BBC Complaints Director Takes Six-Month Sabbatical to Learn How to Promote ‘Climate Crisis’

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Chris Morrison

The BBC Complaints Director Colin Tregear has enrolled on the green grooming course run as a six-month sabbatical by the Oxford Climate Journalism Network (OCJN). The course is funded by the Green Blob and aims to make the ‘climate crisis’ a central element in the journalism of the attendees. Tregear is said to have responsibility for climate complaints at the BBC. Quite why the British TV taxpayer should fund this activist boondoggle for a man who is supposed to independently consider matters that often involve disputed areas of science is not immediately clear. In the past, attendees have been asked to consider that fruit such as mangoes aren’t as tasty as a year ago due to climate change. A previous speaker is on record as speculating on the need for “fines and imprisonment” for those expressing scepticism about “well supported” science.

Tregear is joined on the jolly by Maeve Campbell who is a TV climate reporter on Channel 4 in the UK. Her inclusion is less surprising since she is an identikit activist fully up to speed on the need for fear mongering to support the Net Zero fantasy. She should fit in well at the OCJN. Recently, she wrote that all over the world “fertile land is gradually becoming dry, barren and unable to support plants animals or people, as climate change causes temperatures to rise”. At the risk of imprisonment, it might be kind for someone to point out to her that the recent small rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide has led to a massive ‘greening’ of the planet, significant de-desertification and record yields of staple crops around the world.

The OCJN is run by the Reuters Institute, which is funded by the Thompson Reuters Foundation. The overall steering committee is chaired by Alan Rusbridger, who in his time as the editor of the Guardian helped turn the newspaper into an hysterical proclaimer of a coming climate apocalypse. Direct funding for the course, which seeks to influence journalists around the globe, has been provided by the European Climate Foundation (ECF) and the Laudes Foundation. The ECF is heavily supported by the Extinction Rebellion funder Sir Christopher Hohn, while Laudes chipped in £1 million in 2024 to support the network’s course activities until 2027.

The Green Blob paymasters are well represented on the OCJN Advisory Board, which is said to be dedicated to “improving the quality and impact of climate change journalism worldwide”. Katy Hartley is the Director of Strategy, Innovation and Narrative and is a member of the Laudes management team. In a previous job, she was part of a “cross-entities team exploring how all the philanthropic entities could respond to climate breakdown”. Other interesting advisers are Leo Hickman, the Editor of Carbon Brief, an activist blog funded by the ECF, and Dr Friederike Otto who runs a Green Blob-funded pseudoscientific weather attribution outfit from Imperial College London. Regular readers will of course recall that Otto was one of the leading instigators in the infamous Alimonti affair, when a group of activists and journalists forced Nature to withdraw a paper that had stated a climate emergency was not supported by the facts – the facts being those provided largely by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Otto claimed the authors “of course” were not writing in good faith. The distinguished science writer Dr Roger Pielke Jr later noted that “shenanigans continue in climate science, with influential scientists teaming with journalists to corrupt peer-review”.

Perish the thought that anything like this will be plotted at the OCJN. But its deliberations and relentless agitprop will hopefully be helpful to Colin Tregear as he faces all those impertinent complaints from the public about the BBC’s biased coverage of climate change. He has good form in shutting down debate. In February 2014, Nigel Lawson, a prominent Conservative minister in the Governments of Margaret Thatcher, told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 that global temperatures had paused over the last decade. Responding to the complainer, Tregear replied: “I hope you will accept my apologies on behalf of the BBC, for the breach of editorial standards you identified”. In fact the pause, although highly inconvenient, was well known at the time and the Met Office even wrote a paper about it titled, The Recent Pause in Global Warming. Within a short period, the BBC moved to close down all sceptical comment on a science that was declared “settled”, a ban that is strictly enforced to this day.

Meanwhile for his ‘mango’ contribution, your correspondent helpfully suggests the following. Use AI to tell you why its taste has declined because of climate change and you will have mainstream media-ready copy within seconds. Try asking it, as I did, for an alternative view that mangoes are now tastier than before and again, before you can say bananas, a plausible article appears. The point of course is that if mainstream media is simply being groomed to write copy within strict pre-set narrative guidelines, what is the point of employing the journalists in the first place? The entire over-staffed climate desk at the BBC could be closed down, and Mr Grok tasked with supplying a never-ending stream of ‘scientists say’ propaganda designed to induce mass climate fear and nudge the general public to accept the controlling Net Zero elitist fantasy.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.

4.8 25 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

48 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
altipueri
July 3, 2025 2:37 am

The BBC, Guardian, Times, and curiously The Financial Times are all still in thrall to the carbon dioxide climate doom narrative. No debate or doubt is allowed or if it slips through is met with cries of heresy and denier.
We live in very strange and unpleasant times not just on the science front but religion and politics too.
I still don’t understand how clever rich people are so easily beguiled. Someone I know worked for the billionaire Chris Hohn mentioned in the article as a funder of Extinction Rebellion. He is very clever, very rich, mad, and unpleasant to work for.

strativarius
Reply to  altipueri
July 3, 2025 3:09 am

A sociopath?

Nobody at the top got there by being a nice person.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 7:18 am

aka libertine

Scissor
Reply to  altipueri
July 3, 2025 4:28 am

Doctors and other healthcare professionals in Colorado can receive continuing educational credit for learning how the climate is sick and is bad medicine.

July 3, 2025 2:39 am

CV check: Mr Tregear has made no information about his background available. I am going to assume he has a PhD in power engineering or meteorology. (/sarc)

Ms. Campbell has a BA in French.

strativarius
Reply to  quelgeek
July 3, 2025 3:18 am

Funny thing, he’s a member of…

https://www.associationforcoaching.com/members/?id=49225791

Wherein it says he is a member of CMAC:

At CMAC, we deliver high-quality training programmes tailored to the needs of students, researchers, and professionals working across the medicines manufacturing sector.
https://cmac.ac.uk/skills-development

Curious.

Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 3:45 am

Yep, poor inadequate sod doesn’t seem to to ANY academic qualification whatsoever. !!

Curious George
Reply to  quelgeek
July 3, 2025 5:51 am

The BBC is a form of public support.

strativarius
July 3, 2025 2:55 am

I posted on this yesterday (Ted Cruz Demolishes Activist’s “Climate H*micide” Claims) and the only outlet reporting it is… the Daily Sceptic. If anyone has ever complained to Auntie and has had to wait and wait for an utterly useless [and patronising] response… soon it won’t even be a human one.

The BBC will use AI to handle viewers’ complaints, it has been revealed…
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/11/bbc-to-use-ai-to-handle-viewer-complaints/

Good luck Mr Homewood.

But in all seriousness, after the events at Glastonbury at the weekend – televised/streamed live by the BBC to the nation, no 7 second delay, even – no BBC director should be going anywhere than to a jobcentre. The lame excuses just keep coming.

“on Monday, the BBC said: “The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c75rr6g96z4o

The team was probably busy chanting, too.

Interestingly… 

Sadiq Khan meanwhile has kept quiet…” –
https://order-order.com/2025/06/30/bbc-we-regret-livestreaming-bob-vylans-glastonbury-set/

There’s death, taxes and having to pay for a blatant propaganda organisation.

Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 6:34 am

Yer right, a Google News search on “David Arkush Ted Cruz” doesn’t come up with any “legacy” media hits.

____________________________________________________

The so-called main stream media now trying to rebrand itself as
“The Legacy Press” is in its tenth year of bashing Donald Trump.
____________________________________________________

KevinM
Reply to  Steve Case
July 3, 2025 9:13 am

Every time I see him (at a bad moment or camera angle almost every time) I try to recall seeing the previous presidenr (at any moment from any camera angle).
Point being: The old news covered DT for 10 years so they could forget the other guy existed for 4 years

Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 6:44 am

Trump banned that anti-Israel rap group from performing in the United States, as a result of what they did on the BBC.

Trump says we don’t want their kind here in the U.S.

strativarius
Reply to  Tom Abbott
July 3, 2025 7:25 am

He’s right

KevinM
Reply to  Tom Abbott
July 3, 2025 9:17 am

Sounds like a stand against free speech.I don’t grant US constitutional rights to non-US-citizens, but the overarching concept applies. Anyone who pays to listen to that garbage – I hope they figure it out.
But once in a while they’re right and I’m wrong.

Reply to  KevinM
July 3, 2025 7:13 pm

I sort of agree and Trump should let them come, but I doubt that they would have the free speech rights they found at Glastonbury. They probably already know to be careful where they get their cellphones. What an incredibly stupid thing to do. I guess they need money, etc.

cgh
Reply to  philincalifornia
July 3, 2025 9:03 pm

No, you cannot allow people publicly shouting their support for mass murder and genocide. Free speech does NOT mean shouting anything vile that you wish to. There are clear criminal limits.Bob Vylan stepped way, way over the line into criminality.

Reply to  cgh
July 4, 2025 3:17 am

Yeah, the United States gets plenty of hate speech from the homegrown, radical Democrats. We don’t need to be importing more hate speech.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 8:10 am

Re job centres. The i newspaper reported (30th June) that in the UK

“the number of entry level jobs, including graduate jobs, apprenticeships, internships and junior jobs with no degree requirements had fallen by 31.89%” since ChatGPT went live in November 2022.

This is only going to get worse.

Reply to  strativarius
July 3, 2025 9:31 am

In my experience no matter what you complain about the BBC has a set procedure.
1 make them wait
2 send an apology for delay
3. Send a standard rejection
4. You appeal
5. Make you wait
6. Send apology and say it’s being dealt with by appropriate department.
7. Send a BBC is right because we quoted experts reply.

cgh
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
July 3, 2025 9:04 pm

The only cure for the BBC (or CBC) is to level them to the ground, terminate everyone, and start over.

July 3, 2025 3:36 am

Thing is… The so-called “climate crisis” is the very opposite of “well supported” science.

2nd thing is… a low-end journalist hack would have zero clue what “science” actually is.

strativarius
Reply to  bnice2000
July 3, 2025 4:59 am

These days a journalist is a passionate activist [for some cause or other ] who can string a couple of sentences together.

Curious George
Reply to  bnice2000
July 3, 2025 5:09 am

Is the difference between journalism and climate journalism the same as the difference between a jacket and a straitjacket?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  bnice2000
July 3, 2025 7:22 am

It was a few years back when it was revealed that in college, students did not want to study objective journalism, they wanted advocacy journalism.

Advocacy journalism is the are of forming an opinion and publishing it as factual news.

KevinM
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
July 3, 2025 9:28 am

US government backed student loans are the mechanism to blame during my lifetime. I’m sure earlier times in other places did similar things.
The US college/debt system of 1985-2015 entrapped generations with debt they could not pay, skills that nobody wanted and ideas they could not explore. On the one hand, it is that US generation that “blew it” – on the other hand, who paid for them to do so?

Reply to  KevinM
July 4, 2025 3:30 am

Nobody forced students to go into student loan debt.

The Democrat government of Obama made student loans easy to get and naturally, some people took the money and ran, without thinking about the consequences.

Now, the chickens are coming home to roost and some people are whining about it, like it’s someone else’s fault.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
July 4, 2025 7:51 am

Nobody forced students to go into student loan debt.

My son’s total cost for 4 years of college was about $30,000. He got his degree less than 2 years ago, so that’s a contemporary price. Even if he HAD gotten loans to cover it, he could easily pay it off with a BSEE and $80k salary.

Probably wouldn’t be doing as well with a Gender Studies degree.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
July 4, 2025 3:24 am

“Advocacy journalism is the are of forming an opinion and publishing it as factual news.”

That’s related to advocacy alarmist climate science “journalism”. They, too, present opinions as established facts.

Rod Evans
July 3, 2025 3:46 am

Great article, made me laugh many thanks. There was a time back in history where I would have been concerned about the BBC activities. Thankfully we can safely regard them as broadcasting to an empty room. The fact their Complaints Director is taking time out to be more limited in what his freedoms to adjudge any complaint re climate alarmism at the BBC should entail simply confirms their ever narrower mindset and ever weaker position.
NB Don’t ask them what passes for unbiased Glastonbury music and lyrics broadcasting sounds like.

strativarius
Reply to  Rod Evans
July 3, 2025 5:05 am

The BBC keeps pushing the envelope

“‘This weekend Glastonbury was turned into a sickening hate rally, and chants for death were beamed into millions of homes by the BBC.”

We all know how biased their reportage is, but this just shows that those (‘the BBC crew’) broadcasting the event did not see anything wrong with it at all.

They would have cut it if they had.

July 3, 2025 4:16 am

BBC + climate — keep flogging that dead horse

KevinM
Reply to  SteveG
July 3, 2025 9:31 am

If I didn’t read it here, I would not have known.
Do you get 6 month vacations?

Denis
July 3, 2025 6:32 am

According to Katharine Hayhoe and others, the evidence of climate change damage is all about us. Every twister, every hurricane (except for this year when there have yet to be any), every flood, every drought, every…. clearly states the truth. Colin Tregear must be pretty thick if he can’t see that. Why is a man of such limited intelligence even working for the BBC?

MarkW
Reply to  Denis
July 3, 2025 7:12 am

Because people of even more limited intelligence run the BBC.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Denis
July 3, 2025 7:37 am

Punxsutawney Phil is more knowledgeable than Katharine. Colin Tregear and Maeve Campbell seem {based on this post} equally clueless. For a simile, see Wiki: Witch trials in the early modern period

Mr Greengenes
Reply to  Denis
July 3, 2025 8:46 am

“Why is a man of such limited intelligence even working for the BBC?”

I think you’ll find that it’s a necessary prerequisite.

Reply to  Denis
July 4, 2025 3:35 am

“every hurricane (except for this year when there have yet to be any)”

What’s the deal with hurricanes? Wasn’t the hurricane season supposed to start June 1? Here we are into July and no hurricanes. What does Hayhoe have to say about this?

Hayhoe is an alarmist climate change propagandists. She presents climate speculation and assumptions as established facts. She is practicing Science Fraud.

ResourceGuy
July 3, 2025 7:53 am

Lack of science education, critical thinking, and professional ethics are requirements for attendance.

July 3, 2025 8:18 am

I learn something new on WUWT every day.

Who knew, that people already holding full-time propaganda jobs still had to attend propaganda continuing education classes?

For the Brits on the site: I am sorry that some of your tax dollars are distributed to THAT tripe.

Russell Cook
Reply to  pillageidiot
July 3, 2025 2:01 pm

If BBC Complaints Director Colin Tregear needs to take a 6 month sabbatical to learn anything, it is what the reality of the climate issue actually is, on its science and its false accusations against skeptic climate scientists.

As an American, I had my own personal run-in with Tregear back in 2021, summarized in my “Ofcom Complaint” blog post concerning Radio 4’s August 2020 broadcast of an episode in their series of “How They Made Us Doubt Everything” in which their specific 8/3/2020 episode was titled, “‘Reposition Global Warming as theory, not fact’.” The series had 7 more episodes added to its total count, so the count changed from what I showed in my then-current screencapture of the episode page, but what I see today is that the BBC later altered the name of the episode at some point after they closed my complaint — burying exactly the false accusation phrase I detailed in the complaint I filed. Their specific accusation about the fossil fuel industry operating under a memo’s directive to reposition global warming was demonstrably false, as I comprehensively explained to Colin Tregear. The new name for the 8/3/2020 episode is now “The Tobacco Playbook: 6. From Fact to Theory

I’ll have to write an update on this situation at my GelbspanFiles blog.

Reply to  pillageidiot
July 3, 2025 2:48 pm

For the Brits on the site: I am sorry that some of your tax dollars are distributed to THAT tripe.

It’s not. It’s paid by payers of an optional licence fee, unlike most state broadcasting.

KevinM
July 3, 2025 9:05 am

“Quite why the British TV taxpayer should fund this activist boondoggle for a man who is supposed to independently consider matters that often involve disputed areas of science is not immediately clear.”
In what other field…

0perator
July 3, 2025 11:11 am

Call it “Seminary.”

Edward Katz
July 3, 2025 2:35 pm

As I’ve continued to say, the climate alarmist crowd, of which the BBC is possibly the leading cheerleader, will continue to pull out all the stops to promote their doomsday narratives. It’s immaterial if all the evidence flies in their faces and if fossil fuel use continues to rise while highly subsidized green initiatives fail to attract supporters, much of their reporting hinges on wishful thinking. In their cases climate-related deaths and destruction that they keep hoping will occur to justify excessive and unnecessary spending and laws to combat non-problems.

July 3, 2025 2:43 pm

Quite why the British TV taxpayer should fund this activist boondoggle

Taxpayers don’t pay. TV licence payers pay. It’s an optional fee, unlike most other countries’ state broadcasting.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Zig Zag Wanderer
July 7, 2025 10:59 am

A tax by any other name is still a tax.

Ed Zuiderwijk
July 3, 2025 2:45 pm

Marcel Grok is a Dutch climate-science-sceptic journalist and co-founder of the sceptical Clintel organisation, clintel.org.

Bob
July 3, 2025 5:36 pm

We need to single out a couple high profile graduates from this propaganda class and hound them relentlessly with the actual science of climate and CO2.