Opinion by Kip Hansen — 29 November 2022
If you thought that The Science had run out of things to blame on Climate Change, then you lack imagination. Now the field of “evolutionary ecology” [no need to ask me why I have added quote marks to that] has entered the fray with a new entry.
Such a shame that John Brignell’s “complete list of things caused by global warming” stopped being updated in 2015. Brignell’s official reason for discontinuing the updates:
Footnote (September 2015) Why the list stopped growing. The time it takes to process a new entry increases approximately with the square of the list length, after checking for duplications, spoofs etc. Starting it was based on the naïve assumption that the rate of appearances would decline as opposing evidence accumulated, but the reverse happened. That’s the difference between science and religion. It was taking over my life, which I did not want to end as a garbage collector. There have since been hundreds more claims of an increasingly ludicrous nature.
Time has proven him absolutely correct. The list has not stopped growing and has become ‘increasingly ludicrous”.
The new entry for the list of “Things Caused by Global Warming” was featured in an article in the once-respected journal Science. The piece is in their News—Social Sciences section with the title “Weather can affect baby names. A couple uncommon ones might be about to blow up”. The piece is amusing and should be read with your sense-of-humor knob turned full up.
The article includes supporting statements from an “evolutionary anthropologist” [ditto] and, de rigueur, a physicist! (Who, by the by, “was not involved in the work but has examined parents’ reasoning for baby names.”)
The article states:
“Evolutionary ecologists Raymond Huey of the University of Washington, Seattle, and Donald Miles of Ohio University, Athens, have spent their careers learning how the physical environment, particularly temperature, influences the behavior, physiology, and other aspects of the lives of animals, particularly lizards. They wondered whether the environment might influence a uniquely human behavior: naming a baby.”
Now, you may ask “Who are you to doubt the opinions about human baby names voiced by Scientists! who have spent their careers studying lizards?”. I have no excuse, I just have to.
There is a study – a published “Accepted manuscript” peer-reviewed study. No, really. It is “Signatures of geography, climate, and foliage on given names of baby girls” in the journal Evolutionary Human Sciences.
The abstract reads:
“Parents often weigh social, familial, and cultural considerations when choosing their baby’s name, but the name they choose could potentially be influenced by their physical or biotic environments. Here we examine whether the popularity of month and season names of girls covary geographically with environmental variables. In the continental USA, April, May, and June (Autumn, Summer) are the most common month (season) names: April predominates in southern states (early springs), whereas June predominates in northern states (later springs). Whether April’s popularity has increased with recent climate warming is ambiguous. Autumn is most popular in northern states, where autumn foliage is notably colourful, and in eastern states having high coverage of deciduous foliage. On a continental scale, Autumn was most popular in English-speaking countries with intense colouration of autumn foliage. These analyses are descriptive but indicate that climate and vegetation sometimes influence parental choice of their baby’s name.”
Where, you ask, is the Climate Change claim? It’s in the Science article about the study. Elizabeth Pennisi, writing for Science quotes “Ruth Mace, an evolutionary anthropologist at University College London (UCL) who was not involved in the work” (and not even at the same institution as either of the authors), who says:
“[It’s] interesting to speculate our great-grandchildren may have names like January and February as global warming races along” and warm weather comes earlier in the year.”
# # # # #
Author’s Comment:
That’s science for you (and Science the journal).
The author at Science, Pennisi, must have a rather short “go to” list of scientists to call on for quotes – all those used in her article on baby names are at University College London (UCL). Neither of the study’s authors are at that institution or even in the same country as UCL.
On the upside, Pennisi passes on a Hat Tip (from “the physicist” — Paolo Barucca) to Simon & Garfunkel who released their very popular song April Come She Will in 1966, crediting the song as the influence behind the fact that “April began to rise in popularity, and from the 1960s until 2000, April was the predominant month name.”
And there you have it.
Thanks for reading.
# # # # #
LOL ! They haven’t lived in Africa where those kinds of names are quite common 🙂
I went to school with an April, May and June and 2 Augusts
I have female relatives named May and June and a male relative named August and they all received those names long before anyone was talking about “climate change.”
Maybe the pseudo-scientists should focus on a different “concern” – that as a RESULT of the stupid POLICIES they want to implement, you won’t HAVE any “great grandchildren” to worry about the “naming” of – your grandchildren will freeze and starve to death in the dark as a result of climate POLICIES long before they’re old enough to have children of their own if the Eco-Nazis get their way. And that is only IF your children are old enough that THEY haven’t starved and frozen to death in the dark before you even get to grandchildren.
Frivolous CC papers are like frivolous lawsuits…
They could bring in big bucks but accomplish naught except for being the fruit of ridicule fodder
This is a prime example of a Frivolous Climate Change Paper
I feel like gender change is going to have a bigger influence on baby names. “Let’s make it something neutral like Chris or Lee, just in case.”
Alice and Marion are good too
And let’s not forget…
A boy named Sue
Bryan ==> Come now, lay off Marion (with an “o”) — that was my late mother’s name. Bless her soul….
Has anyone done a study to confirm that climate change is responsible for the 200X increase in gender dysphoria?
I’m feel safe in saying that some self-appointed “expert” has indeed linked climate change to gender dysphoria.
And do these ‘scientists’ actually get paid for this stuff? I mean real money?
John ==> I don’t know — but often, publishing a paper in a journal costs the author’s (or their funders) money .
In this case, it ought to cost them their job !
Articles like this are disappointing because they lend credence to the silly notion of gender fluidity. This adds unwanted length to the time that disturbed individuals will take before they finally realise that a family is comprised of a man and a woman and their children, if any, as determined by Nature in allocating chromosomes. In the learnng process, these individuals take up too much time with their invented problems instead of getting on with productive work to help the economy.
We can do without senior court judges who decline to define ‘woman’. It creates mental scenes about the decline and fall of empires, with the reclining elitist demanding “Slave, peel me a grape.”
All people can think what they like about anything, but they need to restrain themselves when dictating nonsense that affects others. (Like I am doing here?) Geoff S
Geoff ==> Yes, ideally, “a family is comprised of a man and a woman and their children”. Things can happen though…divorce (unfortunate but common), death of a spouse, single motherhood…..some of the less ideal conditions are caused by poor decisions, some are caused by the nature of mortality itself.
In the past, if a woman’s husband died, some unmarried man would often step up to marry her and help raise the children. Less common today.
In the US, there is a “man” to help raise every child. His name is Sam, as in Uncle Sam.
Many people in the US know of WIC, Women, Infants and Children which provides food for children without “fathers” in the household. What most don’t know is originally WIC stood for Widows Infants and Children.
That is, when morals meant something, unwed mothers were not supported by the government, or even, as today, encouraged by the current welfare system.
Anglocentric nonsense. Six percent of the world population (half a billion). Somehow these idiots think that the world revolves around native English speakers.
Yes, you are right. Whatever happened to Latin, or the lingua franca?
I’m referring to word twisting by feminists, gender fluid etc.
It’s not cultural appropriation (god), It’s cultural dismissal.
I am part of the anglosphere, despite my name, I just find many of these people are ignorant and an embarrassment.
Perhaps there will be a follow-up paper on boys’ names citing the popularity of Hewey, Dewey and Louie.
Or Moe, Larry and Curly.
Or Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe
Dewey is no longer a partner there. The other two determined he was unnecessary.
Yeah…Who remembers this one? – https://youtu.be/WdcrTUcdO0Q
aelfrith ==> Hmmm….nope. But a fine example of 70’s (?) British bubble gum pop. (I hope I’m not insulting anyone’s musical taste….)
That one deserves to be shadow-banned.
This explains the full name of “Exceptionally Cool For The Fourth Tuesday In August Weld“. (who was actually born on a Friday and not her real name but that would spoil the joke)
Right-handed ==> Yes, not her real name, but her father was “Lathrop Motley Weld”. She had a successful acting career but her personal life was a train wreck from the start.
The only oddly named person I know is named Tuesday, and she is a pharmacist.
I wonder if there is a cultural or religious (or lack of) aspect to names. I can’t recall anyone in my family tree with month or season names. As for “Autumn” — see Autumn Leaf Capital of the World — Clarion, PA. I can’t recall anyone from Clarion being named Autumn. Okay, there is the small sample size there. And don’t start a fight over rights to the “Capital” claim.
So while industry continues to pollute without cleaning up after themselves & climate changers fly big diesel planes to meetings & parties, it’s our children who must carry the mantle of responsibility for this scheme. Twerks (sexualized style of dancing wherein one manipulates the hips & posterior in an often hypnotic and physics-defying bounce)
Twerking is sexual? I thought it was an emetic. At least, that’s how it affects me.
This septuagenarian was walking on a beach a few years ago- walking by a group of “twenty somethings”- and a cute young lady got up, approached me, walked behind me and twerked me. For several seconds I was in shock- had no clue what was going on until my companion explained to me that it was a joke to entertain the other youngsters.
Apparently the Germans had some diesel engined aircraft in WWII
Big diesel planes??? I though only light aircraft had diesel engines. I saw a programme on the box just the other day which showed how a German outfit had developed a small diesel engine for twin engined four/six seaters.
From the article: “These analyses are descriptive but indicate that climate and vegetation sometimes influence parental choice of their baby’s name.”
No, that is pure speculation, unless you have actually spoken with the parent and they told you they named their child after a month or season because of the weather or vegetation. I’m skeptical that the “analysis” has gone to those lengths. Typically, those who read CO2 into everything, assume way too much, and my bet is that is what is going on here, too.
Tom ==> Way to serious a response to such a nonsensical study….turn the sense of humor knob clockwise. 🙂
To 11!!
“Autumn was most popular in English-speaking countries with intense colouration of autumn foliage.”
Where I live in Scotland we have pretty “intense colouration of autumn foliage”. We are also regarded as an English-speaking country, although, as a result of immigration, we have a fair number of people living in the country who do not speak English. NHS institutions invariably have signs in various languages. I am not aware of anybody called Autumn and the Mumsnet website does not include it in the top 50 names of baby girls in Scotland.
April May and June arent impressed
Huey Louie and Dewey couldnt give a quack!
Maybe we should try for a shorter list, perhaps a list of things for which climate change isn’t blamed for…
Blank sheet of paper, or a list of beneficial things, no doubt.
For many years of my early childhood I thought my name was “god”. Every time my father came home he would look at me and say “My god, what have you done now?”
Tom in Florida ==> Made me laugh….
Another fine example of pseudo science types collecting paychecks to come up with more ridiculous and useless information for the masses.
Blaming anything on a faux ideology, such as climate whatever, is getting way beyond reasonable. This names “research”, grade school project, falls under the heading of “well, that’s interesting”. Maybe.
But, hey, it keeps the many people involved in the various “climate” projects off the real welfare lines. For now.
Just sayin’.
Was this article perhaps lifted from the Babylon Bee?
barryjo ==> I wish that the author’s had meant it as a joke….at least I thought it was funny….I particularly liked the fact that the authors had spent their entire careers studying the effects of weather and temperature on lizards (which are cold-blooded reptiles….) — but I fear that they were entirely serious.
Coolio. Warmista. ChangeALot.
The current editor of “Science” is ultra liberal.
Terry Pratchet described (If my memory serves) a village where the girl children were given attractive names describing hoped-for attributes such as ‘Faith’, ‘Hope’, and ‘Charity’.
Unfortunately, they misunderstood the requirement slightly, with the result that the boys were called ‘Corruption’, ‘Hypocrisy’ and ‘Bestiality’….
Sounds like they would all grow up to be climate scientists..
Pratchett had Great A’Tuin, but around here it’s turtles all the way down.
Next up: How Climate Change is impacting academic offerings such as underwater basket weaving.
My guess is that wokeism will have a much larger impact on kids names that climate change.
And now I want to see a comparison between scientists and lizards.
niceguy ==> As Climate Change Advocacy (under the guise of The Science) becomes more profitable (both in a monetary sense and in a career advancement sense), more scientists will, like lizards, move towards the warmth.
“Man Friday” in R.L.Stevenson book ?
“Wednesday Addams”
“Tuesday Weld”
Wouldn’t this mean more people named October or November if Mommy and Daddy start getting randy in January and February instead of April and May?
Well, we do need milestones in the timeline of China overtaking the West in science.
Reality bites…
CNN begins layoffs for paid contributors, employees – Washington Times