Launching AI into Orbit

By Timothy Murphy

The Strait of Hormuz reminds us that a single chokepoint can shape the global economy overnight. What most policymakers miss is that space has its own version of Hormuz—and we are rapidly losing control of it. Multiple sectors of the global economy are dependent on access to the Strait of Hormuz, but nations are becoming ever more reliant upon access to space to drive their economies. Similar to the Strait, the key corridor in space is Low Earth Orbit (LEO). All space systems are dependent upon access to it (either directly or indirectly), and the security of LEO and freedom of maneuver in space will increasingly rely upon Artificial Intelligence (AI). Success will come from AI’s capabilities in advancing commercial space activity, responding to current and future threats in space, and ensuring AI dominance through American control of the AI supply chain.

AI is fundamental to maintaining U.S. advantages in commercial space activity. Many people still do not realize the extent of U.S. military involvement in all international space activity – both military and commercial. During my time standing up current operations at U.S. Space Command, we saw the volume and speed of activity in space explode beyond what human operators could effectively track in real time. That gap is only widening. The Space Force operates a Space Surveillance Network that monitors the space environment and tracks all artificial objects in Earth’s orbit. U.S. and foreign companies use this data to launch satellites, avoid debris, and ensure their systems do not conflict with other objects in space. The surveillance network has always relied upon complex algorithms, and as the volume and complexity of space-based activity increases, AI compute will be increasingly necessary.

Providing this surveillance and tracking service will also advance U.S. advantages in the development of the commercial space industry. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and its preceding organizations played a critical role in solidifying air commerce as an economic force in the 20th century. U.S. development of the FAA ensured control over the global air industry which has generated wealth, economic benefits, and advanced logistics for over 100 years. America is on track to have similar influence over the development of space commerce, but AI will be critical to ensuring the expansion of surveillance, tracking, and deconfliction of space assets. The country that successfully employs AI capabilities to accomplish these functions will have the most influence on the future of the space industry.

While AI will be critical to commercial space development, it is absolutely necessary to counter the quantity and capabilities of current threats, much less future ones. Existing threats to the space domain are significant and not well understood. The dominant adversary is China, which has over 1,300 satellites in orbit and maintains multiple systems (in space and on earth) that can target U.S. and allied space systems. China’s threats to space represent a range from destructive weapons to high-power laser weapons and powerful jammers. A coordinated Chinese effort to jam or blind satellites in LEO wouldn’t just affect military systems. It would disrupt GPS, financial transactions, logistics, and communications simultaneously. Much of China’s efforts to deter and defeat the U.S. rely heavily on their counter-space plans and capabilities. China could attempt to deploy those capabilities to hamper U.S. operations in LEO and thus disrupt the key “choke point” for space access.

Much of China’s efforts to deter and defeat the U.S. rely heavily on their counter-space plans and capabilities. If deployed, they could directly disrupt U.S. operations in LEO and threaten access to this critical choke point. The U.S. cannot rely on human operators alone to respond. AI will be essential for detection, tracking, threat analysis, and real-time response to adversary actions. It can also provide decision-makers with options at tactical, operational, and strategic levels. These are capabilities the U.S. must accelerate in the years ahead.

In space, AI is not an efficiency tool. It is the only way to maintain control. To realize these advantages, the United States must confront a harder truth: AI is only as strong as the supply chain behind it. If the U.S. does not control the AI stack—from chips to training data—it will not control the space domain. And today, that stack is globally fragmented and exposed.

U.S.-based Nvidia’s GPUs power much of the AI ecosystem but systems like the GB200 rely on hundreds of global suppliers. That creates real vulnerability but also reflects reality. The U.S. cannot retreat from global markets without ceding influence. Selling American AI abroad sets standards, builds dependence, and keeps U.S. companies at the center of the ecosystem. The challenge is not whether to engage, but how. The U.S. should protect its most advanced capabilities from adversaries like China while avoiding broad export controls that weaken its own industrial base.

The world has seen how a single chokepoint can shape the global economy. Space has its own chokepoint that it is becoming more critical by the year. AI will determine who can operate in that domain and who cannot. The country that builds and supplies that infrastructure will not just compete in space. It will define it.


Col Timothy Murphy (U.S. Air Force, ret.) is a former national security affairs fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. From 2019 to 2020, he served as the first Chief of Current Operations for U.S. Space Command.

This article was originally published by RealClearDefense and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.3 7 votes
Article Rating
34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Walter Sobchak
April 21, 2026 6:35 pm

Oh give me a break. When you have AI systems whose main products are not slop and hallucinations. When you have servers that can run unattended for thousands of hours. When you have servers that can do all of that and are radiation hardened and do not need rivers of cold water to cool them.
Maybe 30 years from now.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
April 21, 2026 7:07 pm

When AI agents are narrowly focused, there is almost no hallucination or slop. You’re thinking of image and video, and the like. I’ve found that when focused, AI is very efficient and self-correcting, especially with things like coding.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
April 22, 2026 12:00 am

Yes, its quite remarkable. People who doubt the usefulness of AI have probably never used it for technical queries. You still need to inspect the code carefully, and its a good prudential rule that you should only run AI generated scripts if you are sufficiently proficient to have written them yourself given time and effort. But its ability to produce at least relatively short properly documented scripts is remarkable.

Its also an excellent source for non-scripting technical solutions to problems. For instance, compiling some package from source is failing with cryptic messages. AI can not only explain the messages, it can take you step by step through a solution.

Finally, the most impressive part is something most people probably don’t even notice – its ability to conduct natural colloquial ordinary language conversations. 50 years ago Chomsky would have claimed this was impossible. But AI is passing the Turing test on ordinary language tens or hundreds of thousands of times a day.

And, its only just got started. Where will it be in another ten years? 20 years?

Reply to  michel
April 22, 2026 4:46 am

20 years? Robots walking around that you can hardly tell if they’re robots or real people with all that AI capability built in?

hiskorr
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 22, 2026 5:24 am

I’m still waiting for the flying car-boats in every garage!

John Hultquist
Reply to  hiskorr
April 22, 2026 7:49 am

 The demand is miniscule. Can you guess the rest?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  hiskorr
April 22, 2026 8:18 pm

Well, that’s an unreasonable expectation! You should be waiting for flying Boat-Cars.

hiskorr
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 22, 2026 5:24 am

I’m still waiting for the flying car-boats in every garage!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 22, 2026 7:10 am

Those robots are today. But, they only need the human language interface.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  michel
April 22, 2026 7:08 am

One human perception that has existed since language was invented is: the more articulate the speaker, the more intelligent the speaker is assumed to be.

Having a high quality human language interface convinces people there is intelligence even when there actually isn’t.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 22, 2026 8:38 am

But there is a lot of intelligence or nobody would use it. It’s not just about that interface. Once you use it a lot you begin to realize just how smart it is. Of course that doesn’t mean its sentient- then again- it might be to some degree. It all depends on how you define intelligence.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 22, 2026 9:35 am

How do you tell whether there is or is not? And why does it matter? If it talks colloquial English (or whatever), gives answers that are correct, proposes measures for you to take which work when tried, can correct its mistakes when they are pointed out… Is it ‘intelligent’? Who cares?

There is some point in this trip where its not so much whether its intelligent as whether we start to feel that we are talking to a person like us. I don’t know where that is, I’m sure we are not there now, though sometimes we are on the border of what could turn into it.

If you want to see that in action I would suggest (haven’t tried this particular one) asking it; How did Waller, in the phrase, ‘reform our numbers’, and was the result beneficial or harmful to English poetry after him. Then carry on asking it to assess the influence of Pope. Did Pope write as he did because of Waller, or because of Dryden, or because of Milton?

It is not quite like talking to a person, but its definitely in the foothills.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 23, 2026 8:58 pm

“One human perception that has existed since language was invented is: the more articulate the speaker, the more intelligent the speaker is assumed to be.”

Then along came Barack H. Obama.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  michel
April 22, 2026 8:17 pm

Well, I have guided AI into creating almost 20 WordPress plugins that I never would have been able to do myself. I didn’t inspect the code, I ran it and if it worked with repeated testing it’s good. I’ve also had it create multiple Windows apps, with C#, Python, Electron, and don’t know squat about any of those languages. I can follow logic flow in most of them, however, so if need be I can debug some if the AI runs into trouble. But the capabilities from just a few months ago are leaps and bounds ahead now.

Reply to  michel
April 23, 2026 8:53 pm

“And, its only just got started. Where will it be in another ten years? 20 years?”

A hint of the answer:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/04/13/bixonimania-how-ai-turned-a-joke-diagnosis-into-peer-reviewed-medicine/

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
April 22, 2026 12:51 am

Your 30 years was already up in 2017 … google “Bae systems rad5545 running ai”

It successor the BAE system RAD510 will be qualified by end of this year.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
April 22, 2026 7:05 am

You do not know much about AI, do you?

The hallucinations are driven by the information made available. Most common AIs use the internet.

But the, we know everything on the internet is true…. because it says so on the internet. /s

That said, AI is an identifier only. These software solutions are definitely not intelligent, just skillful and quick.

Randle Dewees
April 21, 2026 8:01 pm

I think I’ll take a break and not worry about this.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Randle Dewees
April 22, 2026 7:11 am

Thank you Scarlett. Worry about it tomorrow. 🙂

April 21, 2026 9:37 pm

All space systems are dependent upon access to it (either directly or indirectly), and the security of LEO and freedom of maneuver in space will increasingly rely upon Artificial Intelligence (AI). 

And what is the AI supposed to be understanding that tracking systems cant do?

Reply to  TimTheToolMan
April 22, 2026 4:46 am

Risk factors?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  TimTheToolMan
April 22, 2026 7:11 am

Speed to process massive amounts of data well beyond human capabilities.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 23, 2026 9:08 pm

Right . . . all US Apollo lunar landings were faked because humanity didn’t have AI systems back then. R-I-G-H-T!

/sarc

(In case you’re wondering about it, consider human capabilities to rapidly process 6-DOF body/orbital mechanics in the lunar gravitational field, together with raw radar altimetry data.)

Sonicsuns
April 21, 2026 10:16 pm

This article has nothing to do with climate change and is weirdly short on detail.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Sonicsuns
April 22, 2026 8:03 am

 You can find a climate change article on the internet by searching for Wisconsin_glaciation. the Wikipedia version has colorful maps, but no photos. Photos abound under the images tab for “retreating glaciers“.

Reply to  Sonicsuns
April 23, 2026 9:15 pm

Were you expecting any and all articles that discuss AI to also discuss climate change?

That’s weirdly.

And if you believe that WUWT only posts articles about climate change . . . well then, you haven’t been reading this website very long.

April 21, 2026 10:52 pm

Well, is this going to be another ‘plant yr flag on the moon and call it ours’ moment?

Reply to  ballynally
April 23, 2026 9:30 pm

That hasn’t been done to date . . . what makes you think it will be done in the future???

Per Article II of the international Outer Space Treaty of 1967 (formally the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies), national appropriation of the Moon by claim of sovereignty, use, occupation, or any other means is explicitly banned. It’s been signed by over 100 countries, including the US, China, Russia, Japan and India.

However, that leaves to door “wide open” for Djibouti, Sudan and the Maldives (among other non-signing nations) to plant their flags there and make such a claim. /sarc

April 22, 2026 4:43 am

So, China is a threat- yet, most of its best scientists and engineers were educated in America. Why did we allow that? Because they were paying full price, like hardly anyone else? Is there actually a good long term advantage for allowing this?

DD More
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 22, 2026 2:43 pm

China Full price +plus a little.
Professor Joe at the University of Pennsylvania, paid $900,000 to teach NO Classes. The Beacon reports that UPenn has received $61 million “in gifts and contracts” from China from March 2017 through the end of 2019.
Under cover bribes take many forms, but NoGoJoe was still getting his 10%

Sparta Nova 4
April 22, 2026 7:04 am

I have been privy to critical technology conversations for 4-plus decades and ALL of them have come to pass in the negative domain.

April 22, 2026 8:08 am

There a huge TILT! in the lead-in graphic and title “Launching AI into Orbit” of the above article verses the text of the article itself:
nowhere does author Col. Timothy Murphy (U.S. Air Force, ret.) say that AI data centers need to be located in space.

In fact there are significant issues with locating any power-hungry AI data center in space in ANY orbit around Earth, particularly how to provide continuous power to such and how to dump the waste heat from such.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
April 22, 2026 10:04 am

Continuous power = Solar Power Satellite

To reduce waste heat, use fiber instead of copper. I heard that suggested the other day.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
April 23, 2026 10:07 am

“To reduce waste heat, use fiber instead of copper. I heard that suggested the other day.”

Hopefully, you didn’t hear that from anyone familiar with computers.

Fiber optics can easily carry data bits, but not any significant amounts of electrical power as needed for power supply/computer “motherboard” baseline power routed to individual ICs/CPUs/ASICs and supporting electronic components (resistors, capacitors, inductors, diodes, transistors, LEDs, cooling fans, etc).

Moreover, most computers even today still use copper or gold electrical traces and short small copper wires to carry data bits because the integrated circuits themselves use electricity, not photos, to perform their switching/routing/timing/computing/formatting/ROM/RAM storage functions and it’s just not practical to convert electricity to/from photos carried by fiber optics to perform such functions or the interconnects required for such.

Electrical resistive and inductive losses still “rule the day” as the source of waste heat from computer systems that are the heart of AI.

As for “Continuous power = Solar Power Satellite”:
that simple equation glosses over the many issue of how to transfer SPS electrical power to a independently orbiting AI data center (or even to a ground-based data center). I need not go into the hundreds of science/engineering-based documents that have pointed out the current impracticality of deploying solar power satellites.

Then too, look at the hard evidence: even acknowledging today’s reduced cost to launch mass into Earth orbit (enabled largely by SpaceX’s efficient, reusable launch vehicles) and a few demo flights of potential SPS technology starting six years ago:
— US Naval Research Laboratory’s PRAM (2020)
— Caltech Space Solar Power Project (SSPP) (2023)
— Star Catcher Technology Demo (March 2025),
there are no commercial SPS systems orbiting Earth today.