Oh Noes! Climate Change is Messing with the Nitrogen Cycle

From the “ridiculous press releases I never bothered to finish reading” department comes this gem of a doomsday paper. The press release looks like it written with AI, one wonders if the study was too. – Anthony

Climate change is quietly rewriting the world’s nitrogen cycle, with high stakes for food and the environment

Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University

Climate change is not only warming the planet and disrupting rainfall, it is also quietly rewiring the way nitrogen moves through the world’s croplands, forests, and grasslands. This hidden shift in the global nitrogen cycle carries major consequences for food security, water quality, biodiversity, and climate policy.

Nitrogen is a basic building block of proteins and DNA, and healthy terrestrial ecosystems depend on a steady but balanced flow of nitrogen through soils, plants, and microbes. When that balance is disturbed, harvests can fall, rivers can turn green with algae, and more greenhouse gases can escape into the atmosphere.​

“In a warming world, nitrogen is becoming a make or break factor for both food security and environmental health,” said lead author Miao Zheng of Zhejiang University. “Our study shows that climate change is reshaping nitrogen cycles in ways that can either support sustainable development or push ecosystems beyond critical thresholds.”​

Impacts of climate change on global terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Credit
Miao Zheng, Qin Huang, Jinglan Cui & Baojing Gu

What the study did

The new review pulls together 30 years of field experiments and global model simulations to examine how three key climate forces affect nitrogen: rising carbon dioxide, higher temperatures, and shifting rainfall patterns. It compares their impacts across croplands, forests, and grasslands worldwide, and links these changes to human goals such as ending hunger and protecting clean water.​

By translating hundreds of site level studies into a global picture, the authors quantify how nitrogen inputs, plant uptake, harvest, losses, and long term storage respond under different climate conditions. They also highlight large regional inequalities, showing that some areas may gain productivity while others face deepening risks of crop failure and pollution.​

When higher CO₂ helps and hurts

The review finds that elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide can act like a double edged sword for nitrogen. On one side, higher CO₂ tends to boost plant growth and crop yields by around 10 to 27 percent in forests and grasslands, and about 21 percent for major crops such as wheat, rice, maize, and soybean.​

At the same time, plants often dilute their nitrogen content under high CO₂, which can lower the protein quality of grains and leaves. “More calories do not automatically mean better nutrition,” said co author Baojing Gu. “We may be harvesting more biomass but with less nitrogen per unit, which matters for both human diets and livestock feed.”​

Warming drives losses and inequality

Rising temperatures tell a more troubling story, especially for agriculture. The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops, with maize particularly vulnerable in tropical and arid regions, while also accelerating losses of reactive nitrogen compounds to the air and water.​

Warmer conditions stimulate soil microbes, speeding the breakdown of organic matter and increasing emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and nitrogen oxides, as well as nitrate leaching into groundwater and rivers. These losses can worsen air pollution, fuel climate warming, and degrade water quality, while disproportionately harming developing regions in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.​

Too little or too much rain

Changes in rainfall patterns further complicate the picture. In dry regions, modest increases in precipitation can strongly boost plant growth and nitrogen uptake, while in wetter regions, droughts can cause large drops in productivity and nitrogen harvest.​

The review reports that decreased rainfall tends to suppress microbial activity and reduce many nitrogen losses, effectively trapping more nitrogen in soils. In contrast, heavy and frequent rainfall can flush nitrate into waterways and enhance gaseous nitrogen emissions, raising the risk of algal blooms and greenhouse gas release.​

A call for integrated nitrogen management

Overall, the study concludes that climate change is amplifying spatial inequalities in how nitrogen cycles operate and in who bears the risks. Regions already facing food insecurity and weak environmental protections are likely to experience the most damaging combinations of yield loss, nutrient stress, and pollution.​

To respond, the authors call for integrated nitrogen management that links fertilizer practices, water management, climate policy, and biodiversity goals. Promising examples include pairing rainwater harvesting with organic amendments in African smallholder systems, and planting nitrogen fixing tree species in tropical forests to maintain natural nitrogen inputs.​

“We need to move beyond treating nitrogen as just a farm input and start governing it as a global commons,” said Zheng. “If we manage nitrogen wisely under climate change, we can support zero hunger, protect clean water, and limit greenhouse gas emissions at the same time.”​

The authors argue that nitrogen must be more fully integrated into international climate and sustainability frameworks, including the Paris Agreement and national climate pledges. With climate change accelerating, they stress that coordinated global action on nitrogen is essential to keep both people and ecosystems within safe operating limits.​

=== 

Journal Reference: Zheng M, Huang Q, Cui J, Gu B. 2025. Impacts of climate change on global terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Nitrogen Cycling 1: e012  

https://www.maxapress.com/article/doi/10.48130/nc-0025-0012


As my counter to this doomsday paper from clown-world, here’s some data. – Anthony

5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Wojick
January 13, 2026 10:10 am

I’ll take this fact: “higher CO₂ tends to boost plant growth and crop yields by around 10 to 27 percent in forests and grasslands, and about 21 percent for major crops such as wheat, rice, maize, and soybean”.

The rest is the usual speculation.

KevinM
Reply to  David Wojick
January 13, 2026 10:39 am

Not really written in a factual way… reads more like a 4-year old who was told facts for a few hours then asked to recount them next week after an Avengers movie.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  KevinM
January 13, 2026 11:52 am

What we expect from China ….

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/shenyang-agricultural-university-529736

not very high on the list ….

😉

Mr.
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
January 13, 2026 1:54 pm

and they didn’t mention the 2 most educational sources in the world –

The University Of Life
and
The University Of Hard Knocks

Reply to  David Wojick
January 13, 2026 1:36 pm

That “fact” may or may not be true, but where is the proof that CO2 controls climate change?

Tom Halla
January 13, 2026 10:19 am

Crop yields increasing violates a basic
tenet of Climate Science(TM)!! It must
be an account of Man’s Fall from the Perfection of The Pre-Industrial Climate!!!
And if you ever want to get a grant, remember that catechism.

Giving_Cat
January 13, 2026 10:33 am

> The study concludes that climate change is amplifying spatial inequalities in how nitrogen cycles operate and in who bears the risks. Regions already facing food insecurity and weak environmental protections are likely to experience the most damaging combinations of yield loss, nutrient stress, and pollution.​

Giant meteor to destroy all life on Earth. Women, children, minorities and the poor to be disproportionately impacted.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
January 13, 2026 10:35 am

Will they ever stop with the speculative claims? Aren’t people getting tired of the doomsday yet? I think they are but the alarmists haven’t noticed and believe they just need more propaganda to save the ship.

KevinM
January 13, 2026 10:37 am

“The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops,”
Yeah, not worth reading

Based on comments I went back and checked that the authors took both sides. They say explicitly that global warming reduces yields and that CO2 increases yields. Smells a little like a paper written by a grad student team who neglected to read each others sections before they turned the paper in.

Reply to  KevinM
January 13, 2026 11:35 am

“The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops,””

It is just manifestly WRONG.. Crops like warm weather.. hate cold. !

Dave O.
January 13, 2026 10:53 am

17 billion bushel corn crop in the U.S, in 2025. We have an over supply of corn due to climate change.

strativarius
January 13, 2026 11:23 am

nitrogen must be more fully integrated into international climate and sustainability frameworks

ie charges, revenue etc. Can Trump grab Starmer for trial?

Britain ‘less investable than Venezuela’, says North Sea boss
UK politicians accused of treating carbon reduction ‘like a religion’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/13/britain-less-investable-than-venezuela-says-north-sea-boss/

John Hultquist
January 13, 2026 11:26 am

From Duck Search Assist:
“… , modern crops often have diluted nutrient levels due to selective breeding for higher yields, which results in larger produce that contains a lower concentration of essential nutrients. This phenomenon is known as the “dilution effect,” where increased size and weight of crops do not correspond to an increase in nutrient density.”

Key here is “nutrient density”, and notice the phrase “selective breeding for higher yields” . I’ll not have an “in-place panic” over this report out of Shenyang. I will also note that generally I permit chickens, hogs, cattle, and yeasts do the vegan-thingy. 

Denis
January 13, 2026 11:36 am

“The study shows that warming generally reduces yields…” Wow! It must have been really cold during the Carboniferous! 

January 13, 2026 11:37 am

Just wondering how all the plants coped in past eras when CO2 was much much higher than the measly amount we currently have.!

R.Morton
January 13, 2026 11:45 am

So, once again – after thousands of other ‘once agains‘ – the science ISN’T really settled, huh?

bobpjones
January 13, 2026 11:48 am

“Messing with the nitrogen cycle”

So what happened during the Medieval, Roman and Minoan Warming periods, did they give it a miss?

Charles Armand
January 13, 2026 12:08 pm

“The new review brings together 30 years of field experiments and global model simulations […]”

Hmm… Seven days of field study and 1559 weeks of predictive modeling? That doesn’t seem unreasonable, and the number of decades checks out.

Sparta Nova 4
January 13, 2026 12:10 pm

We need to put more miles on our ICE vehicles. The NO2 emissions have been found to fertilize plants.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
January 13, 2026 1:17 pm

I searched: How much nitrogen oxide (N2O)is produced by a discharge of lightning? Bing reports: 30-660 moles ca 1.3-290 kg. There are many millions of discharges of lightning everyday.

Bob
January 13, 2026 1:26 pm

Nothing too surprising here the Chinese have found a problem and just like climate change they will find a solution that will fit right in with the wind industry, solar industry, EV industry and so on. Trust them they can help.

jvcstone
January 13, 2026 1:33 pm
  1. I’m beginning to think that all these climate researchers need to have a mandatory historical geology class as part of their curriculum. Maybe then they would understand that what is current is nothing new nor unusual, and past extremes in both directions did not result in the end of the world. Still waiting for one of these geniuses to tell us all just what is the optimum atmospheric CO2 content, and optimum global temperature ( as if there is such a critter.)
January 13, 2026 1:40 pm

One thing about cycles in nature, “What goes around, comes around”.
Take care of yourself, your family, your friends and neighbors.
“Nature” will take care of the planet.

Bruce Cobb
January 13, 2026 2:04 pm

“We need to tell farmers how to farm, because we know what’s best for them, and for the planet”.