People’s Republic of Boulder Wants To Run Your Energy Policy

By Larry Behrens

Boulder, Colorado, has spent decades wearing a nickname most towns would take as an insult: “The People’s Republic of Boulder.” It’s a college town of roughly 100,000 people, where the politics climb about as high as … the elevation. But now Boulder wants to export its “Rocky Mountain High,” and it’s headed to the Supreme Court.

At stake before SCOTUS is whether that town gets to set energy policy for the rest of America. That’s the real question in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, no matter how carefully supporters dress it up.

In 2018, the City of Boulder, Boulder County, and San Miguel County sued in Colorado state court arguing energy companies’ products fueled climate change and that the companies should cover whatever local costs these opportunistic politicians wanted.

Translation: Sell a legal product to willing customers around the world, and a county in Colorado can bill you for the weather.

Boulder insists it isn’t trying to regulate anyone’s emissions. One of its own lawyers forgot the script. David Bookbinder, who helped file the case for Boulder told a Federalist Society panel that tort liability is “an indirect carbon tax” and the lawsuit is “somewhat of a convoluted way to achieve the goals of a carbon tax.”

Congress has refused to pass a carbon tax for decades because voters won’t stand for one. So the activists went shopping for a courtroom instead.

This is how the green movement operates when it can’t win an honest vote. Pick one friendly jurisdiction, score a win where nobody’s watching, then export the result to everyone else.

California perfected the method. Its rule to end sales of new gas-powered cars by 2035 was never put before the people of Ohio or Virginia. Yet the Clean Air Act let other states copy it, and 11 states plus Washington, D.C., signed on. Unelected regulators in Sacramento were writing the car-buying rules for a huge share of the country.

Boulder is running the same play, with a jury box in place of an air board. A win wouldn’t stay in the Rockies. Roughly three dozen similar lawsuits are already waiting around the country, and every one of them would get a green light.

One law professor put it plainly: “If Boulder can attach liability to these two companies … it can attach liability to thousands of others.” That isn’t a lawsuit. It’s a regulatory regime run by whichever county files first.

Emissions don’t stop at county lines. They come from every state and every nation on earth, and Beijing won’t be cutting Boulder a check anytime soon. The Constitution has an answer for problems that cross state lines and national borders: Washington, not a county courthouse.

Thankfully, the Trump Justice Department filed a brief backing the companies, as did Alabama and more than two dozen other states. Lined up behind Boulder? Colorado and 18 Democrat-led states. That tells you whose agenda this really is.

Oil companies, like every other company, don’t eat judgments. They pass them along. Every dollar a Colorado jury awards becomes a cost baked into what you pay to fill the tank, heat the house, and ship the groceries. Then they will feign crocodile tears over “affordability.”

The trucker in Missouri and the farmer in Kansas never got a vote for Boulder County commissioner. Under this theory, they’d still get the invoice.

But as the case comes up for a hearing, there’s a twist. Justice Samuel Alito recused himself last week, leaving eight justices to decide the case. An evenly split Court would leave the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling in place, and Boulder’s lawsuit would roll on.

That makes this argument even more important. The justices need to see this case for what it is: national energy policy, drafted in one of the most liberal zip codes in America and aimed at everyone else.

America became an energy superpower because producers, workers, and voters built it, not because a county commission found a sympathetic judge. If the left wants a carbon tax, it should make that case to Congress and the American people, out in the open.

Boulder is free to govern Boulder. The rest of us never voted to join the People’s Republic.

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 16 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
33 Comments
observa
October 6, 2026 6:55 pm

Oil companies, like every other company, don’t eat judgments. They pass them along. Every dollar a Colorado jury awards becomes a cost baked into what you pay to fill the tank, heat the house, and ship the groceries. Then they will feign crocodile tears over “affordability.”

Always dump the virtue signalling on the deplorables-
Tesla and power giants revolt against Australia’s ‘EV charger tax’

observa
Reply to  observa
October 6, 2026 7:04 pm

PS: ….and send more grants for the settled science-
Antarctic blind spot emerges as major sea-level threat

Reply to  observa
October 7, 2026 3:46 am

Regarding your link on Antarctic blind spot,
” … ice rests on bedrock 2000M below sea level”.
You’ll need some big icebreaker to navigate that.

claysanborn
Reply to  observa
October 7, 2026 9:24 am

There are many,volcanoes in/under West Antarctica. A 2017 study identified 138 volcanoes in Antarctica

KevinM
Reply to  observa
October 6, 2026 9:05 pm

Thus: tax

Mike Larkin
Reply to  observa
October 7, 2026 1:39 am

As the current laws stand in Australia EV owners pay nothing to use the roads, because the road funding comes from fuel excise.

Scissor
October 6, 2026 6:58 pm

Ironically, Boulder gets most of its electricity from fossil fuels.

The XCEL Valmont power plant is adjacent to the reservoir in the upper center of the photo above. It used to be a coal plant but has been converted to natural gas. The University of Colorado has a natural gas cogeneration plant on its campus also.

All emergency power generation for hospitals, business and critical government facilities is provided by diesel fuel, not surprisingly from Suncor.

https://bouldercounty.gov/environment/water/valmont-station/

October 6, 2026 7:15 pm

‘Justice Samuel Alito recused himself last week, leaving eight justices to decide the case. An evenly split Court would leave the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling in place, and Boulder’s lawsuit would roll on.’

Three justices are in the tank for the Left, while Thomas is a reliable vote for reason. That means if just one of the four remaining squishes sides for Bolder, it’s sayonara for fossil fuels

leefor
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
October 7, 2026 12:48 am

By my calculation, with Alito recusing and leaving 8, it would seem either 4-4 or 5-3 split at best? Isn’t an even split a result in the negative?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  leefor
October 7, 2026 9:32 am

The tie vote simply leaves the lower court decision untouched.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
October 7, 2026 2:02 pm

As far as I can tell, he recused himself because he owns oil stocks. I don’t think that would have biased his opinion but he didn’t want to give the impression that it did.
I wish he hadn’t recused himself but I give a nod to his personal integrity.
(If only the Muppet who refused to define what a “woman” is would recuse herself from any and all SCOTUS cases related to men in women’s bathrooms or playing women’s sports!)

DarrinB
October 6, 2026 7:21 pm

“California perfected the method. Its rule to end sales of new gas-powered cars by 2035 was never put before the people of Ohio or Virginia. Yet the Clean Air Act let other states copy it, and 11 states plus Washington, D.C., signed on. Unelected regulators in Sacramento were writing the car-buying rules for a huge share of the country.”

It’s worse then that depending on manufacturer. It used to be common that you saw California legal but that meant our auto industry was making two different vehicles. As time has gone on it’s become 50 state legal for cost reasons or in other words California legal. That means California is actually setting rules for all 50 states.

Mike Larkin
Reply to  DarrinB
October 7, 2026 1:41 am

Not just for all 50 States. Because of the size of the California market “California legal” has become the default for a lot of things, not just vehicles.

Reply to  Mike Larkin
October 7, 2026 10:45 am

“California legal” has become the default

But not for Tabasco color sticks. They actually won’t ship them to California due to Prop 65 warning requirements.

More companies should do that.

Siotu
Reply to  DarrinB
October 7, 2026 10:30 am

Colorado is what you get when the single-party state of California is allowed to metastasize. The insanity is essentially codified by the state.

KevinM
October 6, 2026 9:02 pm

If the settlement is equivalent to a tax then one city may have found a way to tax the nation. (Tax because it is on ‘necessities’)

Rationally, all other cities in the nation would have precedent to take the same action – they’d be foolish not to.

Thus the exclusive power to tax (people in different states) is stripped from the federal government to be shared with local government?

October 6, 2026 10:47 pm

Time for Suncor to sue the City of Boulder, Boulder County, and San Miguel County and each of the specific leftist lunatics in government who brought this frivolous lawsuit for the legal fees it has cost Sunco and, say, $10 billion on top as a monetary penalty to dissuade other leftist autocrats trying to impose their diktats through perverting the legal system instead of using the democratic legislative process. Let the people of Boulder City and the two counties bear the financial burden, and especially the bureaucratic tyrants individually. Sue them into bankruptcy. Make it hurt so bad that they never want to try again for at least a generation. All attempts to impose tyranny should be met with severe consequences in a country founded on the principle of government by the consent of the people.

Walbrook
October 7, 2026 12:39 am

“arguing energy companies’ products fueled climate change “

Since the weather is becoming better in most every way perhaps the energy companies should send a bill to “The People’s Republic of Boulder.”
They would hardly have a leg to stand on as they claim the energy companies are responsible for the weather.

Reply to  Walbrook
October 7, 2026 1:07 am

Indeed, they are enjoying a nice Indian summer right now. Can we still say “Indian summer”?

Bob B.
Reply to  johnesm
October 7, 2026 3:23 am

Indigenous peoples summer

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bob B.
October 7, 2026 9:34 am

Those “indigenous people” prefer not to suffer cancel culture and like being called Indians.

MarkW
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 7, 2026 9:41 am

I’ve never met an actual “indigenous” person who minded.
Pretty much the only people who ever cared were white liberals who thought they knew better what was best for the natives.

PS: Most of the actual natives did not mind having sports teams with Indian themed names. Many of them actually liked it. Selling Indian themed souvenirs to the Braves organization used to be a major source of income to the tribes in N. Georgia.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
October 7, 2026 11:25 am

As a historical footnote, there were no indigenous peoples in North or South America with indigenous being defined as evolved here. All of these “indigenous people” migrated here from Asia, Africa (some say Egypt), and various Polynesian Islands. So, what is the definition to establish an indigenous claim? Migration 4000 years ago? 15000 years ago? Some other era?

To my previous post, I refer people to the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) https://www.ncai.org/

Yes, MarkW, many do like it and approve. The Washington Redskins helmet logo was a stylized portrait of Chief John Two Guns White Calf of the Blackfeet Nation designed by Walter “Blackie” Wetzel, a Blackfeet tribal chairman and past president of the NCAI.

Washington build playgrounds for various tribes. When asked if they were offended by the logo, the response was no and look we got playgrounds for the kids (words to that effect).

oeman50
Reply to  Walbrook
October 7, 2026 4:40 am

“Fueled climate change”

So what impact would there be on climate if all the energy companies being sued stopped supplying fuel within the U.S. (since that is the limit of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction)?

According to John Kerry, nothing, since stopping ALL U.S. emissions would still be swamped by emissions from the rest of the world.

Reply to  oeman50
October 7, 2026 8:05 am

If in the hypothetical, the Supreme Court caves and fails to strike down Boulder’s lawsuit, and if the lawsuit were to then succeed for say a $1 billion judgment, how might the energy companies localize the payment of the judgment? The energy companies could calculate their annual sales within the jurisdiction of Boulder, divide that into $1 billion, and pay the judgment by forgoing sales revenues and ceasing to provide fuel to Boulder for that number of years. If Boulder doesn’t want fossil fuels, then Boulder doesn’t get fossil fuels. Who’s next?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  pflashgordon
October 7, 2026 9:36 am

Better if the energy companies got a judge to issue a stay inhibiting their sales.
That way they could not be sued for harm and damage for not providing their products.

Ed Zuiderwijk
October 7, 2026 12:50 am

Name the lawyers driving this.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
October 7, 2026 5:48 am

I wonder if David Bois is involved … Bois was one of the lawyers on board with Algore v. whomever in the 2000 presidential election and the controversy with ‘hanging chads’ that finally went before the USSC.

David Bois, AIA, LEED AP – Partner at Arrowstreet Inc.

October 7, 2026 1:08 am

Colorado is enjoying wonderful autumn weather right now. Perhaps we should send a bill to Boulder. You can thank us later.

claysanborn
Reply to  johnesm
October 7, 2026 9:09 am

Randle Dewees had an excellent comment on a different page the other day on Performance Contradiction whose principle will be the reason any court must shut down Boulder plaintiff’s spurious case; summary judgement should work:
His version of the definition: “Performative Contradiction: A philosophical term for a state of being where a person’s explicit claims or protests are fundamentally contradicted by the very conditions required for them to make those claims. Protesting the historical existence of fossil fuels while existing because of them is a textbook example.”
Since Boulder, CO would still be a wild west, dirt-street-ed, wooden building lined city, with no running water nor electricity w/o its fossil fuel-fed energy structure, it can’t have its cake and eat it too.
What Boulder, CO SHOULD be doing is arranging an annual parade for Life-giving, Energy King Fossil Fuels. Some talented Boulderite could write the parade theme song: “Thanks be to fossil fuels for bringing our city out of abstract poverty into its current comparative blissful state in which certain ingrates have to work hard to find things for which to complain.“

claysanborn
October 7, 2026 8:21 am

Boulder, CO…. I love it when Pink-O Commies reveal themselves. It takes all the guesswork out.

Sparta Nova 4
October 7, 2026 9:30 am
Bob
October 7, 2026 3:53 pm

Yep my hometown is as pathetic as Boulder sorry to say.