New Year’s Resolution to Embrace CO2 Emissions and Benefits

By Vijay Jayaraj

Scientific advancement and agricultural technology have revolutionized food production, enabling humanity to feed more readily a ballooning population. And working behind these celebrated innovations is an unacknowledged but indispensable contributor to the world’s growing food security: rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).

The very molecule that has been wrongly branded as a doomsday gas has been contributing to increasing yields for essential crops like rice, wheat and soybeans.

Food Security is Serious Business

The 20th century’s Green Revolution demonstrated how scientific intervention – including the use of fertilizers – could dramatically boost crop yields. The late 1960s saw a huge turnaround in yields across the globe, thanks to Norman Borlaug’s high-yielding, drought-adaptive, disease-resistant varieties of food crops.

Nations that had suffered severe poverty and famine became agricultural giants within a decade or so. Between 1965 and 1970, wheat yields nearly doubled in Pakistan and India, two nations that were once pleading for international aid to rescue their people from malnourishment and starvation.

Despite being criticized by some, agricultural advancements in the use of fertilizers, pesticides and gene editing have been vital. Without them, feeding our growing global population would be impossible. But they’re not the complete story.

Also driving higher crop yields has been an increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere that began in the 19th century as the Industrial Revolution accelerated. The rate of increase rose further with global industrialization following World War II.

C3-C4 Divide: Understanding the Difference

Having an especially efficient photosynthetic pathway are C4 plants, which have a four-carbon sugar molecule produced during photosynthesis. These plants, which include corn and sugarcane, have an evolutionary adaptation from millions of years ago that was a response to an atmosphere relatively low in CO2. Thus, C4 crops are already operating near peak efficiency when it comes to CO2 utilization under suitable environmental conditions like that of the present era.

In contrast, C3 plants that developed during a time in the distant past when CO2 levels where many times higher than today’s show dramatic responses to increased atmospheric levels of the gas. C3 plants, named for their three-carbon sugar molecule, have a relatively inefficient photosynthetic process. Their stomata – tiny pores on leaves that allow gaseous exchange – must remain open longer to capture sufficient CO2, which leads to greater water loss through transpiration.

Higher ambient CO2 levels allow C3 plants to photosynthesize more efficiently while losing less water. The benefits of elevated CO2 aren’t merely theoretical, as proven in field studies that have confirmed laboratory findings.

These studies, conducted in real-world conditions, show consistent yield increases across various C3 crops. Wheat yields increase by 20-30% under elevated CO2 conditions, while rice shows increases of between 15-32%. Soybeans, another crucial C3 crop, exhibit yield increases of up to 46% in some studies.

Perhaps nowhere is the CO2 effect more evident than in greenhouse cultivation. Modern greenhouse operators routinely boost productivity by elevating CO2 levels to 800-1,000 parts per million (ppm), which are well above current atmospheric levels of around 420 ppm. The results are striking: tomato yields increase by 40-50%, cucumber production rises by 30-40%, and growth of lettuce and other vegetables accelerates significantly.

In addition, it has now come to light that even C4 crops – like corn and sugarcane – can benefit from elevated CO2 under conditions of drought and low soil nitrogen. This is big revelation for tropical Asian countries where sugarcane farmers often struggle with insufficient water for their plants. Further research could reveal that the 21st century’s elevated CO2 levels have been aiding crop production there.

Understanding CO2‘s role in crop productivity should inform the policy landscape, where governments and corporate entities like Blackrock and Vanguard have incorrectly promoted the reduction of atmospheric CO2 as a “life-saving” endeavor without understanding basic plant biology. The opposite is true: More atmospheric CO2 is a boon to humanity, and less is bad.

We should be grateful for the industrial emissions of carbon dioxide that contribute to greater crop productivity instead of spending billions on foolish projects to remove the gas from the air to store it underground. Such initiatives will do nothing to improve the weather while impoverishing people.

Today’s release of carbon dioxide through the combustion of coal, oil and natural gas is reversing a process that sequestered CO2 from the atmosphere millions of years and lowered to less than optimum concentrations the amount of the gas available for plant growth.

A resolution worth adopting this New Year would be to reject the coordinated demonization of CO2 by climate scaremongers and to celebrate it for what it is: the gas of life.

This commentary was first published at BizPac Review on December 27, 2024.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.

5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

38 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 2, 2025 6:20 am

Once again:

1. More rain is not a problem.
2. Warmer weather is not a problem.
3. More arable land is not a problem.
4. Longer growing seasons is not a problem.
5. CO2 greening of the earth is not a problem.
6. There isn’t any Climate Crisis.

NOAA & NASA pages on CO2 Greening of the Earth 2016

Reply to  Steve Case
January 2, 2025 2:01 pm

Maybe the increase in global temperatures will also break the glacial/interglacial cycles this planet has experienced over the last 400,000 years and keep us in a comfortable, warm phase. This will benefit humanity for many thousands of years in the future. The planet was a lousy place to live in about 10,000 years ago with kilometres of ice covering the northern continents.

Thanks to R Hannon for the climate stratigraphic sequence presentation of the Holocene cycles, and H Vinos for the ice core graph.

Hannon-Vinos
Reply to  jayrow
January 2, 2025 2:28 pm

oops – J Vinós

Reply to  jayrow
January 3, 2025 5:39 am

At that time, there were less than 15 million people. They had plenty of lebensraum

Duane
January 2, 2025 6:28 am

The warmunists spend all their energy trying to prove to the Great Unwashed Masses that today’s conditions are tantamount to the oft-forecast “tipping point” that will send us all to hell in a handbasket …. while in reality, this is the greatest period in human history for bountiful food, bountiful energy supplies, long life expectancy, great comforts, and “social justice”. The better we have it in this life, the more miserable the warmunists and cassandras who themselves are the great pollutants of life on earth.

Reply to  Duane
January 3, 2025 5:40 am

Warm-mongers?

strativarius
January 2, 2025 6:43 am

“Embrace CO2 Emissions and Benefits”

We’re entering a cold spell and there’s every chance of our lighting a fire in our – yet to be banned – fireplace.

Is there anymore a tight and warm embrace of coal and wood borne CO2 – plus anything else you want to burn?

strativarius
January 2, 2025 7:14 am

Story tip

Net zero ‘nudge unit’ accused of Covid scare tactics will push heat pumps on public

Behavioural Insights Team receives £100,000 contract from Government as ministers aim to deliver 300,000 extra home upgrades this year
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/01/02/net-zero-nudge-unit-accused-covid-scare-tactics-heat-pumps/

Dave Andrews
Reply to  strativarius
January 2, 2025 9:01 am

Given that there were less than 40,000 heat pumps of all kinds installed in the UK in 2023 (figures are not yet available for 2024) there is absolutely no chance that an extra 300,000 are going to be installed in 2025.

strativarius
Reply to  Dave Andrews
January 2, 2025 9:36 am

Not in my house…

John Hultquist
January 2, 2025 8:12 am

Modern greenhouse operators routinely boost productivity by elevating CO2 …”
In a closed “greenhouse” CO2 has to be added just to replace that consumed by the plants. The elevated term is important. Further, on a windless day, a rapidly growing field, say of corn, will use-up the ambient CO2 and the growth will slow.

Reply to  John Hultquist
January 2, 2025 2:57 pm

We should take the captured CO2 from some industrial processes and release it in the fields of growing crops instead of pumping it into underground storage. We could release it into orchards and vineyards.

We could submit an application to the USDA for a research funds for these projects.
For field work we will need several brand new F-150 Ford pickup trucks.

Sparta Nova 4
January 2, 2025 8:29 am

So, are we not at the “tipping point” where we can transition from

“Have nothing and be happy”

to

“Have plenty to eat and be ecstatic”

Curious minds want to know.

January 2, 2025 9:34 am

A few days ago Astronomy Picture of the Day APOD put up this statement:

“…methane, a greenhouse gas that, if released, could potentially increase the amount of infrared light absorbed by Earth’s atmosphere, and so increase the average temperature of the entire planet.

In their Asterisk discussion board it was pointed out that CO2 is beneficial to crops around the world which produced this response: Here

In any case, a few percent difference in crop production in either direction isn’t really the issue. It’s the collapse of ocean ecosystems, the shift in location of agricultural zones, the rise of sea level, the huge increase in extreme weather events, the loss of species diversity, and many other things that are defining this as a crisis. Hundreds of millions will die, billions will have their lives disrupted, our global economy will collapse and that will almost certainly continue us on our path away from democracy (already beginning, obviously). It’s not going to be pretty for the next generations.

This the mindset that the New Year’s resolution is up against. People really do believe that.

Reply to  Steve Case
January 2, 2025 2:31 pm

Hundreds of millions will die, billions will have their lives disrupted, our global economy will collapse….

If we descend into another glacial cycle. 

Reply to  jayrow
January 2, 2025 2:53 pm

The climate crusaders want us to believe that a
warmer world with more CO2 constitutes a crisis.

Reply to  Steve Case
January 2, 2025 3:21 pm

The concentration of CH4 in the air is 1.929 ppmv. One cubic meter of air contains ca.
0.0014 g of CH4. The low concentration of CH4 is due to the initiation of its combustion by discharges of lightning. Everyday there are millions of lightning discharges, especially in the tropics (cf. Wiki).

A hydrocarbon, CH4 is readily oxidized by ozone which is produced by lighting discharges.

CH4 is slightly soluble in cold water. One liter of ice-cold water can contain 35 mls of CH4. That is not very much, but the cold polar waters a quite large.

Jet planes with their large engines are flying vacuum cleaners for CH4. Vehicles with ice’s burn up CH4 in the air they use. Wildfires burn up CH4.

We really do not have to worry about CH4.

Mr Ed
January 2, 2025 10:06 am

Interesting piece, especially on the C3-C4 divide. Nicely encouraging
prospective.

January 2, 2025 11:15 am

….

PlantsLuvCO2
Reply to  bnice2000
January 2, 2025 1:31 pm

And another.. this could be made into a badge..

CO2_green_pLANET
Bob
January 2, 2025 12:55 pm

Very nice Vijay, wonderful post.

Richard Greene
January 2, 2025 1:39 pm

Another great Vijay article

My first decade of interest in climate was mainly reading scientific studies of CO2 enrichment and plant growth. I have read at least 200 of them. About 95% were about C3 plants because it was believed another 300 ppm of CO2 would not benefit C4 plants like corn much. But the benefits were larger than predicted.

This is just my educated guess because there are no conclusive statistics:

Global Food Crops
C3 plants 70% of food
C4 plants 30% of food

Average growth increase per +100 ppm CO2
About 10%

NOTE: A huge amount of corn (40% globally) is used as food for steers (not cows), pigs and chickens.

Biological Impacts of CO2
20 page Summary
of a 1079 page document

Microsoft Word – _03-26-14_ CCR-IIb SPM.doc

Reply to  Richard Greene
January 2, 2025 1:52 pm

I vaguely recall reading an article somewhere that C4 plants are actually capable of reverting back to C3 processes to make better use of the enhanced atmospheric CO2.

I much prefer my beef, range fed rather than corn fed. 🙂

January 2, 2025 2:03 pm
Reply to  bnice2000
January 2, 2025 3:38 pm

Shown below in the graphic is a plot of the of annual average temperatures for
Adelaide. The graphic is from the late John Daly’s website available at:
http://www.John-Daly.com.

Do think you could go to the BoM and get the temperature data up to 2023? If the trend continues, this would be additional info that CO2 does not cause warming of air. However, it is likely that original weather station has been moved so it would not be possible to complete the plot.

adelaide
David A
January 2, 2025 7:22 pm

While this is a good article. it considerabl;y understates the benefits of CO2.

While the harms fail to manifest, the benefits increase linearly to concentration levels well above anything likely to occur. These benefits are massive. Currently most every every crop on the planet grows 12% to 20% more food (conservative estimate) then it would if the atmospheric CO2 level suddenly dropped from 420 PPM to pre-industrial 280 PPM. (280 PPM CO2 is near starvation levels. If CO2 concentration had moved 125 PPM in the opposite direction to only 155 PPM concentration, almost everybody on the planet would starve, and almost all bio-life would cease.) Also, this CO2 caused increased production of bio-life, delivers another stupendous benefit, in that zero increase in water or land acreage is required. Additionally CO2 makes crops more drought, heat, and frost resistant – geographically expanding growing zones and growing seasons!

Indeed, if we went to 280 PPM tomorrow, WWIII would happen within weeks.

David A
Reply to  David A
January 2, 2025 7:30 pm

Also there are far more benefits to C4 plants then listed. Please begin here, http://www.co2science.org//subject/c/c4plantbiom.php
and there are many more then the multiple links here.

Reply to  David A
January 3, 2025 7:07 am

…….280 PPM tomorrow, WWIII would happen within weeks.

WWWIII is much more likely to result from the brain chemistry of a power crazed politician than from atmospheric chemistry.

David A
Reply to  DMacKenzie
January 3, 2025 10:19 am

They are orthogonal.
However a 20 percent global drop in food production would cause very rapid global conflict.

Yooper
January 3, 2025 4:38 am
Yooper
Reply to  Yooper
January 3, 2025 4:40 am

Add this:

Highlights

  • We introduce True Significant Trends (TST), an integrated workflow for trend detection.
  • The TST workflow addresses temporal-spatial correlations and manages multiple testing in gridded data.
  • Using TST, we analysed 42 years of AVHRR NDVI data, revealing refined spatiotemporal trends.
  • TST identified trends in 38.16% of our data, reducing false positives from 50.96% by conventional methods.
  • TST showed 76.07% of areas with significant greening and 85.43% in regions with NDVI >0.15.
January 3, 2025 5:35 am

As usual, Vijay’s CO2 essay is excellent.
I will reference it in my articles

Dutch and Belgium consortia own about 50% of all food supermarkets in the eastern US, which provides plenty of shelf space for display of European farm products, at the expense of US farmers, all as part of our full of holes trade agreements.

What is not generally known, Dutch greenhouse owners in Quebec, Canada, receive low cost electricity and gas to provide lighting and CO2 and heat in the winter, during which they grow blueberries, cucumbers, parsnips, tomatoes, etc, which I buy in the Hanneford market, in West Lebanon, NH, owned by a Belgium consortium.

Reply to  wilpost
January 3, 2025 7:35 am

Most supermarket chains now charge wholesalers for “shelf space” ….so maybe the US farmers need to get into the kickback game….Canadians, on the other hand value their quota system which insulates their farmers from going bankrupt every time the US has a production bubble.

Reply to  DMacKenzie
January 3, 2025 12:20 pm

Trump will soon have a tariff system

You sell to us, only if you buy from us, to maintain balanced reciprocal trade, otherwise a tariff high enough until you do.

The Europeans will go ape shit, hate Trump more, but will have to suck it up.
They refuse to buy from us.

KlimaSkeptic
January 3, 2025 6:17 pm

I personally despise this “hint dropping” in articles, like “…increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere that began in the 19th century as the Industrial Revolution accelerated. The rate of increase rose further with global industrialization following World War II.” This is only reinforcing the belief, that we, the humans are the cause of this “dangerous” increase in CO2 in the atmosphere in less informed, often indoctrinated individuals. There are numerous published studies, some even in this blog, which show convincingly, that burning of fossil fuels is NOT the cause of CO2 increase, and that CO2 is NOT controlling the temperature of the planet.

Reply to  KlimaSkeptic
January 3, 2025 9:22 pm

After WWII the NH temperature dropped by at least 0.5C, while beneficial CO2 continued to climb.

Of course that period, called the Global COOLING Scare, has now been erased from the temperature records.

January 5, 2025 11:35 am

Brilliant concise explanation of what should be totally obvious to anyone who has not deliberately forgotten their elementary biology. This diagram might help.

Screenshot-2025-01-05-at-08.26.34