Deployable Energy’s new compact nuclear reactor

By Andy May

I first read about Deployable Energy on Joanne Nova’s website and was very interested in their innovative small modular nuclear reactor and how it worked. The reactor was produced under President Trump’s 2025 nuclear reactor plan. It was designed by Australian Bobby Gallagher and his team in Houston. It can produce one megawatt of power, at a cost of 15 cents per kilowatt hour, for five years before refueling is required. The entire reactor can fit on the bed of a Ford F150 pickup, as shown in the photo. More importantly, it can be manufactured in a factory, fits into one 20-foot shipping container, uses the existing conventional supply chain, and requires no exotic custom-made components.


Figure 1. The first Deployable Energy reactor on its way to Idaho National Laboratory for testing.

The advantages are obvious, the reactor has less than a six-month lead time, it is transportable by rail, ship, conventional trucks, and normal logistics. It fits on an ordinary slab or other small structure and can be easily installed with off-the-shelf plumbing and wiring. It is cooled with either helium or water, or the excess heat can be used for additional power generation. It has inherent safety and security and does not require full-time monitoring; it is walk-away safe. The fuel is standard 4.95% enriched uranium oxide; that must be replaced every five years at a current cost of $1.3 million. The fuel is well below weapons grade and is readily available.

In the photo you can see Deployable Energy’s first reactor being trucked to Idaho National Laboratory to be tested. Their reactor first went critical on June 30, 2026. They recently signed a 145-billion-dollar contract for three GW of cumulative clean nuclear power deployments with Gridmarket.

What is truly amazing is the company built its first reactor and brought it online in 150 days and did it all with less than $10 million in private funding. They did this by utilizing low enriched uranium-235 (<5%), standard manufactured components, and mass manufacturing processes. Their original design was elegant and beautiful, but required a lot of exotic components and materials so it was abandoned. They quickly realized that the design was not scalable or economic. They redesigned it to use off-the-shelf readily available components wherever possible. Their goal was to make nuclear a commodity product; they needed a mass-producible reactor.

Gallagher admits that without the considerable help he received from Chris Wright and the Department of Energy he and his team could never have accomplished what they did. I was surprised to see the government and government employees helping him, as opposed to fighting against him.

Their next steps are to complete the full suite of required tests of their reactor and staff up for manufacturing. They also need a factory, and they are looking at several possible building locations in Texas. They also plan to build similar special reactors for ships and hope to become the first manufacturer of commercial maritime nuclear power plants. Their plants are ideal for critical infrastructure, like data centers, military installations, or hospitals.

Gallagher mentions in his interview on the Oilfield 360 interview that both China and Russia are building small reactors and have contracts to provide them around the world, in the USA we have none. China and Russia are leading today, and the USA has done nothing so far in the commercial nuclear space.

Additional resources and videos:

Nuclear Investing Podcast

Joanne Nova

Deployable Energy Roll out

Idaho National Laboratory

Oilfield 360 podcast

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
August 21, 2026 2:17 pm

The greens are going to have a fit.

Scissor
Reply to  John in NZ
August 21, 2026 2:25 pm

Hybrids with a million mile range.

Allen Pettee
Reply to  John in NZ
August 21, 2026 2:29 pm

Just to rub it in, they should rename themselves “Deplorable Energy.”

August 21, 2026 2:21 pm

Great news. Can’t wait till I get mine.

sherro01
Reply to  John Shewchuk
August 21, 2026 2:41 pm

Dirty miner.

Mr.
August 21, 2026 2:31 pm

And like quite a few such practical life-improving developments throughout history, this kind of innovation will take place while “the cognoscente” in this arena will pooh-pooh every aspect of its existence.

It will probably take the shock of sticking their finger in the live outlet of an operating SMR before the “cognoscente” will admit that they’ve actually been built and producing electricity.

Pro tip for SMR doubters –
read up on the Model T Ford take-up, and why it happened that way.

sherro01
August 21, 2026 2:41 pm

That $1.3 million every 5 years for refuel seems a little high. Anyone agree?
Of course, the photo shows only the nuclear heat source and a ute, but for conventional electricity generation there needs to be some type of turbine, which is not a problem because they exist. It would be interesting to see the overall cost of the whole box and dice.
Australia used to be a world class nuclear contender in the 1950 to 1980 era, but with irrational opposition from a handful of ignorant greens the ball was dropped. Same can be said for aviation, aircraft design/build, for electronic chips, for radio astronomy, for medical research, for automobiles …..
Modern politicians are too slow to learn never to make deals with greens to get bills into acts. There is usually a high cost for the deal. If you disagree, do tell us about any green deal that has been of benefit to Australians. (Communism is not a good deal).
Geoff S

Kpar
August 21, 2026 2:42 pm

I knew that, with Chris Wright at Dept of Energy (formerly the place where good ideas went to die) things might get a bit more interesting.

And it’s nice to see the NRC supporting nuclear power again, instead of trying to eliminate it.

atticman
August 21, 2026 2:45 pm

At the risk of being thought a party-pooper, I’d say, “It almost sounds too good to be true.” And you know what they say about things that sound to good to be true.

Nevertheless, I wish the project luck.

Richard Rude
Reply to  atticman
August 21, 2026 2:55 pm

Your pessimism is noted, Eeyore. So we will see. One thing for sure, if the Dems get power again this will die.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
August 21, 2026 2:52 pm

Great! But how did they get the $.15/kwh to pencil out? Especially with the recharge every 5 years at $1.3M. Help me with the math.

Richard Rude
August 21, 2026 2:52 pm

Now, that is fascinating! And shows what can be done if the public and private sector cooperate.
This just seems revolutionary and will change the nature of electrical generation in America.
At least that is what it seems to be to a layman like me.