Can US grid handle next Winter Storm Fern – or major solar flares?

US mostly dodged disaster this time. But what if Net Zero mandates aren’t adjusted or ended?

Paul Driessen

Winter Storm Fern (January 23-27) dumped heavy snow and ice on more than 240,000,000 Americans across 40 states and 2,300 miles, beginning in Arizona and wrapping up in Maine.

Scores died, including 20 in New York City, where Mayor Mamdani refused to close homeless camps or compel “unhoused residents” to move indoors, instead letting them rely on the “warmth of collectivism.”

Roads and highways were impassable, 11 states declared emergencies, 30 airports closed for a day or more, and many cities recorded 10-24 inches of snow.

The New York Times asked “What’s up with this big freeze? Some scientists see climate change link.” Two years earlier its headline warned, “Weirdly warm winter has climate fingerprints all over it, study says.” Fossil fuel fearmongering clearly never ends.

Mid-twenties temperatures in Florida clobbered citrus groves and froze iguanas. The reptiles fell from trees, providing “tastes-like-chicken” meat for sumptuous stews, curries, gumbos and soups, and helping conservation officials to cull the rampant invasive species.

There were no widespread blackouts from power failures, though there were close calls. Texas gas lines were weatherproofed after Winter Storm Uri (February 2021) and other jurisdictions had kept coal and gas generators operational, instead of opting to rely on wind and solar that were virtually useless during Fern’s mostly windless and sunless onslaught.

However, ice on trees and power lines caused prolonged power outages that left millions of homes and businesses without electricity – or heat. Two weeks later, thousands still had no electricity.

In Memphis, a friend got her power back quickly, because her home is near shops, groceries and restaurants. But nearby areas were still without power a week after Fern, despite the local utility deploying 1,800 line workers. Several homes caught fire moments after their power was restored, perhaps because they lacked surge suppressors or their old or inadequate electrical systems couldn’t cope.

Stories were similar all across Fern’s impact area. But the United States dodged a potentially huge bullet.

Modern early-warning, communication, building, electricity and other technologies have made our lives far safer than in the past. But big winter storms across Southwest, Midwest, East Coast or even much of the Lower 48 States still strike frequently and recall deadly historic events like these.

The School Children’s Blizzard (January 1888) sent temperatures +35 to –20 and lower within hours, dropped several feet of snow, and killed 500 people, mostly in Nebraska and most of them children.

The Great White Hurricane (March 1888) buried New York City and much of the East Coast under mountains of snow, killed over 400 people and became the impetus for NYC’s underground subway.

The real question: Will we learn lessons from Fern and heed warnings about the US grid and too-heavy reliance on wind, solar, battery and related (heavily Chinese) technologies in time for the next Big One?

Isaac Orr and Mitch Rolling provide lessons and helpful charts, links and readers’ comments.

* The Midcontinent Independent System Operator’s territory had an extremely close call, when hourly nameplate capacity factors for its wind turbines plunged from over 60% before Fern to 7% a day later, well below MISO’s expected 29% winter capacity value, and didn’t return to 60% for two more days.

* US Department of Energy emergency orders kept three big Indiana and Michigan coal-fired generators operating (using coal stored onsite). Otherwise, the situation would have been dire in those states.

* New England has been forcing or subsidizing heat pump installations and built a $1.6-billion transmission line to bring electricity from New York and Quebec. During Fern, natural gas prices skyrocketed, coal power had been eradicated, reliable nuclear did its part, wind was minimal and solar was MIA. Much-hated oil became the foremost electricity generator – because extreme and sustained cold air across Québec forced the Canadians to suspend power delivery to New England!

That raises an even bigger question. What happens if large numbers of states go Net Zero, mandate heat pumps or electric home and water heating? If they’re all relying on nearly nonexistent “renewable” energy? Of if they’re dependent on sources like Quebec and a “Clean Energy Connect” transmission line? And they’re caught in a blizzard proportionate to Fern or other historic storms?

As Orr and Rolling asked: Where do you turn when you run out of other people’s energy? 

* The huge PJM Interconnection (wherein I reside) perhaps had Lady Luck on its side, because comparatively mild temperatures across the region kept demand low enough to forestall emergency alerts and load shedding (deliberate, planned interruption or rolling blackouts), and it hasn’t gone hog wild on “renewables.” However, its own gas winterization efforts also paid off.

* The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) may have weatherized its natural gas transmission system, but higher than predicted temperatures and thus lower than expected peak power demand may have saved the region – because its enormous wind and solar fleet was simply not up to the task.

Why ERCOT – covering oil and natural gas capital Texas – would add 31 GW of solar, 9 GW of wind and only 3 GW of gas over the past decade is inconceivable. Maybe that lone star will keep bringing it luck during the next Winter Storm Uri or Fern. But responsible energy providers shouldn’t count on it.

Other harbingers of danger must also be addressed.

More than half of the entire US electric grid will soon reach high or elevated risk of blackouts, due to growing demand, accelerating retirements of reliable coal, gas and nuclear generators, and increasing reliance on unreliable, weather-dependent wind, solar and battery storage power, according to a new North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Long-Term Reliability Assessment.

Making the grid even more vulnerable, Carrington Events triggered by giant sunspots (like AR4366 on February 1, 2026) and solar flares can send coronal mass ejections into Earth’s magnetic field. A large enough CME can electrify the planet’s surface, send massive currents into high-voltage transmission lines, fry transformers and other equipment, cause widespread blackouts lasting months or years, shut down refrigeration, transportation, water systems and our entire lives – and kill countless millions.

We must also consider risks of sabotage, terrorism and deliberate shutdowns by malevolent foreign or domestic actors. China is our primary source not only for rare earth elements and other critical minerals, but also for wind turbines, solar panels, transformers and grid-scale batteries.

Beijing, Moscow and their surrogates could them as strategic weapons: ban exports to impose political goals; use trip-switches or hacker backdoors already embedded in those technologies to close down limited or vast sections of our already vulnerable grid; engage in cyber or physical infrastructure attacks; or launch electromagnetic pulse attacks from high altitude or outer space to inflict the same catastrophic damage as a huge coronal mass ejection on our grid, infrastructure and military.

If our politicians, judges and regulators cannot end their obsession with climate change nightmares, renewable energy fantasies and other nitpicking topics – and our nation is plunged into widespread, prolonged and deadly blackouts – “accountability” must come in much stronger forms than merely voting them out of office. Prosecution for gross malfeasance and dereliction in office will also be in order.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, climate change and human rights.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
4.9 16 votes
Article Rating
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 15, 2026 6:30 pm

A Carrington Event or anything even close would be a major disruption. It is one thing for a winter storm to knock down power lines and make access for repair difficult. A CE would fry major components like transformers and switches for which there are no on-the-shelf replacements and lead time is 50-60+ weeks even in the best of times

Reply to  Fraizer
February 16, 2026 4:06 am

A CE would fry major components like transformers and switches for which there are no on-the-shelf replacements and lead time is 50-60+ weeks even in the best of times”

A federal commission studied this issue some years ago and their verdict was just what you say: No replacements available and very long lead times.

The commission said this situation could be corrected by spending about three billion dollars.

Unfortunately, Congress never did anything about it. Congress wanted the electric utilities to pay for it, and the electric utilities wanted taxpayers to pay for it, and nothing ever got done.

Three billion dollars would be cheap insurance, it would seem to me. Probably a little more today, but less than Minnesota fraud.

We need to get this done. A Big Extended Blackout could kill millions of people.

Bob B.
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 16, 2026 4:51 am

$3 billion, that’s just 1/3 of the revenue of the Learing Center franchise.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  Bob B.
February 16, 2026 9:34 am

I’ll bet John Learing was really pissed after spending a lot of money to establish his sports media education center, just to have the Minneapolis scam go public.

Robertvd
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 16, 2026 11:55 am

And this just for 1 country.

Robertvd
Reply to  Fraizer
February 16, 2026 11:54 am

And can it be much bigger than a  Carrington Event?

2hotel9
February 15, 2026 7:02 pm

Sure it can, with more gas, oil, hydro and nuclear generation plants.

John Hultquist
February 15, 2026 7:58 pm

 Heat pumps are electrical appliances. A facility with a heat pump in cool/cold regions should also have a source of emergency heat that can perform as long as the maximum expected outage. Maybe 2 weeks is enough? It is a bit of a guess. A modern catalytic burner wood stove is a natural fit, or propane. Living spaces, including houses, need to be designed accordingly for efficiency and reduce danger. Besides, who wants their ice cream to go liquid?

Reply to  John Hultquist
February 15, 2026 11:00 pm

True that, sadly almost all backup we carefuly could install in our homes somehow requires electricity (deep in the roots of manufacturing or supplying). We’ll be good for a short period of time, but if a major Carrinhton Event fries the main transformers in the grid (for which there is no replacement) we’re screwed.

So god help us or good luck, depending on your belief 😉 … (sometimes I can be diplomatic, don’t get used to it sarc)

Bruce Cobb
February 16, 2026 1:35 am

Fortunately, we here in the Northeast have our Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to protect us from nasty, planet-killing Carbon, as well as providing ample supplies of Virtue, which can be burned to supply home heating in such emergencies – wait, no, I’m hearing that it actually can’t, but anyway, virtue is its own reward, and besides, if you aren’t part of the solution then you’re part of the problem. So there’s that.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 16, 2026 4:12 am

Trump says to the Northeast: No more windmills for you!

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 16, 2026 6:00 am

So far, I’m seeing almost no response from the New England governors to Trump’s plan to stop the windmills.

February 16, 2026 3:39 am

I don’t like the naming of storm fronts but at least you give the date of the event, otherwise we would have to do a search to know what you are referring to.

What’s the name of the storm front that caused the start of the Daytona 500 car race yesterday to be moved up an hour to avoid it? It wasn’t given a name. So sad, a nameless storm. So dumb.

I’m averse to conforming to dumb, scary climate memes like naming storms over land the way they do with hurricanes. The better to scare you with.

When will we start naming tornadoes?

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 16, 2026 6:02 am

If we name tornadoes, we’ll need more exciting names. It’s silly naming severe weather events with lame names. 🙂

abolition man
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 16, 2026 7:20 am

I don’t know, JZ, Fern sounds pretty deadly to me! Just think of all the mass casualty events blamed on spores! Almost as deadly as milquetoast!

Reply to  abolition man
February 16, 2026 10:07 am

let’s see- maybe call the next tornado, Greta!

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 16, 2026 12:21 pm

I think The Weather Channel was the one that started naming winter cold fronts.
It always seemed odd to me that they’d name each cold front but they won’t name a blizzard.

abolition man
February 16, 2026 7:38 am

Not just electric generation and transmission would be affected by a CME or an EMP! The total loss of modern transportation would have profound effects on our society with most being relegated to bicycles or horses! That could slow down Amazon Eats a tad!
Note to self: ensure that the shop has a proper Faraday cage around backup generator and truck.

Michael C. Roberts
February 16, 2026 8:33 am

The Pacific Northwest has its own history of destructive storms that we shouldn’t forget. In January 1921, a huge Pacific storm hit Northwest Oregon but mostly western Washington state, destroying destroying huge swaths of mostly old-growth forests as the population of the area was still growing. If you’ve never heard of this event, please click this link and be amazed about what Ol Mother Nature is/was capable of, long before the supposed impact of ‘carbon dioxide caused glowbull warming’.

https://www.historylink.org/File/5249

Attached for your reading pleasure,
Regards,
MCR

Harry Durham
February 16, 2026 9:16 am

Shucks, why worry about something as rare and unlikely as a massive X solar flare or coronal mass ejection (CME)? After all, according to NOAA:

“The most powerful flare on record was in 2003, during the last solar maximum. It was so powerful that it overloaded the sensors measuring it. They cut-out at X17, and the flare was later estimated to be about X45.”

And it should be a rare happening, since “Solar storms like the one in 1859 happen only about every 500 years—thankfully.”

Apparently,they feel comfortable ignoring the 1859 Carrington Event. Until recently, many estimates ranked it at X45. However, this is the CONSERVATIVE estimate, since we didn’t have any solar monitoring satellites in orbit, and only a few instruments capable of recording geomagnetic data (which were developed in 1858, just a few months before the Event), plus a number of visible light telescopes at the time. Which was the instrument used by Richard C. Carrington to observe solar flares in the period of the Event, and from whom the name was derived.

In 2025, a multinational team published a paper describing their methods of analyzing historically recent events for which better data was available, but which could be correlated to the few such records of the Event. See: https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/358269/1/358269.pdf

The result? The Carrington Event was rated at X105/+41/-25,

Don’t know about YOUR house, but I’m pretty sure having a generator isn’t going to help if we ever face the effects of a CME of THAT size. And that’s assuming we don’t get a fire or explosion from a surge over 100 times the intensity of the “most powerful flare on record,”

PS: If you’re into science fiction about this topic, there are dozens of books published. One of my favorites is the “Fire from the Sky” series by N.C. Reed. Then contemplate how strong THAT CME would be in the real world. Of course, you should feel comfortable knowing (ha) you’ve got about 300 years before the next Carrington-class event…

Michael S. Kelly
February 16, 2026 9:36 am

We’re building our retirement home in Tennessee, where power is pretty cheap and reliable. But we have propane and a 22 kW standby generator, to avoid all of this mess.

Bob
February 16, 2026 1:01 pm

There is one simple solution to this stinking mess and everybody knows what it is. End government money and mandates for wind and solar and it all goes away.

Sparta Nova 4
February 17, 2026 7:43 am

Why does a snowstorm have a name?

Frank @TxTradCatholic
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
February 17, 2026 9:49 am

So the alarmists at The Weather Climate Change Hysteria Channel can convince the masses that every time it snows somewhere it’s as big a deal as a hurricane? That’s the best I can come up with.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Frank @TxTradCatholic
February 17, 2026 11:52 am

Personification to give it human attributes?