From the “ridiculous press releases I never bothered to finish reading” department comes this gem of a doomsday paper. The press release looks like it written with AI, one wonders if the study was too. – Anthony
Climate change is quietly rewriting the world’s nitrogen cycle, with high stakes for food and the environment
Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University
Climate change is not only warming the planet and disrupting rainfall, it is also quietly rewiring the way nitrogen moves through the world’s croplands, forests, and grasslands. This hidden shift in the global nitrogen cycle carries major consequences for food security, water quality, biodiversity, and climate policy.
Nitrogen is a basic building block of proteins and DNA, and healthy terrestrial ecosystems depend on a steady but balanced flow of nitrogen through soils, plants, and microbes. When that balance is disturbed, harvests can fall, rivers can turn green with algae, and more greenhouse gases can escape into the atmosphere.
“In a warming world, nitrogen is becoming a make or break factor for both food security and environmental health,” said lead author Miao Zheng of Zhejiang University. “Our study shows that climate change is reshaping nitrogen cycles in ways that can either support sustainable development or push ecosystems beyond critical thresholds.”

Miao Zheng, Qin Huang, Jinglan Cui & Baojing Gu
What the study did
The new review pulls together 30 years of field experiments and global model simulations to examine how three key climate forces affect nitrogen: rising carbon dioxide, higher temperatures, and shifting rainfall patterns. It compares their impacts across croplands, forests, and grasslands worldwide, and links these changes to human goals such as ending hunger and protecting clean water.
By translating hundreds of site level studies into a global picture, the authors quantify how nitrogen inputs, plant uptake, harvest, losses, and long term storage respond under different climate conditions. They also highlight large regional inequalities, showing that some areas may gain productivity while others face deepening risks of crop failure and pollution.
When higher CO₂ helps and hurts
The review finds that elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide can act like a double edged sword for nitrogen. On one side, higher CO₂ tends to boost plant growth and crop yields by around 10 to 27 percent in forests and grasslands, and about 21 percent for major crops such as wheat, rice, maize, and soybean.
At the same time, plants often dilute their nitrogen content under high CO₂, which can lower the protein quality of grains and leaves. “More calories do not automatically mean better nutrition,” said co author Baojing Gu. “We may be harvesting more biomass but with less nitrogen per unit, which matters for both human diets and livestock feed.”
Warming drives losses and inequality
Rising temperatures tell a more troubling story, especially for agriculture. The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops, with maize particularly vulnerable in tropical and arid regions, while also accelerating losses of reactive nitrogen compounds to the air and water.
Warmer conditions stimulate soil microbes, speeding the breakdown of organic matter and increasing emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and nitrogen oxides, as well as nitrate leaching into groundwater and rivers. These losses can worsen air pollution, fuel climate warming, and degrade water quality, while disproportionately harming developing regions in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.
Too little or too much rain
Changes in rainfall patterns further complicate the picture. In dry regions, modest increases in precipitation can strongly boost plant growth and nitrogen uptake, while in wetter regions, droughts can cause large drops in productivity and nitrogen harvest.
The review reports that decreased rainfall tends to suppress microbial activity and reduce many nitrogen losses, effectively trapping more nitrogen in soils. In contrast, heavy and frequent rainfall can flush nitrate into waterways and enhance gaseous nitrogen emissions, raising the risk of algal blooms and greenhouse gas release.
A call for integrated nitrogen management
Overall, the study concludes that climate change is amplifying spatial inequalities in how nitrogen cycles operate and in who bears the risks. Regions already facing food insecurity and weak environmental protections are likely to experience the most damaging combinations of yield loss, nutrient stress, and pollution.
To respond, the authors call for integrated nitrogen management that links fertilizer practices, water management, climate policy, and biodiversity goals. Promising examples include pairing rainwater harvesting with organic amendments in African smallholder systems, and planting nitrogen fixing tree species in tropical forests to maintain natural nitrogen inputs.
“We need to move beyond treating nitrogen as just a farm input and start governing it as a global commons,” said Zheng. “If we manage nitrogen wisely under climate change, we can support zero hunger, protect clean water, and limit greenhouse gas emissions at the same time.”
The authors argue that nitrogen must be more fully integrated into international climate and sustainability frameworks, including the Paris Agreement and national climate pledges. With climate change accelerating, they stress that coordinated global action on nitrogen is essential to keep both people and ecosystems within safe operating limits.
===
Journal Reference: Zheng M, Huang Q, Cui J, Gu B. 2025. Impacts of climate change on global terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Nitrogen Cycling 1: e012
https://www.maxapress.com/article/doi/10.48130/nc-0025-0012
As my counter to this doomsday paper from clown-world, here’s some data. – Anthony

I’ll take this fact: “higher CO₂ tends to boost plant growth and crop yields by around 10 to 27 percent in forests and grasslands, and about 21 percent for major crops such as wheat, rice, maize, and soybean”.
The rest is the usual speculation.
Not really written in a factual way… reads more like a 4-year old who was told facts for a few hours then asked to recount them next week after an Avengers movie.
What we expect from China ….
https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/shenyang-agricultural-university-529736
not very high on the list ….
😉
and they didn’t mention the 2 most educational sources in the world –
The University Of Life
and
The University Of Hard Knocks
That “fact” may or may not be true, but where is the proof that CO2 controls climate change?
Background articles on Nitrogen:
https://co2coalition.org/publications/nitrous-oxide-and-climate/ [2022]
and
Nitrogen cycle wrt Earth’s history:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412885/ [2017]
and
Is Nitrogen the next Carbon?
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000592 [2017]
If you only have time for one, read the 2022 co2coalition article.
[ btw Can someone give me any tricks on how to attach a graph to a comment? Thx! ]
To “dynamically load” image files from the Internet “inline” into a comment each time it is rendered by a browser see the contents of this comment under another WUWT article.
To upload an image from your computer (/ phone / device ?) the usual method is to click on the “mountain and sun / landscape” icon in the bottom-right corner of the “Comment edit box” (which has the pop-up help text of “Attach an image to this comment” when you hover the mouse pointer over it … for me at least …).
This should result in a version of your local file manager “popping up”, which will allow you to navigate around your local hard disk and select the “graph” you want to add.
Note that you can only attach one image file per comment using the latter method, and it will always appear at the end of your post.
I’m still trying to understand why some people have the image button and some don’t…
“I’m still trying to understand why some people have the image button and some don’t…”
My assumption is that it’s some weird interaction between the WUWT (/ WordPress ?) site’s HTML code and a user’s “Device + OS (+ browser ?)” combination.
I’m on a laptop under Linux (Mint, from 17.0 to 21.3), and have always had access to the “Attach an image” icon.
I use Firefox on both Mac and Ubuntu/KDE and on both I don’t see it.
I’ll have to try another browser.
Windows 10/Chrome, never have I seen it.
Crop yields increasing violates a basic
tenet of Climate Science(TM)!! It must
be an account of Man’s Fall from the Perfection of The Pre-Industrial Climate!!!
And if you ever want to get a grant, remember that catechism.
> The study concludes that climate change is amplifying spatial inequalities in how nitrogen cycles operate and in who bears the risks. Regions already facing food insecurity and weak environmental protections are likely to experience the most damaging combinations of yield loss, nutrient stress, and pollution.
Giant meteor to destroy all life on Earth. Women, children, minorities and the poor to be disproportionately impacted.
Will they ever stop with the speculative claims? Aren’t people getting tired of the doomsday yet? I think they are but the alarmists haven’t noticed and believe they just need more propaganda to save the ship.
“The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops,”
Yeah, not worth reading
Based on comments I went back and checked that the authors took both sides. They say explicitly that global warming reduces yields and that CO2 increases yields. Smells a little like a paper written by a grad student team who neglected to read each others sections before they turned the paper in.
““The study shows that warming generally reduces yields in key crops,””
It is just manifestly WRONG.. Crops like warm weather.. hate cold. !
“Warming” only “reduces yields” in ModelWorld (TM).
Here in reality, “warming,” most of which is “overnight lows not as cold,” is nothing but a benefit.
17 billion bushel corn crop in the U.S, in 2025. We have an over supply of corn due to climate change.
nitrogen must be more fully integrated into international climate and sustainability frameworks
ie charges, revenue etc. Can Trump grab Starmer for trial?
Britain ‘less investable than Venezuela’, says North Sea boss
UK politicians accused of treating carbon reduction ‘like a religion’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/13/britain-less-investable-than-venezuela-says-north-sea-boss/
From Duck Search Assist:
“… , modern crops often have diluted nutrient levels due to selective breeding for higher yields, which results in larger produce that contains a lower concentration of essential nutrients. This phenomenon is known as the “dilution effect,” where increased size and weight of crops do not correspond to an increase in nutrient density.”
Key here is “nutrient density”, and notice the phrase “selective breeding for higher yields” . I’ll not have an “in-place panic” over this report out of Shenyang. I will also note that generally I permit chickens, hogs, cattle, and yeasts do the vegan-thingy.
Yes, herbivores are natures “nutrient consolidators”, lol.
“The study shows that warming generally reduces yields…” Wow! It must have been really cold during the Carboniferous!
Just wondering how all the plants coped in past eras when CO2 was much much higher than the measly amount we currently have.!
So, once again – after thousands of other ‘once agains‘ – the science ISN’T really settled, huh?
No, the science isn’t settled yet.
“Messing with the nitrogen cycle”
So what happened during the Medieval, Roman and Minoan Warming periods, did they give it a miss?
“The new review brings together 30 years of field experiments and global model simulations […]”
Hmm… Seven days of field study and 1559 weeks of predictive modeling? That doesn’t seem unreasonable, and the number of decades checks out.
We need to put more miles on our ICE vehicles. The NO2 emissions have been found to fertilize plants.
I searched: How much nitrogen oxide (N2O)is produced by a discharge of lightning? Bing reports: 30-660 moles ca 1.3-290 kg. There are many millions of discharges of lightning everyday.
Usually, when one talks about nitrogen oxide the meaning is NO (nitric oxide). In fact, the main nitrogen products from lightning are NO and NO2, although some N2O (nitrous oxide) is formed.
Nothing too surprising here the Chinese have found a problem and just like climate change they will find a solution that will fit right in with the wind industry, solar industry, EV industry and so on. Trust them they can help.
First we need to re-instate reading, writing, and arithmetic.
Until those competencies are achieved, geology would go over their heads.
One thing about cycles in nature, “What goes around, comes around”.
Take care of yourself, your family, your friends and neighbors.
“Nature” will take care of the planet.
“We need to tell farmers how to farm, because we know what’s best for them, and for the planet”.
Great! Next up- nitrogen supplements…
Commercial crops are basically always given Nitrogen supplements
They are called ” fertilisers”.
They are usually made using natural gas.
So this paper is advocating the use of more natural gas.
Good ol’ N-P-K.
NO!NO!NO! using nitrogen fertilizers is BAD because it creates TOXIC run off and algae blooms that KILL fish!!!
The only way to fix this is to have governments and panels and politicians charge us big fees and create nitrogen markets,and….and….and….
sheesh, when sarcasm starts to sound real.
Keep in mind this is a Chinese paper. While China continues to contribute more CO2 to the atmosphere than any other nation, they build more coal fired plants than any other country. I firmly believe that this paper continues China’s scare war on other top tier nations to encourage their moronic climate change idiots to interfere with more gas, coal, and nuclear plants.
My thoughts exactly. Just fuel for the West to destroy themselves.
Nitrogen makes up 80% of the atmosphere. CO2 makes up 4/10000ths of a percent of the atmosphere and has been 17x higher, while life thrived on Earth. I am immediately skeptical about CO2 altering the Nitrogen cycle.
“4/10000ths of a percent”
hmmm.. 4/10000th…..
or 4/100th of a percent
So about 97% model circle jerk, then.
“often dilute their nitrogen content under high CO₂, which can lower the protein quality of grains and leaves.”
With words like “often” and “can”- doesn’t look to me like serious science.
“the authors call for integrated nitrogen management that links fertilizer practices, water management, climate policy, and biodiversity goals.”
gonna need a GIGANTIC burro-ocracy for that- a world-wide burro-ocracy, probably set up by the UN- let’s give them 100 billion dollars for this- should be a good start /s
This is an old argument getting recycled. Plant growth is ALWAYS governed by the limiting resource. Usually it’s water, but CO2 makes plants much more water efficient by reducing the time their stomata need to be open to intake the necessary carbon. When they get enough water to keep their circulatory systems operational, they consume to the next limiting resource, phosphorous, calcium, nitrogen or potassium. Heck, sometimes it’s iron or magnesium.
The statements about rainfall are just insulting tautologies. Cut water off to the same plants and their circulatory systems collapse. Dump water on plants in arid regions with sandier drier soils and, get this, you’ll get the same nutritional effect these guys are complaining about because there is not enough organic material in the soil to support the bacteria necessary to properly fix the above minerals anyway.
This paper is nothing more than advocacy masquerading as science.