The International Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) sixth assessment report serves as the justification for many politicians to try and pass increasingly restrictive laws on society in the name of climate change. However, Andy May of the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL) found many problems with the IPCC’s sixth assessment report. It made numerous false assumptions and flawed assessments, while ignoring facts and research that is should have considered in its report.
May also found that The IPCC erred in its comparisons of present data with proxy data for past climate conditions, make flawed assumptions about climate sensitivity and emissions, and unjustifiably assumed nature plays not significant role in climate change. In addition, the IPCC ignored or downplayed the tremendous benefits to human life of present climate change. May also found that the IPCC erred in its comparisons of present data with proxy data for past climate conditions, made flawed assumptions about climate sensitivity and emissions, and unjustifiably assumed nature does not play a significant role in climate change.
In addition, the IPCC ignored or downplayed the tremendous benefits to human life of present climate change. Andy May of CLINTEL joins host Anthony Watts and panelists H. Sterling Burnett and Linnea Lueken for this week’s episode of Climate Change Roundtable, live every Friday at 12pm CT.
Watch LIVE here
Not surprised. See Donna Laframboise for IPCC serial dishonesties and the corruption of compromised Pachauri. Where does 1.5degsC catastrophism come from, eh?
It materialized when they figured out that we wouldn’t get to the previously touted 2ºC “tipping point”
Intergovernmental, not International Panel.
Yes, although a quite common mistake. In reality, “Intergovernmental” is a much more proper qualifier in IPCC’s title, since all of the output of the IPCC comes from government bureaucrats of various nations and their hand-picked “climate expert” (hah!) lackeys. IPCC doesn’t pay attention to those outside its clique.
The IPCC’s hidden agenda bias is not so well hidden . . . just look at their refusal to walk away from their “ensemble” of multi-million dollar, climate computer models that on average have over-predicted average global warming compared to scientific observations (i.e., measurements) from the get-go and by about a factor of 3 on average, starting around 1990.
The IPCC has been repeatedly informed of this prediction discrepancy produced by their ensemble of climate models by renowned climate scientists outside of the IPCC for at least the last five years, but refuses to acknowledge this (let alone correct it) because it goes against their bias and self-serving need to predict a coming global disaster if humans don’t drastically scale back CO2 emissions in the next 30 years.
Why is the IPCC continuing to do this? . . . “follow the money” (and the power).
He got the word wrong. That’s all there is to it. He doesn’t even know what IPCC stands for.
The IPCC stands for non-science to support the AGW climate agenda.
Intellectually Penurious Criminal Coalition?
Same story. Wash, rinse, repeat. We think progress is being made against the AGW hysterics but it keeps coming with MSM and government support. It’s obvious the Marxists will control the narrative until/when cooling begins and then they’ll say “see, our restrictions worked to save the world”. Meanwhile quality of life and production will diminish in the West to lower its’ standards in line with the ROW.
Exactly, You know that is just what they will do. And they fully recognize we’re nearing a cycle change where temps will start to decline and they will claim credit for it.
Fantastic show!!!! Andy May was great, but so were all of the other participants. I wish more people could see presentations like this. Thanks so much, Anthony.
Intergovernmental….
Jeez.
Yep, Governmental propaganda.
Well done, are you finally waking up to reality?
The poor cannot afford new appliances….
So appliance manufacturers go bust !
DOPEY !
There is no escape from gaseous dooming-
How climate change is pushing oxygen out of the world’s oceans (msn.com)
Carbon dioxide…methane…hydrogen…nitrogen…oxygen…these are all dooming gases.
There is a lot of talk about the increased presence of carbon dioxide in the upper layers of the atmosphere, even above 100 km, where it radiates in infrared into space. Where does CO2 come from so high up?
The answer is simple, CO2 in the uppermost layers of the atmosphere is increasing as a result of increased galactic radiation, the levels of which have increased significantly since the 24th solar cycle.
“Carbon-14 (symbol: 14C) – a radioactive isotope of carbon, discovered on February 27, 1940 by Martin Kamen and Sam Ruben. The atomic nucleus of 14C contains 6 protons and 8 neutrons.
It is formed in the upper troposphere and stratosphere by the absorption of neutrons by the nucleus of the 14N nitrogen atom. These neutrons are created by the interaction of cosmic radiation (consisting mainly of protons) with the atomic nuclei of the elements present in the atmosphere.
The resulting elemental carbon is oxidized to carbon dioxide, which enters the organic carbon cycle in nature through photosynthesis. Carbon-14 undergoes beta-minus decay, forming non-radioactive nitrogen 14N, an antineutrino and an electron.”