Why don’t these lives matter?

Child labor, human rights abuses and deaths are routinely ignored by Greens and Democrats

Paul Driessen

Marathon Petroleum recently announced it will “indefinitely idle” its Martinez Refinery. The decision will remove hundreds of jobs, billions of dollars, and nearly 7 million gallons of gasoline, diesel and other petroleum liquids per day from the energy-hungry California economy. It will also send fuel prices even higher for minority and other poor families that already pay by far the highest gasoline prices in the continental United States: $1.32 more per gallon of regular than in Louisiana and Texas.

California’s green and political interests don’t want drilling or fracking, pipelines, or nuclear, coal or hydroelectric power plants – or mining for the materials needed to manufacture electric cars. They prefer to have that work done somewhere else, and just import the energy, cars and consumer goods.

They’ve long wanted a totally electric vehicle (EV) fleet, which they claim would be clean, ethical, climate-friendly and sustainable. Of course, those labels hold up only so long as they look solely at activities and emissions within California state boundaries – and not where the mining, manufacturing and electricity generation take place. That kind of “life cycle” analysis would totally disrupt their claims.

Consider copper. A typical internal combustion engine uses about 50 pounds (23 kilograms) of this vital everyday metal, the International Copper Association says. A hybrid car requires almost 90 lb (40 kg); a plug-in EV needs 132 lb (60 kg); and a big electric bus can use up to 812 lb (369 kg) of copper. If all 15,000,000 California cars were EVs, they would need almost 1,000,000 tons of copper.

But copper ores average just 0.5% metal by weight, notes energy analyst Mark Mills. That means 200,000,000 tons of ore would have to be dug up, crushed, processed and refined to get that much copper. Almost every step in that process would require fossil fuels – and emit carbon dioxide and pollutants.

That’s just California. According to Cambridge University Emeritus Professor of Technology Michael Kelly, replacing all the United Kingdom’s vehicles with next-generation EVs would require more than half the world’s annual production of copper; twice its annual cobalt; three quarters of its yearly lithium carbonate output; and nearly its entire annual production of neodymium.

Just one electric car or backup-power battery weighs 1,000 pounds and requires extracting and processing some 500,000 pounds of various ores, Mills says. The true costs of “green” energy are staggering.

Imagine replacing all of the USA’s nearly 300,000,000 cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, buses, trucks and other vehicles with electric versions under the Green New Deal – and then charging them daily. The millions of wind turbines, billions of solar panels, billions of backup-power batteries, thousands of miles of new transmission lines, grid upgrades and million or so fast charging stations all across America would also require copper, concrete, all these other metals and many more materials, in incomprehensible quantities.

Alaska’s Pebble Mine deposit has an estimated 35 million tons of high-grade copper ore and 3 million tons of molybdenum and other critical GND ores. The copper alone is nearly two times the world’s 2019 output of that essential element. Permits were blocked for years for questionable reasons. But the US Army Corps of Engineers recently found that mining would not have a “measurable effect” on sockeye salmon numbers in the Bristol Bay watershed and should be allowed to proceed, under tough US pollution control, reclamation, wildlife protection, workplace safety, fair wage and child labor laws.

Environmentalists intend to delay the Pebble Mine as long as possible – and block other US exploration and mining projects. That’s why most mining and processing is done overseas, much of it in China and Mongolia or by Chinese companies in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where none of these laws apply.

Most of the world’s rare earth ores are extracted near Baotou, Inner Mongolia by pumping acid into the ground, then processed using more acids and chemicals. Producing one ton of rare earth metals releases up to 420,000 cubic feet of toxic gases, 2,600 cubic feet of acidic wastewater, and a ton of radioactive waste. The resulting black sludge is piped into a foul, lifeless lake. Numerous local people suffer from severe skin and respiratory diseases, children are born with soft bones, and cancer rates have soared.

Lithium comes largely from Tibet and arid highlands of the Argentina-Bolivia-Chile “lithium triangle.” Dead, toxic fish join carcasses of cows and yaks floating down Tibet’s Liqi River, which has been poisoned by the Ganzizhou Rongda mine. Native people in the ABC triangle say lithium operations contaminate streams needed for humans, livestock and irrigation, and leave mountains of discarded salt.

The world’s top producer of cobalt is the Democratic Republic of Congo, where some 40,000 children as young as four toil with their parents for less than $2 a day up to 12 hours a day. Many die in cave-ins, or more slowly from constant exposure to toxic, radioactive mud, dust, water and air that puts dangerous levels of cobalt, lead, uranium and other heavy metals into their bodies. The cobalt ore is sent to China for processing by the Chinese-owned Congo Dongfang International Mining Company.

That’s just to meet current raw material requirements. Try to picture the raw material demands, Third World mining and child labor conditions, and ecological destruction, under the Green New Deal

Liberals often say they support sustainable, ethical coffee, sneakers, handbags and diamonds. No child labor, sweat shops or unsafe conditions tolerated. But it’s a different story with green energy and EVs. In 2019, California Assembly Bill 735 proposed that the state certify that “zero emission” electric vehicles sold there are free of any materials or components that involve child labor. Democrats voted it down. The matter is complicated, they “explained.” It would be too hard to enforce, cost too much and imperil state climate goals. And besides, lots of other industries also use child labor. (So shut up about it.)

Last month, the US House of Representatives had an opportunity to legislate a national certification that federally funded electric buses and charging stations would not include minerals mined with child labor. The Transportation Committee approved the amendment 43-19 (all 19 nay votes were Democrats). But Pete DeFazio(D-OR) quietly replaced the enforceable certification language with a meaningless statement that “it is the policy of the United States” that funds “should not be used” for items involving child labor.

DeFazio claimed certification is unnecessary because US trade agreements prohibit child labor. But there is no agreement with Congo, and China has shown no interest in ending child labor in its supply chains. (Plus, the matter is complicated, hard to enforce and perilous for climate and Green New Deal goals.)

It’s easy for Nancy Pelosi and her colleagues to wear Kente cloth stoles in solidarity with Black Lives Matter. And for Sierra Club staff to criticize the organization’s “history and culture of white supremacy” – what I call callous, deadly and arguably racist eco-imperialism and carbon colonialism. We need real reform, and an end to the cancel culture that silences discussion about the horrors of what’s going on in too many non-white areas of the United States and world.  

The human and ecological realities of GND policies cry out for debate. So do the violence and death that preceded and followed George Floyd’s inexcusable death. Not just the 25 police killings of unarmed blacks all across America in 2019 that have become the narrow focus of Black Lives Matter, politicians and rioters. But also the murders of David Dorn, Patrick Underwood and other police officers; Mekhi James, LeGend Taliferro, Secoriea Turner and other black children gunned down by their fellow blacks; and as many as 7,000 American black men, women and children murdered by blacks every year.

In Chicago, over the July 4 weekend, police reported 87 shootings and 17 deaths, and nearly a dozen of those shot were children caught in the crossfire, the New York Post despaired. In fact, the black-on-black Windy City murder toll over almost any two recent successive weekends exceeds those 25 police killings.

“Every single person who has been shot in New York City [so far] this July, nearly 100 in total, has been a member of the minority community,” NBC News reporter Tom Winter tweeted, “and 97% of shooting victims in June were members of the city’s minority community.” The solution is defunding the police?

ALL these African, Asian, Latin American and minority American lives matter. It’s time to talk about it honestly, figure out what’s really driving the inhumanity, and create a world we can be proud to live in.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, environment, climate and human rights issues.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 2 votes
Article Rating
101 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 11, 2020 7:48 pm

Mods I am most upset that my contribution to this topic was discarded. From having read most of the comments, I believe I am the only one who has had considerable experience with artisanal mining and on two continents. And certainly, I’m superior in my knowledge on the topic to the article’s author.

One of my duties with the Geological Survey of Nigeria was to assist artisanal miners (family scale and community scale) to explore and develop their mining projects, to organize production for efficiency and safety, to improve their methods of concentration of the valued minerals, etc. and this was in the 1960s. Along with a Polish metallurgist I was also a founder of the Nigerian School of Mines, where I taught geology and mining to artisanal mining folk.

My main take was that Paul Driessen’s ‘outrage’ on children in mining is sourced from the same kinds of NGOs that have corrupted climate science and retarded economic development in the Third World. There are of course abuses and negligence, and with the Hutu massacre of Tutsis (Rwanda, Burundi and in eastern Congo where Tutsis illegally mined and Hutu took over) there was slavery and cruelty in the famous Coltan deposits. However, overall these industrious families live considerably better than the average. Actually, up to early 20th century, children labored in horrible conditions in Europe and North America and children around the world still work on family farms.

I also worked with artisanal miners in northern Benin in evaluations of gold and placer gold, and more recently undertook an evaluation of a large area in Minas Gerais for lithium, almost all the operations of which are by ‘garimpeiros’ – often family scale. These people have all been insulted.

It’s to late for people on this thread to get this valuable input but hopefully you will see what was missed.

Megs
August 11, 2020 10:33 pm

Gary I’m sorry you weren’t in the conversation earlier too, we might have had some enlightened conversation. I have read dozens of articles regarding the conditions in mining in developing countries. One of them was a science paper. This paper was pretty comprehensive, and current. It pretty much confirmed what other articles were reporting.

It sounds to me like you did really good work during your time there. I would love to think that all this was BS and that it is really as you describe things. That was sixty years ago Gary. Is it possible? Do you have any way of finding out what things are really like in these mines now? Maybe you still have network contacts?

If you can find out that in the main artisanal mining is still conducted in they same way that it was when you were involved I will apologise on this site for being so insistent. Remember though, I would seriously be happy if it is nothing like what is described in this post. But however it is now, it’s only going to get a whole lot worse with fools scrambling to meet the Paris agreement, whatever that is these days.

I have never put so much into a debate, and I am not against miners or mining. I am well travelled and I know that living conditions in developing countries or even communities within Australia are vastly different to ours. You would know that if you read my last post here. I could never support the level of degradation that this science paper has concluded. I would love to think that you could show me it’s all a lie.

I’ll include the link here, so you know where I’m coming from. I think it would be fair of me to ask you to read it through.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378019305886

Clyde Spencer
Reply to  Megs
August 12, 2020 9:35 pm

Megs
The core of the problem is poverty. Artisanal or free-lance mining is common throughout the world with people trying to find jade in Asia, mining gold in the Amazon and New Guinea, coltans and ‘cobalt’ in DRC, and diamonds. De Beers formerly had a monopoly on diamonds, which was largely broken with the discovery of diamonds in Russia and Australia. However, De Beers still has a vested interest in controlling mining in Africa. Hence the success of the “Blood Diamond” campaign to reduce the value of African diamonds not under the control of De Beers.

Megs
Reply to  Clyde Spencer
August 13, 2020 12:11 am

Thanks Clyde, I understand that people anywhere will do just about anything out of need, or greed. I’ve been to a few developing countries and deliberately travelled by their public transport, or hung off the back of a ute with the locals and explored places that tourists don’t go to.

I also understand that these people chose to mine, that they can make more money doing this than any other type of work that they would normally do. That $2 a day is more than they could otherwise earn.

My point is that with the production of solar, wind and EV’s growing at the rate they are and the the fact that it’s all about the dollar, the pressure on the artisanal miners and the recyclers is too great, it’s just growing too fast.

The dynamics are different now than they were 50 years ago, refugees are seeking work too, they have no support network and speak different languages. The corruption is rife, the few rules that are in place are ignored for bribes. Miners are not being paid fair prices for working ten hours plus a day, they are cheated at the scales, the women working in mines are paid far less than the men. They know the risks, they see what can and is happening all around them, but the money is still better than what they can otherwise earn.

Renewables are pushing these mines for cheap materials and it’s only going to get worse. I can’t imagine what the landscape looks like in these areas today compared to 50 years ago, and what it will look like in 5 or 10 years time from now. They do not benefit from all this, and we don’t have to suffer the consequences, we even send the dead renewables back to them as though are useful.

I know that in the past children used to work in the mines in the UK and Europe, and that they worked long hours. But at some point we decided, this isn’t right, enoughs enough. We stopped it, children went to school and became educated. That decision gave them choices.

I just wonder Clyde who’s going to say enoughs enough for these children, and when will be the right time? There are obscene amounts of money being made in the name of ‘clean’ energy, is no one willing to give up any of it?

I have a constant reminder of all these renewables cradle to gave issues 4 kilometers away. No one will tell me if they’re safe. No one will tell me that if they are damaged by hail, storms or fire if 310 hectares of thin film solar panels are a risk to our soil and waterways. The local fire brigade have already told us that if there was a fire there they would let it burn, that even if they could fight it the toxic fumes would make it far too dangerous. Do you know what a conversation like that feels? We live here! Can you imagine being told that there are 1800 hectares planned or proposed and you have no say in it? It’s bloody overwhelming! I know you’ve heard this before but I really do fear the legacy we are leaving future generations. So much of it is ending up in landfill.

It’s like the new asbestos. My father-in-law died an agonising death at 52 years of age of asbestosis, they thought that was a wonderful product to.

What are we doing? There is nothing positive about wind turbines, solar panels or EV’s, wasted resources, wasted lives, future risks, even the emissions are increased, because of them. I don’t believe that CO2 is going end the world or humanity. All this, for what? To prove how clever we are?

I am scared for our future, I am overwhelmed by just how wrong this is, all of it. All out of greed, all out of, power and control. It’s not even about clean air or a healthy future, I know where it’s going and I’m astounded at the level of ignorance in the general population, and how gullible they are.

I won’t be commenting on WUWT anymore, at least for a while, except to respond to people on recent posts. I was deprived of a voice for so long, and there are so many injustices in the world that I have felt the need to speak out and I know that I am more than just a tad verbose. Besides that, it’s doing my head in.

I sincerely hope that Donald Trump wins this upcoming election, or we’re all screwed.