During the first half of 2025, a new record was set for the number of deaths caused by climate and weather disasters. Can you guess what that record was?
If you read left-wing media sources, and believe anything they say, you might think that the recent record has something to do with a large and growing number of deaths. Recent articles in sources like CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and CBS News all explicitly claim that climate change is making weather events “deadlier,” or leading to increasing numbers of deaths, or some variation of that same message. I’m sure if you checked thirty such “mainstream” news sources over the past year, all thirty of them would have pieces parroting that same narrative.
Therefore you might be surprised by the actual record that has been set: The first half of 2025 (January to June) has seen the fewest number of deaths from climate and weather disasters of any first half year this century.
Just curious if you’ve seen that information reported in any source other than here? (I came across the information at Roger Pielke, Jr.’s Honest Broker Substack. He in turn cites the Global Catastrophe Recap for the first half of 2025 issued by insurance broker Aon and the EM-DAT data base of catastrophe losses.)
But before getting to the details, let’s consider what you might believe if all you read or see is the usual “mainstream” sources:
- From MSNBC, July 9, “How climate change is making natural disasters deadlier”: “At least 119 are dead and over 170 people are still missing after the catastrophic flooding in Texas. NBC News’ Jay Gray and The Kerry County Lead Editor and Publisher Louis Amestoy share the latest updates from Kerrville, Texas, and University of Pennsylvania Presidential Distinguished Professor Michael Mann joins Chris Jansing to discuss the impact of climate change on natural disasters.”
- From CNN, July 9, “Extreme heat is a killer. A recent heat wave shows how much more deadly it’s becoming”: “Extreme heat is a killer and its impact is becoming far, far deadlier as the human-caused climate crisis supercharges temperatures. . . .”
- From CBS News, March 18, “World climate report warns of growing risks to lives, economy and planet”: “A new report from the World Meteorological Organization delivers a stark warning: climate change is accelerating, with some impacts now irreversible for centuries. The State of the Global Climate reportconfirms global temperatures, greenhouse gas emissions and sea levels all reached record highs in 2024.”
- From the New York Times, October 31, 2024, “Climate Change Is Making Disasters Deadlier. Here’s How Much.” “Two weeks before world leaders meet to debate the climate crisis, a report released on Thursday shows the 10 deadliest extreme weather events in the past two decades were made worse by burning fossil fuels.”
So let’s now look at the actual data on deaths from climate and weather disasters during the 25 years since 2000, and specifically focusing on the first half of each year. The following statement (quoted by Pielke) appears in the Executive Summary of the Aon report:
At least 7,700 people were killed due to natural disasters during the first half of 2025, which is well below the 21st-century average of 37,250. Majority of the deaths (5,456) occurred as a result of the earthquake in Myanmar.
An earthquake is not a climate or weather disaster. Take out those 5,456 deaths from the Myanmar earthquake, and you have only 2,244 deaths left that could possibly fall in the climate or weather category.
How does that compare to other recent years? Pielke goes over to the EM-DAT data base, where he finds data for deaths from weather and climate-related disasters for each of the years from 2000 to 2024. Here is the chart he compiles for January to June of each year:

The tiny red bar at the right represents the ~2,200 climate/weather related deaths through June 30, 2025. Those ~2,200 deaths from climate and weather-related disasters this year is clearly the lowest in the comparable period of the 26 years in question. The second-lowest is 2009 at about 2,600. Also obvious is that the numbers of deaths are hugely dominated by major disasters that have occurred in a few years, particularly 2008, 2010 and 2022. But with or without those outlying years, there is no obvious trend up or down in the annual number of deaths from these causes.
So 2025 is clearly the record holder for fewest first-half-of-year climate/weather disaster deaths in the 21st century. But how about before that? Pielke does not have comparable data for the comparison. However, before modern weather reporting and disaster warnings, deaths from climate and weather disasters were generally hugely greater than they are today. Drawing on other sources, he finds fairly rough estimates of around 50,000,000 deaths from climate and weather disasters in the decade of the 1870s (that would be 5,000,000 per year), 5,000,000 in the 1920s (500,000 per year) and 500,000 as recently as the 1970s (50,000 per year). The generally much greater levels of deaths in prior decades leads Pielke to the following assertion:
I’d go so far as to suggest that it is likely that the first half of 2025 has seen the fewest deaths related to extreme weather of any half year in recorded human history.
It’s not possible to prove that assertion definitively, but it is very likely correct.
The constant efforts of the media to scare people out of their wits on this subject are, frankly, despicable.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The Climescream Media has an agenda, and truth aint it.
It’s disappointing that you did not address the following potential problem:
“…while both EM-DAT and Aon track deaths from weather, their primary objectives and the data they prioritize (global impact vs. insurance risk assessment) likely lead to differences in their methodologies and potentially in the specific figures they report.”
But you fail to point it out in detail…… while deaths are an easy statistic to record as people are either alive or dead a distinction easily understood.
Exactly.
Bodies are easy to count, unlike modeled deaths or modeled damages that the alarmists cite as if their results are data or observations.
Why dont you go and read Judith Curry’s book:’climate uncertainty and risk’?
Actually, everybody should read it. At least the people on this platform.
Arguing if it 6 of one or half a dozen of the other… 😉
But earthquakes are also The Wrath of Gaia,so be good little doobies and stay ritually pure. Build more Green Prayer Wheels to demonstrate your good intentions!/s
You forgot to mention sacrificing virgins to the volcano gods.
And covens of witches summoning storms.
If it bleeds it leads, and these numbers don’t have enough blood on them. The silence is deafening.
I’m surprised they’re not blaming air crashes on climate change- or are they?
https://simpleflying.com/newer-aircraft-global-warming-high-altitudes/
OK, time to stop aviation- and go back to the horse and buggy!
Except clouds reflect sunlight cooling the planet. We need more jets, not less if we are to achieve the idiotic 1.5C warming limit.
Just got this plea from National Grid. I edited it with bold and caps.
****************************************************************************
We’re expecting high energy demand today and you can help.
By making small, temporary changes to your energy use during the hottest days of the year, you can help reduce air pollution and lower stress on the electric grid BECAUSE THE GRID DEPENDS TOO MUCH ON UNDEPENDABLE, RENEWABLE ENERGY– which benefits your whole community. Please do what you can to limit your energy use SINCE WE DON’T HAVE ENOUGH between the peak hours of 3-8 p.m. today.
Here are a few easy tips to reduce energy use during peak hours:
Start earning rewards for reducing your electricity during peak demand days
Enroll your smart thermostat or battery storage device in our ConnectedSolutions program to automatically reduce energy use during periods of high energy demand, and start earning rewards this summer.
So how much longer will the people put up with this? Do we sit back and do without while the largest emitter gets away with increasing their emissions every year?
I always wonder… If the thermostat is turned up until people arrive home and everyone turns it back down to be reasonably comfortable, how great is that surge?
I’m glad that here in Ohio we never get similar notices. Yes, there are energy-saving pamphlets sent out once or twice a year, but they only point to general stuff like “turn off lights when not needed”. No time-specific suggestions that I can recall. Note that we also do not have peak and off-peak pricing. Just one rate, usually set for up to 3 or 4 year contracts,
Also, the only blackouts I can recall are always traced to something very specific, like a downed wire or fire at the utility (which happened last month in Cleveland). Not high utilization per se.
It’s good to live in a state not overcome by so-called green energy.
Wokeachusetts is completely unaware that the tide has turned regarding green energy. I think they think Biden is still president- or Harris. So much for being the self chosen elite state.
Far more people die from cold than heat yet the propagandists claim heat is the problem. And we let them get away with the lie.
It’s more comprehensive than that:
1. More rain is not a problem.
2. Warmer weather is not a problem.
3. More arable land is not a problem.
4. Longer growing seasons is not a problem.
5. CO2 greening of the earth is not a problem.
6. There isn’t any Climate Crisis.
More rain is not a problem.
Tell that to west NC.
I see this said a lot here. I’m not convinced it’s actually true, but it definitely needs to be said with qualification. It’s CERTAINLY not true on a regional basis. Aside from flooding, too much rain, even if not at flood levels, can drown crops. Overwatered plants also don’t produce well. I’ve been dealing with that a lot this year.
More rain is not a problem, unless it is already flooding.
More heat is not a problem, unless you live in Death Valley.
From a old Lone Ranger/Tonto joke: What you mean we, white man?
See? SEE?!?!?! Net Zero is working. We just need to work it harder.
Certainly. Net Zero means use no electricity for anything.
Net Zero = return to The Stone Age.
Which “Acts of God” are considered “climate related” again ?
Well, there are actually NO climate-related deaths. People die from weather phenomena. Climate is a statistical summation of weather events. People don’t die from statistics. Just sayin…
You cannot repeat that often enough.
WE NEED MORE BRAINS
— line from Return of the Living Dead
It’s not that fewer people are dying due to climate change. Climate change is accelerating the growth of the zombie population.
So I propose I receive a grant of $200 Billion dollars to test every person on the planet to determine the exact zombie population. It is only $25 per person over the global population of 8 billion. Cheap at any price, right?
If needed: /humor and /sarcasm
I am trying to understand how we can detect a “climate disaster”? Climate is a statistical construction, the average of weather.
Well, truth is optional. The image is paramount..
What are the odds of seeing an article like this in the mainstream media? It would surprise no one to learn that the various climate alarmist organizations and agencies are paying the BBC, The Guardian, the CBC, CNN, the NY Times and the like to suppress these sorts of facts because they would further undermine the climate crisis argument.
Just one problem with this otherwise fine article.
THERE ARE NO ‘CLIMATE DISASTERS.’
There are WEATHER disasters. Nothing more.
Please stop adopting their misuse of language and thereby enabling their propaganda.