UN climate advisor Ayisha Siddiqa (also Time Mag’s 2023 Woman of the Year): “The climate crisis is manmade. And it’s not just manmade, it’s white manmade. (applause) It is a result of capitalism, years of colonialism, years of racial oppression. And so if you want to get involved, the way that we save our planet is when we protect the most vulnerable communities among us. And this includes black trans women. This includes indigenous people. This is why it includes children and young people, because when we protect them, we can protect everybody else.”
Time Mag: Ayisha Siddiqa Is Making the World Think Differently About Climate Action
UN touts Aysisha Siddiqa as Time Mag’s ‘Woman of the Year’ for 2023: The Secretary-General’s Youth Advisory Group on Climate Change provides him with practical and outcome-focused advice, diverse youth perspectives and concrete recommendations, with a clear focus on accelerating the implementation of his climate action agenda.
UN secretary-general youth climate adviser calls for Whites to be stripped of power in ‘revolutionary fights’ – ‘Racial harmony is a fallacy,’ said United Nations climate adviser Ayisha Siddiqa
#
UN climate advisor Ayisha Siddiqa (also Time Mag’s 2023 Woman of the Year): “The climate crisis is manmade. And it’s not just manmade, it’s white manmade. (applause) It is a result of capitalism, years of colonialism, years of racial oppression. And so if you want to get involved, the way that we save our planet is when we protect the most vulnerable communities among us. And this includes black trans women. This includes indigenous people. This is why it includes children and young people because when we protect them we can protect everybody else.”
Racist hate speech ?
According to those on the left, only white’s can be racist. So by definition, even if what a minority says sounds racist, and would definitely be racist if said by a white, it can’t be racism.
I think you’re right, Mark, but I’m hoping you’re not thinking about crossing over to a black trans woman? Please don’t do it.
If I want to self identify as a black lesbian, why can’t I?
Be sure to get a full dose of puberty blockers.
That is a question?
Ayisha is definitely racist.
The radical Left has to have an oppressor to berate, and a victim to defend, so this time around, it is the white guy who is the bad guy and everyone else is a victim of the white guy.
It’s part of the Divide-and-Conquer strategy of the radical Left. This kind of hate is what is being taught to children in our schools. Ayisha probably learned this hate at her school.
Gotta admire the flexibility of the Left. Since the proletariat-bourgeois angle didn’t work for them, they just moved on to ‘race’ and gender. Not very difficult for the academics, either – just do a simple ‘find and replace’ on your old lesson plans, and voila, a new course is born!
No, not racist hate-speech, just a load of old bolleaux, considering that it’s the Indians and Chinese who are increasing their CO2 emissions exponentially while europe and N. America are cutting theirs.
Do not confuse people with facts. You will distress their mental health!
I suppose adding a sarcasm notation to that post is absoltely necessary.
Just saying…
In case I was not clear, I agree with your post.
And once again they reveal that the goal is the same as it has always been. Replace capitalism with communism. Presumably with them being in charge.
More like they do not care about that.
They want to control everything and have riches beyond the dreams of Avarice.
Just another orthodox leftist who is speaking on the environment. Rather as predictable as a Young Earth Creationist, or a Flat Earther, in being immune to evidence.
She’s perfectly free to live a stone-age life, but I notice she’s not doing so.
Wow… This sure pegged my B.S. meter!
Exemplifies what is wrong about the UN. And Time magazine.
The US needs to get out of the UN. It’s not salvageable.
Without the US’s 25%, the UN would be able to do a lot less damage.
Kick em out of that building in the UN. It can be put to better use as a home for the homeless.
On the other hand, if you make it a home for the criminally insane, would anyone notice a difference?
And get the UN out of the US..
Send them to a third world country where their absolute corruption will be just part of general scenery.
Somalia.. would be a good option.
Who owns the land the UN buildings are on? That land must be priceless. I went there once in ’65- my first trip to the Big Apple from the backwoods of the Berkshires.
The 17 acres were purchased by John D. Rockefeller Jr and given to the UN. It is owned by the UN, and is legally not part of the US.
This anti-American family must have a sedition rap sheet 10s of feet long waiting for attention.
Then the US should not be supplying it with anything.
No electricity, no FF powered deliveries etc etc
The UN wants to be self-contained.. let them be.
As it is, the US is supporting and providing to their worst enema.
Absolutely. It would definitely signal our willingness to get with the program of eliminating CO2.
This is true but they rely on US energy for heating and lighting, US accomodation and security. Remove the provision of those and they’ll have to relocate.
I say we wall it off, and let those inside go the way of Lord of the Flies.
The middle east countries nationalized oil wells. The USA can nationalize the land under the UN building.
Oh, so the UN does not pay US taxes. How convenient.
Eminent domain means there’s effectively no private land in the US.
“and is legally not part of the US”
A perfect excuse for a some entirely justified colonialism.
An interesting tidbit: Within the UN headquarters, there is a publishing company called Lucius Trust that prints and distributes UN materials. That company was originally called Lucifer Trust and was founded by Alice Bailey to print and distribute the Theosophical works of Bailey and Helena Blavatsky.
That might give you some insight into the fundamental nature of the UN and the people behind it.
I’d say not only get the UN out of the US, but the US out of the UN. And the UK, too. I think the idea of “UNexit” is, albeit very slowly as yet, starting to gain a tiny bit of momentum. At the very least, exiting the WHO is being talked about in certain circles as a real option.
Isn’t UNexit joining? 😉
“Kick em out of that building in the UN.”
But allow no removal of documents, computers, or drives. One suspects examination of the private UN papers will reveal the worst sorts of intentions, collusions, and massive thefts.
Occupy the building at 2 am. Block the entrances and exits, usher out the night crew, and invite the diplomats and staff to go home forever as they arrive for work.
Won’t someone please inform this moron that no group has killed and abused more black and brown people than other black and brown people.
Past time to expell the UN from the USA.
Yes and by the way, all those brown and black people, including Siddiqa, use FF every day and they want to use more as they develop and grow their economies. She is a Hypocrite.
“The climate crisis is not just manmade, it’s white manmade. It is a result of capitalism, years of colonialism, years of racial oppression.
Today’s infographic, created all the way back in 1931 by a man named John B. Sparks, maps the ebb and flow of global power going all the way back to 2,000 B.C. on one coherent timeline.
Histomap: Visualizing the 4,000 Year History of Global Power
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/histomap-big.html
Not until the Greek Alexander knocked off the Egyptians & SW Asia around 350 BC was the “White men” in charge of more than half the territory. Then the Romans followed around 175 BC, just taking over what the Greeks already ruled. They lasted, being cut down by the Goths & Visi-Goths in 300 until Attila the Hun & Attila became the next major players in 450. Then Mohammed got the boys up and running between 600 to 750.
White Guy Europe didn’t control more than half the world until 1500.
Guess those “People of Shade” just don’t have staying power.
So when is he going to stop destroying the climate?
Those are some mighty fine Cthulhu tentacles she’s sporting on that Time magazine cover.
Purple is a color that requires oil to manufacture it.
She is absolutely right that many white males of European ancestry have much to answer for, in terms of the mistreatment and exploitation of black and brown people, and of women, through history.
Where she is wrong is her, and others’, stopping of the historical analysis at that point. It ignores the complicity of all manner of people in the crimes of history. Arabs were active participants in the African slave trade. Despots in Africa, India and Asia have repeatedly subjugated and abused their own people, with no help needed from Europe or America. There are plenty of of white people who had nothing to do with that oppression, and many were oppressed themselves.
Furthermore, I doubt Ms. Siddiqa is willing to live without the cultural and scientific advances that accompanied European and American civilization. From Britain’s efforts to end the slave trade to current campaigns against female genital mutilation, there have been forces at work in the West for good as well as evil. The amount of freedom and number of functioning democracies now compared to 200 years ago is a heartening example of Western advances. And in the realm of science, you can thank a lot of dead white males for life-changing discoveries in medicine, public sanitation, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing – you name it. Ms. Siddiqa leads a life of relative ease because of the inventions that were discovered and the energy that was created by Western civilization.
There’s a lot this old white male is still learning about the evils of slavery, the mistreatment of women, and the positive contributions of other civilizations, that have been ignored too long. I’m willing to hear and consider criticism of what is being done in my name today. But to think that is all of the story, or more than just a small part of it, is wrong. And counterproductive.
Every single culture that has ever existed, fought against their neighbors.
All of the cultures that we have enough evidence to determine whether they had slaves or not, had slaves. (There are a lot of cultures that we don’t have enough evidence one way or the other.)
Every other culture on the planet, would have behaved in a manner similar to the Europeans, had they developed the technologies needed first.
Find a culture that never had slavery, and you’ve found a culture that never took prisoners in war. Either they never won a battle, or they slaughtered all captives.
‘There’s a lot this old white male is still learning about the evils of slavery, the mistreatment of women, and the positive contributions of other civilizations, that have been ignored too long.’
Learn away if you will. But please keep in mind that prior to the rise of (classical) liberalism under the aegis of Western Civilization, primitivism and despotism were the rule, not the exception, of human existence.
You are absolutely right. But I don’t want to fall into the same close-minded, echo chamber trap Ms. Siddiqa inhabits. I can acknowledge the importance and value of western civilization without ignoring the inevitable dark side of almost every human endeavor. A little humility aids in any analysis. To paraphrase Feynman, you shouldn’t fool yourself, and you’re the easiest person to fool.
again, don’t fool yourself … you are not being open minded … you are being indoctrinated in victim ideology … answering for your ancestors actions is a version of blood libel … you can pay for your own crimes and transgressions not someone elses …
No, nothing in what I wrote is an apology for what others have done, and I don’t take responsibility for what others did. I am, however, willing to learn from what others did wrong, and try to avoid that in my own life. I am willing to hear what is being done by my government today, as an American citizen, and weigh it as an informed citizen.
The central point that brings a pertinent understanding to it all, is that the culturally-derived bad actions (slavery, etc.) were universal.
The culturally-derived consciously good actions are pretty much entirely in the province of the West and the Enlightenment.
18th Century England consciously spent large treasure ending the slave trade. The first consciously altruistic action ever carried out by any society anywhere at any time.
Maybe the 1000 Plataeans coming to the aid of the 10,000 of Athens marching off to meet the Persian army at Marathon counts.
Its actually rather worse than this. The trans-Saharan slave trade was entirely Arab, and several times the size of the trans-Atlantic trade. It was also practiced with crude genital mutilation of the male slaves, a practice accompanied by very high death rates. There were also high death rates from the conditions of travel, even without that.
The trans-Atlantic trade was cruel and accompanied by high death rates on the passage, and treatment on the far side was also cruel – as slavery always has been. But anyone studying the historical record will have to conclude that the trans-Saharan trade was decidedly worse, both in its scale and its practices. If reparations for slavery are to be paid to African states, the Islamic regimes of the Middle East should be major contributors.
There was also another Arab slave trade, raids on British coastal villages by galleys from the North African states, and a slave trade in Northern Europeans where the Arab traders handled one part of the transport. The North African kingdoms had a rude awakening from the British and American navies in the early 1800s, which put an end to their raids and piracy.
The question to ask is also, where did the trans-Atlantic traders get their slaves? And the sad answer is, no, they didn’t go raiding in the jungles, they bought them from African kingdoms who made slave raiding a vital part of their economy. Dahomey was the African centre of the trans-Atlantic trade.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Kingdom_of_Dahomey
That the trade came to an end is almost entirely due to Britain. There was first the celebrated case of Somerset v. Stewart (1772), with the classic often quoted remarks of Justice Mansfield:
The exact nature of the legal precedent set by this judgment is disputed, but in practical terms it led to the general contemporary view that slavery was not a lawful state in England.
There followed, after much agitation by the Evangelical movement, the abolition of the slave trade in 1807, and then the abolition of slavery in all British possessions. But there was far more than this. To abolish the slave trade required seizure of ships engaged in it. To this end the British persuaded other nations to agree to having ships registered in their countries seized. The West Africa squadron was stationed off the West Coast of Africa for many decades. The British fought a war with Dahomey to abolish that country’s trading. They also suppressed the trans-Saharan trade in the late nineteenth century in their expanding possession in East Africa.
These efforts were enormously expensive, both in money and in lives, and only partly successful – there are particular questions about the way in which the return of the freed slaves to Africa was managed. Still, any reasonable inspection of the record, making allowance for the technology and resources of the period, would have to say this was a humanitarian effort on a scale of which there are few if any other examples in history.
Nice summary, which I’m certain is completely suppressed in today’s post-modern infused academic environment. Also worth pointing out that most of the Africans transported across the Atlantic were sent to destinations outside the current borders of the US.
Also worth mentioning is one fundamental difference between the Arabic and Western slave trade – in the West there are millions of descendants of slaves but in the Arab world there are none whatsoever. Arabic slaves were killed when they were no longer useful, their children killed at birth or worked until they were no longer useful, none survived.
Excellent. Well put.
Plus the Arab slave trade began several centuries before the Europeans became involved though this is rarely mentioned these days.
Missing is the Atlantic slave trade was created by the Pope in Rome who issued letters to Portugal to exploit the Atlantic African coast including suppression and exploitation of the native populations.
An aside tidbit, 95% of the Atlantic slave shipments went to Brazil. Only 5% went to the USA which by Constitution could not import slaves after 1806 (I think I got the year right).
The constitution said that Congress could not ban the importation of slaves until 1808. In February 1807, Congress passed a law against importing slaves, effective Jan 1, 1808; they banned it on the first day they could. Also in February 1807, Parliament banned the cross-Atlantic slave trade, also effective Jan 1, 1808. I can’t find anything about coordination between the two…
These laws did not end slavery in the USA or the British colonies. Slavery was illegal in the British Isles and legal in the colonies until the 1830’s – but it still was a big change from the time that a British governor vetoed an act by the colonial Massachusetts legislature banning slavery.
Enforcement of the bans was spotty; the British Navy had substantial forces patrolling the African coast, but keeping a constant patrol on a distant coast with sailing ships was impossible so smugglers could get through. The US had very few ships to add to this, and the will to prosecute those that were caught landing slaves was sometimes missing. But the British Navy off Africa and the American officials that did do their job on our shores added a substantial risk of slavers losing their ship and cargo and maybe spending time in jail. It might make a difference to the calculations of a merchant captain considering the African slave trade, and the number of Africans kidnapped to sell to the new world decreased substantially.
American enforcement was poor for quite a while. But by the late 1850’s, the American slave-smuggling voyages known to history were down to about one a year. IIRC, two of the last ones were burned on American shores to destroy the evidence, with many of the slaves escaping; that must have been quite a financial loss. In the very last one, the captain must have concealed that it was a slave voyage while hiring crew. When they learned that in the mid-Atlantic, they mutinied and turned back to America. Those backers got their ship back, so they were only out the cost of outfitting for a voyage and whatever they paid the crew up front, but that could not have been cheap.
A first class summary, thanks Michel.
The Arabs also slaved down the coast of East Africa, and took slaves in India. They also raided as far northeast as the Caucasus, raided for slaves all along the Mediterranean coast and into the Atlantic as far north as Ireland.
The Crusades were the response of Europe to 200 years of incessant raids and slave-taking.
The North African Muslim states took more Europeans as slaves than the number of African slaves deported to North America.
nice!
Europeans didn’t round up the slaves. They were part of “trade goods” on offer from dominant tribes who raided neighboring weaker tribes. They were brought to seaside ports and accumulated in trading stations. Historically, slave coffles were herded across the Sahara in the Middle Ages to the Eastern Mediterranean customers. Hausaland (Eastern sahel – Northern Nigeria, Niger, etc. even had an embassy the Arab worldin the 11th century to promote and facilitate trade in slaves, West African gold etc.
One has to go back 200,000 years to when homo sapiens first congregated and started dwelling in caves. Most of that history is brutal, and no small measure of that brutality was necessary for species survival. Some of that is still present today, but much of it has been overcome and replaced with more enlightened and tolerant practices.
“The climate crisis is manmade. And it’s not just manmade, it’s white manmade.”
I guess all those white guys in China have a lot to answer for. And they’re probably Christians, too!
And all those in India …..
😉
Beat me to it, both of you.
The “climate crisis” is a figment of anti-science imaginations…
IT DOES NOT EXIST !
(When you look at it.. yes, the perpetrators are mostly old bald white guys).
old— check
bald— check
white guy— check
I didn’t mean you, JZ 😉
Yeah, that’s me too.
Me2
And me. Beard too.
The shoe fits me, too.
Nope, at 75 I’m silver-topped rather than bald. In the hair, I’ve been lucky to take after my French grandfather – who looked and may have been half Algonquin – rather than my Anglo-Scottish-German grandfather, who was completely bald on top by 45.
I know, I’m just going off of their contention that emissions are supposedly causing dangerous climate change. If so, blaming North America and Europe, whose combined population isn’t even as large as China alone, is a ridiculous accusation.
This old, bald, white guy has an advantage–I drink dirty martinis.
Hard to say. I am not sure they celebrated either Easter or the trans day of visibility.
It took me all of two minutes to discover she has a political science degree and is 25. She is, according to Wiki, a Pakastani American climate justice advocate.
From this, I can legitimately deduce that she knows nothing about the sciences needed to understand climate nor does she know anything about real law and justice. Perhaps she is being rolled out as an upgrade on Greta Thunberg and better DEI fit not being white and born in a wealthy country. Clearly climate alarmism has nothing to do with science but is about playing a political game for financial gain.
Ayisha can go to hell.
In spades!
I would not wish that on the good denizens of the underworld.
What does the fact that there is no climate crisis say about her ability to discern its cause?
That a racist idiot can be woman of the year says a lot about society today.
I’m old enough to remember when that magazine was worth reading.
That ended, I think, about 30 years ago.
Anyway, there is no climate crisis, so she starts with a wrong premise and
everything that follows is schist.
At least she IS a woman. Not always the case.
How much more deluded can you get? Just when you think rock bottom has been reached someone comes along and shows you a completely new level below.
It sure looks like Time doctored its cover photo to make this person appear to be a dark-skinned trans-female.
But, yeah, it’s time to disband the UN. It only serves to divide rather than unite. Kick ’em out – the new UN offices are effectively in Brussels and Beijing anyway.
I vote they go to Somalia. !
Or Haiti.
They go to Haiti and the Caribbean slave trade starts up again. Oh, wait….
Can someone explain, how the thickest and most prejudiced morons, get to the top of society? Frankly, I’m getting fed up, of hearing/reading about more and more preposterous ideologies coming from people, with low IQs. Who, through rank arrogance somehow believe, that what they think and have to say, is of some value to society.
It’s a matter of saying the magic spells. One of them is: ‘black trans women’.
Apply a small amount of heat and the scum rises to the top.
A lot of it comes from those who own the media.
Here we go! Just imagine . . . a spokeswoman for the United Nations—with the United States being its largest funding nation—intentionally playing the race card, and not being called-out for it.
It’s high past time for the USA to defund the mostly-useless UN.
De-fund it, but also deport and cancel the diplomatic passports of:
-All UN employees that cannot account for the money under their control, or espouse racism, antisemitism, terrorism, war crimes, and other human rights violations.
-All representatives of nations that sponsor terrorism, oppose proper fiscal controls on the UN budget, lack free elections, fail to protect freedom of speech and the press, voted to put human rights violators on the human rights council, etc.
-Also, everyone who uses his diplomatic passport to violate parking and traffic ordinances.
And _do not allow replacements_ for these personnel.
It’s a good job she doesn’t live in Scotland.
Or Pakistan. Imagine how a snotty, mouthy woman would fare in Karachi.
Scotland, the nation where dudes wear skirts but you better not misgender them.
Not guys who pick up telephone poles and throw them for fun. 🙂
Caber toss
Actually it doesn’t matter. As written, Scotland’s new hate law has extra-territorial reach. If someone in Scotland reads her words and feels, well, hated, they can make a complaint to the police, and the police have promised to investigate every report. And because of the way the UK is constituted, even flying into England, to say Heathrow, she could be detained for questioning.
In principle.
I doubt that would ever happen.
I am actually more annoyed by Scotland’s silly law. We are erecting the apparatus for a police state so we’re only one dud election away from getting it.
The Hate Crime Law is ambiguous. It can mean different things to different people. It is made to order for totalitarian governance.
Why are the people of Scotland electing communists?
I think I’m related to a king of Scotland. James, but I’m not sure of the number.
J.K. Rowling just posted an anti-nonsense-gender text (men are men and women are women) and told the authorities to lock her up. They were stuck in a bad place: either they could arrest her or ignore the tweet (X). They chose to ignore her tweet (X). People with power can ridicule these stupid laws. A win is a win even if she is a stupid liberal.
you did fine until you name called JK
shes one of the few with a name standing up and calling BS on the trans takeover of womens lives.sports.privacy.
To paraphrase President Reagan, someone I agree with 80% of the time is not my enemy. However, the fact that I agree with J.K. Rowling on only one issue does not make her an ally.
Rowling may be a liberal and that is fine. She is not a progressive which is much further to the left.
There is no way she is stupid.
You’re right: “stupid liberal” is redundant.
dunno, the dude running the show now is a black racist, hed approve of her
The only response to one more obscene attack by the world’s elites is: FU2; see you in court and at the ballot box.
If you want to support the “most vulnerable” then give the solid reliable electricity…
.. not crap unusable intermittent supply that you can’t even keep a refrigerator running with.
Give them a source of energy apart from dung that they can use to cook on in the evening.
The whole anti-CO2 scam is the very worst thing to happen to third world countries…
… it puts a massive brake on any possible development.
Convert our coal generators to NG. Build coal plants where they are needed most and ship the coal from us to them. Even if free to them it will cost us a lot less than what Tsar Biden is trying to do.
Absolute nonsense. There is no climate crisis. The climate is always changing, naturally, but it is certainly not made by man of any colour.
That’s the bottom line.
The climate crisis is all in the heads of climate alarmists.
Like the Scarecrow, their heads are made of straw and have no brains.
As programmed. Brainwashed, even.
How long now have we been on the precipice as announced by the UN? 6 months, 9 months?
Precipice is another way of saying tipping point. “Runaway global temperature rise” is just a repackaged “runaway greenhouse effect.” They insult us by assuming we do not remember all of the idiocies.
Hey, “advisor” Ayisha Siddiqa, please get a clue:
1) The government of the United States continued to be UN-agency UNICEF’s largest supporter in 2022, providing $1,286 billion USD in funding.
— source: https://www.unicef.org/partnerships/united-states-america
2) For many years, the USA has also been one of the largest donors to the UN-agency World Health Organization. In 2020-21, it was the third largest, having invested approximately US$ 700 million. More than 65% of that sum was voluntary funding – money the USA donated on top of its annual membership dues.
— source: https://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors/usa
Incidentally, the second largest donor to WHO in 2020-2021, just ahead of the USA, was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, having $67.3 billion USD available for charity purposes around the world as of 2022 . . . you know that worldwide charity founded by a self-made “rich white guy” and his “white” wife.
You may not know this, but a very large amount of the USA taxpayers that send in the monies to enable the above actions, as well as to fund the US military and other relief organizations that distribute food, medicines and medical treatments, and education freely to third-world countries around the globe are “white”.
Now, you were spouting off something about “years of colonialism, years of racial oppression” . . .
Wow, you just opened a 20-litre can of whoop-ass on
ms mr ?Siddiqa.Respek!
Evidently white man has stymied the development of non-white men and women throughout history by controlling the weather.
So, as one of those evildoers, I look at it from the bright side. Apparently my kind rules the world. Yippee!
I don’t think we did it enough
Further confirmation of Blair’s Law: “the ongoing process by which the world’s multiple idiocies are becoming one giant, useless force” coined by Australian journalist Tim Blair (Urban Dictionary).
My favorite Tim Blair law is –
“nothing ‘green’ ever works properly’
And just to prove this, I recently had correspondence with a brewery and their ‘plant-based’ 6-pack beer cans holders.
Their holders held the can alright – Arnie Schwarzenegger couldn’t get the buggers out.
The brewery suggested all kinds of manipulations to get the cans out of the holders.
I eventually said – I don’t need this much of a fight to get my evening beer down my gullet.
I’ll go back to something packaged in a cardboard pack
thats FUNNY, cos cardboard would be THE greenest option
Has Time magazine become this irrelevant? Used to be a subscriber, and to the New Yorker as well. Bad,bad old days.
yup, Time has really gone down hill in the last 86 years.
I no longer have time for that magazine.
You can’t cure stupid.
True, but also true, stupid can rob you blind.
What was life like for women back before we started burning FF? Is that what she wants to go back to?
You mean like having to haul water in a bucket from a well or stream?
Or maybe having 8+ kids hoping 2 or more made it to adult hood?
Or perhaps being bought/sold under the guise of wedding?
If we went back to that, she would not have an education and definitely would not have a job.
She doesn’t want to go back to that. She wants you to go back to that.
She wouldn’t have a job, but would be working harder than she ever imagined.
I think we can now say the UN/Time has ‘jumped the shark’
The absurdity is now at a level even the promoters of the anarchy must be asking, ‘what have we done’?
Nah. They are saying, “look, we won!”
How about the “climate crisis” that led to the retreat of the glaciers covering much of northern North America and Eurasia starting some 10-12,000 years ago? Was that white manmade? Maybe they were burning too much wood roasting wooly mammoths instead of just living off the native plants and grains. Incidentally, in case Ms. Siddiqa hasn’t noticed it, almost 40% of current global emissions are originating in China and India these days and the greatest degree of coal consumption is in Africa and southeast Asia. Could it be that the white population in those places is much greater than anyone has realized?
Oh. (/sarc) You just don’t understand. It would not be like this today except for white supremist chauvinistic colonialism.
Of course, it could have, in an alternate universe, that some pale skinned lady was blaming it on dark skinned men.
Yes we know what the UN jackbooters are all about and fingers crossed Elon can make a dent in their evil game-
Elon Musk’s X sues the Australian government in ‘free speech’ battle after its ‘world-first’ e-Safety Commissioner ordered an ‘offensive’ post to be taken down | Daily Mail Online
You’re just one of their useful idiots Ayisha and women like J K Rowling are trying to knock some sense into you about that as well as white men.
PS: These worshippers of an old dead bearded white guy your new found heroes Ayisha?
Climate activists protest electric cars at New York motor show (msn.com)
One thing’s for sure they aint about changing the weather but are you crazy enough to fit in with the vanguard of the struggle?
Hmmmm whites, about 8% of the world’s population. Invented, discovered and/or made 90% of the technology that has raised the standard of living for 100% of all humanity. White nations led the reduction of slavery world-wide, now it only exists in non-white countries. Not parasites. But whites are the mostester bad peoples ever, for sure. Just look at what any mainstream media outlet has to say, or subverted/corrupt government.
Another nutjob leftist who has the brains the good Lord gave a goose. Let her remove herself from all the accomplishments brought about over time by “White” folks and live in what she ends up with. She could give up capitalism and move to a jungle somewhere so as not to be bothered by the accomplishments of civilization. Yeah, but being as how she is a hypocrite, she’ll keep taking the bucks provided by the capitalists. Just sayin’.
Time is clearly migendering this creature. the pronouns are “she/they”, so that is not a woman’s identity. Aisha must not be labeled as a woman when she aspires to be something more lofty.
Yet another profoundly stupid person.
I would say she is at least partly right, but definitely isn’t seeing how: Those pushing “net-zero” do seem to be mostly white, and they are pushing it on the mostly-brown/black populations of third-world countries, forcing them to remain impoverished.
Doubtful she will ever understand that, though.
Anyone know what the racial breakdown is of the UN?
I would lose sleep if I ever found out.
This woman seems to be a very angry, bitter person. Her ancestors were involved in the African
slave trade as early as 2500 BCE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Ocean_slave_trade
In 1971 Pakistan committed the Bangladesh genocide of over 3 million citizens.
Racist white men indeed…..
The power of the human Melanin molecule never ceases to amaze me.
Wiki: Ayisha Siddiqa: BS in Political Science and English from Hunter College, NY (2021). She describes herself as a socialist with Marxist leanings.
From her dress, she is also a devout Muslim.
So, let’s see: as regards climate — or science in general — she doesn’t know what she’s talking about. She merits zero attention.
As regards her politics, she advocates a failed and murderous totalitarian system. She opposes individual freedom, including (especially) of speech and of conscience, but also of travel. And she has no problem with large-scale political murder and righteously imposed poverty.
As a Muslim she abases women has having half the intelligence of men, and that a raped woman must marry her rapist, absent two Muslim men to testify on her behalf.
She also claims a divine right to violently capture and keep slaves, including sex slaves (which include castrated boys), and the right to murder apostates, atheists, and any who oppose the imposition of Islam and Islamic law (Sharia).
She is, and her ilk are, as a blight upon the land.
And then Time names her as woman of the year.
I name Sam Jacobs as malefactor of the year. Odious. Utterly despicable.
Anytime she wants to live her life without any of the inventions and discoveries of the oppressive white colonialist males, be my guest. Be a great tv series to watch! -although it wouldn’t last very long.