29 Comments
August 11, 2026 6:39 pm
First, let us agree that Theory is a wonderful land. Everything always works out for the best there.
Then, it is amusing that, in the background of this diagram supposedly meant to explain the social mechanism that hinders climate action, one can make out the symbol of recycling and the circular economy. A sort of admission that this generalized hysteria is merely an exercise in opportunistic communication whose deleterious mechanism perpetuates itself. I have an image of an autophagous intestine feeding exclusively on its own excretions since time immemorial. There is something rather Lovecraftian about this representation, but I do not think the Master of Providence would have appreciated seeing the state of cultural softness and despondency into which our civilization has fallen.
August 12, 2026 5:11 am
Climate Change does exist, Climate has always changed, Climate is changing now, Climate will always change in the future. Climate Change is natural, humans do not significantly change the Climate by emitting CO2, that is a trace gas, the influence of man-man CO2 cannot be measured. Climate Change Analysis has always been a study of a solution to a Static Stability Problem, one value is considered correct and any change is declared harmful. In the history of all that is known about Climate, it has always been changing, Climate Change is Dynamic with natural alternating warmer and colder time periods, every warmer period was followed by a colder period, current dogma is that all natural change ceased and the only change is man-made. The natural change is unknown, not studied, because it has been declared that natural change has all ended and the only change in the future is man-made, all controlled by greenhouse gases, mostly CO2. Question everything, demand that other factors be studied and understood. CO2 helps green plants grow better while using precious water more efficiently, the good from more CO2 has been proven many times, Greenhouses raise the CO2 levels over a thousand parts per million. Harm from more CO2 is a theory, no actual proof has ever been found, it is promoted by many so they can get rich from green energy scams, it is promoted by our enemies, who have infiltrated our government and industries, in order to make us weak, while they burn more coal and get stronger.
August 12, 2026 6:37 am
Global Warming is such an easy problem to solve, just cut aviation in half and in less than a year temps will drop considerably, or put more SO2 in the exhaust stream to compensate. I wonder what the world would choose, put up with acid rain or stop gallivanting around the globe so much.
August 12, 2026 7:06 am
I recall back in Junio High School (now called middle school) our class officer elections.
They were strongly advertised as “Democracy in Action) by the school staff. This was in 1968.
On reflection, there was no budget controlled by the class officers. Every penny had to be requested and approved by the principal or the school board. There were no issues controlled by the class officers. We had no say in class content, offered curricula, dress code, sports scheduling, music and arts scheduling, nada.
The election was purely a popularity contest.
This is how we were trained to approach federal, state, and local elections.
Democracy in action = popularity contest.
The mechanisms to sway public opinion? Fear, anger, greed are the top 3. Hyperbolic headlines accomplishes this. Stating opinion as factual in rampant today.
I recall many of the Presidential elections of the decades since. The primary campaign messaging by all candidates is: “We need change. Trust me.” Rarely were specifics offered. Policies with decidedly emotional context were sometimes offered.
It goes back decades prior to my emerging awareness, even before I was born.
The first goal of an elected politician is to get reelected. I have no proof but I suspect our Founding Fathers recognized that paying someone to be a politician was a mistake. It was declared that political parties were something to be avoided (G. Washington).
While the graphic is informative it misses on one key point. The goal of government is to protect the people from the government (or it should be). It is mandatory (but ignored) that the government is responsible for protecting the rights of its citizens (not taking them away).
The issue of climate catastrophe caused by humanity is faced by populations and administrations across the world.
It is a shame that your nation is so dysfunctional and suggests that the experiment is proving to have been a failure. Some of the old ways worked better and are still working better now.
The issue of climate catastrophe caused by humanity is fabricated.
After over 50 years of predictions of catastrophe, none have come to pass.
How many more decades of failed catastrophic predictions will be recorded before the ideology is abandoned?
That aside, I was commenting on the article, specifically on the political corner espousing “I have to make them happy to get reelected” and “Politician isn’t to blame because the most popular politician gets elected.”
I do not accept your premise that my nation is so dysfunctional, nor the suggestion that the experiment is proving to have been a failure.
I grant it is not perfect.
“Perfection is unobtainium” is a long used and valid expression.
So your challenge is, name one government that is not dysfunctional.
August 13, 2026 12:05 am
A dysfunctional world is needed in order to justify the imposition of global centralized government. It’s always been this way around. The “climate crisis” has always been the primary channel of propaganda through which a global government would be pushed upon Western countries. Fear, guilt and shame were unleased upon the populous for decades. They are now failing, but it will be a close call as to whether they fail in time to save Western civilization or not.
Climate Blame Game: Global Central Planning Needed?
By Robert Bradley Jr.
Central holistic planning (think global government) is needed to organize a dysfunctional world. That is what the climate architects dream about. Enter “planet regeneration” and “macro-systemic architect” Greg Reynolds, who has the post below on social media. It concerns one utility practice; there are thousands more needed to “save” the planet. From the center.
Continuing:
Buyer beware. The smartest guys in the room; the expert planners; the government-enabled Lords of the (political) marketplace want to demote you. Your plans, made with your resources, are to be subject to that one institution with a monopoly on the initiation of force: government.
Buyers and sellers, billions of us, subjecting their will to the ‘Common Good’? Just say No.
Share this: