By Andy May
Friends of the Earth (Netherlands) sued Royal Dutch Shell, using The Netherlands law that allows non-governmental organizations to sue over environmental or social issues that affect all citizens. They won a judgement that ordered Shell to reduce its emissions in 2030 by 45% compared to 2019. The reduction includes the emissions by Shell’s customers around the world, including you and me.
Shell has appealed the verdict, which is now before the Hague Court of Appeals. Clintel has intervened (in Dutch here) as a third party in the case to make the case that the court did not consider evidence that climate change is not a danger to Dutch citizens. The court ruled that Shell’s emissions threaten to cause “dangerous climate change,” a phrase and concept that even the IPCC does not use.
Shell did not contest this phrase, a phrase that is not supported by observational evidence. The only evidence is from unvalidated climate models that clearly do not match observations to date.
Since this case affects Shell’s customers and suppliers worldwide, Clintel is asking people from around the world to sign a petition asking the court to consider the scientific evidence that Shell’s global emissions are not dangerous. Shell, and other companies are often terrified of adverse publicity if they challenge the popular, politically correct, and erroneous view that anthropogenic climate change is dangerous. This is despite evidence that it is not. Until Shell and other companies “grow a pair,” it is up to us to fight this nonsense.
Please sign their petition here, and if possible, donate to help them pay their legal costs.
Why are “Friends Of The Earth” opposed to returning CO2 to the atmosphere from which it came? Obviously that’s where it belongs to prevent ice ages.
Why did WUWT use anti-Shell artwork (David the righteous hero pitted against wicked Goliath Shell)?
The picture completely negates Andy May’s entire article.🤨
Janice, Remember, clintel is fighting both Shell and Friends of the Earth. Shell did not dispute the claim that CO2 emissions ae dangerous, in a way they are just as guilty as the judge and the Friends of the Earth.
Thanks for the clarification, Andy. I think it would be better to not create the impression, nevertheless, that Shell and “Friends of the Earth” are morally equivalent.
Just stop selling Petrol Diesel and Gas in Holland . Same should apply to any of the US states being sued
No, I don’t think so. I don’t buy Shell petrol. I buy whatever is cheapest and it isn’t Shell. If they can’t grow a pair and defend themselves and get sued for their cowardice, they deserve to go out of business. There are plenty of other gas companies who will be happy to sell to Shell’s customers.
Signed,
Cagey Consumer
It doesn’t do any good to boycott one brand of gasoline (or diesel, for that matter) as they all get their fuel from the same terminals, which get their fuel from the same pipelines or barges. Refineries all dump their fuel into common pipelines, so you can’t get exclusively Exxon or Shell gasoline.