Reduce Energy Bills? Don’t Make Me Laugh, Ed Davey–You’re The Reason Why They Are So High!

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

Ed Davey has promised that the Lib Dems will cut energy bills by £870 a year, bringing the “benefits of cheap renewable power”. He naturally blamed the Tories and labour for high electricity prices.

But Davey himself is personally responsible for one of the worst and costliest decisions made concerning energy policy.

As Energy Secretary, Davey signed up a batch of Investment Contracts as part of the Final Investment Decision Enabling for Renewables (FIDeR) process. These contracts for wind farms and biomass generators were part of the bridging arrangements introduced in the Energy Act 2013, also pushed through Parliament by Davey and designed to support certain renewable projects before the full competitive CfD auction regime began in 2014/2015.

At the time of signing, the guaranteed, index linked strike prices for offshore wind that Davey agreed to were triple the market price at the time. They have since continued to increase with inflation. Some like Dudgeon and Walney are now paid £214.50/MWh. The average market price last year was £77/MWh.

To date, Davey’s subsidies have cost bill payers an astonishing £11.2 billion. This figure will probably triple by the time the contracts expire after 15 years. The cost last year alone was £2.1 billion.

Bear in mind, energy policy during the Coalition was solely under the control of the Lib Dems – neither David Cameron nor his party had any real say whatever, as this allocation of responsibilities was built into the coalition agreement at the start.

It is therefore a bit rich for Ed Davey to complain about energy bills now, when it was his decision to saddle bill payers with the cost of his obsession with climate change.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.9 9 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 7, 2026 2:15 am

To date, Davey’s subsidies have cost bill payers an astonishing £11.2 billion.

So that’s where the governments black hole is – between Ed’s ears

Bill Toland
March 7, 2026 2:41 am

Ed Davey likes to boast that he personally stopped fracking in Britain. At least he is consistent; he is on the wrong side of every argument.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Bill Toland
March 8, 2026 12:29 pm

Whereas two heads are often better than one.
We find
Two Eds (Davy & Miliband) are a complete disaster.

strativarius
March 7, 2026 4:00 am

The Church of England was once dubbed as the Conservative Party at prayer. Now the Church is the very woke Liberal Democrats at prayer – incorporating Gaia.

Davey is another Parliamentary traitor.

atticman
March 7, 2026 4:09 am

Davey, when in government, was also the idiot who refused to sign off on a number of new nuclear power stations on the basis that “Building nuclear takes too long; we’ll get results quicker with renewables”. Truth is that Lib Dems have always been anti-nuclear; it’s in their drippy liberal DNA.

Now, 14 years later, when we really need them, those nukes would have been up and running if he’d OK’d them then. In reality, we’re still many years away from new nuclear because of his spurious logic and brainless delaying tactics.

The man is a total clown and certainly not fit to lead a political party. I wonder just whose useful idiot he really is.

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  atticman
March 7, 2026 5:11 am

He’s not useful. He’s a useless idiot.

atticman
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
March 8, 2026 1:14 am

To you and me, Ed, yes; but he seems to be acting on orders from somewhere. Ask yourself who gains most from the UK being either short of power or having power that’s too expensive to make its industry competetive.

I’ll give you three guesses… no, on second thoughts, just one – that’s all you’ll need.

Sweet Old Bob
March 7, 2026 4:57 am

NEWS Tip

And the EU energy ….problem ….. gets worse …

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/07/right-now-russia-is-like-amazon-during-covid/

a great insight into energy policies …

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
March 7, 2026 9:15 am

“If Putin stops selling LNG to Europe, and Europe cannot get LNG from the Gulf of Oman, and China/Asia are LNG dependent (not exporting), then where is Europe going to get the LNG to replace what Russia will no longer provide?”

atticman
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
March 8, 2026 1:18 am

USA?

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
March 7, 2026 1:58 pm

comment image

strativarius
March 7, 2026 5:05 am

Despite running on a very green leadership platform, Sir Ed Davey has continued pocketing thousands from a couple who make their money from renting out 23,000 private jet flights a year. […] Over the last year, Sir Ed has pocketed £16,500 from Chris and Tina Leach, the duo behind private jet rental company Air Charter. As Guido previously reported, he’s been taking their cash for seven years… – Iowa Climate

Given that you’d think Davey might keep his big mouth shut, but no…

Davey has raised eyebrows in Westminster after criticising government minister Liz Truss for flying by “private jet” to attend a trade meeting in Australia.
Taking to Twitter, Davey postured: “Nearly 500 tonnes of unnecessary CO2 emissions in the midst of the climate crisis. Liz Truss and the Conservatives are woefully out of touch.”Lib Dem Watch

Me? I blame the mediaeval system we are stuck with, a heritage museum piece; you could put a saint in the House of Commons and they’d be fiddling expenses within a week.

But note it is a system they are all very determined to keep and to hold on to, Parliament is all about maintaining the status quo (above monarch and people: 1660, 1688). Adding new powers is always welcomed and the digital world offers that in spades.

Polling today [%]:
Reform 27.8
Conservative 18.2
Greens 15.5
Labour 18.3
Lib Dems 12.4
Others 5.1
https://politpro.eu/en/united-kingdom/opinion-polls

I don’t fancy the Lib Dems’ chances.

Tom Halla
March 7, 2026 5:53 am

But in their models, wind and solar are cheaper. In the real world, . . .

Reply to  Tom Halla
March 7, 2026 4:03 pm

onshore wind and central solar power generation are indeed cheaper than fossil fuels

Bill Toland
Reply to  Warren Beeton
March 8, 2026 12:59 am

This is wonderful news. This means that all subsidies for wind and solar power can be cancelled with immediate effect.

William Howard
March 7, 2026 6:02 am

its in their DNA – create problems then blame republicans, and convince the media to try to convince the public that they are the only ones that can solve it – Buyden increased prices in the US over 21% but now it is Trump’s fault that everything is so high and democrats think they can get elected by screaming that things are not affordable

John Hultquist
March 7, 2026 9:04 am

 Why is Brit Ed Davey tossing US C-notes ($100 bills) in the air?

1saveenergy
Reply to  John Hultquist
March 7, 2026 10:07 am

To prove he’ll waste anybody’s money except his own !!!