Miliband Isolated as EU Prepares to Reverse Petrol Car Ban

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Will Jones

Ed Miliband has been left isolated over his Net Zero policies after the European Union dropped “indefinitely” a flagship pledge to ban sales of new petrol cars. The Telegraph has more.

Brussels was said to be preparing for a major climbdown on vehicle emissions rules amid a revolt by member states including Germany and Italy.

Manfred Weber, head of the European Parliament’s biggest grouping of MEPs, said a ban on petrol, diesel and hybrid cars scheduled for 2035 was now off the table indefinitely.

The dramatic reversal across the Channel will be seen as a fresh blow to Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and Labour’s Net Zero policies that critics say risk damaging industry and driving up costs for households.

Ministers are now facing calls from the car industry to revisit Britain’s own plan to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030 and hybrids from 2035.

Before these deadlines, car makers must also hit electric car sales targets under the so-called zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate.

On Thursday night, the Government insisted it remained committed to the policies. A review has been pencilled in for 2027.

But Claire Coutinho, the Conservative Shadow Energy Secretary, said: “Rather than banning, taxing and forcing people into electric cars, the Government should get out of the way and back consumer choice.

“That’s why we have to repeal the Net Zero legislation, cut people’s electricity bills by 20% with our Cheap Power Plan and allow people to use that cheap electricity to buy the products they want to, when they want to.

“Forcing people to buy expensive technologies before they’re ready simply for the sake of meeting a Net Zero target just makes people poorer.”

Richard Tice, of Reform UK, said: “We should stop the internal combustion engine ban as part of scrapping Net Zero.

“This is the only way to save the UK automotive industry.”

A revised ZEV mandate that relaxed some of the requirements was unveiled by Sir Keir Starmer and Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, in April following intense lobbying by the automotive industry.

Mr Miliband has been a vocal supporter of the EV rollout, arguing that it will create a “global opportunity” for domestic manufacturers, slash Britain’s carbon emissions and clean up the air in cities.

The EU’s ban would have required a 100% fall in passenger vehicle carbon emissions by 2035 – effectively banning new petrol and diesel cars from sale, including hybrids.

However, Mr Weber, of the European Parliament, told German newspaper Bild that the requirement would now be reduced to a 90% reduction and that a total ban had also been taken off the table.

He said the decision followed talks between him and Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission.

Still a 90% reduction, then – some way to go before they give it up properly.

Worth reading in full.

5 10 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

45 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
observa
December 14, 2025 11:18 pm

Well it would be even better if they presented the prices in real rather than nominal terms-
CNN forced to report on almost four-year low of gas prices thanks to Donald Trump
Drill baby drill!

SCInotFI
December 14, 2025 11:57 pm

Without question this insane green dream will fall apart – just a matter of when, and how much pain will be inflicted on its way out.

Reply to  SCInotFI
December 15, 2025 11:37 am

and how much pain will be inflicted on its way out.

About 10 times as much pain as has already been inflicted

another ian
December 15, 2025 12:12 am

Borrowed and adapted from an item on Instapundit –

On the road to “Euthenasing Nut-Zero”

Reply to  another ian
December 15, 2025 3:32 am

‘Euthanising…’

strativarius
December 15, 2025 12:59 am

Mad Ed says: Heresy.

He wants us to believe….

Reply to  strativarius
December 15, 2025 2:20 pm

Isolate him, as in solitary confinement.

Rahx360
December 15, 2025 1:39 am

Removing the ICE ban doesn’t solve the problem of affordability. They killed the 10-20.000 price range which is what most people buy. When I walk around, and that’s a lot and look at cars 50% are cheap compact cars. Maybe stretch it to 25.000 when a households buys 1 family car.
The stupidity of politicians knows no boundaries. If people can’t afford A then let’s make B so expensive so that they will buy A is their reason, just as with heat pumps. In reality you still can’t afford A.

Remove CO2 fines.
Cancel Euro 7
Make safety systems optional, most suited for luxury cars. Everyone I know hates all those system anyway.

Do this and you can build back a 10.000 car. Millions cars can be sold just like that. I really wonder what car manufacturers were thinking building 70.000 EV’s and being surprised sales fell. Even if the God of fortune was kind to me I wouldn’t buy a 70k car. For f sakes, it’s a bloody car.

Reply to  Rahx360
December 15, 2025 4:41 am

Make safety systems optional, most suited for luxury cars. Everyone I know hates all those system anyway.

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck

There is a reason those systems exist. The solution is more public transport and walk-able cities, not having only rich people survive a car crash.

Cancel Euro 7

I too hate breathing clean air.

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 6:22 am

It really amazes me how socialists actually believe that their fevered dreams would ever work.

Reply to  MarkW
December 15, 2025 9:28 am

All right, but apart from public healthcare, weekends, worlplace safety,public education, pensions, child labor laws, unemployment insurance, minimum wage, libraries, civil rights, and maternity leave. What have the socialists ever done for us?

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 9:39 am

Make others pay for it?

stevo
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 10:23 am

Socialist govts around the world are not necessarily the orchestrators of all those nominated items. Many have been legislated by conservative govts… Get off your high horse.

Reply to  stevo
December 15, 2025 10:29 am

After pressure from socialists.

Reply to  stevo
December 15, 2025 11:21 am

There are a lot of weak-minded Lusers that absolutely NEED the Government to control every facet of their existence.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 11:55 am

Kill 100’s of millions of people. Mao, Stalin, Hitler are true socialist champions.

And of course there’s mister ‘MyUsernameReloaded’ who lists a totally random number of things and attributes them to socialism is wrong on every count.

The very first law to restrict child labour was to expand working possibilites for adults. Not an ounce of Socialism in that. Thank God.

I could go on but I’ll the debunking as an excercise for the reader. Suffice to say that Socialism has only contributed to the bodycount and nothing else,

Reply to  huls
December 15, 2025 12:13 pm

Were the Nazis Socialists?

No, not in any meaningful way, and certainly not after 1934.

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists

1833 Factory Act

Government passed a Factory Act to improve conditions for children working in factories. Young children were working very long hours in workplaces where conditions were often terrible.

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/1833-factory-act/

ethical voter
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 12:52 pm

Socialism always morphs into fascism. Think Pol Pot among those already mentioned.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 1:17 pm

Their own hand picked name: National Socialist German Worker’s Party,
I would take them at their own word.
Socialism back in the early 1900s meant control [or ownership] of the means of production by government, not private entities. This would include Communism [owned] and Fascism [controlled]. These political systems are “3 peas in the same pod”, ie authoritarian.
Modern Socialism, say, post the fall of USSR, is usually a democratically elected government that has a capitalist-like market economy and tries to implement a extensive welfare system. The key is how much control of the economy and individual companies does the government have? Your laundry list of welfare programs does not make a nation “socialist” [ but I do love the MP “Roman Skit” reference! Lol ]

Monty Python “Romans: What have they ever done for us?” skit

JTraynor
Reply to  B Zipperer
December 15, 2025 4:36 pm

So few understand fascism belongs on the left and not the right. It might be right of socialism but it’s on the left.

And, anyone who uses Monty Python to make a point is fully engaged in my book. Great choice.

Reply to  B Zipperer
December 15, 2025 10:38 pm

I would take them at their own word.

Sure, and the DPRK is really a Democratic People’s Republic.

JTraynor
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 4:26 pm

Public healthcare is a mess

Public education is a disaster

Minimum wage laws? Goodness…

Pensions? Most states are grossly underfunded. Private is moving away in favor of 401ks

Civil rights is not a tenet of socialism

Unemployment insurance does little to address unemployment or underemployment and can be better provided by private companies

Most work weekends because minimum wage laws don’t provide enough to overcome the inflation and lack of training caused by minimum wage laws, along with the high cost of living created by central planners (a tenet of socialistic behavior.)

I’ll give on safety laws as I see value in this. You should have stopped at safety laws on cars instead of all of those galactic failures of the others.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 8:47 am

I think the “safety” systems being referred to are things like lane guidance which if you drive on UK roads you know will bleep and shake the steering wheel because if has detected a road repair, the collision warning bleeps frantically as you negotiate parked cars and traffic islands. Electronic annoyances you can’t switch off permanently.

stevo
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
December 15, 2025 10:38 am

I just drove around Spain for five weeks, Ford Focus hire car with driver assistance.. whilst annoying at tmes, I found it to be very good and I couldnt change lanes without indicating or it would fight me for control of the wheel.. It could be turned off if required and clearly all the Audis, BMW’s, Porche and Mercedes driving up the highway at 150 klmphr and not using indicators had theirs in the off position. I also found the car would constantly pull me to the centre of the lane with the lane control. Lights also come on in the side mirrors providing warning as cars approach to pass…….and trying to enter the tight parking garages would have multiple warnings blasting. I thought it was good tech overall and would look for it in a new car…

Reply to  stevo
December 15, 2025 10:51 am

I couldnt change lanes without indicating or it would fight me for control of the wheel

pull me to the centre of the lane with the lane control.

What about emergency maneuvering? I wouldn’t want to have to fight the car if I need to swerve suddenly.

Reply to  Tony_G
December 16, 2025 10:02 pm

I have had to swerve violently for 3 seperate wildlife accidents…. 1st a deer. Wrecked the car.
2nd a wild boar – my swerve saved the car and certain injury… 3rd another small deer – didn’t miss mostly, and damaged the car but could drive on.
If I couldn’t control my car but some stupid electronic device intervened, it’s quite possible I wouldn’t be here today.

strativarius
December 15, 2025 2:11 am

A government spokesperson said: “We remain committed to phasing out all new non-zero emission car and van sales by 2035. More drivers than ever are choosing electric, and November saw another month of increased sales with EV’s accounting for one in four cars sold.

“We’re investing over £7.5bn to support drivers and manufacturers make the switch to zero emission. This includes £4bn investment to back British manufacturing and R&D, create jobs and drive growth in the sector.” – 6th Form Student Rag

When they say investing they of course mean subsidising it all from taxes and charges etc

“Our electric car grant is making it cheaper than ever to choose an EV, with over 40,000 drivers saving up to £3,750 since launch, backed by an extra £1.3bn announced at the autumn budget.”

What amuses me about the 6th formers is their choice of go to talking heads:

Doug Parr, the Greenpeace UK policy director, said: “Nothing the Tories suggest is likely to take effect before 2029, one year from when the ban takes effect. A U-turn now would create chaos after years of preparation for electric cars, wasting effort, risking jobs and leaving Britain stuck in reverse while the rest of the world accelerates towards cleaner, cheaper cars.

The UK will have to cave and follow the EU lead. They just need time to figure out a really good weasel word statement to that effect.

Denis
Reply to  strativarius
December 15, 2025 4:28 am

Doug Paar seems to be a willfully ignorant man.

strativarius
Reply to  Denis
December 15, 2025 4:45 am

The true believer – and Doug is certainly one of those – holds to their belief, no matter what.

This is evidently true of mad Ed Miliband and many others.

MarkW
Reply to  strativarius
December 15, 2025 6:23 am

Outlaw ICE vehicles. Then use the fact that few ICE vehicles are being sold as proof that the people support the ban.

ethical voter
Reply to  strativarius
December 15, 2025 12:59 pm

That’s a lot of other peoples money. No wonder socialists always soon run out of it.

ResourceGuy
December 15, 2025 2:13 am
strativarius
Reply to  ResourceGuy
December 15, 2025 2:26 am

Mann is a text book example of a 5th columnist.

I really don’t think anyone could possibly accuse Michael E Mann of being an objective scientist, unless somebody can show otherwise…

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
December 15, 2025 4:29 am

He’s definitely one of the 5th column people, that somehow always end up at the top before the fit shits the hen.

There is a Victor Mature quote that fits Mann very well

“I’m no actor and I have 64 movies to prove it”.
And Mann has proven for 3 decades that he ain’t a scientist.

MarkW
Reply to  ResourceGuy
December 15, 2025 6:27 am

The crazy thing is that Mann is one of those activists who loudly denounces others for having conflicts of interest in their funding.
(NOTE: Mikey’s accusations are universally are bogus.)

Denis
December 15, 2025 4:24 am

Why on earth would any government at any level interested in reducing CO2 emissions legislate to ban hybrid vehicles? If all were hybrid, vehicle fuel consumption would be reduced by roughly half which is more than an all-EV plan could considering where the electricity comes from. Is that not a good goal to them? Are our politicians really that stupid?

December 15, 2025 4:41 am

Here in UK I have two fuel efficient cars a Skoda Karoq 1.5 Tsi and a Skoda Fabia 1.0 Tsi . Both do 0-60 mph in around 9 sec . I checked the Karoq and I’m getting 44 mpg ( Uk gallon ) and the Fabia about 46 mpg . I keep them serviced and I don’t see the need to buy an expensive electric car which takes hours to charge

AleaJactaEst
Reply to  Northern Bear
December 15, 2025 11:22 am

I also have a very fuel-efficient car. A 4.8l, V8 Maserati GranTourismo which converts petrol (gas) so well that it goes from 0-60 in 4.2 seconds and maxes out at 185mph (apparently….)

I purchased it (2nd hand) because it is drop dead gorgeous and fits my golf bag nicely in the boot (trunk for our colonial types of this ‘ere manor)

Randle Dewees
Reply to  Northern Bear
December 15, 2025 7:09 pm

What is a ‘Skoda”? I’ve seen other products named that.

Ronald Stein
December 15, 2025 6:33 am

 
Energy Wisdom may be lacking among public officials, thus, all candidates running for public offices throughout the country (both parties), for Mayor, Governor, President, etc., should be given the opportunity to share their Energy Wisdom in public debates.
 
Most candidates running for public office remain oblivious to the fact that wind turbines and solar panels can ONLY generate electricity but CANNOT make any products for the 8 billion on this planet. Continuous, dependable power remains essential for industrial society. Voters deserve to know how a candidate plans to secure reliable electricity under all conditions to support hospitals, airports, and datacenters.
 
The global population has surged from 1 to over 8 billion in less than 200 years. This growth has been supported by the dramatic increase in the number of products and transportation fuels made from oil, and food production made possible by synthetic fertilizers, all of which did not exist before the 1800’s, just a few hundred years ago.
 
In addition, most of those candidates remain unaware that the demand by humanity continues for the more than 6,000 products that rely on petrochemicals every day, many of which are essential to health, safety, transportation mobility, agriculture, and national defense. Voters deserve to know a candidates plan for what the replacement will be for that black tar commonly referred to as crude oil, to maintain the supply chain of products demanded by our materialistic society

Reply to  Ronald Stein
December 15, 2025 11:23 am

And NOT ONE of the climate hysterics could go one day without the MASSIVE SOCIETAL BENEFITS given to us by the use of fossil fuels.

December 15, 2025 11:20 am

For UK temperature check, I went to:
https://www.extremeweatherwatch.com/countries/united-kingdom/average-temperature-by-year. The Tmax and Tmin data from1901 to 2024 are displayed in long table. Here is the data for the two years:
Year—–Tmax—–Tmin—-Tavg Temperatures are ° C
2024—–12.9——-6.9——9.9
1901—–11.8——-4.7——8.2
Chng—-+1.1——+2.2—-+1.7

After 123 years there has been only slight warming in the UK. For Tavg the rate of warming is 0.14° C/decade from1901. By 2050, Tavg would be 10.3 ° C.

We need to inform Minister Ed M. that he should abandon Net Zero by 2050 because this slight warming will have little effect on the climate of the UK.

Bob
December 15, 2025 1:28 pm

All I have to say is dumb and dumber, what hell is wrong with Europe?

ResourceGuy
December 16, 2025 11:33 am

I feel your pain in the UK, occasionally.

rhs
December 16, 2025 11:49 am

It’s hard for policy makers to remember what applies in cities and high density centers doesn’t apply to farms, rural, and other low density population centers.