From the University of Michigan and the Eye-rolling Climate Science Department, because asking your doctor about severe weather is the dumbest thing you can possibly do. And for the zillionth time, WEATHER IS NOT CLIMATE!
Weather emergencies affect older adults’ views on climate and health
People over 50 who recently experienced an extreme weather event are far more likely to express concern about the effects of climate change on their health
Nearly 3 out of every 4 older Americans have experienced at least one extreme weather event in the last two years, a new University of Michigan poll finds. And living through such an event appears to make a big difference in how they view the potential impact of climate change on their health.
The new findings from the National Poll on Healthy Aging show that 59% of people aged 50 and over are concerned about how climate change could affect their health.
The percentage expressing concern was even higher among those who had recently lived through a weather emergency such as a wildfire, extreme heat, severe storm or power outage lasting more than a day. In all, 70% of those who had experienced at least one such event in the past two years expressed concern about climate change and their health, compared with 26% of those who had not lived through such an event.
Other groups of older adults were also more likely to say they are concerned about the effects of climate change on their health, including women, those reporting fair or poor mental health, and those who live in urban areas.
Only 6% of people over 50, though, had talked with a health care provider about how extreme weather might affect their health and how they could prepare or protect themselves.

This finding suggests more opportunity for older adults to ask their doctors and other health care providers about things like how to protect their lungs from wildfire smoke, how to prepare for prolonged disruptions to their supply of medications or the electricity that powers their medical equipment, or how to know where to find cooling centers, warming centers and emergency shelters in their community.
“Our findings suggest a need to help more older adults understand and take steps to prepare for the impacts of wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, extreme heat waves, winter storms and more, especially when it comes to the medications, medical supplies, electricity and access to care that these emergencies can disrupt,” says Sue Anne Bell, Ph.D., FNP-BC, a nurse practitioner and associate professor at the U-M School of Nursing who worked with the poll team. Bell specializes in studying the impacts of disasters and public health emergencies among older adults.
The poll is based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, and supported by Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center.
In addition to the national poll report, the team compiled data for Michigan adults aged 50 and older compared with those in other states; an interactive data visualization is available at https://michmed.org/MDKQ2. An article summarizing the Michigan findings is available at https://michmed.org/28dbD.
The poll was conducted in August 2024, before some of the most extreme climate-related emergencies of the past year, such as September’s Hurricane Helene – the deadliest hurricane to strike the U.S. since Hurricane Katrina in 2005 – and the wildfires in the Los Angeles area in January of 2025.
In all, 2023 and 2024 were nearly tied for the number of weather and climate disasters with costs of more than a billion dollars, and the number of disasters of such magnitude has grown over the lifetimes of today’s older adults.
In addition to concern for their own health, 74% of people aged 50 and over say they are concerned about the potential impact of climate change on the health of future generations. That includes 43% who say they are very concerned, and 31% who are somewhat concerned.
Those older adults who had lived through a weather emergency in the past two years were more likely to express concern about future generations, with 83% of them saying they’re concerned, compared with 45% of those who had not experienced a weather emergency.
Extreme heat was the most common extreme weather event experienced by poll respondents, with 63% saying they had experienced at least one major heat wave in the past two years. Poor air quality due to wildfire smoke was next most common, at 35%, and 31% had been in the path of a severe storm. Prolonged power outages (lasting more than one day) were next most common, at 13%; power outages may be due to factors other than extreme weather.
The poll also asked older adults which potential future effects of climate change concerned them most. The most-cited potential future effect was more extreme heat events (70%), followed closely by air pollution and poor air quality (69%), loss of basic infrastructure like power and water (68%), more frequent severe storms (68%), and changes in infectious diseases (66%).
“These kinds of events can affect an older adult’s health directly – for instance, people with asthma and other lung diseases can have trouble breathing due to wildfire smoke, home medical equipment can be affected by power outages, and older adults can be more vulnerable to extreme heat and cold,” says poll director Jeffrey Kullgren, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., a primary care physician at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and associate professor of internal medicine at U-M.
“But there are also indirect effects, including mental stress, lack of access to medications and medical care, and in extreme cases, lack of ability to evacuate safely or find shelter,” he added.
Bell notes, “Planning and preparing for emergencies is especially important for those with complex health conditions and disabilities, who should ask their regular health care provider for advice as well as seek information from their local and state emergency preparedness authorities.”
Poll respondents reporting a health problem or disability that limits their daily activities were slightly more likely than other older adults to say they had spoken with a health care provider about how to prepare for a climate-related emergency, at 8% vs. 5%. Among all older adults who had had such discussions, 64% had taken at least one action to prepare.
The U.S. government’s Ready.gov website offers information about how to prepare for and cope with extreme weather events and other emergencies.
Bell previously worked with the poll team to explore what older adults have done to prepare for emergencies; read the report here.
The poll findings come from a nationally representative survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago for IHPI and administered online and via phone in August 2024 among 3,486 adults ages 50 to 94 across the U.S. The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect the U.S. population. Read past National Poll on Healthy Aging reports and about the poll methodology.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’m a ’59e (engineering) graduate of the UMich and am embarrassed by its climate stand, which infects all departments.
Blue-Green family and I agree.
Stuff at MSU included.
I stopped making alumnus donations to both because of the woke and ideological nonsense being pursued.
best to tell them that if they keep asking
I never gave a penny to my alumnus. They kept bugging me year after year. So once I said, “OK, I promise to send you a dollar”. A year later they called and a guy said, “you haven’t sent us the dollar yet”. 🙂
You should be. As a Michigan resident I am more concerned that U of M is planning to spend billions of dollars to achieve net zero “carbon emissions.”
Gee, in Texas, my healthcare providers who ever mentioned politics were as or more right wing than me. Most never mentioned politics, but those who expressed an opinion on it were libertarian to conservative.
And the “Climate Change is Gonna Kill You Right Soon Now” theme is pure leftist dogma.
If it’s a concern for medical consultants, take a look at their fellow professionals at the American Society for Civil Engineering. They wallow in ‘climate change’, nobly preparing for all the dinars and shekels they’ll gain by designing megatons of structures to ‘save’ us from the rising of the seas and the disasters of super-hurricanes. Their trade magazine has been flooded for a decade about their wise preparations for AGW – without a speck of application of the scientific method, which calls for skepticism and evidence before accepting the total surrender of the political community from the UN on down, to the legend of disastrous warming changes due to CO2.
Just for clarity:
Medicine is an art, not a science.
Engineering, likewise, is not a science.
Both use science, of course.
That intelligent, educated individuals gobble down this nonsense is the real point you make. It is demonstrating a tragic loss of critical thinking.
FYI, it is not a legend. It is a lie.
I’ve heard it said differently: “Math is the only pure science. All the rest use engineering.”
I like it.
I frowned after the climate change alarmism under engineers thinking it odd.
Then i reread and noticed i glossed over ‘civil’ before engineering.😁
For clarification; Our response to climate change has resulted in extended power disruptions. Not climate change, our response.
I’m well over 50 [What’s that got to do with it?] and have – most of the time – prepared for disruptive weather events.
If my taxes helped pay for this carp, I want my money back. 🤠
Discuss it with your plumber and your letter carrier as well. 🙂
People over 50 who recently experienced an extreme weather event are far more likely to express contempt at the news media / enviro-activists / woke 20-something researchers when it comes to blaming this stuff on Clima-Change™ because we’re old enough to remember when the craze of our youth or just prior to it was global cooling, plus we readily see how critical thinking is never applied to the issue by zealot news media / enviro-activists / woke 20-something researchers (insert old guy yelling at clouds meme here).
Good one, John.
“63% saying they had experienced at least one major heat wave in the past two years.”
Two years is…wait for it….WEATHER!
And “major hear wave” is called SUMMER!
Part of the problem for us old folks is that we were hounded by the coming ice age scare. Many of us worked with our dads, uncles, and grandparents. My dad and uncles discussed the scare of their day: “The Earth is going to Burn!”, and Grandpa would chuckle and tell us about his generation’s fear of a coming ice age.
So, us oldsters can’t forget that the science is NOT settled, and in fact appears very periodical. Dad doubles down by telling me every Fall that Global Cooling has returned, and every Spring that Global Warming has returned. Very old joke, and reminding him he’s only right for the Northern Hemisphere doesn’t stop him from making the joke again.
Actually, it’s kind of refreshing.
Dad jokes are great.
Kids moan. Wives shake their heads and roll their eyes.
Dad jokes are great.
Cloud A to cloud B: “Shirley you can’t be Cirrus.”
Cloud B: “Oh, but I am. And don’t call me Shirley”.
That “coming ice age scare” was so important they even beamed Mr. Spock down from the Starship Enterprise to play “Leonard Nimoy” as the narrator of a documentary about it. 🙂
I remember when Spock declared that there was no intelligent life on a certain planet. I now have to wonder if he was describing Earth.
Balderdash, I say.
Don’t sugarcoat it. Tell us how you really feel.
/humor
“Balderdash, I say.”
And poppycock, not to mention piffle, fiddlesticks, blatherskite, codswallop and humbug. !
When we read this sort of stuff (tosh?), one must wonder how “newly-discovered” lands ever became populated by the various peoples who lived in those times.
I mean, can we imagine say Columbus reporting that when his ship reached land across a vast uncharted ocean, the crew were wary about landing there, feeling that the weather was “a bit fresh” for their liking?
Seriously, urbanised humans these days are becoming an endangered species because ambient climatic conditions aren’t Goldilocks.
(Maybe that’s nature’s way of bringing about “The Great Re-Set” that leftists crave?)
Many of us remember when air conditioning was a luxury. If we have an air conditioner in our homes, it was a window unit and we only used it on the worst days. Our cars had no a/c, just windows.
But the younger generations go from climate-controlled homes to climate-controlled garages to climate-controlled autos to climate-controlled workplaces. If they work in an office, they probably have a sweater to wear when the office gets too cool in the summer.
It’s a small wonder they believe the climate is heating.
I have a friend who worked in the computer room at our college back when Jiminy Carter was president. Carter ordered all government agencies to reduce energy usage.
The computer room had big chillers that were used to keep the humidity low, this was in Atlanta. After refrigerating the air to squeeze the water out of it, they then warmed the air.
Since reducing the amount of dehumidification would invalidate the warranty on those very expensive computers, they decided that the way to meet Carter’s new orders was to no longer heat the air before it was released from the chillers.
It got so cold in the computer room that the workers had to wear coats. They even had to put small electric heaters in the computers, to keep them from getting too cold.
In the middle of a typical Atlanta summer, my friend managed to come down with pneumonia.
“Our cars had no a/c, just windows.” But we had wing windows that haven’t been seen since before the ice age scare.
Those wing window (vents) were fabulous.
Discontinued because in an accident or two, someone banged their head.
Wing AND sliding windows…and green moss over time.
Our cars had 460 air conditioning: 4 windows down and 60 mph.
The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect the U.S. population.
Homogenized data.
A lot depends on the wording of the questions.
“Did you beat your wife again last night?” is the old comedy version of this.
Once collected data is “treated” in any way, is it still “data” or a collection of “numerical constructs infused with assumptions”?
(asking for pedant friend 🙂 )
The latter.
Maybe they should worry about how climate propaganda is affecting their mental health.
Well, some time ago on the BBC a psychologist suggested taking up…wait for it..: CLIMATE ACTIVISM.
So, scared of Climate? Become a Climate Activist. Officially approved.
I have never discussed climate with any of my physicians. My daughter is a physician, she might mention the weight epidemic in America, and her thoughts on why, but I don’t think she would want a patient to discuss climate.
Also, a real engineer gets a degree in applied science, and to be able to practice effectively you need to understand the underlying science that applies. Most engineers end up doing something other than engineering once out of school for a few years (usually for opportunity, advancement and money), but that does not mean they know little about science.
That is correct. Engineers are not scientists, but we do use science.
The climate modelers could use more than a little help from engineers.
Analysis of alternatives pops up quickly as does identifying and challenging assumptions.
“Nearly 3 out of every 4 older Americans have experienced at least one extreme weather event in the last two years, a new University of Michigan poll finds.”
Two questions.
Did they define just what makes a weather event “extreme”?
Did they ask how many “extreme” weather events in their lifetime?
(OK. Three questions.)
Why only the last two years?
(OK. Four questions.)
Are they counting hurricanes when they went to Florida for the winter?
Question 4: Why did they bother with the survey if they already had determined the outcome?
The answer is obvious..
Scraping the bottom of the barrel.
I am in my mid seventies, and have lived thru blizzards and tornadoes in Chicagoland, and several severe (cat3+) hurricanes here in south Florida.
My prep comprises updating my hurricane go bag beginning of every season. Don’t need any help from the government or my doctors.
Do you need to tape your windows Rud?
Living in a tropical cyclone zone as a child, we were too poor to afford rolls of tape, so our Mum used to tack blankets to the tops of the window frames inside our house, and also rig up rolls of towels that could be placed at the outside bottoms of the doors and drawn in up against the outsides with twine under the bottom door frames once they were closed.
I guess that kept the driving rainwater out, and also helped minimise the build-up of pressure inside the house.
Necessity being the Mother of Invention, and all that . . .
Come on, man up, everybody!
I have experienced extremely good weather over the last 77 years.
It’s all so obvious…..no amount of money will fix today’s weather, but taxes can fix the 30 years of it called climate.
This is pitiful. Number one most people 50 years old would likely kick the snot out of you for calling them old. Number two they probably had to include people in their fifties to insure at least some in their poll had been brainwashed by the worthless education system. Three most retired people 62 plus are in pretty good health and don’t need a bunch of college kids telling them what do. Those seniors who aren’t in good health likely have lots more important things to worry about than so called CAGW. Everyone involved in this worthless study should be fired.
To me, at 75, and some of my peer friends, anyone under 50 looks like a kid. 🙂
I remember watching John Wayne in “The Sands of Iwo Jima” 10 or 15 years ago when it struck me. Not only was I now well over twice the age of the character he was playing but I was also well over the age John Wayne was at the time!
I’ve lived in southern Sydney, the central west of NSW and Newcastle region.
I’ve seen floods, droughts, and experienced things called “heat waves”.
It is just WEATHER, and none of it has changed much in several decades.
This is just an attempt to measure the effectiveness of their propaganda campaigns and generate additional alarmist talking points. Love the use of the phrase “lived through” as though the minor weather related discomfort of a heat wave was a life threatening trauma. DOGE the lot of them.
A very insightful post. “Lived through.”
Story Tip: Germany’s Greens successfully write ‘net zero’ commitment into Constitution – Brussels Signal
Greens running the agenda because of Merz’s cowardice and betrayal of the people who voted for him.
Look to AfD to win biggly next election as all betrayed conservative voters vote to that party.
When will they conduct the wake on Germany?
If leftist alarmists and the media (but I repeat myself) weren’t constantly bleating about
climate changeglobal warming, no one would think to ask about something so completely irrelevant to your health as your concern aboutclimate change global warming. It’s as relevant as asking how your concern for commercial air travel safety affects your health. It doesn’t. Unless you’re a chronic worrier, then you have mental health problems to address.This poll is a good example of priming responses through questioning. The actual poll questions are found here (pdf download.).
Kip, that link does not work.
Perhaps this one, although ‘final’ indicates some revision?
https://www.healthyagingpoll.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/0428_NPHA-Climate-Change-Report-Qs_FINAL_03-17-2025.pdf
Oh boy. Read it. Did you beat your wife AGAIN last night?
What has astounded me is the Billions in different departments EPA, NIH, NASA that was being spent on very dubious reasons and I am not a US citizen and paying the bill. Perhaps it time for Australia to have an audit of it’s departments and see if they have gone the same way.
This caricature is almost funny.
> Nearly 3 out of every 4 older Americans have experienced at least one extreme weather event in the last two years, a new University of Michigan poll finds
What they don’t say, but which is almost certainly true is that nearly 3 out of every 4 Americans have experienced at least one extreme weather event in every 2 period period since they were born – and so did their ancestors.
How many of those were heat related and how many were winter storms?
My years in Michigan were covered by moderately pleasant summers and brutal winters.
I recall a 3 week period of time where 16 of those days were listed as the coldest temperature in CONUS.