Church of England orders parish to rip out brand new gas boilers

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

Sometimes I wonder if I’ve woken up on a different planet!

From the Telegraph:

The Church of England has ordered a parish to rip out new gas boilers because they are not “sustainable”.

Christ Church Chineham, in Basingstoke, Hants, spent £18,200 last year replacing two failing gas boilers, with the new ones expected to last for at least two decades.

But the parish will now be forced to remove the system and pay for an eco-friendly replacement after a church court ruled it had not “adequately explored more sustainable options” before installing them.

Christ Church Chineham is the latest church to fall victim to the Church of England’s target of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2030.

New rules require churches to obtain a faculty – ecclesiastical planning permission – and prove there is no viable green alternative before new oil or gas boilers can be installed.

The church chose to install gas boilers after commissioning a report from a mechanical engineer, who was a member of its congregation, which found heat pumps would require “extensive and intrusive works” and be much more expensive than gas.

Parish applied for retrospective permission

The church also commissioned an Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS) report which estimated the cost of installing heat pumps at £62,000, but still recommended its installation before the net zero target date of 2030.

The church chose instead to install the gas boilers at a third of the price and then applied retrospectively for a faculty.

But when the case came before the Diocese of Winchester’s consistory court, it ruled that the gas boilers were “undesirable as it locks the church into significant fossil fuel use well beyond 2030”.

“If the 2030 objective means anything, it is in churches such as this that sustainable heating solutions need to be installed now, not in 2045 or thereafter,” Cain Ormondroyd, the diocese’s chancellor, said.

Full story here.

Let’s go to the heart of this.

That £62000 which will now be wasted could have been used for charity. In what world is it moral for the Diocese of Winchester to divert it instead to green wokery, which will be of absolutely no benefit at all to real people?

5 25 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 4, 2026 10:19 pm

And if it is “green”, it won’t work anyway.

Parishioners will be praying for more warming.

Scissor
Reply to  bnice2000
January 5, 2026 5:39 am

He who is without fossil fuel sin should cast the first Joule.

Rational Keith
Reply to  bnice2000
January 5, 2026 11:42 am

😉

Nevada_Geo
January 4, 2026 11:03 pm

What would Jesus do?

Reply to  Nevada_Geo
January 5, 2026 1:14 am

Jesus would know that CO2 is nothing other than a benign gas, essential for life on Earth, so he wouldn’t do anything with regard to reducing CO2.

He would probably chastise the Church Elders for being such fools.

Robertvd
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 5, 2026 6:28 am

Remember that the Supreme Governor of the Church of England is Charles III or in other words it is The State

Hans Henrik Hansen
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 5, 2026 2:52 pm

“Climate scientists and their hangers-on have become the high priests of a new age of unreason

How is it that much of the Western world, and Europe in particular, has succumbed to the self-harming collective madness that is the climate change orthodoxy? It is difficult to escape the conclusion that climate change orthodoxy has in effect become a substitute religion, attended by all the intolerant zealotry that has so often marred religion in the past, and in some places still does so today…”

Soon 11 years old, but still relevant! 😎

SxyxS
Reply to  Nevada_Geo
January 5, 2026 2:56 am

He would have thrown the climate changers out of the temple.

Reply to  SxyxS
January 5, 2026 5:12 am

🙂

Reply to  Nevada_Geo
January 5, 2026 5:11 am

He’d smite the climatistas for their destructive intentions. 🙂

Rational Keith
Reply to  Nevada_Geo
January 5, 2026 11:42 am

It is claimed He would spend the money on poor people.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nevada_Geo
January 6, 2026 1:29 pm

Jesus would text God and request God fix the climate. /s

HB
January 4, 2026 11:32 pm

The church has swallowed the whole climate scam hook line and sinker

Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 1:15 am

Blame it on the temperature data mannipulators. They have presented a False Picture of the world, and unfortunately, too many people have been taken in by this fraud.

Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 4:19 am

They now worship the New God.

Reply to  Mark Whitney
January 5, 2026 5:21 am

You can worship him in MN.

Screenshot-2026-01-05-081810
strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 5, 2026 5:43 am

Is that the Jolly Green Giant?

The Chemist
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 7:28 am

From here in the US, yes. Oddly enough, both the jolly Green Giani and Santa Claus are known for their “ Ho, Ho Ho” signature statements. To be fair to the JGG, he’s a vegetable farmer, so his green is honest.

Reply to  The Chemist
January 5, 2026 7:52 am

Does he use fertilizers and tractors…asking for a friend.

Rational Keith
Reply to  Phil R
January 5, 2026 11:49 am

POTUS Trump does not want farmers to import fertilizer.

(Much of the nitrogen fertilizer used by US farmers comes from the potash mines of Saskatchewan Canada.)

Reply to  Rational Keith
January 6, 2026 6:01 am

Only if the Canadians beg to become the 51st state. 🙂

Reply to  strativarius
January 6, 2026 6:00 am

Right- in a county park in MN, just off of Rt. 90. Driving along 90 and needing a place to stay- saw a sign about the park that has some campgrounds- got there and saw the Green God. Supposedly 60′ tall.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 5, 2026 7:39 am

Doesn’t look like Paul Bunyan to me.

jdunfee12
Reply to  Mark Whitney
January 5, 2026 2:29 pm

They stopped worshiping the God who invented gender a long time ago. I guess the green idol is the replacement.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  jdunfee12
January 6, 2026 1:32 pm

God did not invent gender. The Romans did (and other languages besides Latin).
God invented two sexes, male and female.
Gender is too often conflated with sex.

Robin Andrew
Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 4:37 am

Old churches will also ‘swallow’ any heating as they are very poorly insulated, draughty, with large spaces, large single pane poorly insulated windows, any heat rapidly dissipating and rapidly rising to the high ceilings. Totally unsuitable for and a waste of money to install heat pumps. Anyone suggesting heat pumps for such buildings has no scientific knowledge or common sense. They are merely virtue signalling and taking on the new climate change religion, wasting money is their penance.

StephenP
Reply to  Robin Andrew
January 5, 2026 11:38 am

My old physics teacher said that the ideal heating system for churches was an infra red system. You only heated the area that needed heating for as long as the service was taking place. With the size of congregations going down that might be a small area for an hour and a half.
My experience was with a meeting room where some storage heaters kept a low background temperature and the infrared heaters were turned on for the duration of the meeting. It was always quite comfortable and the electricity bill wasn’t too outrageous.

Reply to  StephenP
January 5, 2026 12:27 pm

A single one bar radiator 😉

Reply to  StephenP
January 6, 2026 1:09 pm

a church court ruled it had not “adequately explored more sustainable options”
And that church simply became irrelevant.

The only good reason for those monstrous and horrible behemoths is to have nice concerts in preferably during a summer heatwave, when it gives a welcome cool relief from the baking outside temps…

In that case I don’t see any issue with gas boilers, like our (catholic) church next door it’s used for nothing at all except the occasional wedding and the now more frequent funerals..

Rational Keith
Reply to  Robin Andrew
January 5, 2026 11:51 am

Ayup, and an earthquake would bring them down.

As for the windows, they are special so replacement discouraged.

Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 5:13 am

They’re horrified that the UK may turn into a tropical paradise, like Eden.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 5, 2026 7:18 am

If the UK turns into a tropical paradise, what does the rest of the world turn into?

The Chemist
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 5, 2026 7:30 am

can the earth have too many tropical paradises?

Reply to  The Chemist
January 5, 2026 7:57 am

That doesn’t answer the question.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 5, 2026 9:33 am

Here’s your answer. During warmer times, the Cretaceous for example, the Arctic bloomed but equatorial climes were much the same as today. That’s right, Binky. Global warming affects the high latitudes the most, the tropics the least.

The screaming paranoia that fuels the Climageddon Myth is based on ignorance (or denial) of paleo-climatology. The facts are that even in the most thermal of past epochs, life teemed in the warmest places as well as the coolest. The plant communities in the Amazon today are Cretaceous in origin. They thrived in the PETM as well as the LGM. Truth out, man.

Reply to  OR For
January 5, 2026 10:02 am

Thanks for the answer

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 6, 2026 6:04 am

A question about something that can’t happen is a foolish question. If anyone is really worried that the UK will turn tropical, you need therapy. By the way, never been to the UK but I’ve seen photos of some palm trees on some islands near the UK and I think even one in Scotland. When you see banana plants, not in a greenhouse, in the UK, let us know.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 5, 2026 2:59 pm

More likely to be invaded by Romulans.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
January 6, 2026 6:02 am

Well, don’t worry, ain’t gonna happen.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 6, 2026 1:33 pm

If Eden, then we no longer wear clothes?

Asking for a friend. 😉

Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 10:02 am

We were foretold this would happen with church elders:

“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

— Romans 1:22, King James Version (KJV)

Rational Keith
Reply to  HB
January 5, 2026 11:47 am

Decades ago the Catholic church in the Seattle WA area went hard left, climate alarmists are Marxists at heart (check their beliefs on economics – fixed pie, drive-to-bottom ethics, born-sinner behaviour).

The King is, and his father was, climate alarmist.

Keitho
Editor
January 4, 2026 11:36 pm

The Climate religion strikes again.

SxyxS
Reply to  Keitho
January 5, 2026 2:32 am

Even the church has a new god now.

January 4, 2026 11:55 pm

The money wasted easily exceeds 62000£, have in mind that a “sustainable” replacement costs significantly more and does not work as well or reliable. They would have been better off setting a stash of cash on fire to heat up the place.
sarc

can’t fix ecowoke stupidity

SxyxS
Reply to  varg
January 5, 2026 3:03 am

All this stuff had to be mined,molten,refined,transported,built,
transported again and installed.
And is now being replaced by something else that has to be mined, molten, refined, transported, built, transported again and installed.

Where exactly is the sustainability here?

Reply to  SxyxS
January 5, 2026 5:23 am

All the fuss helps sustain the jobs of the climate nut jobs.

January 5, 2026 12:08 am

the Church of England’s target of achieving net zero carbon emissions parishioners by 2030

Who wouldn’t want to freeze while being lectured on global warming?

SxyxS
Reply to  PariahDog
January 5, 2026 2:36 am

You’ll stop freezing the moment the priest tells you that you gonna burn in hell for not believing in global warming.

The era of Monotheism has ended in the church of England.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  PariahDog
January 6, 2026 1:35 pm

The Population Bomb strikes again?

Bill Toland
January 5, 2026 12:19 am

The Church of England must have money to burn if they can afford to waste money like this on utterly pointless virtue signalling.

oeman50
Reply to  Bill Toland
January 5, 2026 4:15 am

Unfortunately, the parish is on the hook for the bill, not the diocese.

Reply to  Bill Toland
January 5, 2026 11:12 am

Slavery repartions are in progress to pay out £100m.

strativarius
January 5, 2026 12:24 am

18k?

That’s peanuts when they’re determined to throw £100 million away – and they are.

New church leader urged to stop £100m slavery paymentshttps://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsbirmingham/new-church-leader-urged-to-stop-100m-slavery-payments/ar-AA1T9NaF

The Church never had anything to do with slavery…

worsethanfailure
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 3:04 am

+100

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 5:34 am

Where exactly are the payments for those who are still enslaved these days?

Oh wait, current non-white slavery is not that bad as white slavery from hundreds of years ago.

This kind of perversion of reality started about 60y years ago with the apartheid-paradoxon,
where suddenly people got pissed about south africa while real slavery that happened elsewhere and mostly in muslim countries(and still going on ) was ignored.

And the indoctrination and narrative control was so perfect that literally 99.9% of people never bothered to point it out.
En contraire black Americans were converting in huge numbers to islam (when Malcolm X visited Mekka slavery was still going on there),
and no Nelson Mandela or Louis Farrakhan, who never got tired to point out the Jewish role in transatlantic slave trade but ignored that of his own religion , gave a crap as long as the enslavers were black and brown people.

Maybe one day people will start to wonder the paradox why apartheid got way more attention than slavery.

strativarius
Reply to  SxyxS
January 5, 2026 5:57 am

This is the best part. Take that woke luvvie, Lenny, sorry, Sir Lenworth Henry.

Sir Lenny Henry has called for the payment of slavery reparations to all black British people.

in a new book titled The Big Payback, the comedian supports the case for the UK government to give £18 trillion in compensatory payments.

“All black British people… need reparations for slavery,” adding that “we personally deserve money for the effects of slavery”. – BBC
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yqn2x490zo.amp

All black people just because they are black.

I counter that with costs in blood and treasure to the British for stopping slavery:

The West Africa Squadron 1808 to 1867 (59 years)
The Anglo Ashanti wars 1824 to 1900 (76 years)

At that time defence spending was > 5% GDP. We can barely manage 3% now.

As for apartheid and islam, both are not white, and… the Quran sets out the conditions for keeping slaves. It’s all above board in islam.

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 8:22 am

What’s exactly so special about black people.

They have the worst scores in Universities,
the lowest education levels by far, especially in cities that are run by liberals for decades who are wasting tons of money on black education.
They are just 13% of the population in the USA, shouldnt occupy more than 2% of any relevant position if we take their (barely existing)educational level into account,
yet they are overrepresented ,
while this should only be in Entertainment, where they actually deliver the best performance.

And this irrational and over top proBlack agenda is everywhere.
In the USA it’s the Indians(the real ones like Cheyennes, not the Hindhus) who suffered by far the most and who got screwed the most (the USA broke literally 99% of the contracts with them)
Yet it’s the blacks who are being sold as absolute no. 1 victims while they are by far the biggest perpetrators.
And if blacks are the victims, the perpetrators are 90% black.

And I’m pretty sure in UK it’s a similar scenario that the hidden hand has created.
Even without actual slavery.
Quite the opposite – the first skinheads used to be black.
It was black,usually Jamaican(as the Skinheads originate from Jamaica) and white skinheads teaming up to beat the shit out of brown muslims
(back then the muslim numbers were low, and muslims in tiny numbers with 0 leverage are the biggest asslickers(2nd biggest to be accurate) you can imagine.
I know this as I was born as one.)

The fact is that nooner ever bothered to free black people except for the white men.
The only ones who actually died to do so(see US civil war,etc).

And while slavery is still going on these, so much that the arabs casual term for a black person is abeed/abdi = slave/nigger
we are being told this reparation BS .

Why? It is a fake artificial scenario (just as the non-existent climate crisis) to tear down the existing standards and culture
and demoralize and silence the native people.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  SxyxS
January 6, 2026 1:38 pm

Lincoln offered reparations. Most did not take the offer.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 7:29 pm

Another ‘comedian’? Isn’t Ukraine enough? Jeez!

1saveenergy
Reply to  strativarius
January 6, 2026 9:56 am

“the Quran sets out the conditions for keeping slaves.”

So does the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh. (that’s where the Quran & the Christian Bible come from)

MrGrimNasty
January 5, 2026 1:37 am

I wonder if any of the clergy have bothered to inquire of Satan if hell is heated sustainably. I guess they’ll find out soon enough.

strativarius
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
January 5, 2026 2:33 am

I doubt it, Satan was excluded from the baptism rite over a decade ago

Church of England kicks the devil out of baptism rite
priests said the traditional service was unnecessarily complex and might confuse people – Ministry Matters

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 5:47 am

at least they were smart enough to say ” might confuse ” instead of
” might offend “(the devil? probably )

I wonder what the thing was that made them realize after (probably ) just a few hundred years that something might be too complex and confusing?

strativarius
Reply to  SxyxS
January 5, 2026 7:21 am

They’ve been dumbed down.

strativarius
January 5, 2026 1:38 am

Story tip

Sensational New Findings: Higher Warming Trend at Start of 20th Century Casts Serious Doubt on Role of Human-Caused CO2https://dailysceptic.org/2026/01/05/sensational-new-findings-higher-warming-trend-at-start-of-20th-century-casts-serious-doubt-on-role-of-human-caused-co2/

Ed Zuiderwijk
January 5, 2026 1:52 am

Is more evidence needed that the CoE is lead by gullible people of mediocre intelligence?

atticman
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
January 5, 2026 2:24 am

The C of E has made itself look very silly and very un-christian. They’d have been better fixing the leaks in the church roof…

Reply to  atticman
January 5, 2026 12:29 pm

And the leaks in the church’s religion. !

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
January 5, 2026 7:32 pm

“led by” lol

Richard Saumarez
January 5, 2026 2:36 am

Cain Ormondroyd is, inevitably, a lawyer. In the UK we are seeing increasing judicial overreach, which serves no useful purpose apart from making practically anything ompossible.

strativarius
Reply to  Richard Saumarez
January 5, 2026 3:04 am

Blair made a real hash of things with the Supreme Court.

Keen observers will note that the SC can easily override a prorogation of Parliament, and it can declare that equality law is based on biological sex alone.

The prorogation didn’t happen. But strangely enough, the lower courts (and public institutions) have chosen to ignore the equality ruling completely…

English courts are still allowing biological men to use women’s toilets in defiance of a Supreme Court ruling…Telegraph

Blair created a politicised judiciary. There is an overabundance of evidence on that.

worsethanfailure
January 5, 2026 3:02 am

I am not a believer but I find the idea of heating a church strangely impious, as if we are implicitly correcting God for deficient work.

I am not alone. The church in my village has neither heating nor electricity. They proposed installing leccy about 20 years ago and the howls of outrage will not soon be forgotten.

strativarius
Reply to  worsethanfailure
January 5, 2026 3:09 am

Heating a church is a hiding to nothing. They weren’t built with that in mind.

Rational Keith
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 12:00 pm

True.
Weren’t intended for continual occupation.

(Priest residences were separate.)

January 5, 2026 3:37 am

Not using gas for heating?
Why not use electric heat pumps instead?
At present, electricity generation in Britain is using near record amounts of gas.
25.9 GW instead of the record 26 GW.

Why does this church have to pay so much to switch from efficient gas boilers to less efficient gas power stations?

strativarius
Reply to  stevencarr
January 5, 2026 3:49 am

It is God’s will…

worsethanfailure
Reply to  stevencarr
January 5, 2026 4:12 am

Reading the story and taking its words at face value, the church is being penalized for a process failure.

There is nothing in the story that explains why they are being compelled to remove a working installation. The church court did not find that the “eco-friendly” replacement was superior. It only found the parish had not worked hard enough to prove it is inferior.

In a sane world that finding would only result in a new report being demanded. Only then would there be a basis for deciding the optimal solution.

All the guff about the 2030 Objective is irrelevant, though mentioning it creates the unpleasant appearance that from the start the whole thing was about the church “marching the guilty bastard into court”.

(I repeat that I am taking the words of the story at face value. Often–even usually–news stories turn out to be different than first presented.)

MrGrimNasty
Reply to  stevencarr
January 5, 2026 7:31 am

And all the interconnectors are running negative except Norway. There’s a surprise.

ResourceGuy
January 5, 2026 4:05 am

What a strange land of commandments and commanders.

rovingbroker
January 5, 2026 4:40 am

What would Jesus do?

I think that they should buy a woolen coat for each and every parishioner that uses, works and/or spends time in the church. And when such coats are halfway through their calculated useful lifetime, donate them to the needy and replace them with new coats to support the local organic sheep industry.

Rational Keith
Reply to  rovingbroker
January 5, 2026 12:01 pm

😉

Roger Collier
Reply to  rovingbroker
January 6, 2026 1:53 am

A burka for everyone made from Agnes Dei in the modern CoE.

elktracks
January 5, 2026 4:46 am

If you go green you will never get clean

January 5, 2026 4:48 am

Ripping out boilers in 2026 to get to Net Zero…. Stupidity.
How is Ed Miliband and Labour’s Net Zero project coming along?

It is 4 years until Ed Miliband’s 2030 target. Today is quite a sunny and a bit windy day.
So how are renewables coping with winter demand on this sunny, windy day, which isn’t incredibly cold?

We are having to use near record amounts of gas to keep people warm. This morning gas production of electricity hit 25.8 GW and the record is 26 GW.

I wonder what will happen at 5pm when solar power goes.

4 years to get from near record amounts of gas to very little gas.

Net Zero is a fantasy. The government are in a fantasy world.

January 5, 2026 5:11 am

The UK has gone bonkers.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 5, 2026 5:23 am

Bar at least one – yours truly…

atticman
Reply to  strativarius
January 5, 2026 2:08 pm

Count me in on that!

sturmudgeon
Reply to  atticman
January 5, 2026 7:36 pm

2 sane persons in the U.K…. I didn’t realize.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  sturmudgeon
January 6, 2026 1:42 pm

You will have to huddle together to keep warm.

January 5, 2026 6:58 am

Burning NG in a modern furnace or water heater loses about 15% of the energy up the flue.
Converting NG to electricity loses about 65% up the chimney and out the cooling system before it even leaves the plant site.
Dumb!

Natural gas at $6/E6Btu burned in a modern condensing furnace (air) or water heater with 85% efficiency has a net delivered cost of $7/E6Btu.

Electricity at $0.15/kWh and 100% efficiency powering a furnace (air) or water heater has a net delivered cost of about $40/E6Btu.

A heat pump using $0.15/kWh and a COP of 3.5 has a net delivered energy cost of about $12/E6Btu. The colder the weather the lower the COP and higher the net cost.

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
January 5, 2026 7:17 am

Spot on. Actually you get in the nineties with a modern condensing boiler, so the case is even stronger than your summary. The best way to burn gas to heat a house, lowest cost, lowest gas use, lowest emissions (if the last matters to you) is burn it locally in a modern condensing boiler.

Which for a church has the great advantage that you can heat up the building fast and temporarily, for a service or similar. You cannot do that with a heat pump. In the home a typical use is to heat the house first thing in the morning for a couple of hours, take the chill off, then turn it off till the evening, and off again at night. Can’t do that with a heat pump either, but its the rational way to use central heating in a temperate climate.

As for this church, they should just refuse to replace it. What is the church court going to do? Take them to secular court? Just say no.

Reply to  michel
January 5, 2026 11:34 am

There are two NG heating values: LHV, lower heating value & HHV higher heating value.
LHV assumes the flue gas moisture latent heat cannot be recovered and can therefore be ignored. This can amount to 10 to 15 percentage POINTS higher combustion efficiency.

Coal combustion (uses HHV) flue gas contains relatively little flue gas water vapor while NG combustion (HHV) produces a lot.
LHV might have been conjured up to misrepresent the coal/NG combustion efficiency comparison make NG seem much better.

I suspect +90 % appliance efficiencies are based on LHV which is incorrect, inappropriate & maybe deceitful.

BTW I earned my BSME at CU Boulder in 1978 and applied that across the power generation spectrum over 35 lucrative years.

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
January 5, 2026 12:30 pm

I’m no kind of expert, just assumed that what companies quote is the standard metric, which maybe it isn’t. Well, almost certainly isn’t, from your reply. So I asked Grok and got a great deal more confused! This is what Grok said:

**Typical efficiency of modern condensing boilers in the UK**

As of 2026, virtually all new gas boilers installed in the UK are condensing models, and they typically achieve efficiencies of **90-94%**, with top models reaching up to **98%**. Manufacturers commonly advertise figures around 92-94% for most standard models, while premium ones (e.g., from Viessmann or Worcester Bosch) often hit 94-98%. In real-world conditions, efficiencies can be lower if the system isn’t optimised (e.g., due to high flow temperatures preventing full condensation).

**Legal standards for new boilers**

Yes, there are strict legal requirements:

– Since 2005, nearly all new or replacement domestic gas boilers must be condensing types (with rare exemptions for impractical installations).
– Under the Boiler Plus legislation (introduced in 2018 and still in force), all new gas combi boilers in England must achieve a minimum ErP (Energy-related Products) efficiency rating of **92%** (equivalent to an A-rated label). This applies UK-wide through ecodesign regulations.
– Additional measures like time/temperature controls are mandatory, and for combi boilers, features such as weather/load compensation or smart controls are often required to maximise efficiency.

No major changes to the 92% minimum have been implemented by 2026, though consultations have explored higher standards or hydrogen-ready requirements.

**How efficiency is calculated**

Boiler efficiency in the UK is primarily measured using the **ErP rating** (since 2015), which replaced the older SEDBUK system for most purposes:

– **ErP (Energy-related Products)**: This EU-derived directive rates boilers from A+++ to G based on seasonal space heating efficiency. It’s calculated using standardised laboratory tests that simulate typical annual usage, including full-load, part-load, standby losses, and auxiliary energy use. The test accounts for the boiler’s ability to condense (recover latent heat from flue gases). A minimum of 92% is required for new gas boilers, meaning at least 92% of the fuel’s energy is converted to useful heat under test conditions.
– **SEDBUK (Seasonal Efficiency of Domestic Boilers in the UK)**: The older UK-specific system (still referenced for some calculations like EPCs) uses similar lab tests but adjusts for typical UK weather, usage patterns, and factors like boiler type or ignition. Modern boilers typically score 89-90% under SEDBUK, even if ErP is 92-94% (due to slight methodological differences).

In practice, condensing efficiency improves when return water temperatures are low (below ~55°C), allowing more heat recovery from vapour condensation—adding up to 10-11% extra over non-condensing designs.

I have been quoted a new boiler, rather expensive, with a 30 year guarantee on the stainless heat exchanger, which promises in the high nineties efficiency. Though I don’t know how that is measured.

A friend has his efficiency tested by the local engineer every annual maintenance. Again, not sure how he does it, but this is a non-condensing boiler about 20 years old, and he gets quoted readings of 85%.

But maybe they are not measuring the same thing as what you quote?

Either way of course your main point, the idiocy of converting gas to electricity and running a heat pump, still applies.

Reply to  michel
January 5, 2026 3:35 pm

Efficiency is output/input.
Input is smaller w LHV & efficiency higher than w HHV
LHV + flue gas latent = HHV.
Matters big time which one they use & it is not mentioned.

January 5, 2026 7:09 am

As the old saying goes, “You can’t fix stupid.”

youcantfixstupid
January 5, 2026 7:28 am

Gotta lover church dogma…reminds me of the “earth is the center of the universe debate” that riled up the Catholic church way back when…ah those were the days…

sturmudgeon
Reply to  youcantfixstupid
January 5, 2026 7:45 pm

Why not “no meat” on Wednesdays or Thursdays?

Bob Armstrong
January 5, 2026 7:31 am

The anti-science anti- human & ecological welfare fanaticism of ( some ) governments is appalling .

altipueri
January 5, 2026 9:23 am

They are on emission for God.
..
And thanks for the music blues brothers.

January 5, 2026 9:56 am

Just curious . . . where the orders tacked to the doors of a church?