New Study in journal Nature reveals ’85 years of glacier growth & stability in East Antarctica

From CLIMATE DEPOT
Early aerial expedition photos reveal 85 years of glacier growth and stability in East Antarctica

Published: 25 May 2024 – Mads Dømgaard,  Anders Schomacker,  Elisabeth Isaksson,  Romain Millan,  Flora Huiban,  Amaury DehecqAmanda Fleischer,  Geir Moholdt,  Jonas K. Andersen &  Anders A. Bjørk 

Nature Communications: Our results demonstrate that the stability and growth in ice elevations observed in terrestrial basins over the past few decades are part of a trend spanning at least a century, and highlight the importance of understanding long-term changes when interpreting current dynamics. … However, in Antarctica, the scarcity of historical climate data makes climate reanalysis estimates before the 1970s largely uncertain10,23, and observed trends cannot clearly be distinguished from natural variability24,25

By Marc Morano

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48886-x

Early aerial expedition photos reveal 85 years of glacier growth and stability in East Antarctica

Published: Mads Dømgaard,  Anders Schomacker,  Elisabeth Isaksson,  Romain Millan,  Flora Huiban,  Amaury DehecqAmanda Fleischer,  Geir Moholdt,  Jonas K. Andersen &  Anders A. Bjørk 

Nature Communications 

Abstract (Emphasis added) 

During the last few decades, several sectors in Antarctica have transitioned from glacial mass balance equilibrium to mass loss. In order to determine if recent trends exceed the scale of natural variability, long-term observations are vital. Here we explore the earliest, large-scale, aerial image archive of Antarctica to provide a unique record of 21 outlet glaciers along the coastline of East Antarctica since the 1930s. In Lützow-Holm Bay, our results reveal constant ice surface elevations since the 1930s, and indications of a weakening of local land-fast sea-ice conditions. Along the coastline of Kemp and Mac Robertson, and Ingrid Christensen Coast, we observe a long-term moderate thickening of the glaciers since 1937 and 1960 with periodic thinning and decadal variability. In all regions, the long-term changes in ice thickness correspond with the trends in snowfall since 1940. Our results demonstrate that the stability and growth in ice elevations observed in terrestrial basins over the past few decades are part of a trend spanning at least a century, and highlight the importance of understanding long-term changes when interpreting current dynamics.

Introduction

The East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) contains more than 52 m of potential sea level equivalent (SLE)1. Recent observations indicate that the EAIS is more vulnerable than previously anticipated2, and has made a considerable contribution to the continent-wide mass loss during the past decades3. The losses have primarily occurred in some of the marine-based catchments in Wilkes Land4, and are largely attributed to the intrusion of modified Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW)2. The terrestrial catchments, where the majority of the ice is grounded above sea level, have recently shown a mass gain caused by increased accumulation5,6,7,8, which has balanced some of the overall mass loss9,10. Observational time series of glaciers in East Antarctica pre-dating the satellite era are rare11 and consequently not long enough to determine if recent trends are independent of natural fluctuations2,12. Historical datasets from early expeditions serves as a crucial link connecting records from the pre-satellite era, such as those derived from ice cores13 or geological14 and geomorphological evidence15, to quantitative observations of mass change acquired from satellites5,6,7. While geological and geomorphological records cover longer time scales with temporal uncertainties of up to thousands of years14,15, SMB estimates from ice cores are generally very local and spatially confined16. In contrast, data from historical aerial expeditions often provide extensive coverage across large areas, with detailed temporal and spatial information17,18,19. Additionally, historical data provide an important baseline for forward modeling of glacier dynamics, allowing for long-term reanalysis data and more accurate model calibration20. In Greenland and Svalbard, long-term observations from historical aerial images have been vital for determining the historical response of glaciers to climate change18,19,21,22However, in Antarctica, the scarcity of historical climate data makes climate reanalysis estimates before the 1970s largely uncertain10,23, and observed trends cannot clearly be distinguished from natural variability24,25.

Here, we rediscover and utilize the images from the earliest large-scale aerial photography campaign conducted on the Antarctic continent, allowing us to extend the era of observational records of glacier evolution back to the 1930s. Since the beginning of the 20th century, several expeditions were launched to Antarctica with the aim of exploring and capturing aerial images for the production of geographical maps26,27,28,29,30. However, just a handful of studies have previously used these data for generating digital elevation models (DEMs) and only for glaciers located in West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula11,31,32, dating back to 194732. On the Antarctic Peninsula, these observations show widespread near-frontal surface lowering and inland stability since 196031. On the other hand, historical observations of the Byrd Glacier over the past 40 years indicate a constant surface elevation, stable grounding line, and surface flow velocity11.

Currently, the earliest ice-sheet wide mass balance estimates start in the late 1970s3,6,7, and since then all the sub-regions examined in this study have exhibited either an overall mass gain or been relative unchanged.

Regardless of potential climatic changes, our results indicate that the glacier in Kemp and Mac Robertson Land and along Ingrid Christensen Coast, have accumulated mass during the past 85 years which inevitably have mitigated parts of the more recent mass loss from the marine basins in East Antarctica and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS). This positive accumulation trend and positive mass balance is anticipated to persist as snowfall is expected to increase over the entire EAIS in the next century54,55, and ice sheet modeling studies project positive mass balance estimates in all three sub-regions across all future RCP scenarios56.

Lastly, we determine frontal changes of 21 glaciers from 1937 to 2023 (Table S1 and Fig. S11). From the 85 years of observations, we find two distinct regional patterns; one of constant glacier surface elevations and one of ice thickening.

#

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 19 votes
Article Rating
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Milo
June 2, 2024 2:25 pm

As shown by soil isotopes, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, depositoiry of most fresh water on Earth, quit retreating about 3000 years ago, at the end of the Minoan Warm Period.

Reply to  Milo
June 2, 2024 4:19 pm

The period referred to as the “Neoglaciation”…

We are only just above the coldest period of that cooling..

Milo
Reply to  bnice2000
June 2, 2024 5:17 pm

Alarmists are nuts to want to return to famine, plague, war, societal collapse, environmental degradation and deforestation of the late, unlamented Little Ice Age.

Reply to  Milo
June 2, 2024 7:11 pm

Way I see it, we are the “lucky ones”

After WWII we have generally lived in a time of prosperity and progress.

The AGW zealots want to destroy all that with their Net-Zero and unstable energy supply policies.

Life will be a lot harder for the next couple of generations…

… by their own choice and their own ignorance. !

Paul S
Reply to  bnice2000
June 3, 2024 1:36 pm

Don’t worry about it. Sleepy Joe has given permission for Ukraine to launch our missiles into Russia. We may have a nuclear war before the greenies can destroy us.

Reply to  Paul S
June 3, 2024 3:43 pm

Russia started the war and attacking other countries seldom goes as planned.

Milo
Reply to  Paul S
June 4, 2024 8:52 pm

No fan of Bribem, but I doubt that Putler will risk his life and $300 billion-worth of ripped off roubles by going nuclear.

Plus, by now he must know that half his nukes would be duds anyway, thanks to the rampant corruption from which he and his cronies have so lavishly benefitted.

Milo
Reply to  Milo
June 2, 2024 10:18 pm

Story tip: Paper predicts winter warming in NH winter and cooling in Australian winter from Tongan eruption’s infusion of water into stratosphere.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/configurable/content/journals$002fclim$002faop$002fJCLI-D-23-0437.1$002fJCLI-D-23-0437.1.xml?t:ac=journals%24002fclim%24002faop%24002fJCLI-D-23-0437.1%24002fJCLI-D-23-0437.1.xml

Reply to  Milo
June 3, 2024 4:30 am

From the link: “The simulations show that the stratospheric water vapor (SWV) anomalies lead to strong and persistent warming of Northern Hemisphere landmasses in boreal winter, and austral winter cooling over Australia, years after eruption, demonstrating that large SWV forcing can have surface impacts on a decadal timescale.”

Well, it looks like, contrary to what some climate alarmists said, that the Hunga-Tonga eruption has longterm effects.

Milo
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 3, 2024 7:09 pm

IMO that should be a gimme. Excess water vapor will linger in the stratosphere for years.

Rud Istvan
June 2, 2024 2:49 pm

Much Antarctic SLR alarm hype about losses in the small Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in the Amundsen Embayment in WAIS. This new study reports offsetting general good news for much bigger EAIS. (WAIS about 1/3, EAIS about 2/3, the Penninsula about rounding error.)

NASA glaciologist Zwally’s most recent Antarctic ice sheet estimate paper (2023) covering both says the net net is a total Antarctic ice sheet gain of about 200 bt/year since 1990. For reference, a billion tons of ice is 1 cubic km of water.

So the observed SLR of 2.2mm/year with NO acceleration is mainly just melting of Greenland’s ice sheet fring after the natural end of the LIA. Because of its ice sheet weight, Greenland land topography is bowl shaped. So no danger of its ice sheet somehow catastrophically ever sluffing off. Slow melting only.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 2, 2024 3:27 pm

Under Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers have active volcanoes under them.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Sunsettommy
June 2, 2024 4:09 pm

Yup. An AGW thermal inconvenience. The visible proof findable with some effort (since ‘buried’ on line) is a Thwaites glacier face tumbling into the Amundsen Embayment sea—with embedded volcanic ash very visible in its ice. Wonderful visual.

DD More
Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 4, 2024 8:10 am

Rud – Much Antarctic SLR alarm hype about losses in the small Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers

Except where it isn’t. Read the earlier studies. From 2004 Climate Variability in West Antarctica Derived from Annual Accumulation-Rate Records from ITASE Firn/Ice Cores

<i>The ice cores from this study were analyzed to look for recent changes in accumulation rates. The period 1970–present was chosen due to numerous previous studies reporting changes in accumulation during this same time period. Mean accumulation since 1970 for each site was compared to the long-term mean and, due to the different time period covered by each record, the mean from 1922 to 1991 (the period of overlap between records) (Table 2). Results for cores 01-5 and 99-1 are disregarded because of the possible need for topographic corrections (see previous section). The results indicate a slight decrease ( 1–4%) in accumulation at sites 00-4, RIDS C and Siple Dome, and a larger decrease (9%) at site 00-5. Accumulation increased (5–10%) at sites 01-3, 01-2 and 00-1. The geographical clustering of these sites suggests that there has been an increase in accumulation since 1970 in the western sector of the Pine Island–Thwaites drainage system (00-1, 01-2, 01-3) (Fig. 2; Table 2).</i>

http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1127&context=ers_facpub

So they compare average accumulation 1922 to 1991 against accumulation 1970 to 2003. Since there was growth 1922 to 1991, it would take a 100% decrease between the two before any ‘Alarming loss’ is seen. So far only one core has 9% less growth than average and the whole group shows growth not melting.

Meisha
June 2, 2024 2:51 pm

Is it just me, or do the authors start by saying “we’re losing glacier mass…” but hide the accumulation in a blizzard of what sound like scary words? And the say “…natural variability…” in several places. In using that phrase they imply there *might be* “unnatural variability.” Is this code for “changes are caused by human activity”? If so, I’d be OK with that way of attributing change, but I always thought humans were part of nature and everything we do is as natural as what every other natural thing does.

OK, assuming their phrase is meant to say what I *think* they mean, how could they possibly attribute any changes in ice mass in the Antarctic — including growth…you know, those nasty Sulphur compounds we throw up that block sunlight — to anything but “natural variability”? That scientists even talk like this is a corruption of the science.

Mr.
Reply to  Meisha
June 2, 2024 4:04 pm

I reckon there’s a gentle pitch for more research on their observations.

If so, I’d support it *

  • no models though, just verifiable observations and evidence
Reply to  Meisha
June 2, 2024 5:29 pm

G’Day Meisha,

“…natural variability…”

When the IPCC was first formed, their ‘mission statement’ called on them specifically to: look for only man-made effects, and not to look at ‘natural’ causes for climate change. After a few years that paragraph was revised.

Seems some skeptical folk thought that without knowing what the natural variations were to begin with, how the ‘bleep’ can you tell just what you’re looking at. Hence the ‘natural variability’ phrase in the paper, basically “We’ve considered it, don’t bother attacking our paper from that angle.”

June 2, 2024 3:19 pm

It’s WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!!!

What? No? Nevermind.

June 2, 2024 6:00 pm

NOAA’s global region Antarctica land and ocean average temperature anomaly data through April 2024 shows that the highest anomaly measured in Antarctica occurred in August 1996 some 28 years ago.

So despite climate alarmist claims of never ending dangerous “heat” increases around the world caused by increasing CO2 levels (as claimed by the Democrats in their hyped 1988 Senate global warming hearings) Antarctica hasn’t experienced a new record high average temperature anomaly outcome in nearly 3 decades.

Clearly the end of all mankind on earth is near.

Reply to  Larry Hamlin
June 2, 2024 7:08 pm

Clearly the end of all mankind on earth is near.”

If places like the UK, EU, US etc continue with this Net-Zero idiocy, life there will certainly become a lot harder and more miserable than the lucky times of the last 40-50 years.

Richard Greene
Reply to  Larry Hamlin
June 2, 2024 11:13 pm

The lack of Antarctica warming since the 1970s is a symptom of greenhouse warming that you obviously did not know.

Look up permanent temperature inversion and negative greenhouse effect in Antarctica.

Reply to  Richard Greene
June 3, 2024 3:51 am

WOW, there is nothing CO2 can’t do !!

If there was a negative greenhouse effect, surely it would be cooling… but it isn’t doing that either.

There was no atmospheric CO2 warming in the Arctic from 2000-2015, then an El Nino transient which has been gradually dissipating.

UAH global data shows basically no warming except at strong El Nino events…

It is almost as though CO2 has basically zero effect at all, isn’t it.

Reply to  Larry Hamlin
June 3, 2024 3:48 pm

They can disconnect their heating in the winter, if it is so warm, and see how hypothermia feels.

June 2, 2024 8:57 pm

we find two distinct regional patterns; one of constant glacier surface elevations and one of ice thickening.

How is “surface elevation” different from “ice thickening”.

June 3, 2024 9:46 am

Its a typical “speak out of the both sides of your mouth” type of paper to increase their chances of getting published.