Energy Security: Trump Bluntly Admits Why Venezuelan Action Was Needed

By Gary Abernathy

This article was originally published at The Empowerment Alliance and is re-published here with permission. 

The calendar had just barely heralded the new year when President Donald J. Trump got 2026 off to a rollicking start with the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

The operation had been openly foreshadowed by Trump’s repeated warnings to Maduro, the systematic destruction of sea-going vessels and their crews moving drugs, and the amassing of an impressive U.S. military presence just off Venezuela’s coast.

Still, the dead-of-night swiftness and skill demonstrated by the United States military was enough to bring a collective worldwide gasp of both astonishment at a mission so expertly accomplished and a reminder of the consequences when America decides to flex its muscles.

Maduro was a South American dictator who, like his predecessor Hugo Chavez, ruled his country with an iron fist, squashing freedom and democracy, all while cozying up to U.S. adversaries like Russia and China.

Most presidents after successfully removing such an authoritarian from power would defend those actions by citing the loftiest of ideals. It was a blow for freedom, they would insist, a righteous strike for democracy, a liberation of an oppressed population yearning to live free.

As we know, Donald Trump is not most presidents. In his remarks the morning following the successful operation, as Maduro was being uncomfortably escorted to the U.S. to stand trial, Trump barely let any such high-minded rhetoric pass his lips.

Instead, he noted that Maduro had been indicted in the U.S. on narco-terrorism charges and – most importantly – had “stolen” oil from the U.S. and a number of American oil companies. In fact, it was crystal clear, based on the time and attention the president allotted to the subject, that the capture and control of Venezuela’s vast oil reserves was the primary justification for removing Maduro from power and for the U.S. taking the reins there, at least for a while.

Some may fault Trump for being so blunt about the real objective of the action. But it is entirely admirable for Trump to remind the U.S. and the world of the importance of energy dominance, and it is entirely keeping with Trump’s “America First” policies. The nation that controls the energy will largely control the world, as Russia and China well know.

“We’re going to be taking out a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground,” Trump told the assembled reporters at his press conference, while “promising that American companies would be able to tap more of Venezuela’s vast oil reserves,” as the New York Times reported.

The Times story added, “The money made, he said, would go not only to the people of Venezuela, but also to American oil companies and ‘to the United States of America in the form of reimbursement for the damages caused us by that country.’”

What damages? Trump reminded everyone of Venezuela’s history.

“We built Venezuela’s oil industry with American talent, drive, skill, and the socialist regime stole it from us,” Trump said, correctly. “This constituted one of the largest thefts of American property in the history of our country.” He added, “They stole our oil. They took it over like it was nothing.”

As Forbes described it, “While Venezuela formally nationalized its oil industry in the 1970s, beginning in the early 2000s under President Hugo Chávez, Venezuela moved beyond its earlier state ownership model and launched a wave of expropriations that fundamentally reshaped its oil sector.”

The U.S. government and American companies suffered the damages. In fact, “international tribunals later awarded billions of dollars in compensation” to such companies, which Venezuela has mostly failed to pay.

Later Saturday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth told CBS, “We are going to get American companies in there. We are going to get investment in there. These oil depots have been operating at 20 percent capacity. That’s going to change.”

Trump’s political opponents will wring their hands over the constitutionality of the military action. Even many Trump supporters will worry that it violates Trump’s “America First” agenda and commits the U.S. to at least a limited degree of “nation building.”

But Trump understands a truth that supersedes any such concerns – the country that loses the struggle for energy supremacy will risk its national security, put itself at the mercy of foreign actors who could turn off our lights on a whim, and surrender the ability to ensure affordable and reliable energy for homes and businesses for generations to come.

Trump’s actions in Venezuela represent an acknowledgment that every aspect of “affordability” in regard to our economy starts with low-cost, reliable energy – a belief in line with legislation introduced in Congress to affirm America’s energy dominance. If passed, the Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Act – ARC-ES – will codify into U.S. law the kind of energy preeminence and security that Trump routinely champions.

Asked how his actions against Maduro line up with his “America First” agenda, Trump replied, “We want to surround ourself with energy, we have tremendous energy in that country. It’s very important that we protect it. We need that for ourselves. We need that for the world, and we want to make sure we can protect it.”

It’s comforting to know that when it comes to energy’s crucial role in America’s future, Trump completely gets it. So must we all.

Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing columnist for The Empowerment Alliance, which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

4.8 5 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Rude
January 13, 2026 11:15 pm

Chavez stole what American oil companies created. Now we get it back.
PS Cuba expropriated American business assets too. Perhaps we will see a reckoning there too.

David Solan
January 14, 2026 12:09 am

So let’s get this straight. We’re praising Trump because he has no lofty ideals and
no principles, but he just went in to Venezuela to blow up drug transportation and
steal oil, and he did a damn good job of committing those acts of force and brutality
(killing 100’s of people in the bargain). He is to be praised because he “bluntly”
deals in the currency of fear, not freedom. Without any “lofty ideals”, how can the
people of Venezuela be saved? How can any good come of this? It’s true that the
statists of Venezuela, who took over the government by force, stole the property that
they’re now using to finance their evil activities (though the drug activity is
actually financed by Americans who consume those drugs voluntarily). But is Trump
going to take the stolen property and somehow make good to the victims of the
original acts of theft of the 1970s and 1990s? Will he give the oil back to the
companies that it was originally stolen from? Can you even determine who should
receive that money from that oil after all this time and all that corruption? I
doubt it. It’s just going to finance different statist schemes, this time of the
American government, like building more ballrooms or financing an educational system
that Trump himself says he despises or tax credits for land-destroying, wind and
solar, make-believe power generation or giving $2000/$5000 checks to every man and
woman in America who claim they are “America-firsters”, whatever that is supposed to
mean. Even with that oil, and a hundred times more, he couldn’t begin to cover the
budget deficits that America is now racking up in an ever-spiraling race to the
complete destruction of our dollar. Trump is no hero and what he’s doing is really
trying to get in on the action of another dictator, so he can do the same thing to us
that Maduro, if he had kept the loot, would have done to Venezuela. The insanity
goes on and on.

David Solan

Reply to  David Solan
January 14, 2026 12:29 am

America-firsters”, whatever that is supposed to mean

America alone. Currently they trade a lot of soft power for…good feelings.

Reply to  David Solan
January 14, 2026 1:33 am

Haven’t you heared? It seems this channel thinks the sun shines out of Trump’s arse..

January 14, 2026 12:11 am

Adding more oil to the existing oil glut.
Pushing China and other asian countries to electrify faster.
In a world where electric vehicles gain more share each year.
All of that can push the oil price into the 40s.
Then watch the US shale producers go belly-up.
Exxon is right: Venezuela isn’t a good investement.
At least US citizens will pay for his little military adventure.

Well played.

strativarius
January 14, 2026 12:42 am

Energy Security: but not in the UK…

Miliband unveils £1.8bn of new subsidies to bankroll wind farm blitz
Energy Secretary approves plans for six new offshore wind farms.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/14/miliband-unveils-new-subsidies-wind-farm-blitz/

strativarius
January 14, 2026 12:59 am

The Cover-Up of the True Cost of Net Zero is Finally Being Blown Open
https://dailysceptic.org/2026/01/14/the-cover-up-of-the-true-cost-of-net-zero-is-finally-being-blown-open/

Tom Halla
January 14, 2026 1:10 am

The right wing satire site, the Babylon Bee, is selling a T-shirt with a stylized B-2 bomber, and the caption “International Law”.

strativarius
Reply to  Tom Halla
January 14, 2026 1:15 am

Starmer not only has the tee shirt, he wrote the book on how to get round British law.

January 14, 2026 1:32 am

Complete slop article not worthy of WUWT. It seems this channel gets politicised more and more. Is this just the ‘everything Trump does is great’ channel now?

strativarius
Reply to  ballynally
January 14, 2026 1:45 am

Some might think that, but not everybody here is an American…

Reply to  ballynally
January 14, 2026 2:11 am

Free speech —