New Paleoclimatology Finding Shows Earth’s Climate Was Typically Warmer than Today

Guest essay by H. Sterling Burnett, originally published on ClimateRealism.com

Archaeologists have published a new paper in The HoloceneDOI: 10.1177/0959683620972775 that confirms what previous research has shown: numerous periods during recent history have been as warm as or warmer than the present.

The press release was covered in The New Scientist, “Climate change has revealed a huge haul of ancient arrows in Norway,”  and discusses the findings of researchers from the Universities of Cambridge, Oslo, and Bergen. The researchers discovered a “treasure trove” of arrows, arrowheads, clothing, and other artifacts, recently uncovered by a receding ice in a mountainous region of southern Norway. The oldest arrows and artifacts date from around 4100 BC. The youngest artifacts date from approximately AD 1300, at the end of the Medieval Warm Period. Because present temperatures are only now exposing some of the artifacts were deposited when no ice covered the ground, temperatures were clearly warmer during the many periods when artifacts were deposited.

Along with the arrows and other artifacts, the researchers found nearly 300 specimens of reindeer antler and bone exposed by receding ice. Because reindeer presently frequent the area, the archaeologists say they are confident the area has served as an important hunting ground, off and on, for millennia.

The fact that artifacts were found from several different periods separated by hundreds and thousands of years in time indicates the ice and snow in the region has expanded and receded several times over the current interglacial period.

Elsewhere in Norway, scientists also recently uncovered what they have labeled a “Viking highway,” a route the ancient peoples inhabiting the region used to travel regularly. The route had for approximately 2,000 years been covered by snow and ice that expanded as the region’s climate shifted from a relatively warm period, comparable to present temperatures, to a colder period during which “permanent” thick snow and ice cover formed. This erected the equivalent of a “highway closed” sign.

More evidence for relative warm periods in recent history has recently been found half a world away in frozen Antarctica, where scientists report they have discovered perfectly preserved, 800-year-old penguin remains exposed by a patch of melting ice along the Antarctic coast.

In an article published in the peer-reviewed journal Geology, scientists reported discovering what appeared to be the fresh remains of Adelie penguins in a region currently uninhabitable by penguins. Carbon dating showed the penguin remains were approximately 800 years old, implying the remains had only recently been exposed by thawing ice. Further analysis of the site showed penguins colonized and abandoned the site multiple times between 800 and 5,000 years ago.

Penguins are currently unable to inhabit the area where the frozen corpse was found because “fast ice” (ice that extends from the Antarctic shore many miles out into the ocean) prevents them from accessing the ocean for food. During the Medieval Warm Period, the absence of fast ice allowed penguins to colonize and nest in the area for hundreds of years.

Numerous other frozen and near-perfectly preserved human and animal corpses have been discovered in Arctic and glacial alpine regions in recent decades as the Earth has modestly warmed.

The most famous of these, perhaps, is the frozen human mummy scientists call Otzi, which hikers discovered in 1991 in a then-recently thawed area of the northern Italian Alps. Analysis of the mummy’s clothing, body, stomach contents, and the plants found frozen around it indicate Otzi died, was nearly flash-frozen in place, and then covered over by and ice- and snow-driven glacial expansion more than 5,300 years ago. This fact suggests the Earth was just as warm, and the snow and ice extent just as low, 5,300 years ago as it is today.

Also, in the December 3, 2019 edition of Geophysical Research Letters, scientists examining materials from three lakes on the Svalbard archipelago jutting into the Arctic Ocean found evidence that from 11,700 through 8,200 years BP, temperatures in the region often exceeded both currently recorded temperatures and those projected by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to occur even under its worst-case scenarios. Such ancient warmth existed for hundreds of years at a time.

According to Svalbard evidence, peak warmth occurred approximately 10,000 years before the present, at which time temperatures in the region were estimated to be 7 degrees Celsius warmer than today.

Proxy data from tree rings, shell middens, and pollen trapped in peat, fossilized remains, and oral and written historical records all show not only that global temperatures have been as warm as or warmer than today, but also that all of these warm periods have been a boon for life, including the expansion of human communities. Indeed, history shows these warmer periods contributed to the rise of agricultural societies, human civilizations with large permanent settlements (which have recently morphed into megalopolises), and modern nation-states.

[Photo courtesy of Wikimedia commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neolithic_arrowheads_Chariez.jpg]

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
3 2 votes
Article Rating
248 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 3, 2020 11:40 am

Where’s the beef? Warmer Is Better. Less ice is a Good Thing. Ice is Death, Warmth is Life. If we (Humanity, Americans, Euros, Chinese, etc.) can warm up Planet Earth, then let’s do it! It’s way too cold now. Brrrr! My Christmas Miracle wish is for a nice 2°F bump up right away. Instead of it being 37°F today, it would be 39°F. That would be a tiny improvement, but I’ll take it, thankfully.

GREGORY J SUHR
December 3, 2020 1:03 pm

More people die from cold than from heat, so if you are against Global Warming you are for human death. That doesn’t seem very nice to me.

Here is a link to the Center for Disease Control site that shows the pattern of excess winter deaths. It’s off this year because of COVID-19, but if you look at previous years, more deaths in winter than in summer.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

MarkW
Reply to  GREGORY J SUHR
December 3, 2020 5:00 pm

Most of the people who are supporting the global warming myth, are the same people who have been claiming for at least 50 years, that the world would be better off if 90% of the humans were gone.

John Monaghan
December 3, 2020 7:33 pm

Here is evidence of an extreme climate change that occurred in ten years.

The change to glacial conditions at the onset of the Younger Dryas in the higher latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, between 12,900 and 11,500 calendar years BP, has been argued to have been quite abrupt.[16] It is in sharp contrast to the warming of the preceding Older Dryas interstadial. Its end has been inferred to have occurred over a period of a decade or so,[17] but the onset may have even been faster.[18] Thermally fractionated nitrogen and argon isotope data from Greenland ice core GISP2 indicate that its summit was around 15 °C (27 °F) colder during the Younger Dryas[16][19] than today.

In Great Britain, beetle fossil evidence suggests that the mean annual temperature dropped to −5 °C (23 °F),[19] and periglacial conditions prevailed in lowland areas, and icefields and glaciers formed in upland areas.[20] Nothing of the period’s size, extent, or rapidity of abrupt climate change has been experienced since its end.[16]

JohnTyler
December 4, 2020 9:32 am

So, in the several previous warm periods cited in the article, what were the CO2 levels and how did they compare to today’s level??
Regardless of the CO2 levels during previous warm periods, did the warming occur before or after any changes in the CO2 levels?
It appears that all forms of life thrived during these previous periods of global warmth; so pray tell, what is the problem with an earth warmer than today??
Is it not true that the higher the CO2 levels, the better it is for plant, trees, crop growth? And if this is so, this would suggest that a lot less fertilizers would be needed for crop land and that arable land would expand into areas now to cold to allow crops.
Also, forested regions would expand into regions presently too cold to sustain forests.
The less fertilizer used, the less nitrogen rich runoff into lakes, streams and rivers would occur and thus reduce the extent / likelihood of eutrophication; so why is higher CO2 levels bad??

Andy thoughts anybody???

Reply to  JohnTyler
December 4, 2020 10:09 am

In the previous integlaial to the Holocene, the Eemian, temperatures peaked at 5-6 degrees C higher than now. Sea levels reached up to 30 m higher than today. CO2 levels in air were never higher than 300 ppm.

https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/825/1/Fis1999a.pdf

December 4, 2020 6:18 pm

“The youngest artifacts date from approximately AD 1300, at the end of the Medieval Warm Period.”

Past the Medieval Warm Period, and should be during a centennial solar minimum, which would driving a warmer North Atlantic and Arctic, driving the glacial retreat in Norway. Like currently.