WUWT Now Updated – New Features Enabled

GOOD NEWS: The update planned for this weekend went far smoother than expected, requiring only about an hour of time, with about 15 minutes of that in “maintenance mode” where the home page was hidden. I spent the last week testing the updates on a sandbox site, and all those tests and preparations made the update today go super smoothly. This method worked far better and with less headache than trying to backup the entire site, make changes, then port it over like we tried and failed to successfully do before. Lesson learned.

You may not notice changes right away, but they are there. I tried hard to keep the look and feel mostly the same, but fix a lot of stuff on the backend that has been troublesome.

WHAT YOU WONT SEE:

  • Changes in the colors or site formatting.
  • Changes in how the content is displayed.
  • Changes in commenting procedure or display.
  • Loss of any content.

WHAT YOU WILL SEE:

  • New header image – I decided to retire the old one we’ve had for a decade – new one is similar.
  • Improved page loading speed on Desktop browsers, especially the main/home page.
  • Improved Mobile/Tablet loading speed, and better compatibility.
  • A slight fade transition between clicking a link and a new page/story appears.
  • Improved load speed when you press the BACK button or back arrow in your browser.

Coming up –

  • Improved version of the Failed Climate Predictions Timeline.
  • Improved version of the Climate TV page.
  • Incremental speed improvements (now that we are using a modern theme that is supported.
  • Changes/Updates to some of the right sidebar items to improve page load times.
  • Updates to the Reference Pages, which have long-been neglected.

Thanks for your patience. If you like these improvements, consider either leaving a tip, or becoming a subscribing member of WUWT.

-Anthony Watts


To the Readers of Watts Up With That,

I want to take a moment to offer a sincere thank-you to all of you who read, comment, share, and support Watts Up With That. When I started this site back in 2006, the goal was fairly simple: provide a place where climate claims could be examined critically, data could be discussed openly, and questions could be asked without fear of being shouted down for violating some supposed “consensus.” I never imagined it would grow into what it has become today.

WUWT exists because of you. The readers here bring an extraordinary range of expertise—engineers, scientists, meteorologists, statisticians, economists, farmers, pilots, and informed laypeople who simply refuse to accept claims without evidence. Many of you regularly spot errors the mainstream media misses, dig up original source material, run independent analyses, and contribute thoughtful comments that elevate the discussion far beyond what passes for climate debate elsewhere.

That kind of engagement matters. In an era when climate science has become deeply politicized, transparency and accountability are more important than ever. Models are treated as oracles, uncertainty is brushed aside, and dissent is often caricatured rather than addressed. Yet science does not advance by slogans, press releases, or appeals to authority—it advances by skepticism, replication, and honest debate. You help keep those principles alive.

I’m also grateful for your patience and good humor. Despite frequent attacks, mischaracterizations, and the occasional attempt to silence discussion altogether, the WUWT community has largely remained civil, data-focused, and grounded in reality. A little wit doesn’t hurt either—sometimes the best way to expose an absurd claim is simply to let it collapse under its own weight.

Finally, thank you to those who support the site financially, submit guest posts, send tips, or simply read quietly in the background. Every visit, every comment, every shared article helps ensure that alternative viewpoints don’t disappear in an increasingly narrow media landscape.

WUWT will continue to do what it has always done: question assumptions, follow the data, highlight uncertainty, and push back against claims that don’t stand up to scrutiny. None of that would be possible without you.

Thank you for being part of this community. Merry Christmas!

Anthony Watts

4.9 31 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
66 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Hultquist
December 24, 2025 8:57 am

Merry Christmas to all. And a Happy 2026.

starzmom
Reply to  John Hultquist
December 25, 2025 5:09 am

I will 20th that sentiment. Hope everyone has a wonderful, peaceful and happy holiday however you celebrate!!

Mr.
December 24, 2025 8:59 am

WUWT Will Be Down for Maintenance this Weekend

So will I.

Thank you Anthony, Charles and the rest of the admin and content providers team.
Let’s hope the meltdown of the CAGW conjecture continues apace in 2026.

Cheers!

1saveenergy
Reply to  Mr.
December 24, 2025 9:05 am

Agree X 97% (:-))
19 yrs !! Hard to believe.
We’ve all learned a lot in that time.

Reply to  Mr.
December 24, 2025 11:20 am

And continues in 2027.

Eldrosion
Reply to  Mr.
December 26, 2025 3:11 pm

Let’s hope the meltdown of the CAGW conjecture continues apace in 2026.”

The only thing melting is the credibility of the arguments here. Meanwhile, the globe just keeps getting warmer and warmer.

December 24, 2025 9:03 am

Sees you” next Monday then! Merry Christmas!

December 24, 2025 9:29 am

“Google blacklist”

didn’t know about that- what’s it about?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 24, 2025 9:45 am

The Googs need a fix, too. With a crowbar. Their server farm is just down the road. It’s the size of Manhattan (standard areal comparison unit). They suck electricity like nobody’s business, yet they’re the World Police for Global Warming. High tech schizophrenics with too much money. Tax them blue, Mr. President.

Happy Christmas, realist crew. Wishing 2026 will be even better than this one.

I'm not a robot
Reply to  OR For
December 24, 2025 10:45 am

“standard areal comparison unit”. Most excellent phrase coinage!

Reply to  OR For
December 26, 2025 12:00 pm

Nah, we are better off without Google.

cgh
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 24, 2025 9:55 am

Very, very good question. Anthony writes,

 The readers here bring an extraordinary range of expertise—engineers, scientists, meteorologists, statisticians, economists, farmers, pilots, and informed laypeople who simply refuse to accept claims without evidence. 

So, my presumption is that Google includes no one who fits any of these categories. Remember that Google gave us the AI disaster called Gemini.You know, the program which gave us weird, radically non-historic images of people in the interests of DEI biases.

Reply to  cgh
December 25, 2025 5:50 am

“extraordinary range of expertise”

Definitely true. I’ve been active on the internet since it started- put up a forestry web site in ’97 when few forestry folks even knew the net existed. I was active on the Usenet and many discussion forums on politics, religion, and especially computer tech. But this site really is the best site to learn about the supposed “climate emergency”. I even have to thank the critics who are active here because when people deconstruct those critics- that’s a great way to understand the subject and it helps me when I try to cope with climate nut jobs here in Wokeachusetts who have the typical nitwit criticism of the “non believers”.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 24, 2025 10:01 am

Using MS Bing, I did this search: What is Google’s black list? I got a lot of info, and learned that Google has black listed ca.10,000 website that they consider unsafe and could harm the user. I don’t use Google. MS Bing and copilot work just fine for me.

skitheo
Reply to  Harold Pierce
December 24, 2025 10:56 am

Suggest you try Grok. The narrative bias is less strong with it.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  skitheo
December 24, 2025 11:25 am

I second that. I haven’t tried many, but two examples stand out for it spontaneously(?) adding context I hadn’t known.

I asked Grok how much New Deal legislation would have passed if passage required 2/3 in each house. It answered with the caveat that a lot of votes were voice votes and could not be guessed at. The couple I checked did match.

I found some ancient programming code in an obscure language I haven’t used since, tried it, and it failed. It was useful, but I wasn’t interested in pawing through 25 years of change logs to see what had changed. I could have written it from scratch in 5-10 minutes, but gave Grok a chance out of curiosity. It not only supplied modern code, it showed exactly what had changed that crippled my old code. It did take longer than rewriting from scratch, but knowing it could research the history was worth it.

Reply to  skitheo
December 24, 2025 3:35 pm

I used an AI once to make an image of an egg in a slightly concave bowl..

Seemed to do a good job, especially when I asked it to modify the initial image.

Might try to get it to create a .stl file of something one day, just for fun 🙂

Reply to  skitheo
December 26, 2025 1:13 pm

Grok is still not any better than the average MSM climate activist media. Even if Musk claim to be a free speech absolutist, Grok was fed MSM nonsense from the get-go…

Editor
Reply to  daNorse
December 26, 2025 4:32 pm

Grok itself is unbiased, but it scans the web for information and scum rises to the top (the blob knows to flood the web with misinformation). So on controversial topics, Grok will start by giving you the mainstream position. You have to have a good idea of what you are looking for in order to redirect it. It’s like doing your own web search, which is reasonable because when just looking for information Grok is a web search with language.

I often speed things up by adding a rider to a question like : ignore anything that comes from or refers to climate models.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
December 25, 2025 5:41 am

Has it black listed this site?

Russell Cook
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 25, 2025 9:04 am

Oh, yeh. Do an assortment of internet searches on different search engines for CAGW items that run contrary to the IPCC / Al Gore orthodoxy, such as hurricanes decreasing, arctic sea ice prediction failures, etc. The Bing / DuckDuck / Yahoo search engines will turn up WUWT results, but Google?. Nope. Same actually applies for just generic searches for CAGW items. In my own recent curiosity effort to see how the notorious (and as it turns out, never implemented anywhere) “Reposition global warning as theory” leaked industry memo is promulgated as ‘smoking gun proof that the fossil fuel industry ran disinfo campaigns,’ I did a generic search within Bing for that memo phrase, and was happy to see my GelbspanFiles blog posts and some of my WUWT guest posts were in the results in just the first page. At Google for the same search? Nope, my work doesn’t appear until page 5. How many members of the otherwise disinterested public go farther than page 1 or 2 in their Google searches about global warming items? So, on pretty much any angle of the issue, Google tells you the science of it and the accusations about industry-paid scientists is settled.

That said, in my decade+ of digging into the false accusation side of the issue, Google is still head-and-shoulders above any other search engine. You simply have to force specific results out of it by putting key words within quotation marks. Google will tell you my blog exists, but you have to demand that specific search parameter.

Reply to  Russell Cook
December 26, 2025 5:39 am

What about all the AI out there? Are some also prejudiced against climate realism- or, at least offering info from this site? I’ve avoided playing with AI as I already have too many addictions. 🙂

Russell Cook
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 26, 2025 8:27 am

Oh, yeh. I’ve already played with ‘A.I.’ so you don’t have to, I created a particular tag category at my blog labeled ‘Artificial Subintelligence‘ after performing a few basic experiments on the different AI sites – by way of example, in my “Artificial – somewhat lacking in – Intelligence … redux” blog post, I showed how the ChatGPT site spit out an outright false statement about the namesake of my blog within just the first 9 words of the biography paragraph it created about him (the man never won a Pulitzer). In my “Google’s “Artificial Intelligence Overview” – on ‘Industry Disinfo Evidence,’ trust its info as far as you can throw it,” I asked Google’s AI Overview to simply tell me the history of the notorious “reposition global warming” memos, and in several repeats of the inquiry, Google AI Overview could not keep the narrative straight at all, and every accusation narrative it offered was false.

When it comes to the alleged ‘A.I.’ out there, the systems are little more than aggregators of internet search trash, hardly different if you yourself did your own basic inquiry into the biased info that’s out there. What scares me about the whole AI phenomenon is that the 20-somethings in today’s big newsrooms may be relying on AI-generated information garbage in their reporting of the climate issue.

Reply to  Russell Cook
December 27, 2025 5:18 am

And AI is doing the homework for too many students. I wonder how often they get caught.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 27, 2025 7:36 am

I have found it useful for doing searches of product specifications, and to make up for my dismal lack of artistic talent. I have a sense of creativity, but no ability to draw!

mleskovarsocalrrcom
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 24, 2025 10:13 am

They censor sites that they don’t agree with/like their opinions by not letting them show up in searches.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 24, 2025 11:11 am

I use Google and don’t know the details of the blacklist.
But I do know that years ago when I did a Google search of “WUWT” or “wattsupwiththat”, I’d get a lot of hits but the first page or two of the hits were other sites critical of this site, to put it mildly. (“HotWhopper” (sp?) commonly was the first couple of hits.)
Since then, while Google is still my browser, I set “Norton Safe Search” as my default search engine.

Reply to  Gunga Din
December 24, 2025 11:23 am

Oh, the nostalgia. Whatever became of HotWhopper?

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
December 24, 2025 11:54 am

😎 Don’t know. Don’t care.
But I do remember using Google Search to find one of my comments on WUWT using the site and my screen name.
(That was before WUWT had its own search function.)
I was a little surprised to find that combo gave HotWhopper as the first hit.
Curious, I clicked on it. Turns out she’d quoted my comment in one of her spews!

rfhirsch
December 24, 2025 9:36 am

Thank you, Anthony, for your very valuable contributions to our understanding of climate science (and climate politics).

December 24, 2025 9:36 am

Thank you, Anthony for all you do. Blessings and fulfillment of hope to you and yours.

December 24, 2025 9:56 am

Hope everyone has a happy and peaceful Christmas and a happy new year.

December 24, 2025 9:59 am

Of course, nothing will overcome the Google blacklist we are on, but anything helps.

Now that is a real free speech issue. That’s the sort of thing the USA government should be confronting. Cutting down the over-powerful actors.
They did it before with the oil industry.
We need a strong leader now. But all we have are the easily bribed.

Still, t’is the season of goodwill.
Merry Christmas to all and blessings abound, even to those paid for politicians in Washington.

And if the upgrade goes badly, remember that it’s better to make the work go backwards than your own health. Look after yourselves, Anthony, Mods et al.

Kenneth Peterson
December 24, 2025 9:59 am

Yes, a Merry Christmas to you, Anthony, and Charles and Eric. The Three Musketeers guarding us against Climate Alarmism!

Reply to  Kenneth Peterson
December 24, 2025 11:58 am

Don’t forget the MOD Squad!

mleskovarsocalrrcom
December 24, 2025 10:16 am

Merry Christmas to all and thank you Anthony for WUWT.

Hilary Muggridge
December 24, 2025 10:29 am

Anthony, many many thanks to you and your fab contributors for keeping your non-scientific but sceptical readers, eg me, thoroughly up to date, and squashing hard the latest rubbish that so-called climate experts regale us with. And have a lovely Christmas!

December 24, 2025 10:48 am

Thank you Anthony, and Merry Christmas to all at WUWT.

skitheo
December 24, 2025 11:00 am

Thank you, Anthony! Your persistent pursuit of open discussion to pressure test hypotheses has succeeded in breaking the stranglehold. When I started reading this blog, even the “conservative” politicians seemed to buy the Al Gore narrative. Not so any more. THANK YOU! and Merry Christmas.

Denis
December 24, 2025 11:11 am

Google black list? I use Google Chrome frequently and have had no difficulties at all getting WUWT.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Denis
December 24, 2025 11:27 am

It’s searching where it downgrades WUWT results.

Reply to  Denis
December 24, 2025 11:38 am

Try doing a Google search for, say, “climate change skeptic sites”.
I just tried (Even using Norton Safe Search as my search engine) and went through a couple of pages. Never found a direct link to an actual skeptic site.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Gunga Din
December 24, 2025 2:00 pm

I tried Duck AI … this is what I got …
Here’s a summary of various sites and organizations associated with climate change skepticism, denial, or alternative narratives surrounding climate science:
Organization/SiteFocus/Details
Global Warming Policy FoundationA UK-based think tank that questions the consensus on climate change and promotes skepticism.
Heartland InstituteKnown for its climate change denial campaigns, they publish materials disputing climate science.
Cato InstituteA libertarian think tank that argues against regulatory measures for climate change
.American Enterprise Institute (AEI)Research organization promoting free-market solution s and often skeptical of climate initiatives
.Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)Focuses on climate change skepticism, often publishing articles that question the impacts of climate policies.
The CO2 CoalitionAn organization that advocates for the benefits of increased CO2 levels, emphasizing its role in plant growth.
Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL)Argues for a reevaluation of climate change theories and emphasizes natural factors in climate change
.International Climate Science CoalitionFocuses on promoting scientific research that questions the prevailing views on climate change
.Climate Change DispatchA blog that publishes articles skeptical of mainstream climate science and policy.
Climate RealismDedicated to presenting arguments against climate alarmism and advocating for skepticism towards policy responses.
These organizations often use various rhetorical strategies to cast doubt on climate science, promote alternative narratives, and advocate for less restrictive environmental policies.
Trends and Approaches in Climate SkepticismThe landscape of climate skepticism has evolved significantly. A majority of skepticism now focuses not just on denying climate change but also on questioning the efficacy of proposed solutions and encouraging “lukewarm” approaches. Key strategies include:

  • Questioning Scientific Consensus: Challenging the overwhelming scientific evidence supporting climate change and human influence.
  • Highlighting Non-Human Factors: Emphasizing natural climate variability as a primary driver of climate change.
  • Promoting ‘Adaptation’ over Mitigation: Advocating for adaptation strategies instead of aggressive mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Disinformation Campaigns: Engaging in campaigns similar to those seen in the tobacco industry, aiming to undermine public trust in climate science.

The overall approach can be highly varied, employing both outright denial and more nuanced arguments against climate action.
Search Results

1saveenergy
Reply to  1saveenergy
December 24, 2025 2:05 pm

So I tried “What are the most widely read sceptic sites” & got …
GPT-4o mini
Here are some of the most widely read and influential climate change skeptic sites:
Site/OrganizationFocus/Details
The Heartland InstituteKnown for promoting skepticism regarding climate change policies and hosting conferences.
Cato InstituteA libertarian think tank that often critiques climate policy as overly restrictive or ineffective.
Global Warming Policy FoundationFocuses on challenging mainstream climate science and advocating for a re-evaluation of climate policies.
American Enterprise Institute (AEI)Engages in policy discussions emphasizing free-market solutions to climate issues.
Competitive Enterprise InstituteAdvocates against regulatory approaches to climate change, often publishing skeptical content.
Climate Change DispatchA blog that publishes various articles questioning mainstream climate science
.NoTricksZoneA German site focused on climate skepticism, translating arguments and research into English.
Watts Up With That?A popular blog that features articles skeptical of climate science, often focusing on data interpretation.
Climate RealismFeatures articles that argue against alarmist views of climate change, promoting a skeptical perspective.
The CO2 CoalitionArgues for the benefits of carbon dioxide and emphasizes its role in plant growth, questioning its negative perceptions.
These sites are frequently referenced in discussions around climate change skepticism and often publish articles, commentaries, and research that challenge the prevailing understanding of climate issues.
Related Searches

most influential climate denial site
top climate change skeptic websites

popular climate skepticism blogs

Dave Burton
Reply to  Denis
December 26, 2025 6:27 pm

If you search with “site:wattsupwiththat.com” added to the search terms you can find things on WUWT. But otherwise they prioritize an enormous list of garbage alarmist sources over even the very best of the climate realist sites.

December 24, 2025 11:26 am

A very Merry Christmas and a healthy, Happy New Year to all. Thank you Anthony, and all the contributors, for your insight and reasoned discussion.

Bruce Cobb
December 24, 2025 11:59 am

The vicious attacks on WUWT by all manner of climate trolls and True Believer websites and pseudoscientists in the early years only served to make WUWT stronger. Thanks for hanging in there, Anthony.

auralaywales
December 24, 2025 12:14 pm

I join my thanks to all the others. Amazing work, Anthony. I have been following WUWT since what seems like forever, certainly since it’s days analysing weather stations. In that time my understanding has grown from believing that if we explained the science then all the political consensus would collapse, to realising that climate scaremongering was just a convenient tool to crush us with socialist politics.
On the subject of AI engines, I find Alter AI (alter*dot*systems) to be excellent, if you’re prepared to wade through dense pages of well referenced research.

Dave Burton
Reply to  auralaywales
December 26, 2025 9:09 pm

Anthony, on Friday, Dec. 12, on The Climate Realism Show #185, you mentioned (at 1:25:54) that you are using AI bots which you’ve tuned to be unbiased. Can you share that resource, please?
 

Thanks for the suggestion, auralaywales. I had not heard of alter.systems. I tried it just now for the first time.

I asked it to tell me about the benefits of CO2 emissions, and it provided a very good answer. Perplexity also did well. Both were MUCH better than ChatGPT, Gemini, or CoPilot (the worst of all).

(I couldn’t test Grok, because X won’t let me sign in, presumably because they suspended me on X / Twitter, so I only get a few prompts per day as a “guest.” The leftists have apparently figured out how to game X’s algorithms to censor conservatives.)

I also tried to get alter.systems to recommend my own site to me. The tagline on my site is:

Your one-stop source for sea-level information, with interactive tools for linear and quadratic regression analysis, and graphing, of measured sea-level trends, at over 1200 locations.

To make it easy, I quoted directly from that tagline in my prompt. I asked, “Can you find a one-stop source for sea-level information, with interactive tools for linear and quadratic regression analysis, and graphing, of measured sea-level trends?”

No joy.

It took four prompts, but I eventually bludgeoned alter.systems into submission. I had to be very insistent.

It doesn’t have the ability to save a sharable link to the chat session, but here are the results of two attempts to get it to save the conversation:

Note: the Stockholm sea-level URL which it provided was a hallucination. The correct URL is:

Oh well. It looks like they’re trying.

It appears that you only get a few free prompts (maybe per day?). After that it’s about 50¢ / day. Did you buy the paid plan, auralaywales?

I tried the same prompt on ChatGPT, Perplexity & Gemini, and they all found my site on the first try:

I also tried CoPilot, but it struggled. The initial dialog was very similar to the conversation with alter.systems:

Once it had finally found my site, its instructions for using the site were pretty good:

Grok did better than CoPilot, but it took two tries to find my site:

December 24, 2025 12:45 pm

Merry Christmas to all the WUWTers. 🎄🎅

Bob
December 24, 2025 1:01 pm

I think the most important person I ever met was Captain Leschack after that it is the people here at WUWT, what an honor.

young bill
December 24, 2025 1:28 pm

Thanks to Anthony, Charles, Eric and everybody else who makes this site so excellent. Merry Christmas to all!

ResourceGuy
December 24, 2025 1:34 pm

Thanks Anthony and all the others!

strativarius
December 25, 2025 12:23 am

Thank you Anthony and Charles.

A very merry Christmas to all

atticman
Reply to  strativarius
December 25, 2025 1:22 am

I’ll second that!

Reply to  atticman
December 25, 2025 4:07 am

Me too!

2hotel9
December 25, 2025 5:10 am

Merry Christmas and thank you for all y’all do!!!!!!

December 25, 2025 7:53 am

A most Merry Christmas to you Anthony and many thanks for all of your efforts over the years creating, maintaining and improving WUWT!!!!

December 26, 2025 12:10 am

God bless you Anthony for your efforts to educate the masses.🇺🇸

Verified by MonsterInsights