Why China Cares About Data Centers in Arkansas

By Greg Kiley

Today, China is trying to slow the pace of data center development across the country, including in states across the nation like Georgia, Virginia and Arkansas. This is because the U.S. is locked in an AI arms race with China and the winner of this high-stakes AI competition may well dominate the global economy and enjoy military supremacy.

Raising awareness of this threat to our national security, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton recently urged the Department of Justice to investigate Beijing’s efforts to block data centers in America by working through U.S. nonprofits.    

With that in mind, it’s important to call attention to two well-known partner organizations in Arkansas, called the Arkansas Advanced Energy Association (AAEA) and the Arkansas Advanced Energy Foundation (AAEF). These self-described “sister organizations” split activities between a trade association that does lobbying (AAEA) and a non-profit “educational” affiliate that conducts research and offers public instruction (AAEF). In reality, the division is just on paper – the organizations share an Executive Director, corporate Board members, and an address. 

These groups are notable given their high-profile work on a variety of energy issues in Arkansas that often conflict with data center construction. Notably, the AAEA helped to lead the opposition against legislation that was essential for the construction of data centers in Arkansas. 

With their vocal opposition to this data center law in mind, I do think it is worth pointing out how AAEF funds its energy policy work in Arkansas. 

Between 2019 and 2024, AAEF received grants of at least $1.3 million from a group called the U.S. Energy Foundation – that’s at least 69% of AAEF’s total grant funding during that period. 

But the origins of this U.S. Energy Foundation are under scrutiny. Prior to 2019, the group was known simply as the Energy Foundation (EF) and EF had a variety of well-documented ties to the Chinese Communist Party. In 2019, EF split into the aforementioned U.S. Energy Foundation and Energy Foundation China (EFC). Also, much like AAEF and AAEA, the Energy Foundation split seems to be performative. According to a report from a reputable conservative think tank, from 2019 through 2022, both entities shared office space in San Francisco. The latest data found that both continued sharing personnel and six EFC employees were being compensated by the U.S. Energy Foundation.

Even more concerning is that EFC’s leadership still has ties to senior Communist Party officials, and it has been criticized for supporting energy policies in the U.S. that benefit China. Transparency groups have raised alarm bells and, last July, the Kansas Attorney General alleged that EFC plays a “central role” in “China’s ongoing asymmetric campaign against the United States…” and called on the U.S. Department of Justice to launch an investigation into EFC. 

Finally, as someone who has closely studied China’s long-term goals to achieve global domination, I cannot stress enough that Beijing’s efforts to influence public policy in the U.S. are a legitimate threat. Therefore, it’s fair to point out China’s investment in AAEF and Arkansans and ask: “is this just a coincidence or does China have an agenda to thwart data center construction that puts our national security at risk?” In fact, residents of all states where China is funding anti-data center propaganda should be asking that same question. 

Gregory Kiley is an Air Force veteran and a former professional staff member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.4 16 votes
Article Rating
34 Comments
Alan
October 7, 2026 11:40 pm

I’m from Arkansas, and local folks are upset that there’s talk of building a DC in the local area.

Denis
Reply to  Alan
October 8, 2026 1:53 am

Why?

SxyxS
Reply to  Denis
October 8, 2026 3:07 am

When corporations try to bribe the local families with 10K to built their data centers,
than local folks have every reason to be upset, as the motivation for the bribery is for sure not something good.

Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 5:43 am

Why are they getting upset? Because they didn’t get 10K, too?

is the 10K a bribe or a business deal?

Aren’t you just speculating?

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 8:18 pm

See above. And its not a business deal; its an attempted bribe-and a piss-poor cheap one.

Alan
Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 8:58 am

I’ve heard that people in the West Memphis area have sold their property for as much as 200K and the promise of full time jobs.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 9:18 am

The skeptic in you is good on this one.
If the 10K offer is real, then it indicates a look behind the curtain is certainly justified.
It would be different if the 10K was demanded by the locals, obviously..

George Thompson
Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 8:16 pm

I live down here-you will not find a more suspicious population anywhere; nobody is to be trusted unless well known. Ozarkers are a clannish bunch,Scots-Irish frontier settlers-type folks. If somebody comes by offering a bunch of money for something that they feel will screw things up…well, best approach would be to leave. Quickly.

Reply to  Denis
October 8, 2026 5:38 am

Good question.

Maybe the locals have been brainwashed by the Chicoms.

As for being upset at the thought of building a Data Center, I too would be upset if a Data Center or any other industrial facility were to locate next to my house, but it wouldn’t bother me a bit if it were out of sight and out of mind.

Proper location of Data Centers is possible. Generalizing about Data Center locations does not help matters.

Brainwashing thrives on generalizations.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 9:21 am

Brainwashing thrives on generalizations.

Yes, but also on using common/social language context derived definitions, and hyperbole, fear, greed, anger, and emotionalism.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 12:48 pm

Brain washing thrives in all developed economies. Belief systems dominate in many forms.

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 8:26 pm

You really don’t get it, do you? All politics are local, so said Huey Long, and local down here is just that, local. So to convince the locals you have to do better than just assume they’re ignorant…or Chicom laundered.

October 7, 2026 11:57 pm

Does EFC fund anti-data center actions in other parts of the US?

1saveenergy
October 8, 2026 1:48 am

As with all new inovations/technologys, throughout history people have divided into 3 groups …

A. “It’s dreadful; I will lose my traditional place in society; the world will be taken over by machines & humans will suffer &/or be wiped out.”

B. “It’s wonderful & the world should embrace it to improve man’s lot & give us a land of milk & honey.”

C. The most powerful group … the elites,
“How can we get control of it, cut out the competition, get someone else to pay for it, so it will keep us in the manner to which we’ve become accustomed & give us more power; Oh & don’t give a sod about the plebs.!!

With AI, the genie is out of the bottle; we have to deal with it.

Rahx360
October 8, 2026 2:17 am

Can’t say for sure there’s an agenda. People have the right to oppose data centers in their communities. For years I warned that payback is coming. Everything the west has done will return, NGO’s, sanctions,… Or it’s OK if we do it? It’s not like wester countries are spending, way more, millions in other countries to preach their green agenda. But maybe it’s a reaction to a hostile US that does everything to undermine the Chinese economy. Don’t act surprised that China retaliates in its own way.

Derg
Reply to  Rahx360
October 8, 2026 2:54 am

It makes sense China would undermine the US. Culturally, they are way different. Sadly, there are too many communist (democratic socialists) in the US who will work with China.

Reply to  Derg
October 8, 2026 5:53 am

The Chicoms are at war with the United States and should be expected to try to undermine the U.S. in every way possible.

The Chicoms think they are destined to control the whole world, and they are on that path.

The U.S. has been on a declining path for decades until Trump came on the scene.

Trump is now trying to fix all the mistakes made by past presidents of both political parties. And doing a damn good job of it, despite all the headwinds he faces, both abroad and at home.

Trump has turned things around. The big question is can we keep it going after Trump?

George Thompson
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 8:28 pm

Probably not, but one can hope. Fervently.

Reply to  Rahx360
October 8, 2026 8:15 am

Xi Jin Ping weaponised Chinese industry by forcing all companies to serve the interests of Cinese state intelligence. In response to this, US industry began to support other Asian economies to replace China in the supply chain. These moves have left many Chinese companies with massive over supply and huge financial losses. Xi’s actions were the root cause of these problems.

SxyxS
October 8, 2026 3:04 am

“…does China have an agenda to thwart data center construction that puts our national security at risk? ”

Is today April 1st again?

How can a data center that does not even exist become a national security if it isn’t being built?
Aren’t those data centers private enterprises?
How can it be that that they can put the national security at risk if there is no merger between corporations and state – which is defined as fascism0?
Isn’t this crazy level of investment and the possible bubble crash of the stock markets a way bigger threat to national security? – you should be grateful to China if they are trying to slow down this lunacy ?

Considering that USA restricted China’s access to advanced AI in 2022 it would be the most normal thing for China to try to counter this somehow – yet it is no national security risk at all
after 250 years.
Those data centers relevant for national security are military ones and have been built long time ago.

Your national security risk is the Epstein blackmail system and resulting stealth takeover of military and intelligence,
40 trillion debt and 1/4 tax revenue wasted on debt-interest and fighting war for 3rd psrties.

But for sure not wether data centers are built or not while you already buy up most of the global AI chips.

And don’t be so picky if you bomb and sanction countries all around the world when someone does a bit on your soil.

starzmom
Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 4:33 am

There is a big difference between restricting China’s access to US made AI computer components and stealthily sending money and operatives to the US to act like citizens and oppose data centers or anything else.

I agree we have a lot of national security risks floating around out there. That doesn’t mean these sorts of covert activities should be ignored.

Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 6:03 am

“Isn’t this crazy level of investment and the possible bubble crash of the stock markets a way bigger threat to national security? – you should be grateful to China if they are trying to slow down this lunacy ?”

Trump was originally claiming that the U.S. would be getting around 15 Trillion dollars in new investments in the United States and his detractors said he was crazy.

Yesterday, Trump announced that new investments in the U.S. had reached the 25 Trillion dollar level.

I think Biden got about 500 billion dollars invested in the U.S. during his four years.

Quite a contrast, wouldn’t you say?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 8, 2026 9:31 am

If those numbers are verified, I will celebrate with a beer.

I shall enjoy a cigarette until then, respecting all other’s right to smoke free air, of course.

Cheers.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 8, 2026 4:58 pm

They reported this morning that 500,000 new businesses have been established since Trump’s second term began.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 9, 2026 1:49 pm

Sounds like a nice round figure, so how many businesses have closed since Trump’s second term began ?
That would give a true picture.

Just quoting start-ups is like solar companies giving installed capacity rather than actual generation.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  SxyxS
October 8, 2026 9:29 am

Swing and a miss.

“…does China have an agenda to thwart data center construction that puts our national security at risk? ”

It is the agenda to thwart… that puts our national security at risk… if it succeeds.

“merger between corporations and state – which is defined as fascism0?”
Not a correct definition. Fits socialism and communism much closer.

And your favorite red herring…. divert to your TDS ramblings.

ResourceGuy
October 8, 2026 7:07 am

It would be quite easy to buy off city council members and county quorum court member votes. After all a pizza box was used to deliver cash payment to the disgraced former State Treasurer Martha Shoffner (D) in Arkansas by a fund manager.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ResourceGuy
October 8, 2026 9:31 am

Did that really happen? I had not heard of it before this. It is credible, just not verified personally.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 8, 2026 6:59 pm

Look it up. It’s not hard to find facts like that on statewide office holders with widespread news coverage.

In addition the county quorum court leader in the largest county had to veto a recent council vote against data centers. I’m not sure on the details of the debate and vote on that one.

October 8, 2026 8:58 am

Given the recent media frenzy about dats centers I asked Claude two questions:
What was the annualized residential cost of electricity in Ohio over the last 10 years?
What is this in constant 2016 $$?

1000001951
David Michael Rinaldi Coleman
October 8, 2026 5:18 pm

China still has a lot of money invested in the U.S., and would be hurt from the economic failure of the U.S. Many economists see our massive investment in A.I. as throwing money and our economy away.

George Thompson
Reply to  David Michael Rinaldi Coleman
October 9, 2026 4:28 pm

Subversion is much cheaper than war.

October 9, 2026 5:07 am

Somewhat kinda sorta right, but mostly woefully wrong.

Does China have a reason to ‘help’ prevent AI data centers? Sure — but so what? Ordinary Americans oppose data centers, and not because China funds oppo research. We’ve seen this ‘Bootleggers and Baptists’ phenomenon repeatedly over the years. Amazon HQ in NYC — opposed by both the left and right, vehemently. Eminent Domain issues equally opposed by the left and right. People with wildly different world views can agree on certain issues again and again — and it’s not because a baddy is involved. That’s just silliness.

The opposition to data centers isn’t one ideology’s narrative but a shared sense that ordinary people bear the costs (higher electric bills, water use, noise, farmland destruction, tax abatements) while the benefits go to distant companies, and permanent jobs are few. That alone is enough for normal folks to oppose them.

A China bogeyman doesn’t change this. Moreover, China’s funding of some of this matters not one bit — because US strategic benefit from AI depends not one bit on data centers in rural Arkansas. If you think it does, you aren’t paying attention, but merely responding to the little hammer that strikes just below the patella.

Reply to  Willy
October 11, 2026 6:20 am

Higher electric bills? See my comment above. That’s inflation not data centers.