By Vijay Jayaraj
South American nations are increasingly realigning energy strategies to capitalize on offshore oil and gas reserves, signaling a marked shift from previously stated goals of reducing dependence on fossil fuels to satisfy the net zero agenda of those obsessed with a faux climate emergency.
This divergence reflects the region’s pressing need to address economic challenges, including poverty, unemployment and a requirement for sustainable revenue streams to fund social programs and infrastructure development.
Nations such as Brazil, Guyana and Argentina are spearheading new deals and projects aimed at intensifying exploration activities within their maritime boundaries. These endeavors are not merely speculative; they represent concrete steps backed by substantial investments from international energy giants seeking to capitalize on the region’s vast offshore potential. The economic imperative driving this resurgence cannot be overstated.
Brazil’s state-controlled company, Petrobras, is set to invest $6 billion in the next five years to uncover new deposits of around 10 billion barrels that could nearly double current reserves. The company’s focus on pre-salt basins has resulted in significant discoveries, including the Buzios field, which is considered one of the most productive offshore oil fields globally.
Guyana’s transformation into an oil powerhouse has been nothing short of remarkable since ExxonMobil discovered significant oil reserves in the Stabroek Block, which is estimated to contain over 11 billion barrels of recoverable oil.
Having started production from the Stabroek Block in 2019, a consortium led by Exxon Mobil is currently producing about 650,000 barrels of oil per day (bpd) from three production platforms. The output has been steadily increasing and is expected to reach 1.4 million bpd soon with ongoing new discoveries.
Fueled primarily by oil revenues, Guyana’s gross domestic product has skyrocketed, with a projected growth rate of 34% in 2024. This unprecedented growth offers Guyana an opportunity to invest in infrastructure and anti-poverty programs, something that would have been impossible without the black gold.
Argentina’s government is looking to tap vast oil reserves, particularly in the Vaca Muerta field. The country is desperate to diversify its energy portfolio and reduce reliance on imported energy, especially in light of ongoing economic challenges that include high inflation, debt and a struggling currency.
With the world’s second-largest shale gas field and fourth-largest shale oil reserves, Argentina’s potential is immense. YPF, Argentina’s state energy company, announced collaborations with international giants like Equinor and Shell to explore untapped reserves in the Argentine Sea.
The Fénix project in Tierra del Fuego — with peak production of around 10 million cubic meters of gas per day — is particularly noteworthy; it promises to transform Argentina into a net exporter of natural gas. A new oil and gas law currently under discussion aims to attract foreign investment into the sector, signifying a shift toward prioritizing fossil fuels in the face of economic turmoil.
Another struggling economy, Venezuela, has agreed to a 20-year natural gas production and exploration deal with British multinational BP and Trinidad. With a production estimate of 400 million cubic feet per day, the Cocuina gas field off the Venezuelan coast will bring in substantial revenue.
As Latin America capitalizes on fossil fuel reserves, it is likely to play a pivotal role in the global energy landscape. Increased production could reshape international dynamics as new sources counterbalance declining output from traditional producers
South America has long struggled with socioeconomic challenges, including high poverty rates and inconsistent economic growth. Offshore oil and gas reserves are an invaluable resource to lift millions out of poverty, and their development an indispensable strategy.
Compared to net zero’s dreary road to societal disaster for the sake of virtue signaling, rising oil and gas revenues are immeasurably more attractive. They offer a tantalizing prospect of monies to fortify national budgets, create jobs and stimulate broader economic growth.
This commentary was first published at BizPac Review on August 27, 2024.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University and, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
And the plants will love this focus on CO2-producing fossil fuels too. More reliable, affordable energy, more food crops and more life in general in the biosphere. What’s not to love?
Didn’t Venezuela nationalize oil and gas production years ago, essentially confiscating the property of the companies that installed and ran the equipment? Am I remembering incorrectly?
Seems to me that doing business with a country with such a track record is a risky endeavor.
Confiscation of assets, whether by outright nationalization or by regulatory fiat is always a problem for investors in countries that don’t respect property rights. We shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking that confiscation is solely an issue in developing countries run by tin-horn dictators – there are myriad examples of the latter approach throughout the so-called ‘liberal democracies’, which isn’t surprising since most of these are effectively run by tin-pot dictators, too.
In light of this and what is going on in China, India, etc. Does the US, Europe, Australia, etc going net zero make any sense? It won’t accomplish anything. I live in the USA and cannot come up with a rationale of why the Democrat party is pursuing it. I can come up with some irrational ones though.
A few sources who frequently troll this page claim China is increasing renewable energy. So why are we worried? China is doing all the work, our pitiful decrease in emissions means nothing in comparison.
In other words, problem solved. Net Zero already solved.
Unfortunately a majority of the American electorate believe the propoganda, spouted primarily by the Democratic party, that Climate Change is an existential threat and policies such as Net Zero are necessary. The main stream media is complicit in this unfortunate situation. Science be damned! Thank you to Anthony and the many contributors to this blog for shining a light on the reality of the “Climate Change” SCAM.
“Compared to net zero’s dreary road to societal disaster for the sake of virtue signaling, rising oil and gas revenues are immeasurably more attractive. They offer a tantalizing prospect of monies to fortify national budgets, create jobs and stimulate broader economic growth.”
Please, please let Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro, know.
I haven’t read anything this pathetic in a while!!
‘Corn Sweat’ and Climate Change Bring Sweltering Weather to the Midwest
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/corn-sweat-and-climate-change-bring-sweltering-weather-to-the-midwest/?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-us
Remember back in the “before times” when Scientific American was credible.
2 deg C over 100 years (maybe, but I doubt it considering UHI) and these people (leftist alarmists) act like it is going up 5 deg C every year, while they use FF every day, it is for the peasants to make sacrifices.
“Remember back ?”
To the 1960s. I dropped my subscription about 15 or 20 years ago. A fading memory.
It was back in the late 70’s under Carter we normalized relations with China.
The narrative was that doing so they would become more like us. Looking back
some 45+ yrs later it appears the opposite has happened with the Democrat party
candidates for president being obvious communists. I went to Wally world last week
for some items and the number of oriental’s shopping was eye opening for a back woods
place like MT.
They haven’t got Edstone Miliband.
Obviously.
Crude reality
Labour DROPS plans to oppose Greenpeace court case with North Sea Oil now on the brink
Starmer campaigned to respect the approval of the fields while banning new ones.
…
Responding to the latest development, Mel Evans, UK climate team leader at Greenpeace, said not defending legal action brought against the new oil and gas sites is “absolutely the right decision”.
https://www.gbnews.com/politics/politics-latest-keir-starmer-cronyism-row
FFS
One has to wonder how much of the migration surges of recent years was due to the unwise decision to pursue Net Zero. One also has to wonder if the migration crush will reduce when jobs, social infrastructure, etc., make the journey much less attractive.
But where are we to migrate?
Canada, The Great White North!
Wave economic stability, prosperity, and increased standard of living in front of virtue signaling poor countries and the truth comes to light.
All good news.