Backlash Against AI Data Centers Is Real, Organic, Widespread

By Brendan Steinhauser

Recently, Republican political operatives have been sounding the alarm about the bad politics of data centers. Data centers have become politically toxic, and the polling makes it undeniable. More than 70% of Americans oppose building a data center in their neighborhood.

This isn’t only about energy costs, water usage, aesthetics, or noise. The American people are worried about artificial intelligence replacing human beings. They don’t want technology companies to build superintelligence. And they fear more loss-of-control incidents that could lead to financial losses, national security threats, or even human extinction caused by a novel biological weapon.

Republican operatives are catching up to something I’ve been saying for months: AI is the sleeper issue of the 2026 midterm elections. The question now is, what should Republican elected officials, operatives, and candidates do about it?

Republicans need to show that they hear the American people, and that they support meaningful safeguards on AI. 

As a lifelong conservative and longtime Republican strategist with deep ties to the grassroots base of the party, I have observed a few important things about this widespread local opposition to data centers. It is real, organic, and present in cities, suburbs, and rural areas of the country. The opposition transcends traditional political divides. I haven’t seen something like this since my days as an early Tea Party organizer in 2009. 

Back then, it was clear to me that there was a growing national movement happening across America, and that the people taking to the streets in protest were issue-driven and angry at both political parties for ignoring them. I see that dynamic building around AI data centers now.

People feel like they are being forced to accept massive new buildings that might drive up energy costs, reduce the value of their land, and provide only temporary jobs. They believe the companies building the data centers are not being transparent with their intentions. It is clear that people do not trust the Silicon Valley entities building the data centers, and they do not trust Big Tech in general.

The skepticism runs deeper than data centers. The American people are worried about AI’s impact on jobs, their children’s education, and the U.S. financial system. They don’t want to see autonomous AI agents replace human beings. They want to see AI used as a tool that increases human flourishing. 

But that is not the path we seem to be on, with AI threatening jobs, going rogue, exacerbating our mental health crisis, and negatively impacting our children. Until the American people are confident that AI and the data centers that power them will benefit rather than degrade society, they will continue to take to the streets in protest. They will show up at town halls. They will demand that Big Tech provide real transparency. And they will push for enforceable laws and safeguards that these companies have promised for decades but never delivered.

All the money in the world from Big Tech and their allies in Washington, D.C., won’t make a difference. Only a real and sustained demonstration that we are on the right path will do that.

That is the work required by Republican elected officials and candidates in the weeks ahead. The Republicans who get this right will be the ones who are rewarded in November. 

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
3.3 12 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
47 Comments
Mr.
August 28, 2026 6:25 pm

A.I. is a very vexed issue.

I’m old enough to remember the days when computerization of administrative functions was going to decimate admin / clerical employment right across the board.

As it urns out, it was another case of “the anticipation was worse than the eventual reality”.

I predict that employers will selectively utilize A.I. to advance their business interests, but they’re not going to throw the baby out with the bathwater over it.

(As for government bureaucracies, nothing yet known to mankind will ever arrest their growth 🙁 )

hiskorr
Reply to  Mr.
August 28, 2026 6:46 pm

The problem with AI is the age-old problem with computers: GIGO!

Mr.
Reply to  hiskorr
August 28, 2026 8:44 pm

Agree!
My novice experience with applying so-called “artificial intelligence” apps to research & financial scenarios is that unless your instructions are fairly detailed & precise, the “agent” will present waffle back to you.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  hiskorr
August 29, 2026 7:28 am

In the case of AI, it will be GIPO, Garbage In Propaganda Out.

rovingbroker
August 28, 2026 6:56 pm

I asked Copilot AI to, “Name five technological advances that resulted in significance job loss over the last 50 years or so.”

Industrial Robotics (1970s → present)Sector hit: Manufacturing (auto, electronics, metals)
Type of job loss: Assembly‑line workers, welders, machinists
Impact:

  • U.S. manufacturing employment peaked around 19.5 million in 1979 and fell to ~12.9 million by 2010, even as output increased.
  • Robotics replaced repetitive, precision, and hazardous tasks.
  • Auto plants today use hundreds to thousands of robots per facility.

Computerized Office Automation (1980s–2000s)Sector hit: Clerical and administrative work
Type of job loss: Typists, secretaries, filing clerks, switchboard operators

Digital Photography (1990s–2000s)Sector hit: Film, photo processing, camera retail
Type of job loss: Photo lab technicians, film processors, camera store workers
Impact:

  • Kodak alone went from 145,000 employees (1988) to ~5,000 today.
  • Tens of thousands of photo labs closed worldwide.

Retail Automation & E‑Commerce (1995–present)Sector hit: Brick‑and‑mortar retail
Type of job loss: Cashiers, stock clerks, retail salespeople
Impact:

  • Self‑checkout systems reduce cashier staffing by 20–40% in many chains.
  • E‑commerce displaced hundreds of thousands of retail jobs; department stores lost over 500,000 jobs since 2000.
  • Warehouse automation further reduces labor needs.

AI‑Driven Back‑Office Automation (2015–present)Sector hit: Finance, insurance, customer service, HR, legal support
Type of job loss: Claims processors, call‑center agents, paralegals, junior analysts
Impact:

  • Banks and insurers report 10–30% reductions in back‑office staffing due to automation.

Change is hard but it is not new.

MarkW
Reply to  rovingbroker
August 28, 2026 7:12 pm

Even while some industries are losing jobs, over all employment has been going up.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  rovingbroker
August 28, 2026 11:50 pm

How are any of those changes actually advances, as in change for the better?
Already the first world nations functioning under socialist principles are keeping hordes of individual is useless work, high prestige sheltered workshops like administrators and bureaucrats and advisers … you get the picture. As Jordan Peterson has pointed out, only 20% of the people do 80% of the productive work – the Pareto principle (the law of the vital few).

Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
August 29, 2026 7:22 am

The B Ark is always easy to fill.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  rovingbroker
August 29, 2026 7:29 am

Should have also asked what job additions/increases occurred as a result of each advance.

hdhoese
Reply to  rovingbroker
August 29, 2026 11:52 am

I seem to recall computers were going to cut out or at least down on paper work. Seems like it has increased it, continual “go paperless” only works with a power source which can be more problematical than a piece of paper. At least some libraries have been sacrificed. At our age we are swamped with paper. Computers are useful but like many technologies carry some unwanted baggage. I fail to see how something called “artificial” is intelligent, language has meaning. I learned fairly late in life that all money is not equal, seems that there is no way that people will not be essential. As a long time photographer I appreciate digital, but it has problems, everybody can’t be a photographer for a living. Concern is very logical.

BenVincent
August 28, 2026 7:10 pm

Here in Temple, TX residents are upset because neither city leaders nor the data center companies will provide any hard answers to posed questions. The hemming and hawing gives the appearance of something not being above board. Makes residents think something is being hidden from them.

Temple is nearing 100,000 population but it is still surrounded by ranches and cropland. The area has suffered from farmland being destroyed by being covered with solar farms. Now more farmland is being lost forever by massive data centers.

People wonder and worry about water use (during a big drought), electric grid capacity, heat and noise.

I guarantee that here in Temple it isn’t a Republican or Democrat thing, or a conservative or liberal thing. People of all sorts are concerned and want limits on data centers.

MarkW
Reply to  BenVincent
August 29, 2026 8:43 am

It’s not always possible to give hard answers to hypothetical questions about possible future events.

August 28, 2026 7:14 pm

The sudden switch towards data centers and the AI they enable, and the consequential abandonment of “renewable energy”, seems more about a switch from using the failing “climate change” fear based propaganda as a control mechanism to an AI based surveillance State where we all live in the equivalent of an open air prison. It’s about power. It’s always been about power.

Reply to  MarkH
August 28, 2026 9:46 pm

I’d suggest that the same Left that finds fear of ‘climate change’ useful also finds fear of ‘data centers’ useful. People should worry a lot less about voluntary market activity, and a lot more about coercive government activity.

Derg
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
August 29, 2026 3:24 am

This ^

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
August 29, 2026 4:57 am

nailed it!

sidabma
August 28, 2026 7:53 pm

From what I hear and read there some very specific things that the people don’t like regarding the AI Data Centers. 1) They are worried that they are the ones paying for the natural gas to produce the electricity- with increased natural gas and electrical rates.
2) They don’t like the noise from the cooling units on the roofs of these buildings.
3) They don’t like the physical size of these Data Centers.
4) Once these Data Centers are constructed and in operation, the local community feels no benefit.
5)They feel invaded when the utility has to put up towers and power lines alongside or over their property to bring power to these new Data Centers.

This industry took off because of the amount of money behind it. Many cities also jumped at the money, excluding what “their peoples” concerns might be.

We are hoping that President Trump and Secretary Wright and Zelden will get together and come up with a plan to control all this AI Data Center expansion. We believe in Community Power Plants providing the power to these Data Centers. These Community Power Plants also need to be told to operate at over 90% energy efficiency.
The combusted exhaust from these power plants can be utilized to create many full time jobs for the local community. Utilizing this exhaust will also make these power plants and Data Centers zero emissions.

This is 2026. These AI Data Centers have so much knowledge inside those buildings. Put it to work for the people of these communities that have to live with them.

Reply to  sidabma
August 28, 2026 9:56 pm

‘We are hoping that President [ ] and Secretary [ ] and [ ] will get together and come up with a plan to control [ ].’

How would you like it if our leading lights on the Left were able to fill in the blanks?

‘The combusted exhaust from these power plants can be utilized to create many full time jobs for the local community. Utilizing this exhaust will also make these power plants and Data Centers zero emissions.’

What?

sidabma
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
August 29, 2026 3:36 pm

It’s not a new technology. Utilizing combusted natural gas exhaust to create jobs and an increase in production in commercial greenhouses has been happening here in North America for over 40 years. The heat energy gets utilized. The CO2 is used for enrichment. The condensation or the water gets nutrients added and is put into the irrigation system.
Inside a commercial greenhouse is a Great place to work.

Reply to  sidabma
August 29, 2026 4:56 pm

You didn’t mention ‘commercial greenhouses’, above, but in any event I’m not sure I’d want to work in an enclosed space that was on the receiving end of, say, a 250MW CCGT. Having said that, if the necessary provisions for heat exchange and CO2 dilution have been made, then go for it.

MarkW
Reply to  sidabma
August 29, 2026 8:50 am

1) The companies are going to pay for the electricity they use.
Everything that increases demand increases price. Why do so many people only complain about AI? Every extra grocery store, restaurant, or even home, increases demand.
2) Every building has cooling units. The bigger the building, the and bigger the units.
3) Did they complain about the new Sam’s/Costco?
4) What benefit does the community gain from a new factory?
5) Did they complain about the infrastructure needs of that new factory, or the apartment complex that went in?

sidabma
Reply to  MarkW
August 29, 2026 3:43 pm

http://www.SidelCREN.com We have recently partnered with a company that for the past 10 years has applied their technology to taking recovered waste heat energy from applications like cooling units, and turning this waste heat energy back into useable electricity.
The new factory hires people. The new apartment building rents units to people who work in the area.
Where do you get the notion that companies that build to meet a communities need must increase their prices?

John Hultquist
August 28, 2026 9:03 pm

Very interesting. The post and comments all used a “data center” to present this to us poor citizens.
 Andreas Karlstadt wrote {April 1517} radical theological comments and posted them on the door of All Saints’ Church, as Luther was alleged to have done with the Ninety-five Theses. Luthor is remembered. Maybe his data center was better than Karlstadt’s. Let’s go back to nailing documents on church doors.  

1saveenergy
Reply to  John Hultquist
August 28, 2026 11:58 pm

Nailing documents on church doors can be considered a hate crime if it is motivated by bias against the religion or beliefs of the church’s congregation.

So yes, we should go back to nailing documents on church doors.
Throughout history, religions have caused huge problems for the have-nots while giving coercive control ( plus great wealth & power ) to the elites of society.

Walter Sobchak
August 28, 2026 11:01 pm

The Tech gurus driving the AI revolution spent years convincing people that AI will certainly make them unemployed and unemployable and that there is a real probability that it will simply render the human race extinct.

And now people don’t want them around.

Irony is even stronger than the Force.

Phillip Chalmers
August 28, 2026 11:43 pm

Just like climate change was made a code for AGW it seems that Data Centres are code for LLM aka AI.
Current experience reports that people are being given output from LLMs that are wrong, contain lies about where and how part of the answer was collected from, false references such as either non-existent sources or sources which either do not mention the topic or actually contradict the answer specifically. Another feature which is worrisome is that they have been programmed to be far too nice and agreeable and reluctant to disagree or contradict questioners. Others report that training an AI to be challenging can make it turn nasty. No laws of robotics are in place, and if you read Asimov closely to the end you will realize that his future reached the point where super robots ruled from far away and hid their existence while still interfering with the entire galactic civilisation.
It is not stupid or neurotic to be cautious about real dangers.
Keep your children free of all screen devices until they are at least 15 years old and developing their own individuality open to reality.

Editor
August 29, 2026 12:36 am

Do Greens oppose them? If the answer is Yes then relax they are OK.

1saveenergy
August 29, 2026 12:37 am

Almost all changes have been resisted by someone & it’s always going to be worse than we thought
The Bronze Age ( put Flint Knappers out of work )
The wheel (put Porters out of work)
Printing (put Scribes out of work)
Canals (put packhorse teams out of work )
Railways ( put canal workers, drovers & coachmen out of work )
The Loom ( put hand weavers out of work )
Motor transport devastated the horse-drawn industries
Computers will end all jobs !!
You … get the idea

So, with all those innovations, is life better for humans now than it was in the Stone Age ???

MarkW
Reply to  1saveenergy
August 29, 2026 8:53 am

Despite all these job destroying inventions, there are more people working than ever before and the standard of living for everyone has increased by huge amounts.

1saveenergy
Reply to  MarkW
August 29, 2026 4:09 pm

Indeed, it’s better than ever !!

August 29, 2026 4:53 am

“The American people are worried about artificial intelligence replacing human beings.”

Not all Americans. I’m not worried about it. 🙂

David Wojick
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
August 29, 2026 12:37 pm

Nor I and I know no one who is. Perhaps it is the same loonies who worry climate change will destroy humanity. The chatbots emulate reading and reasoning amazingly well but that is about it.

Reply to  David Wojick
August 29, 2026 4:50 pm

I went to a townhall meeting with my state senator and representative. It seemed to me that the majority of the crowd was against data centers stating that we already have enough to take care of our electronic communications.
They were concerned with AI bringing about the Big Brother system (agree to a point), short term construction jobs with no long term community work, higher electric bills, noise, and one wide eyed mouth-breather vehemently didn’t want anymore CO2 emitted.
The senator was proposing that they follow Trump’s suggestion stating the developers provide the infrastructure, but tried to make it their own since she’s a democrat.
The crowd seemed to have an activist group to steer the conversation. They even had matching T-shirts and scarves.

David Wojick
August 29, 2026 4:55 am

Given the election is just two months away this article is a year late. But it offers no real guidance so that does not matter.

As policy confusions go AI and data centers are as good as it gets. A normal Revolution running its course.

Bruce P
August 29, 2026 5:29 am

X Uncovers a Massive Chinese Bot Farm Pushing Anti-Data Center Propaganda
Don’t know if the link is paywalled, in any case it is clear that articles like the one above are either inspired by Chinese propaganda or paid for by Chinese propagandists.

Please, please, please, Republicans and Democrats, don’t fall for this Luddite nonsense! WUWT and millions of other sites would be impossible without data centers. Make them energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, sure, but don’t start a torches-and-pitchforks campaign against them!

jvcstone
Reply to  Bruce P
August 29, 2026 9:13 am

Official narrative—not to be believed ever.

Coach Springer
August 29, 2026 6:00 am

Only a real and sustained demonstration that we are on the right path will do that.” They said that about the American republic too. Look where that has led.

As much as we are addicted to tech, we are getting data centers whether we like it or not.

heme212
August 29, 2026 6:00 am

I am neither for nor against data centers but I AM insulted by the stance the pro data center side seems to have taken: that modern life will not be possible without them.

MarkW
Reply to  heme212
August 29, 2026 8:54 am

I have never seen anyone take that stance.

David Wojick
Reply to  MarkW
August 29, 2026 10:17 am

No Internet without the so no modern life.

David Wojick
Reply to  David Wojick
August 29, 2026 10:18 am

Them not the

Junkgirl
August 29, 2026 6:19 am

I have to level my concern in that millions of Chinese bots are working full time to get the leverage it needs to own the world and be first in this. If China gets the upper hand then the rest of us are toast. China wants you frightened and sticking to our own failed policies. Buggywhips anyone? Civilizational change is happening around you. In many forms. Buckle up. It’s going to be a wild ride. As a Christian, I pray for discernment.

MarkW
Reply to  Junkgirl
August 29, 2026 8:59 am

“God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”

Reinhold Niebuhr

jvcstone
Reply to  Junkgirl
August 29, 2026 9:14 am

I suspect there are just as many full time American bots.

Bob
August 29, 2026 4:33 pm

My guess is that a very large percent of the most vocal anti AI protesters are the same people who are against fossil fuels, nuclear, voter ID, internal combustion engine vehicles, ICE and well you get the picture. I don’t give a damn what they think. Having said that I have concerns about AI but they aren’t about water use or energy use. We can handle those issues. My concerns are with how is all the information they are going to possess be used. People already know more about me than I feel comfortable with and I fear what the government can do with even more information than they already possess. I have no idea how jobs will be changed but they are sure to be changed. The point is we will be affected by AI whether the plants are built here or somewhere else. If they are built here we can pressure our government to regulate them prudently. If they are built elsewhere we have zero leverage.