Opinions and News Briefs by Kip Hansen — 3 February 2024 — 1100 words/4 minutes
Over the last few days there have been a few interesting general news items touching on topics that I have covered here in the past. I’m just going to mention them, with my opinions, and give links to the original stories.
[Note: There are hardly ever “original” stories, almost all that become visible in your news feeds are re-writes of some other coverage elsewhere. Were it important, I would track down the earliest version of each one.]
Gray Wolves
The U.S. Wish and Wildlife Service has issued a ‘finding’ — an official statement — on the Gray Wolf:
“After an extensive peer-reviewed assessment using the best available science, the Service today announced a not warranted finding for two petitions to list gray wolves under the ESA in the Northern Rocky Mountains and the Western United States. This finding is not action-forcing; the legal status of gray wolves does not change as a result of this finding.”
“Gray wolves are listed under the ESA as endangered in 44 states, threatened in Minnesota, and under state jurisdiction in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and portions of eastern Oregon and Washington. Based on the latest data as of the end of 2022, there were approximately 2,797 wolves distributed across at least 286 packs in seven states in the Western United States. This population size and widespread distribution contribute to the resiliency and redundancy of wolves in this region. The population maintains high genetic diversity and connectivity, further supporting their ability to adapt to future changes.”
“To accomplish this and address the concern about nationwide recovery for gray wolves, the Service will undertake a process to develop a first-ever nationwide gray wolf recovery plan by December 12, 2025. Recovery plans provide a vision for species recovery that is connected to site-specific actions for reducing threats and conserving listed species and their ecosystems.” [underlining emphasis mine – kh]
What this means depends on your opinion about the re-wilding of Gray Wolves in the United States. On the most basic level, US FWS has decided not to change the rules about Gray Wolves. FWS attempts to de-list the Gray Wolves from Endangered to Threatened have been repeated successfully challenged in Federal court by conservation activists groups — the resulting in the fact that 5 of 6 previous FWS’s issued rules on Gray Wolves have been shot down by courts.
There is a report from the FWS dated December 2023 available here [.pdf]. This report basically finds that wolves are doing fine and don’t need to be protected under the Endangered Species Act [ESA].
Nevertheless, FWS is not going to try again, at this time, to lessen protections for the Gray Wolf.
PBS NewsHour reprinted a piece by Associated Press’sMatthew Brown and titled it: “Feds won’t restore protections for gray wolves, propose national recovery plan”.
How’s that? The “won’t restore” is what the FWS calls “a not warranted finding for two petitions to list gray wolves under the ESA in the Northern Rocky Mountains and the Western United States.” The petitions demanded restoration of full Endangered Species status for the wolves in the Northern Rockies and the Western United States – which the FWS has declined to do – as “not warranted”.
Expect more legal challenges and noisy advocacy and pushback to that advocacy. The topic of wolves produces a lot of opinions, viewpoints and emotional response [ mine here ]
# # # # #
Lake Oroville Dam water release
Who says “people never learn”? The California Department of Water Resources made this announcement on 30 January 2024:
“Ahead of forecasted winter storms this week, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) began increasing water releases to the Feather River today from the Oroville-Thermalito Complex. These releases provide flood control protection for downstream communities and are coordinated closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other water operators. Feather River recreation users are advised to remain alert as river flows are expected to be swift and cold and may change based on projected weather forecasts.”
The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has a terrific video of the event (2:20).
Why is the interesting news? Let me refresh your memory, when in 2017 the DWR failed to release adequate amounts of water prior to heavy rains. This created the Oroville Dam Crisis and resulted in the evacuation of 180,000 people. At that time, Anthony Watts’ hometown was close enough for the Oroville Dam story to be local news and this crisis was covered here at WUWT.
The Great Salt Lake: Personhood ?
The U.S. State of Utah says “Not so fast, Lefty!”
Oddly covered in the Climate Crisis News cabal outlet Inside Climate News (ICN), we get this as:
“Utah Legislature Takes Aim at Rights of Nature Movement
“Nonhuman entities like corporations and municipalities have long had “legal personhood” in U.S. law. Now, Utah lawmakers want to prevent lakes, forests and other parts of nature from having the same legal status.”
“Lawmakers in Utah are advancing legislation aimed at stopping a growing “rights of nature” movement that has coalesced around efforts in the state to save the Great Salt Lake, which is drying up as a combination of climate change, development and agriculture drain on its freshwater sources.”
“With activists promoting legislation recognizing that the Great Salt Lake has a right to exist, lawmakers in Utah’s House of Representatives on Tuesday voted in favor of a bill that would prohibit state and local governments from granting “legal personhood” to lakes and other bodies of water, animals and plants, among nature’s other constituents. The bill also prohibits governments in the state from granting legal personhood to artificial intelligence.”
Of course, the ICN slants the issue way off to the left, but the issue is about what is known as the Rights of Nature movement. A specious legal argument that posits that lakes, trees, rivers should be granted Legal Personhood, with advocates appointed to act on their behalf under the law.
The Utah House of Representatives has passed HB 249 which states:
“ 63G-31-102. Legal personhood restricted.
51 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a governmental entity may not grant legal
52 personhood to, nor recognize legal personhood in:
53 (1) artificial intelligence;
54 (2) an inanimate object;
55 (3) a body of water;
56 (4) land;
57 (5) real property;
58 (6) atmospheric gases;
59 (7) an astronomical object;
60 (8) weather;
61 (9) a plant;
62 (10) a nonhuman animal; or
63 (11) any other member of a taxonomic domain that is not a human being.
64 Section 3. Effective date.
65 This bill takes effect on May 1, 2024.”
This bill is expected to pass the state Senate and to be signed into law by the Governor of Utah. So not just “no personhood for the Great Salt Lake”, but, sorry Hal 9000, no personhood for you either.
# # # # #
Author’s Comment:
I see many more interesting things than my current life allows me to write about. I thought I’d try a little different format and bring a few of these to the forefront.
Let me know in comments if this type of thing is any good.
Thanks for reading.
# # # # #
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
El Niño works. An atmospheric river is flowing into southern California.
Ireneusz ==> This makes two years in a row that California is getting lots of rain. I grew up in L.A. in the 1950s, and rememer years when the greater L.A. storm water canal system would be full and our local park, really a flood control swale about three blocks square, would be come a lake for us kids to build rafts and pole around playing Huckelberry Finn. The police would come and order us to shore, which we would not do until they had left.
Thanks, Kip. It looks like you discovered that: 1. there are more Grey Wolves than honest politicians, 2. after realizing that attempts to flood out WATTS won’t work, they do the right thing with reservoir capacity, and 3. Utah rejects WOKE nonsense (Utah also rejects hippies, child gender reassignment, and Net Zero).
When Salt Lake dries it leaves a flat. Does the flat have a Right of Nature to exist?
The forgotten Great Basin says, “yes.”
Does Tulare Lake still exist?
If the Salton Sea gets more water, maybe the flamingos will come?
Ron and others ==> Lake Bonneville has already dried up, leaving the flats and what is now The Great Salt Lake.
Where I am sitting used to be about 1500 feet deep.
There are sharks teeth in sand dunes 1500 feet above my house.
I lived in the Salt Lake City area for eight years, and have gone on hikes in the nearby Wasatch Mountains to the east of the valley, which extends for about 30 miles south of the Salt Lake to the freshwater Utah Lake near Provo. There is a hiking trail, which follows a contour line about 500 vertical feet above the valley floor called the Bonneville Shoreline Trail, which may have been bathed by the waves of Lake Bonneville thousands of years ago. The climate of that area is much drier now than during the time of Lake Bonneville, and it wasn’t caused by human CO2 emissions.
The drying of the climate of that area is not recent, since the Mormon settlers in 1847 reported that the valley south of the Great Salt Lake was dry, and very little grew there except sagebrush. In order to raise crops through the hot, dry summers, the Mormons built many north/south irrigation canals to capture runoff from the snowmelt in spring (the highest rainfall there is March through May). These canals are still in operation today, as well as freshwater reservoirs at mid-level elevations in the nearby mountains.
This trapping of the freshwater runoff from the mountains has likely turned the valley much greener than in 1847, although it may be contributing to a lowering of the water level in the Great Salt Lake.
There is also a park called Antelope Island near the southeast corner of the Great Salt Lake, where the Park Service maintains a herd of some 800 to 1,000 bison. However, recent droughts have left the area to the south of Antelope Island very shallow, so we shouldn’t be surprised to see a few bison ford the shallow water straight into the Salt Lake City International Airport.
Steve ==> As you probably know, the lake level is controlled by the amount of water that is
ALLOWED to reach the lake. Drought just means the collective they allows less as they want it for lawn watering, gold courses, swimming pools, etc. Last winter’s snow pack was huge, yet the lake barely rose at all in the spring.
Utah’s laws about water rights are very complicated.
I toured SLC and environs around 2010 and saw the buffalo etc.
there have been a few interesting general news items
My favourite was the very idea of getting Gen Z ready for war….
“Britain must train citizen army, military chief warns”
[General Sir Patrick Sanders] talked about the need for the UK’s “pre-war generation” to prepare for the possibility of war and said that was a “whole-of-nation undertaking”.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68086188
“Applicants seeking to join RAF described as ‘useless white male pilots’ in bid to hit ‘impossible’ diversity targets
Leaked emails show the pressure apparently being applied to filter out white male recruits and fast-track women and ethnic minorities.”
https://news.sky.com/story/raf-recruiters-were-advised-against-selecting-useless-white-male-pilots-to-hit-diversity-targets-12893684
All that for an outfit with around half a dozen aircraft.
Despite having a population larger than ever, the British armed forces have rarely been smaller. This is partly due to cutting equipment to save money (Cameron savaged the air force as part of ‘austerity’ a few years ago), but this can be reversed in an emegency. More worrying is the increasing difficulty to recruit. The navy has recently withdrawn the frigate stationed in the Falklands and is considering decomissioning the two amphibious assault ships, both due to the inability to crew these vessels as well as the two aircraft carriers and their supporting frigates and destroyers.Coupled with the destruction of industry by ‘net zero’, I am far from optimistic about the future..
strat ==> They tried this is the 1960s, with the President’s Physical Fitness Program in American schools. The military said the kids (boys) were too flabby and had to be toughened up by the time they were 18 and old enough to be sent to their deaths in Vietnam.
Yeah, I remember gym class using the Marine Corps fitness test.
Good times.
I don’t think the local schools have done this for decades probably due to the shame of not having anyone pass the course.
Except the girls?
_____________________________________________________________
Or maybe just some wishful thinking (-:
Steve ==> Their finding was as accurate as the FWS ever gets — and they found that the wolves will be just fine and the States may be smart enough to make their own rules. Wolfies don’t like that attitude and demand that the Federal government make rules that their advocacy and law-fare can control.
The Green Blob is heavily influenced by both those hostile to pastoralism and animal rights activists.
Trying to be too cute when pointing out a typo doesn’t always work (-:
WWS vs FWS
Steve ==> Gee, I missed it….sorry.
i believe in the person rights of my apple tree (a bramley) when it contributes to the mortgage payments.
I spend a lot of time caring for my large lawn. I love and respect it. I want it to have person rights too. It’s only fair!
If it did ‘become’ a person, with full rights, how could you run a mower over it? Trimming ‘personhooded’ bushes and trees might well turn into a legal battle – is it care or mutilation of a person? Let’s leave them as they are, eh?
nah, I’ll tell my vegetation I’m just giving it a haircut- cleaning it up so it’ll look pretty again 🙂
recently, a male tree (yes, they have sex) asked to have a gender change- I talked it out of that- it later thanked me 🙂
Joseph ==> Wait til it sues you….you might change your mind.
o.k., I love and respect you. Fair enough?
Ed ==> I said the same about my kids…..
Legal personhood? Why would they have to identify what are NOT legal persons? That’s politicians for you. Wouldn’t it be simpler to just say only people can have legal personhood? Oh, of course, there is this from the CRIMINAL RESOURCE MANUAL
CRM 1000-1499
1048. Definition—”Person”The term “person” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(6) to mean any individual person as well as natural and legal entities. It specifically includes United States and state agents. According to the legislative history, “(o)nly the governmental units themselves are excluded.” S.Rep. No. 1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 90 (1968).
So, that seems to indicate that senators are legally people, but the senate is not. Huh? It takes tax dollars to come up with that?
jshotsky ==> You see, it is complicated. IBM as a corporation is a “legal person and can sue other legal persons or be sued by them.
I have a 501(c)3 charity that is a legal person, and could be sued or sue others.
A couple of municipalities n Colorado had granted personhood to local watershed creeks — and appointed advocates for those legal persons.
It is he sneaky “natural and legal entities” that is the loophole.
In response to your question is this type of thing is any good I would say yes.
Roger ==> Thanks, it gives a place for the smaller issues that don’t warrant 16-20 hours of research and writing but tickle my journalistic urges.
“ when in 2017 the DWR failed to release adequate amounts of water prior to heavy rains. This created the Oroville Dam Crisis and resulted in the evacuation of 180,000 people.”
A misunderstanding, they already had been releasing water in line with their normal operating procedure, however damage occurred to the spillway and they temporarily stopped the flow to check it out. As a result it flowed over the emergency spillway, causing the flooding.
Phil ==> Partly correct. They had been releasing water but not enough, and not soon enough to prevent the crisis, and thus were forced to use the unused spillway to prevent a real disaster. Once the spillway was in use, some fault in the bed of the spillway caused it to begin to erode way (see videos at the wiki and elsewhere) which caused a panic that the erosion might cause an overall dam failure.
Read the pieces here at WUWT and the links in them.
I don’t need to read those posts, I followed it very closely at the time. The key to the whole issue was the failure of the main spillway while it was in use in the normal flood control. Shutting it down to check it out and then allowing the emergency spillway to be used led to the lack of control. The amount of corrosion of the emergency spillway led to them having to crank up flow over the regular spillway despite the damage but concern over possible failure led to evacuation.
There is excellent aerial coverage and intelligent dialogue on the Northern California dams and reservoirs by an avid aviator, on his site:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5aWP31r9Vs&t=10s (Oroville Update! “Open The Gates!” 2 Feb 24)
He also has around a hundred videos on the Oroville and other reservoir conditions, mishaps, drought and flood info, along with first hand accounts of various CA wildfires.
D Boss ==> Thanks for the link — great coverage. If I lived in California, I would follow this regularly.
Yes Juan Browne gave the best coverage of the Oroville dam situation.
Oh, those pesky wolves…especially in Northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The “finding” is that they are finding more wolves than ever. But the program must continue so the finders can find more wolves.
rocdoc ==> The US FWS would really like to de-list the wolves—known ’em down to “Threatened” from “Endangered” (which they are not).
The ONLY threat to wolves is PEOPLE. When we quit killing them, they thrive. But, when they thrive, they also threaten human interests — ranching, pets, children.
Few people object to “wolves in the wilderness” — very few feel comfortable and welcoming of “wolves in the back yard”.
Despite their issues with humans wolves continue to maintain a presence in the northern tier of the country. The reality however, is that they are blamed for the depredations of coyotes, common canines that the average person can’t distinguish from a wolf.
For some years now there’s been a program by the USFW to reintroduce Mexican wolves to eastern Arizona and western New Mexico. Evidence of this unpopular move was sometimes seen by drivers who noticed them running around with blaze orange collars to protect them from armed ranchers. Killing one was a very serious offense. A personal investigation revealed that the entire program was initiated by a retired lady in Phoenix who felt that the wolves should be returned to their former range.
The wolves in Wisconsin are protected. Unprotected are the feral hogs that have escaped from styes and are rampaging through the state. Wisconsin DNR encourages hunters to kill any wild hog that they see. Feral hogs are also a problem of sorts on the Big Island of Hawaii, the problem being locating one so it can become the centerpiece of a feast.
General ==> I think that you are right about the inability of most people to differentiate between feral wold-like dogs, coyotes, and real wolves. But, as the article you like points out, oredation experts are not fooled…they know the difference. The Mexican wolf thing is nutty, they barely survive in Mexico and it is NOT a distinct species.
Yes and yes, feral hogs need to be hunted out. The problem is, they are very smart (smarter than many of those who hunt them, I fear.)
Easy. Just send the ‘pigs with lipstick’ that we have in gov’t. and msm to walk by.
This bill is grossly unfair.
Why do we give personhood to a lot of congress critters and the current POTUS, who have less intelligence than a wolf (with similar ethics) yet we can’t do the same for any other natural objects.
Racists!
FJB
Brad ==> I haven’t written about it yet, but I have had a long extended email conversation with a university professor who says that “Cats and Dogs are people and should be treated as such under the law.” Not a stretch for him to shift to “the tree in the quad is a person and cutting it down would be murder.”
I take it that the professor is not associated with the medical or biology departments. He must have failed grade school biology if he thinks cats and dogs are people.\
I consider my dogs part of the family and care for them like one of God’s creatures that I am honored to associate with. I would defend them against harm like I would a child (more likely they would defend me). I am not delusional enough to think they are people.
Infringing on personal rights and insisting on them for the absurd is a strange thought process that only an absurd person could explain. Glad our legislature here in Deseret gets that. As for the Lake, it may get some love this year. We have a normal snowpack and a “robust” reservoir profile at about 80%.
Mark => And the Church led with a donation of Water Shares last year to the benefit of the lake. I haven’t followed up, but I believe many others have followed suit. More Water Shares to the lake means more water inflow.
The lakes problems are very basic — not enough inflow as the normal streamflow in is robbed by other interests before it gets to the lake — that and watering lawns!
USF&W agency types have a very bad reputation in my neck of the woods. I attended every
reintroduction hearing held for the wolf reintroduction back in the 90’s and every single
claim they made in reference to what the wolfs impact would be was a outright lie. Things like
they would only eat the sick and old animals and not livestock ect. Idaho recently redid their
wolf management plan and opened it up for public comments. Just one main result of the
wolf reintroduction was the Lolo elk herd population on the Idaho side. Back in 2010 the herd
was aprox 25,000 head, by 2020 it was estimated to be 2,500. In southern MT
several herds were completely wiped out..Now imagine what those wolves will
eat when the wildlife is wiped out. The same greens that get discussed and bashed on this forum
are trying to ban wolf trapping…The USF&W are a very shady group of agency tyrants IMO, their
trucks pulling bear traps have been caught on surveillance cameras at 4:00 am in remote
areas in central MT this fall bringing in problem grizzly bears and dumping them on unsuspecting
residents. Out on the prairie in the small town of Valier the school kids can’t go outside
during recess anymore because of grizzly bears that have been seen on school property. The
fencing crews now have to have a armed watchman when out working especially in brushy bottom
ground. If one sees a backhoe going down the road in the morning you wonder who shot the bear.
I asked an old friend who’s brother farms up on the Marias River if his brother had any prairie bear issues. He paused for a moment and said his brother shoots every bear he see’s, as long as
it’s on the neighbors place, and his neighbor does the same for him. The Mexican border
would be a good location for dumping these problem bears.
Mr. Ed ==> There are a lot of conflicts with re-wilding of dangerous to human interests animals. Once the laws and regulations are in place, they are in many cases enforced by robotic-compliance types authorized by law to arm themselves against people (not the animals).
An issue related to the wolf reintroduction that never gets any attention that I learned
about some 5-6 yrs into the reintroduction was the “coywolf” hybrid. There was a
livestock depredation in WA state in the Okanogan area and a ADC trapper was brought in
and when he caught the culprit a hair sample was taken and DNA’ed as custom. It was found to be half wolf and half coyote. It was radio collared and released. It traveled back and forth across the border traveling several hundred miles and ended up near Judith Gap MT a few months later and was shot by a rancher for killing some sheep on his ranch.
I have a two packs of coywolves in my area, 80-90 killing machines. I hear them at nites at times, their vocalization starts out with a yodel and ends in a howl a very distinct sound. I had a pack on my place 2 yrs ago after a grizzly killed a neighbors cow close to my house during a dry spell that pushed the cows off of the summer range to the bottoms. There was
nothing left of that cow in less than 3 weeks, no bones, hide, nothing. I collected the
eartag and gave it to the owner. You haven’t lived till you have a dead cow near
your house in grizzly country. I got some interesting trailcam pics that summer.
I wonder why the agency boys never bring up the coywolves and the issues from
them?
Mr. Ed ==> The “coywolf”, “coydog” , wolves, coyotes, and dogs are all a single species under the common definition of “a group of like animals that can interbreed and produce viable offspring that breed true to type”.
The so-called Red Wolf of the Carolinas is just one of the group of various hybrids and crosses possible.
It gets weirder when humans take the domestic dogs of distinct types (purebreds, like mastiffs and
Samoyeds or huskies) into the mountains and let them run free to breed with wolves and/or coyotes.
All wolves, coyotes, and dogs : “All of these species [sic] are members of the genus Canis with 78 chromosomes and therefore can interbreed.”
See “Darwin, We’ve Got a Problem”
Taking a wolf is regulated but a coyote is not. As a livestock producer
that is a serious issue. There is nothing in the regs that defines
where that falls. I can set a snare for a coyote year ’round but
that is prohibited for wolf. I’ve asked several agency guys and
they have yet to give a clear response. I’ve always had respect
for wildlife on the land I run and always will. These agency guys
have an agenda that reminds me of the climate change agency
types and it’s not based on reality.
Mr.Ed ==> Well, as long as you paint on each leg trap or snare: “Coyotes Only – No Wolves” you should be good.
Fine article, for which many thanks.
sensitive ==> You are welcome….
It’s always good to see what new avenues they are taking to shut down civilization.
I struggle with the wolf issue. For the most part I accepted reintroduction of wolves and grizzlies. My fear was that the program would get out of hand and both species would be protected beyond what was needed. And that has happened. I do not worship any animal that would include me on its menu. There may be some areas where these animals still need protection but not where I live we have plenty. Protect them where they need protection and lift the protection where they are abundant.
Bob ==> The ESA is not designed to be reasonable — it is draconian in its features — all for the animal, nothing for the humans affected. (more or less). The problem arises when the species, say gray wolves, thrives….its population grows, and so does its need for habitat — in square miles. Only so many wolves can inhabit so much geographic area. So they expand their area….into a ranchers pastureland or grazing area, and find new prey.
Or they come down out of the high mountains in the winter and set up camp in your neighborhood.
It strikes me that today, many people — especially those who are ‘woke’ — don’t understand and appreciate the distinction between the words “right,” “privilege,” and “protection.” Inalienable rights, as listed in our Declaration of Independence, include “life,” and “liberty.” They explain the behavior of any sentient being in resorting to self defense or trying to escape captivity. Typically, a legal right, such as a constitutional right, is an action that one can exercise, such as voting, the right to a trial by one’s peers, or the right to enter into contracts for one having reached the age of majority. It is essential that one both exercise and defend their rights, which one sometimes does by hiring a specialist in the law. Driving, flying, or operating a large ship are legal privileges that require a license, and can only be engaged in by minors close to the age of majority if they have a special license and typically operate under much stricter regulations than an adult.
Minors, who haven’t otherwise been legally emancipated, usually don’t have standing in a trial by virtue of their being barred from contractual obligations and otherwise having handicaps such as no education or limited education, and no resources to hire an advocate. Thus, society expects that the parents of minors are their first line of protection, although, society does pass laws protecting children from even their parents, and individuals and agencies are tasked with looking out for the welfare of children. Similarly, society has often passed laws protecting animals from cruelty.
As to the legal “personhood” of corporations, they are a group of humans, employed by humans, and usually have staff or resources to be legal advocates for the collection of humans with rights of various types.
Now, when it comes to trees, lakes, or other non-sentient objects, they can’t participate in activities such as voting, and it makes no sense to give them “personhood” or standing in court because they can’t even communicate their non-existent desires to a legal advocate. Calling societal protections created by humans, rights, does not make them so. Inanimate objects cannot exercise rights, actively defend them, or even communicate a desire to do so. Therefore, it is most accurate to refer to them as what they are, societal protections deemed necessary and appropriate by humans, and as defined by humans. This is part of the problem with ‘woke’ people. They are not rational.
Clyde ==> Modern Manias and Delusions — running rampant.
The EPA and State equivalents were created to help protect the natural environment — what the Rights of Nature people want is for THEMSELVES to be appointed legal guardians of these inanimate objects and species of animals — in other words, they want the POWER.
So for the wolves to actually accomplish further adaptation, the agency must establish a plan, providing the wolves with
To heck with that Darwin guy, there’s no way that these un-threatened animals, or for the wishful Fish and Wildlife Service, to survive without agency intervention.
Even nature is coopted to service Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy. https://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/iron.html
I think the FWS small arms ammo budget has been raised again. Wonder who they’re threatened by?
dk_ ==> It is even worse than that. In NY State at least, SPCA has its own ARMED enforcement police, authorized by NY law to enforce animal cruelty laws and to use lethal force if necessary.
More fronts with precipitation will reach California from the northwest.
Ireneusz ==> Eventually, they will declare the mega-drought over.