Risking Alaska’s Energy Exceptionalism (RPS looming)

By Kassie Andrews — October 15, 2024

“Alaska’s ‘capitalism in transition’ requires one final piece of legislation before reaching, arguably, the point of no return: a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS).”

Alaska has no shortage of recommendations from local environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) whose purpose is to implement global Malthusian degrowth.  These plans come at great cost to our future and way of life as free Alaskans.  

In March of 2022, “Alaska’s Renewable Energy Future – New Jobs, Affordable Energy” was released, a report on behalf of the Regenerative Economies Working Group – Alaska Climate Alliance / Fairbanks Climate Action Coalition. Imagining themselves as Alaska’s overlords, the study examined

the potential for 100% clean renewable energy to replace fossil fuels energy in Alaska by 2050 and its attendant benefits including more jobs, lower energy prices, higher energy security and the potential for renewable resources to support the equitable transition to hydrogen-based fuels for the aviation and maritime industry.

Studies, studies…. Competitive energies need freedom; uncompetitive energies need studies and government.

Alaska’s Renewable Energy Future and Global Agenda Align

This plan highlights key strategies for the state to “accelerate the transition to a clean, renewable energy future,” including:

  • Undertaking a comprehensive statewide strategic policy and planning effort, an explicit goal of transitioning to 100% clean renewable energy by 2050, using the Integrated Resource Plan required by legislation that established the Electric Reliability Organization (ERO)
  • Enact legislation to require electric utilities to achieve 100% clean renewable energy by 2050 and to regularly measure and report progress toward that goal, including the adoption of reasonable Renewable Portfolio Standards, e.g., 80% by 2040
  • Seek Alaska Permanent Fund support for publication of environmental disclosures of its investments to ensure portfolio investments are assessing and addressing climate risks.
  • Green Bank – A Green Bank is a capital management program that leverages limited public dollars to attract greater private investment in clean energy.

An underlying theme of the report is to finance the “Just Transition to a Regenerative Economy.”  But what does this mean?  Since the global pandemic, the idea to upend and replace capitalism has become normalized and accepted.  Chief among those calling to replace capitalism is the Trilateral Commission, which published a report in June of 2022 by the Task Force on Global Capitalism in Transition.  

The report references a 2020 survey wherein 56% agreed “capitalism does more harm than good.”  The survey contacted over thirty-four thousand people in twenty-eight countries, including Russia and communist China.  The Trilateral Commission report goes on to state the growing concerns about whether market-based economies can handle major challenges, with the first on their list being climate change, stating climate change is the “greatest issue facing humanity in the 21st century” and the “climate crisis is primarily caused by the rise of fossil-fueled economies.”

The executive summary for the Trilateral Commission report states: “The time was right for this effort.  Despite capitalism’s manifest positive impact on prosperity and well-being, many people are frustrated by its inability to handle some of the greatest challenges facing society. In particular, there are growing concerns about whether market-based economies will be able to adequately address climate change, the disruptions triggered by the digital revolution, and rising inequalities. Moving toward a more sustainable and inclusive capitalism is thus a defining challenge of our age.”

The up-front costs as listed in Alaska’s Renewable Energy Future are “on the order of $128B over 30 years, can be mitigated by federal and state co-investment.”  Contrast this with the $3.5T additional annual capital investment required between now and 2050 to build a net-zero global economy, with investment totaling only $1.8 trillion in 2023, the inflation yet to be seen with exponential increased costs is unfathomable, with no expected real returns or metrics of success. 

Faced with extraordinary costs to implement their experiment, our masters must throw away traditional capitalism and replace it with Marxism repackaged as the “regenerative economy.” Other terms for the rebranded theft include inclusive capitalism, stakeholder capitalism and sustainable capitalism.

The only way to get this much money into the system to pay for something that no one wants would be to steal it from unsuspecting citizens.  Our economy, resources, supply chains, energy infrastructure, food production and agriculture must be stolen and fed back to us under their new terms and control.  The Trilateral Commission’s recommendations to achieve net zero include “Establish new rules of the road” by “Accelerating green finance” and by use of the government where “Central banks should establish as standard practice regular and universal climate stress tests to assess climate risks across financial systems.”  

Additionally, they state:

Establishing a price on carbon is an obvious path toward solving the green transition challenge from an economics perspective.  Setting a price incentivizes firms, entrepreneurs, and researchers to innovate.

We already see this in the way that activist investors used Governor Mike Dunleavy by subjecting the state to carbon extortion in exchange for resource development.

There is a huge disconnect in what environmental activists see as an existential threat to humanity versus how everyday Americans are polling.  In the latest Gallup Poll on the “Most Important Problem,” almost half of Americans at 44% list economic issues as the most important problem where Environment/Pollution/Climate change no longer even registers on the poll <0.5% in September, down from a consistent 2% in the 6 months prior.  Their plans very clearly stated are to exacerbate the very issue most Americans are concerned about (economy), to try to solve the issue that doesn’t concern Americans in the least (climate).

A “Regenerative” Economy?

According to the World Economic Forum, “Only a regenerative economy can build sustainable, inclusive prosperity.”  As covered previously, sustainability is a degrowth construct, and inclusive means equal outcomes for everyone.  According to the Climate Justice Alliance “A People’s Orientation to a Regenerative Economy: “We have long advocated for climate justice through a Just Transition. The emerging Green New Deal (GND) has created an opportunity to deepen this work.” 

The Fairbanks Climate Action Coalition states

If our current economy is producing climate change, pollution, and inequality, what kind of economy can provide good livelihoods that work both for people and the planet? This working group is focused on finding answers to that question that make sense for Alaska—we seek to redefine the goals of the economy away from maximizing income for the wealthy few towards achieving broad-based equity, community health, and ecological sustainability.

According to APlanet, a regenerative economy is “the economic model that represents an alternative to the current economic system in response to its environmental, social and economic shortcomings.”  They go on: “To ensure environmental conservation and promote a universal improvement in quality of life, it is necessary to reduce both GHG emissions and the material footprint” and under “other relevant concepts to consider,” they list degrowth or degrowth theory, doughnut economics and a circular economy.

Enabling the Plan

It is interesting that they use the word “regenerative” while calling for net zero.  There is nothing regenerative or environmentally friendly about the materials required for the so-called transition.  To my oil and gas industry friends who believe we need to buy into carbon capture/sequestration, and that CO2 is something that we need to control, know that degrowthers mean zero

Alaska Climate Alliance, ENGOs et al. have made great progress in getting laws passed to enable this plan. In 2020, SB 123 was signed into law creating the unelected regional Electric Reliability Organization.  According to Renewable Energy Alaska Project

The new ERO will establish and oversee region-wide reliability standards as well as non-discriminatory interconnection standards that will make it easier for independent power producers to access the transmission system to sell renewable energy.

This legislation passed with only one Republican voting nay.

In May of 2024, HB 273 was passed establishing a state green bank as a subsidiary of the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) by way of amendment.  Green Bank legislation was originally introduced by Governor Mike Dunleavy in 2021.  While eleven house members voted no to the Green Bank amendment, final bill passage included only 3 nays in the house and 2 in the senate.

Who is Behind Alaska Climate Alliance?

The primary authors of the report are from the Pacific Environment and Native Movement.  Native Movement is a member of Climate Justice Alliance.  Senator Shelley Moore Capito’s office R-WV reported that in December of 2023, Climate Justice Alliance was granted $50M in Inflation Reduction Act funds by the EPA.  In a statement by Climate Justice Alliance on receiving the funds “Climate Justice Alliance (CJA) was selected to receive a $50 million grant for its UNITE-EJ (United Network for Impact, Transformation, & Equity in Environmental Justice Communities) application and to serve as a National Grantmaker for EJ TCCGM to provide support to the Western United States (EPA Regions 8-10).”  Alaska is in EPA region 10.

According to the Native Movement website:

Native Movement is a proud partner within the Alaska Just Transition Collective, a growing collective of Alaska based organizations with a spectrum of focuses working to support Alaska along a path toward a post-oil economy, an Indigenized Regenerative Economy. 

The Native Movement website states:

The Alaska Climate Alliance is a group of 50+ organizations and more than 120 participants united by our desire to align Alaska’s climate action community with Just Transition principles, addressing the climate crisis head-on at all levels of society and shifting our state towards a joyful, interdependent and Indigenous-led future.  And “Our alliance grew out of Alaska’s Just Transition movement, and is steered by a coordinating team including staff from Native Movement, The Alaska Center, Native Peoples Action, Fairbanks Climate Action Coalition, and the Southeast Alaska Conservation Council. The Alliance’s first statewide virtual gathering was in October 2020, and has happened monthly since that time.” 

In a Q&A with Native Movement, on “What are 3 projects you are working on with your community?”  They state:

This is a hard question to answer because of the breadth of our work. We are a statewide organization that supports multiple grassroots efforts across the state spanning issues of LGBTQ+ rights, missing and murdered indigenous women and girls (MMIWG), climate justice, environmental justice, and energy justice. We are supporting communities fighting multiple extractive projects across the state, including the Ambler mine, the Donlin mine, and the Willow oil and gas project.

We also support communities in their regenerative visions, including land back, food sovereignty, clean energy, and expanding broadband access. We hold trainings on decolonizing gender and untangling colonialism, among other things, and are fostering a cohort of community educators across the state.

Along with Pacific Environment, two of the non-profits listed under the Just Transition Collective, Alaska Community Action on Toxics and Fairbanks Climate Action Coalition make up half of the petitioners listed to dismantle the Trans Alaska Pipeline, which through the evil and oppressive extractive economy (capitalism) provides almost half of the revenue to fund our state.

Next Steps to Energy Serfdom

Alaska’s capitalism-in-transition requires one final piece of legislation before reaching, arguably, the point of no return: a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which would require our co-ops to achieve an increasing percentage of energy by renewable resources by a certain date.

First introduced in 2022 by Governor Dunleavy and introduced again by others in 2023, we were spared as the legislation died in committee this year.  The Alaska Climate Alliance is clamoring for the mandate to require increasing percentage of energy to come from unreliable sources of energy, their plan is dead without the heavy hand of statist mandates.  Due to the terrible business decision to adopt decarbonization goals, electric co-ops have adopted resolutions supporting an RPS. 

Is it a fair question for Alaskans to ask – who are these self-proclaimed manipulators of Alaska’s economy?  This upcoming election, it is critical to know where candidates stand on this issue.  When they come to your door this fall, be sure to ask them. 

5 9 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 15, 2024 2:07 pm

the potential for 100% clean renewable energy to replace fossil fuels energy in Alaska by 2050 and its attendant benefits including more jobs, lower energy prices, higher energy security and the potential for renewable resources to support the equitable transition to hydrogen-based fuels for the aviation and maritime industry.

Not a single word about lowering CO2 emissions to save the planet.

But that’s the only reason to do it at all, isn’t it?

Tom Halla
October 15, 2024 2:21 pm

Classically fascist organizations, with the desire to “solve” a nonexistent problem.

Reply to  Tom Halla
October 15, 2024 4:01 pm

Classically fascist organizations, with the desire to “solve” a nonexistent problem make stuff up to gain more power and control.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Fraizer
October 16, 2024 7:08 am

You nailed it.

erlrodd
October 15, 2024 3:13 pm

The impact of such nonsense in Alaska would be especially strong – Alaska’s taxpayers today share in the revenue windfall of being a high energy exporting state. All of that would disappear with the elimination of fossil fuels at which time Alaska would at best produce it’s own energy. Taking away any state’s major export industry would be disastrous, but doubly so for one which is such a high proportion of the total state economy.

Reply to  erlrodd
October 16, 2024 6:04 am

All that in a state where they need all the global warming they can get their hands on… it’s cold up there! I checked myself!

mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 15, 2024 3:48 pm

Let’s see …… partial daytime sun for prolonged periods, no wind to catastrophic wind at times, inhospitable environment for exposed machinery and glass. How are they going to do this without enough nuclear to run the state by 2050 and massive upgrades to grid to handle increased energy?

Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 15, 2024 4:00 pm

Not to mention the MASSIVE environmental damage inflicted by solar panels and the wind turbine industries.

Can someone take the title image and litter it with huge wind turbines, just to see what Alaska would become.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  bnice2000
October 16, 2024 7:09 am

Can one install a solar farm on a glacier?

October 15, 2024 3:59 pm

So let’s put this proposal to a vote:

  • AK should cease all hydrocarbon production.
  • This of course means an end to the stipend paid to AK residents from the royalties.
  • Institute AK income and increase sales taxes paid by the residents to offset lost royalties
  • Asses each AK resident a one time payment to fund the buyout of TAPS and all oil leases since this would clearly be a taking and fair market value for the assets would need to be paid.

On the other hand:

  • Drill the SH*t out of ANWR and fill up TAPS. Increase the stipend payments to AK residents proportionately.,
  • Build a NG pipeline and LNG facility to export untapped NG resources and Increase the stipend to AK residents proportionally
Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Fraizer
October 16, 2024 7:19 am

You Capitalist you! How dare you oppose the radical marxist socialist agenda!
/ sarc (as if it is needed)

October 15, 2024 4:53 pm

“hydrogen-based fuels for the aviation”

Oh, can’t wait to get into a plane with hydrogen as the energy source! /s

oeman50
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 16, 2024 5:40 am

Hydrogen based aviation has been tried before. Can you say “Hindenburg?”

October 15, 2024 4:56 pm

“greatest issue facing humanity in the 21st century”

The greatest issue facing humanity is as always, death and taxes.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 15, 2024 5:56 pm

“greatest issue facing humanity in the 21st century””

The rabid hatred of atmospheric CO2, and all the Net-Zero crap that goes with it, has to be up near the top. !!

Reply to  bnice2000
October 16, 2024 3:34 am

rabid- good word for their attitude

0perator
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 16, 2024 2:52 am

Death and taxes seems to be the M.O. of the powers that be.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  0perator
October 16, 2024 7:20 am

They get rich while the masses have nothing but are happy.

October 15, 2024 5:09 pm

They keep mentioning clean renewable energy in the article: “…goal of transitioning to 100% clean renewable energy by 2050…”

They don’t mention what kind of renewable energy. I don’t think Solar is fit for use in Alaska. And windmills would be iffy due to the harsh winters. Hydro would probably freeze up in the winter, Nuclear is probably the best bet, but CO2 is not a problem for climate change and these people can’t seem to get that through their thick skulls.

They need to start drilling in ANWAR or the Alaska pipeline might go dry … that’s a real problem that they should start addressing.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  purecolorartist@gmail.com
October 16, 2024 7:21 am

I would love to see the engineering solutions for mounting solar and wind farms on glaciers.

Charles Green
October 15, 2024 6:06 pm

Landscape looks Alaskan but not the pipeline. Above ground mode of Alaska pipeline uses two vertical support members (VSM) with a saddle between them to support the pipe. Not a single support member.

October 15, 2024 6:37 pm
observa
October 15, 2024 7:07 pm
BobBumala
October 15, 2024 7:43 pm

Alaska can never be 100% renewable without Nuclear. Every winter it is totally dark for several months. No Solar. It also gets 30 to 70 below with no wins for weeks at a time. I lived in Alaska from when I was 12 until 18. The only thing this is is an attempt to raid the permanent fund (an oil fund that pays out to Alaska residents).
In fact, if green energy were required for the US, then Most of Alaska would have to be abandoned. Imagine Fairbanks, 70 below zero, heat pumps don’t work, no sunlight, no wind, ice fog, no wood fires, or gas heaters (by regulation), tens of thousands of people would die. Knowing Alaskans, they’d build a huge bonfire and throw any regulator who came by on top of it.

1966goathead
Reply to  BobBumala
October 15, 2024 8:23 pm

Spot on. I lived in Alaska between 1973 and 1978.

observa
Reply to  BobBumala
October 15, 2024 11:06 pm

Aww cmon I’ve seen those picture books with happy eskimos in igloos with whale oil and stuff in Primary School and they were all happy little Gretaheads just like me-
(179) Nanook of The North – Faclan Festival 2016 Trailer – YouTube

1966goathead
October 15, 2024 9:43 pm

I lived and worked in Alaska for four years between 1973 and 1978. I lived mostly in Anchorage, but I lived in Fairbanks from about October 1973 to April 1974. Comments from Bob Bumala, nearby, are spot on. Winter temperatures in Fairbanks can drop to 70 degrees below zero. There is not much wind to speak of. The sun rises low on the horizon around the solstice, and you can’t feel any heating from the sun. Clearly, wind and solar won’t work in this environment. Any constructed facility needs to take into account extreme temperature swings from minus 70 degrees to as much as plus 95 degrees in the summer. This is difference of 165 degrees, and the coefficient of expansion of various construction materials needs to be considered.

I managed building construction projects at the city of Barrow (now known as Utgiagik) on the north coast of Alaska. At Barrow, the sun sets below the horizon at the solstice and doesn’t rise again until spring. Clearly, solar won’t work here. On the other hand, Barrow can experience high winds, albeit not necessarily at the right velocity and when power is needed as it is never consistent. Then again, the extremes in temperature need to be considered. By the way, at the time I was there, Barrow has its own natural gas well.

In 1975, I took a course in Arctic Engineering. The thrust was to learn how to use cold as a resource and to understand how to design structures on underlying perma-frost. All of the building projects that I managed at Barrow were erected on perma-frost. At Barrow, the underlying frost went to a depth of about 2,000 feet. As long as the perma-frost remains frozen, you can build on it. The instructor noted that the Arctic was warming. At that time, there was no hysteria about man caused global warming.

The construction company that I had worked for built the drilling pad near Prudhoe Bay from which oil was discovered, which I believe was in 1968. The company also built segments one and seven of the pipeline access road as well as performed the foundation excavation for the Yukon River bridge. The company was partly involved in minor logistic activities for the Alaska pipeline.

Now a few comments about the Alaska pipeline. Initial construction was delayed due to environmental concerns and settling the Native Land Claims. Both issues were worthy of consideration. Part of the approval of the pipeline was that once the pipeline would no longer be needed to transport oil, it would be deconstructed and the land restored to its original condition. Currently, the oil fields at Prudhoe Bay are being depleted and less oil is being sent through the pipeline and the flow rate is slowing down. A slow flow rate is not good. There will be less friction to keep the oil warm and flowable. To me, it makes eminent sense to develop oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and utilize the pipeline to transport the oil before the pipeline becomes unusable. However, President Joe Biden signed an executive order to halt new Arctic drilling on his first day in office. Biden subsequently suspended oil drilling leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in June 2021. This order is unwarranted and short sighted. At some time in the future, oil from ANWR will be needed – if for nothing else than to provide lubricants for wind turbines, electric vehicles and asphalt for paving roads.

There has been some discussion about using hydrogen as a fuel source. Hydrogen has to be manufactured and transported, both of which are expensive and most likely will use fossil fuels, thereby negating any reduction of greenhouse gasses.

So, trying to force renewable energy sources on the state of Alaska is simply not feasible.

David J. Bufalo
Licensed Professional Engineer

Bob
October 15, 2024 10:21 pm

One way to ease Alaska into its future would be to withhold all fossil fuel revenue from the state of Alaska and its citizens. We could use that money here in the lower 48 to build nuclear power plants. It’s a lose win.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bob
October 16, 2024 7:29 am

Reversed Robin Hood.

Sparta Nova 4
October 16, 2024 7:07 am

Is “regenerative economy” the same as “opportunity economics?”

MiloCrabtree
October 16, 2024 7:25 am

Everyone who had a hand in this ruinous report should be rounded up, caned vigorously on national television, stripped of all assets with the exception of $750, strapped into a coach seat next to the bathroom, and flown one-way to Port Harcourt with no chance of ever leaving.

Verified by MonsterInsights