So Many Problems Continue to Plague the EV Industry

By Kristen Walker

January 28, 2024

The fourth quarter of 2023 was not good for Electric Vehicles (EV). Multiple manufacturers decided to curb or halt production. Ford in particular decided to cut their F150 Lightening Truck series in half. Roughly 4,500 auto dealers signed on to a letter petitioning the Biden administration to “tap the breaks” on its aggressive EV push, on account of EVs stacking up on dealer lots.

The new year is already off to a rough start and we’re not even through the first month.

Hertz announced it will be selling off about one third of its EVs, which will amount to roughly 20,000 vehicles. This is a major reversal from their promise just a few years ago to dramatically increase its EV fleet. The money procured from selling them off will be used for the purchase of internal combustion engines (ICE) in order to “meet customer demand.” The car rental company isn’t too keen on the expensive repairs that accompany EV ownership either, which can cost up to twice that of ICE vehicles.

Mid-January saw a severe cold snap surge across many parts of the United States, greatly affecting the Midwest. Many Chicago-area EV owners found themselves unable to charge their vehicles, leaving them stranded. This is because on average an EV’s range can drop 40% and charging takes significantly longer in freezing conditions. Some motorists waited hours in line at charging stations that struggled to even charge vehicles, and long lines meant difficulty finding open charging stations. Other vehicles had to be towed. This can’t be good PR for the EV industry.

And now, a cheating scandal.

The Texas Public Policy Foundation’s fall study examines a rule in which EVs “improperly benefit from an erroneous interpretation by the U.S. Department of Energy of a series of laws” promoting alternative fuel vehicles, but “clearly excluding electric vehicles.” Carmakers can arbitrarily multiply the efficiency of EVs by 6.67, meaning a 2022 Tesla Model Y which tests at the equivalent of about 65 mpg in a laboratory is counted as having a compliance value of 430 mpg.

Environmental groups questioned the legality of the rule; the Wall Street Journal broke the story last week, claiming that such inflated numbers have “no basis in reality or law.”

With current regulations, automakers that don’t meet Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards are required to purchase credits from those whose fleets exceed them. Imagine the credits EVs can earn using a multiplier that boosts efficiency nearly seven times greater than gas-powered cars. It’s in the billions. Tesla alone apparently brought in $554 million from these credits just in 2023’s third quarter, representing a large portion of their overall net income.

The government is exploiting CAFE standards to drive the adoption of EVs.

If we’ve learned anything in these last several months about EVs, it’s that the government needs to quit manipulating the market through its massive subsidization of an unwanted “transition” and forcing consumers to purchase vehicles they don’t want. And now we learn automakers have been finagled into manufacturing EVs.

Blinded by their own climate ambitions, the net-zero crowd doesn’t see the writing on the wall. Nor do they seem to care that taxpayers are picking up the tab, particularly those purchasing ICE vehicles, which are artificially inflated to help companies recoup what they can’t charge EV buyers. Very few would actually pay the amount an EV really costs. Americans are bankrolling roughly $50,000 per EV over a decade, with the amount it takes to produce and keep them running. 

The rapid push toward electrification is all way too much, far too soon. It’s crippling our economy and consumer wallets.

Centrally planned economies never turn out well; why would this be any different?

It’s past time to put consumers first, not the agenda of a select few. Like the letter penned by thousands of auto dealers across the nation said, “Many people just want to make their own choice about what vehicle is right for them.”

Kristen Walker is a policy analyst for the American Consumer Institute, a nonprofit education and research organization. For more information about the Institute, visit www.theamericanconsumer.org or follow us on Twitter @ConsumerPal.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

4.8 53 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dena
January 31, 2024 8:04 am

Meanwhile I purchased a Dark Horse Mustang and had to pay over a thousand dollars for a Gas Guzzler tax. The government has never seen a tax it didn’t like. They have you coming and going.

Frank @TxTradCatholic
Reply to  Dena
January 31, 2024 8:18 pm

And that’s on top of your share via taxation of all the billions in subsidies.

SteveZ56
January 31, 2024 8:43 am

“Carmakers can arbitrarily multiply the efficiency of EVs by 6.67, meaning a 2022 Tesla Model Y which tests at the equivalent of about 65 mpg in a laboratory is counted as having a compliance value of 430 mpg.”

Even the mileage values “tested in a laboratory” are inflated, whether it’s for ICE cars or equivalents for electric cars. A car driven on a dynamometer in a laboratory doesn’t have to fight air resistance like it does when driven outdoors in the real world. The test laboratories are usually well-heated for the comfort of the people running the test, but this would not anticipate the cold-weather problems of electric-vehicle batteries, while gasoline-powered cars are actually more efficient in cold weather, unless hampered by ice or snow on the roads.

The allowance of “arbitrarily multiplying the efficiency of EVs by 6.67” is an absolute scandal, since it enables the “fleet average MPG” to be artificially inflated. For example, if a fleet of 100 ICE cars gets an average of 25 MPG, adding in ten EV’s at an “equivalent” 65 MPG would result in a fleet average of (100 * 25 + 10 * 65) / 110 = 28.6 MPG, or a modest 14.5% increase over the ICE cars.

If the equivalent mileage of the EV cars is arbitrarily multiplied by 6.67 to 433.5 MPG, the fleet average would become (100* 25 + 10 * 433.5) / 110 = 62.1 MPG, which has the effect of multiplying the average MPG of the ICE cars by 2.49,

The original purpose of the CAFE standards was to increase the overall fuel efficiency of the ICE cars in order to reduce fuel consumption during a time of relative scarcity of petroleum. Artificially fudging the efficiency of electric cars means that carmakers can get away with manufacturing less efficient ICE cars, while covering up this fact by using impossibly high “equivalent efficiency” for electric cars which few people will actually buy, due to their high cost and difficulty of recharging.

John Pickens
January 31, 2024 8:55 am

The elephant in the room is that there is ZERO proof that converting to EV cars will reduce CO2 emissions at all. I posit that the net CO2 consequences of conversion to EV and heatpump systems will produce more CO2 than if they were never produced in the first place.

Why are we doing this, again?

rovingbroker
January 31, 2024 1:50 pm

“The fourth quarter of 2023 was not good for Electric Vehicles (EV).”

The fourth quarter of 2023 was not good for Electric Vehicles not named Tesla.

This is a case of “all in”, “start from scratch” and “it takes a long time.”

Tesla was incorporated in July 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning as Tesla Motors.

In 2008, the company began production of its first car model, the Roadster sports car, followed by the Model S sedan in 2012, the Model X SUV in 2015, the Model 3 sedan in 2017, the Model Y crossover in 2020, the Tesla Semi truck in 2022 and the Cybertruck pickup truck in 2023. The Model 3 is the all-time bestselling plug-in electric car worldwide, and in June 2021 became the first electric car to sell 1 million units globally. In 2023, the Model Y was the best-selling vehicle, of any kind, globally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla,_Inc.

January 31, 2024 2:15 pm

I think governments are trying to cause major car companies to go out of business. How is it possible that Ford is losing $36,000 for each EV they produce versus Tesla which is completely propped up by government largess and is not going bankrupt. Ford GM Stellantis Volkswagen you name it they went all in for ev and are now getting close to going belly up. Except for Toyota that is.

MarkW
January 31, 2024 3:35 pm

Did anyone see this coming?
Apparently guardrails around the country are not strong enough to handle EVs.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/us-guardrail-system-cant-handle-heavy-evs-preliminary-test-crashes-indicate

Story Tip

observa
February 1, 2024 1:27 am

Is Rivian heading for net zero value like Polestar-
What Ever Happened To Rivian? – YouTube