Rare Blast’s Remains Discovered in Milky Way Center

From NASA

Feb 8, 2021

X-ray & Radio Image of Sagittarius A East.

 Back to Gallery

Astronomers may have found our galaxy’s first example of an unusual kind of stellar explosion. This discovery, made with NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, adds to the understanding of how some stars shatter and seed the universe with elements critical for life on Earth.

This intriguing object, located near the center of the Milky Way, is a supernova remnant called Sagittarius A East, or Sgr A East for short. Based on Chandra data, astronomers previously classified the object as the remains of a massive star that exploded as a supernova, one of many kinds of exploded stars that scientists have catalogued.

Using longer Chandra observations, a team of astronomers has now instead concluded that the object is left over from a different type of supernova. It is the explosion of a white dwarf, a shrunken stellar ember from a fuel-depleted star like our Sun. When a white dwarf pulls too much material from a companion star or merges with another white dwarf, the white dwarf is destroyed, accompanied by a stunning flash of light.

Astronomers use these “Type Ia supernovae” because most of them mete out almost the same amount of light every time no matter where they are located. This allows scientists to use them to accurately measure distances across space and study the expansion of the universe.

Data from Chandra have revealed that Sgr A East, however, did not come from an ordinary Type Ia. Instead, it appears that it belongs to a special group of supernovae that produce different relative amounts of elements than traditional Type Ias do, and less powerful explosions. This subset is referred to as “Type Iax,” a potentially important member of the supernova family.

“While we’ve found Type Iax supernovae in other galaxies, we haven’t identified evidence for one in the Milky Way until now,” said Ping Zhou of Nanjing University in China, who led the new study while at the University of Amsterdam. “This discovery is important for getting a handle of the myriad ways white dwarfs explode.”

The explosions of white dwarfs is one of the most important sources in the universe of elements like iron, nickel, and chromium. The only place that scientists know these elements can be created is inside the nuclear furnace of stars or when they explode.

“This result shows us the diversity of types and causes of white dwarf explosions, and the different ways that they make these essential elements,” said co-author Shing-Chi Leung of Caltech in Pasadena, California. “If we’re right about the identity of this supernova’s remains, it would be the nearest known example to Earth.”

Astronomers are still debating the cause of Type Iax supernova explosions, but the leading theory is that they involve thermonuclear reactions that travel much more slowly through the star than in Type Ia supernovae. This relatively slow walk of the blast leads to weaker explosions and, hence, different amounts of elements produced in the explosion. It is also possible that part of the white dwarf is left behind.

Labeled X-ray & Radio Image of Sagittarius A East.

Sgr A East is located very close to Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole in the center of our Milky Way galaxy, and likely intersects with the disk of material surrounding the black hole. The team was able to use Chandra observations targeting the supermassive black hole and the region around it for a total of about 35 days to study Sgr A East and find the unusual pattern of elements in the X-ray data. The Chandra results agree with computer models predicting a white dwarf that has undergone slow-moving nuclear reactions, making it a strong candidate for a Type Iax supernova remnant.

“This supernova remnant is in the background of many Chandra images of our galaxy’s supermassive black hole taken over the last 20 years,” said Zhiyuan Li, also of Nanjing University. “We finally may have worked out what this object is and how it came to be.”

In other galaxies, scientists observe that Type Iax supernovae occur at a rate that is about one third that of Type Ia supernovae. In the Milky Way, there have been three confirmed Type Ia supernova remnants and two candidates that are younger than 2,000 years, corresponding to an age when remnants are still relatively bright before fading later. If Sgr A East is younger than 2,000 years and resulted from a Type Iax supernova, this study suggests that our galaxy is in alignment with respect to the relative numbers of Type Iax supernovae seen in other galaxies.

Along with the suggestion that Sgr A East is the remnant from the collapse of a massive star, previous studies have also pointed out that a normal Type Ia supernova had not been ruled out. The latest study conducted with this deep Chandra data argue against both the massive star and the normal Type Ia interpretations.

These results have been published today in The Astrophysical Journal, and a preprint is available online. The other co-authors of the paper are Ken’ichi Nomoto of The University of Tokyo in Japan, Jacco Vink of the University of Amsterdam in The Netherlands, and Yang Chen, also of Nanjing University.

NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center manages the Chandra program. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Chandra X-ray Center controls science from Cambridge Massachusetts and flight operations from Burlington, Massachusetts.

Image credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Nanjing Univ./P. Zhou et al. Radio: NSF/NRAO/VLA

Read more from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory.

For more Chandra images, multimedia and related materials, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/chandraLast Updated: Feb 8, 2021Editor: Lee Mohon

4.9 9 votes
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 9, 2021 4:33 am

“Along with the suggestion that Sgr A East is the remnant from the collapse of a massive star, previous studies have also pointed out that a normal Type Ia supernova had not been ruled out. The latest study conducted with this deep Chandra data argue against both the massive star and the normal Type Ia interpretations.

Does this mean that we are going to need Chandra X-ray type data before we can determine if all type 1a supernovas are in fact the same brightness. How does this affect the use of these as ‘standard candles’?

OweninGA
Reply to  Alastair Brickell
February 9, 2021 5:06 am

When I read the standard candle discussions, I am always left with this unsettled sense that I just witnessed circular reasoning in all its permutations. It starts with the assumption that the universe is expanding then reasons back that all the explosions of this type have the same energy, then circles back to show that the results of measuring a whole bunch of these leads to the conclusion that the universe is expanding.

This is a great over-simplification, but it is the feeling I am always left with.

Reply to  OweninGA
February 9, 2021 5:42 am

A little bit like the AGW meme then…

Kpar
Reply to  Alastair Brickell
February 9, 2021 8:32 am

More than a little, I suspect…

Kpar
Reply to  Alastair Brickell
February 9, 2021 8:32 am

Thank you for that.

Astronomers use these “Type Ia supernovae” because most of them mete out almost the same amount of light every time no matter where they are located.”

And then, “This result shows us the diversity of types and causes of white dwarf explosions…”

I have never, as an astronomy enthusiast, been entirely comfortable with the “standard candle” assumptions used in that field.

DonM
Reply to  Kpar
February 9, 2021 9:33 am

And,

“When a white dwarf pulls too much material from a companion star or merges with another white dwarf, the white dwarf is destroyed, accompanied by a stunning flash of light.”

So, delta mass is a variable that is ignored when “most of them mete out almost the same amount of light every time no matter where they are located.”

Reply to  Kpar
February 9, 2021 12:03 pm

Yes, it’s a bit shaky I feel. I’m very happy with parallax for nearby stuff (apart from diffuse things like red giants), quite happy with Cephids for a bit further away, but the standard candles for further things may not be so reliable.

But I’m just a spectator so I guess I should really defer to the experts…they’ve obviously thought this stuff through much more than I. I guess our knowledge is always advancing which is great so we shouldn’t be too surprised if things change over time…we’ve come a long way already.

Derge
Reply to  Alastair Brickell
February 9, 2021 2:24 pm

We can’t even measure Polaris accurately using parallax.
Six different satellites, six vastly different distances.
A whopping 27% discrepancy in range…

Eisenhower
Reply to  Alastair Brickell
February 9, 2021 2:49 pm

Q. Does this mean that we are going to need Chandra X-ray type data before we can determine if all type 1a supernovas are in fact the same brightness. How does this affect the use of these as ‘standard candles’?

A. -No. Models say this is a settled issue and no further debate is needed.

Science is settled!

Expansion of universe due to the Hubble constant is exactly 74 kilometers per second per megaparsec while also exactly 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec.

Physics taking page from AGW and no longer debating or allowing questioning of any studies.

Rag
February 9, 2021 4:44 am

I am familiar with the Type lax at the pharmacy, which can occasionally cause blasts of brown dwarfs.

beng135
February 9, 2021 6:36 am

White dwarf supernovae (type 1a) produce most of the iron in galaxies as the whole star is obliterated after fusing. The massive-star supernovae (Type 11) keep most of their iron in the remaining core (which collapses into a neutron star or black hole).

Last edited 5 months ago by beng135
Vuk
Reply to  beng135
February 9, 2021 8:28 am

When two neutron stars merge, it is a very short violent process might produce gravitational wave (aka LIGO data) shortly followed by strong Gamma ray burst. At such event part of the mass is ejected into space. The ejected mass forms a huge radioactive fire ball within which in very short period of time the elements heavier than iron will fuse through ‘ r-, p-, & s- processes ‘ (google wiki etc), they will end-up in the subsequently formed stars and planets. Your silver, gold and platinum jewellery (but not diamonds !) if you have any, I’m told are so created, but don’t take my word for it.

Last edited 5 months ago by Vuk
u.k.(us)
Reply to  Vuk
February 9, 2021 1:54 pm

If I really thought asteroids were composed of gold and diamonds, I would be in a different line of business.
Like writing fairytales.

Duker
Reply to  beng135
February 9, 2021 1:33 pm

I had a quick look at the abstract of the actual paper, and they seem to discuss exactly what you mention
Our X-ray spectroscopic study of Sgr A East using 3 Ms of Chandra data shows a low ratio of intermediate-mass elements to Fe and large Mn/Fe and Ni/Fe ratios…”
Nothing about ‘candles’
https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15049

%d bloggers like this: