be “meaningless”:
— a waste of time . . . never knew that was recyclable,
— a waste of taxpayer money . . . some portion undoubtedly recycled among politicians and bureaucratic hanger-ons,
— the waste of expired medications . . . I’m not supposed to put those into recycling containers,
— human and animal tissue waste from medical surgeries, such as cancerous tumors . . . do you have a Soylent Green recycling site that you can recommend?
— a waste of talent . . . looking around, IMHO, there seems to be quite a bit of that going on right now, so I’m wondering to what degree any of it is available for recycling,
— how about waste of efficiency (i.e., “inefficiency”) . . . recyclable? I do believe DOGE/Elon Musl failed miserably at making that a “meaningless” term.

🙂

I could go on and on, but need I?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
October 22, 2026 1:30 pm

They definitely do NOT emit nuclear waste.

Emit means to send out, give off, or discharge something—such as light, heat, sound, gas, or radiation—into the environment.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2026 6:04 pm

By golly, you’re right!

I forgot to note that almost all currently operating commercial nuclear power plants store their spent nuclear fuel (aka “SNF”, aka “nuclear waste”) on site, within their guarded border fencing . . . so yes, it can be claimed that that such is not “emitted” beyond the nuclear plant’s property limits . . . which, of course, are isolated from the “environment”.

Gosh, how could I have been so careless?

/sarc

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2026 3:43 pm

The steam generators do not emit any water vapor. The spent steam exiting the turbine is sent to condensing unit. This condensed water is cycled back to the reactor. This water is hyper pure water. The warm water generated in the condensing unit coils is sent to the cooling tower were it is cooled by cold water which is heated up enough to generate clouds which exit the tower.

Nuclear reactors are always located where the is an abundant supply of cool water such as the ocean.

Steve Bunten
Reply to  Harold Pierce
October 22, 2026 9:08 pm

That condenser runs at as low a pressure as possible to allow the turbines to extract as much energy out of the steam. Hence the need for the cooling water. Then the condensed water is pumped back into the reactor compartment and through the steam generator to extract heat from the fissioning. I worked in the Navy as a Reactor Operator so have experience on the whole cycle from the fissioning in the reactor through the steam cycle for driving the propellor and generate electricity. Obviously it’s the propulsion turbine was much larger than the two turbine generators.

October 22, 2026 7:14 am

There is no such thang as “emission free.”
Everythang makes a mess one way or another.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
October 22, 2026 1:31 pm

And that is not an exclusive human province.

October 22, 2026 9:09 am

From the above article:

1) “Constellation Energy recently announced agreements with Google and Amazon that will drive uprates at 13 nuclear reactors in four states, increasing output by a cumulative 1,080 megawatts.”

2) “Constellation is able to proceed with confidence on the ambitious uprates as Google has signed a 20-year power purchase agreement that includes the 890 megawatts from the uprates and a separate 15-year agreement for 2,700 additional megawatts from Constellation.”

So, properly combining and translating these statements into straightforward English, 890/1080 = 82% of the uprates of the 13 existing nuclear reactors is already contractually committed just to Google. Furthermore, Google has contracted with Constellation Energy for an additional 2,700 MWe of electrical power that, presumably, will come from yet-to-be-constructed new nuclear power plants. Since the typical time to bring a modern ~1,000 MWe nuclear reactor online is about 10 years, one can reasonably expect Google’s near-term demand for electricity (presumably for its new data centers) to cause the residential cost of electricity produced by Constellation to soar over the next ten years, and of course other electricity providers will follow suit in accordance with the law of supply-and-demand.

Ka-ching!

Bob
October 22, 2026 4:20 pm

Excellent news.